2._PPQ.doc

DOC document 64 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair Underground Feeder #1 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5575-16-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair Underground Feeder #1, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA5575-16-R-0002-0002_Extend_Tech_Pages.pdf PDF
FA5575-16-R-0002-0001_Section_K_Revisions.pdf PDF
25._Const_Tsk_Brkdwn_Rev.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
13._Materiales_y_mtodos_elctricos_bsicos.pdf PDF
15._Transmisin_y_Distribucin_Enterradas.pdf PDF
8._Underground_Electrical_Transmission_and_Distribution.pdf PDF
6._Basic_Electrical_Material_and_Methods.pdf PDF
7._Excavation_and_Fill.pdf PDF
1._CPPS.doc DOC document
23._As-Built_Dwgs.pdf PDF
9._Medium-Voltage_Gas_Switch.pdf PDF
24._Fotografias.pdf PDF
5._Cast-in-place_Concrete.pdf PDF
19._Photographs.pdf PDF
22._Moron_AB_INRMP.PDF PDF
16._Interruptor_con_Aislamiento_de_Gas.pdf PDF
20._AF66_Schedule_of_Material_Submittals.pdf PDF
18._USAFEI32-1007_(Oct'12)_Airfield_and_Heliport_Planning_and_Design.pdf PDF
11._Demoliciones.pdf PDF
14._Excavacin_y_Relleno.pdf PDF
12._Hormigon_vertido_in_situ.pdf PDF
4._Demolitions.pdf PDF
FA5575-16-R-0002 _UG_Feeder_.pdf PDF
25._Construction_Task_Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3._SoW_17_May_2016.pdf PDF
21._List_of_Specific_Design_Criteria.pdf PDF
10._Specifications_(Spanish)_17_May_2016.pdf PDF
17._Concept_Drawings.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2

FA5575-16-C-0002

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A.

GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:

Contract Number*:

Contract Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:

Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B.

RATER INFORMATION:

Name of Rater:

Name of Rater:

Title:

Title:

Address:

OR

Address:

Phone Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Email Address:

C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:

TSgt Rory Bryant/Contract Officer Elia Portz/Contracting Officer

496 ABS

and

496 ABS

rory.bryant@us..af.mil elia.portz.3.es@us.af.mil 955-84-8073 955-84-8017

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical/ administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Did contractor assign personnel with required skills to accomplish the work?
4.
Did contractor personnel provide timely and accurate information/performance to all administration support tasks?
5.
Did contractor personnel create/provide proper and accurate schedules/templates in patient appointment computer system (if applicable)?
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Provided timely resolution of defects.
13.
Was responsive to contract changes.
14.
Provided adequate project supervision.
15.
Complied with environmental requirements, if applicable.
16.
Did contractor consistently respond within the required time frames?
17.
For US Government contracts only: Followed Government accepted Quality Control Plan.
18.
For US Government contracts only: Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
19.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
20.
For US Government contracts only Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES / NO
21.
For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES / NO
22.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES / NO

Remarks:

For Official Use Only

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .