FA524026Q0009 Attachment 8 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 274 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hoods, Ducts, and Fire Protection Systems Maintenance & Repair Services Andersen AFB, Guam
- Solicitation number
- FA524026Q0009
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity issued by the U.S. Air Force for Hoods, Ducts, & Fire Protection Systems Maintenance & Repair Services at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam under Request for Quotation (RFQ) No. FA524026Q0009. The questionnaire is to be completed by previous customers of bidding contractors to evaluate their past performance as a key selection factor in the government's award decision.
The questionnaire requests completion and return by May 8, 2026, at 12:00 P.M. Chamorro Standard Time to three government points of contact: Nicole Servin, Sir Rashaliq Hankerson, and Nathaniel Entilla. Respondents are asked to evaluate contractor performance across six criteria using a four-point rating scale (Excellent, Satisfactory, Unacceptable, or Not Applicable): ability to maintain contractual standards, proactive problem resolution, manpower sufficiency and qualifications, schedule adherence and response times, customer service, and likelihood of rehiring. The questionnaire also requires identification of the past contract, contractor information, respondent details, and confirmation of whether the past contract included preventative maintenance of hoods and ducts systems, fire protection systems certification and maintenance, and repair and service call capabilities. This document is classified as Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Source Selection Information under FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA524026Q0009 – Hoods, Ducts, & Fire Protection Systems Maintenance & Repair Services
Attachment 8 – Past Performance Questionnaire
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 1 of 4
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO: ________________________
__________________________is currently participating as a respondent to the Government’s Request for Quotation No. FA524026Q0009 – Hoods, Ducts, & Fire Protection Systems Maintenance & Repair
Services at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam. For which we anticipate awarding a purchase order.
The Government will be selecting Contractors for this project based on selection factors. One of the key factors in the Government’s final decision is past performance. To assist the Government in its assessment of Contractor past performance, we are required to identify previous projects and clients who are familiar with our past work. For the purposes of this questionnaire, past work is defined as contracts performed and/or being performing for any customer within the last three (3) years from the issuance day of the solicitation.
As one of our customers for past contracting work on __________________________________, we are requesting that you complete the attached questionnaire regarding our past performance. This letter also authorizes you to discuss our past performance with the Government and to release information regarding our past performance to the Government.
Your prompt attention in completing the attached questionnaire will ensure we receive full consideration in this competition. Please return the completed form to the Government point of contacts (POCs) identified below, response is required no later than 08 May 2026 at 12:00 P.M. Chamorro Standard Time
(ChST).
Government POCs
Nicole Servin – nicole.servin@us.af.mil
Sir Rashaliq Hankerson – sir_rashaliq.hankerson@us.af.mil
Nathaniel Entilla – nathaniel.entilla@us.af.mil
Thank you for your assistance and time.
(Signature and title of individual with the authority to sign for and legally bind the Contractor)
Attachment : Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:nicole.servin@us.af.mil mailto:sir_rashaliq.hankerson@us.af.mil mailto:nathaniel.entilla@us.af.mil
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 2 of 4
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor CAGE Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Description of Services Performed:
G. Period of Performance:
H. Contract Dollar Value:
I. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 3 of 4
Section 4: Performance Information
Scope of Work Yes No
1. Does your contract include the preventative maintenance of hoods and ducts systems?
2. Does your contract include the preventative maintenance and certification of fire protection systems?
3. Does your contract include repairs and service calls of hoods, ducts, and fire protection systems?
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
RATING DEFINITION
E Excellent Performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeds many, if not all, aspects of performance. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
S Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
U Unacceptable Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A Not
Applicable
Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
Contractor Performance: E S U N/A
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to maintain standards outlined in your Performance Work Statement, Statement of Work, or equivalent requirements documents?
2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to proactively respond, recognize, and resolve unanticipated difficulties, correct deficiencies, re‐performance, or emergencies in the manner consistent with the contract’s quality control procedure?
3. How well did the contractor provide for sufficient and qualified manpower in the performance of this contract?
4. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to remain on schedule, meet specific response times, and scheduled time
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 4 of 4
Contractor Performance: E S U N/A frames for completion of specific tasks while still providing quality service?
5. How would you rate the Contractor’s customer service?
6. Would you hire this Contractor again? If not, please explain.
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Nicole Servin – nicole.servin@us.af.mil
Sir Rashaliq Hankerson – sir_rashaliq.hankerson@us.af.mil
Nathaniel Entilla – nathaniel.entilla@us.af.mil mailto:nicole.servin@us.af.mil mailto:sir_rashaliq.hankerson@us.af.mil mailto:nathaniel.entilla@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .