Questions_Answers_Round_1_FBO.pdf

1 Can the Government pA7:A39rovide Exhibit B in Excel format? Yes, Posted on FBO 2 Can the Government provide Attachment 18 in Excel format? Yes, Posted on FBO

Wil the Government reconsider removing Phase IN from the Total Proposed Price (FPP)? This gives the incumbent an unfair advantage in the price as they have most all personnel in place and equipment and drastically reduces their overall price vs incoming contractor who will have to hire and or move in their own equipment.

No, Phase‐in costs are included in the TEP as this requirement has costs associated, even from the incumbent, in order to be responsive to the RFP.

WBS PWS 3.2 has no associated CLIN or ELIN. Will there be a CLIN and ELIN assigned to WSB PWS 3.2 to properly price an staff this line?

PWS references 3.2 thru 3.2.13 are spread across CLINs 0101, 0102, and 0103, and ELINs B001 thru B012 for EAS.

CLIN xx01 ELIN B004 SRM (PWS 3.1.12, 3.1.13) has not associated WBS. Will the Government add WBS match up to CLIN and ELIN Structure? In RFP CLIN 0101, the Government needs to add para 3.1.12 reference to the SRM ELIN, B004.

CLIN xx02 ELIN B005 Command Support (PWS 3.1‐3.1.11) has not associated WBS. Will the Government add WBS match up to CLIN and ELIN Structure? Or will the Government drop the reference form the CLIN / ELIN Schedule?

In RFP CLIN 0102, PWS para shows “3.1‐3.1.12,” but should be 3.1‐3.1.11. “3.1.12” is part of EAS Ops SRM, ELIN B004. The Government will remove the reference 3.1.12.

WBS PWS 3.3 has no associated CLIN or ELIN. Will there be a CLIN and ELIN assigned to WSB PWS 3.3 to properly price an staff this line?

CLINs 0104‐0106 for KS cover all PWS 3.3 subparagraphs. There is not just one CLIN associated with PWS 3.3.

WBS PWS 3.3.10 has no associated CLIN or ELIN. Will there be a CLIN and ELIN assigned to WSB PWS 3.3.10 to properly price an staff this line?

The PWS reference 3.3.10 for KS is a placeholder in the PWS. N/A for KS. The offeror should not price or staff this PWS reference.

WBS PWS 3.3.12 has no associated CLIN or ELIN. Will there be a CLIN and ELIN assigned to WSB PWS 3.3.12 to properly price an staff this line?

The PWS reference 3.3.12 is a placeholder in the PWS. N/A for KS. The offeror should not price or staff this PWS reference.

CLIN xx04 ELIN B016 SRM (PWS 3.1.12, 3.1.13) has not associated WBS. Will the Government add WBS match up to CLIN and ELIN Structure?

Correct, the Government needs to add PWS references 3.1 thru 3.1.13 to attachment 18, WBS, and Excel Spreadsheet Section J, Attachment 13 under KS.

CLIN xx05 ELIN B017 Command Support (PWS 3.1‐3.1.11) has not associated WBS. Will the Government add WBS match up to CLIN and ELIN Structure? Or will the Government drop the reference form the CLIN / ELIN Schedule?

Correct, the Government needs to add PWS references 3.1 thru 3.1.13 to attachment 18, WBS, and Excel Spreadsheet Section J, Attachment 13 under KS.

12 WBS 3.4.5.5.a is N/A is this to be staffed/ priced or not? Should it be removed from the WBS File?

The PWS reference 3.4.5.5 is a placeholder in the PWS. N/A at WI. The offeror should not price or staff this PWS reference. The Government identifies this as N/A in the WBS.

13 WBS 3.4.3.10.a is N/A is this to be staffed/ priced or not? Should it be removed from the WBS File?

The PWS reference 3.4.3.10 is a placeholder in the PWS. N/A at WI. The offeror should not price or staff this PWS reference. The Government identifies this as N/A in the WBS.

14 WBS 3.4.6.9.a is N/A is this to be staffed/ priced or not? Should it be removed from the WBS File?

The PWS reference 3.4.6.9 is a placeholder in the PWS. N/A at WI. The offeror should not price or staff this PWS reference. The Government identifies this as N/A in the WBS.

CLIN xx07 ELIN B026 SRM (PWS 3.1.12, 3.1.13) has not associated WBS. Will the Government add WBS match up to CLIN and ELIN Structure? The Government needs to add references 3.1 thru 3.1.13 in the WBS for WI.

CLIN xx08 ELIN B027 Command Support (PWS 3.1‐3.1.11) has not associated WBS. Will the Government add WBS match up to CLIN and ELIN Structure? Or will the Government drop the reference form the CLIN / ELIN Schedule? The Government needs to add references 3.1 thru 3.1.13 in the WBS for WI.

WBS PWS 3.4 has no associated CLIN or ELIN. Will there be a CLIN and ELIN assigned to WSB PWS 3.3 to properly price an staff this line? 3.4 thru 3.4.13 are spread across 3 CLINs, 0107, 0108 and 0109 for WI.

Should WBS 3.1 thru 3.1.13 be put in the Site WBs or left here as the Site CLIN / ELIN Structure has them referenced there?

Yes, the Government needs to add PWS references 3.1 thru 3.1.13 for all sites (EAS, KS, WI).

These are separate from Company HQ requirements, as the PHQ is required to be within 20 miles from JBER according to 3.5.1, and within 20 miles of JBPHH per 3.5.2.

Schedule B says only Para 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 are part of Project HQ or Company HQ? What are the correct PWS / WBS numbers to be staffed and priced here?

The WBS should say “Project Headquarters,” not “Company Headquarters.” The offeror will be required to come up with this overall price based on the PWS requirements.

Section J, Schedule B, SRM for all years have PWS Reference 3.1.12 and 3.1.13 for EAS, KS an WI but Schedule B in RFP document at Main CLIN level only has PWS Reference 3.1.12 and finally the WBS does not have either of these reference for the either EAS, KS or WI but located in the Company HQ WBS. Will the Government please update all 3 areas to match up for staffing and correct pricing?

The CLIN references “3.1.13” for each site, not “3.1.12.” The Government needs to add 3.1.12 to the CLIN language under SRM for each site.

Section J, Schedule B, Command Support for all years matches Schedule B in RFP document at Main CLIN level but the WBS does not have PWS 3.1 thru 3.1.12 for the either EAS, KS or WI but is located in the Company HQ WBS. Will the Government please update all 3 areas to match up for staffing and correct pricing? The Government needs to add 3.1 – 3.1.12 to all sites in Attachment 18, WBS

Section J, Schedule B, SRM and Command Support along with RFP Main CLINs both have Para 3.1.12. Is this correct? Please clarify so we can properly staff each area, ELIN and CLIN.

Exhibit B references 3.1.12 in the SRM ELIN, but the CLIN structure has 3.1.12 in the Command Support ELIN. The government is clarifying this question.

RFP Schedule B,EAS, IT Services has Para 3.2 but Section J, Schedule B and WBS does not. Will this be changed to match all areas?

The RFP, under CLIN 0102 (EAS Mission Support), IT services references 3.2.2 & 3.2.6. Section J, Exhibit B only references 3.2.6 under EAS IT services. Section J, Attachment 13 under EAS references 3.2.2 & 3.2.6. The Government needs to update Section J, Exhibit B to also reference 3.2.2.

RFP Schedule B.KS Security has PWS 3.2.5 but should be 3.3.5 as in the Section J, Schedule B and WBS. Will this be corrected?

The RFP, under CLIN 0104 (KS Ops), the Security ELIN references 3.2.5. The Government needs to update the reference to 3.3.5, because “3.2.5” is for EAS, not KS.

25 RFP Schedule B, KS all CLINs have wrong references as they are 3.2 not 3.3 for KS. Will this be corrected?

Correct, in the CLIN structure for KS (CLINs 0104‐0106), the Government needs to update PWS references to 3.3.

26 RFP Schedule B, WI all CLINs have wrong references as they are 3.2 not 3.4 for WI. Will this be corrected?

Correct, in the CLIN structure for WI (CLINs 0107‐0109), the Government needs to updated PWS references to 3.4.

RFP Schedule B, KS, Logistics has PWS Reference 3.2.10 which is 3.3.10 but the Section J Schedule B does not have it or the WBS. Will this be corrected?

Correct, in the CLIN structure for KS (CLIN 0104) for the Logistics ELIN, the PWS reference is

3.2.10. The Government needs to update the reference in the CLIN structure to be 3.3.10.

Section J, Exhibit B does not reference 3.3.10. The Government needs to add the PWS reference

3.3.10 to Section J, Exhibit B. 3.3.10 is referenced in the WBS.

RFP Schedule B, KS, IT Services has PWS Reference 3.2.2 which should be 3.3.2 but it is not in Section J, Schedule B or the WBS file. Wil this be corrected?

Correct, the RFP, CLIN 0105 under the IT Services ELIN currently references 3.2.2, which is incorrect. The Government needs to change all the references in CLINs 0104‐0106 to 3.3 thru

3.3.13. The Government needs to add PWS reference 3.3.2 to Section J, Exhibit B under CLIN 0105, ELIN for IT Services. 3.3.2 is referenced in the WBS.

RFP Schedule B, KS< Air Field Ops has PWS has 3.2.12 which should be 3.3.12 but it is not in Section J, Schedule B or the WBS file. Wil this be corrected?

Correct, the RFP, CLIN 0105 under the Air Field Ops ELIN currently references 3.2.12. The Government needs to update this reference to 3.3.12. The Government needs to add reference

3.3.12 to Section J, Exhibit B, CLIN 0105 under the Air Field Ops ELIN. 3.3.12 is referenced in the

WBS.

RFP Schedule B, WI, IT Services has PWS Reference 3.2.2 which should be 3.4.2 but it is not in Section J, Schedule B or the WBS file. Wil this be corrected?

Correct, the RFP for CLIN 0108 under IT Services ELIN references 3.2.2. The Government needs to change this reference to 3.4.2. Section J, Exhibit B does not currently reference 3.4.2. The Government needs to add the reference 3.4.2 to Section J, Exhibit B under CLIN 0108, IT Services

ELIN.

King Salmon PWS has the following as N/A for KS but in the WBS file has them to be staffed and priced. Will the following be removed from the WBS to match up to the PWS? Para 3.3.5.5; 3.3.7.4; 3.3.7.6.1; 3.3.7.6.3;

3.3.7.7.5; 3.3.3.12; 3.3.3.13; 3.3.3.18; 3.3.9; 3.3.6.1; 3.3.6.2; 3.3.6.8; 3.3.6.9; 3.3.6.11; 3.3.1.1; 3.3.1.4;

3.3.2?

Correct, these references in the WBS do not currently have “N/A” and would imply that we are having the offeror propose staffing for these references. The WBS (Section J, Attachment 13) needs to be udpated to say “N/A.”

The Government Property listed in Attachments 2, 3, an 4 is provided in “as‐is, where‐is” condition and the Contractor shall be responsible for replacement at the Contractor’s expense. Because the replacement is at the Contractor’s expense and there are mission critical and essential items, to include fuel trucks, fuel tankers, fire trucks, forklifts, cranes, and high‐end medical equipment, that are absolutely necessary to meet the mission critical and essential requirements of this contract, we respectfully request the date of purchase, original price, current location if known, age and condition of each item. The government is currently researching this question.

Additionally can the contractor assume the Government has factored in a price for replacement equipment as part of their evaluation price for each bidder to be compared against? The government is currently researching for clarification on this question.