2._PPQ.doc
DOC document 64 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Underground Feeder #1 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5575-16-R-0002
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2
FA5575-16-C-0002
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Title:
Address:
OR
Address:
Phone Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
TSgt Rory Bryant/Contract Officer Elia Portz/Contracting Officer
496 ABS
and
496 ABS
rory.bryant@us..af.mil elia.portz.3.es@us.af.mil 955-84-8073 955-84-8017
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical/ administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Did contractor assign personnel with required skills to accomplish the work? |
| 4. |
| Did contractor personnel provide timely and accurate information/performance to all administration support tasks? |
| 5. |
| Did contractor personnel create/provide proper and accurate schedules/templates in patient appointment computer system (if applicable)? |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12. |
| Provided timely resolution of defects. |
| 13. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 14. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 15. |
| Complied with environmental requirements, if applicable. |
| 16. |
| Did contractor consistently respond within the required time frames? |
| 17. |
| For US Government contracts only: Followed Government accepted Quality Control Plan. |
| 18. |
| For US Government contracts only: Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 19. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 20. |
| For US Government contracts only Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO |
| 21. |
| For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES / NO |
| 22. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO |
Remarks:
For Official Use Only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .