5 PP Ref List FA520920R0001.pdf

PDF 74 KB Posted

Attached to
Base-wide Custodial Services at Yokota AB and Geographically Separated Units (Tama, Tokorozawa, Owada, and Momote), Japan
Solicitation number
FA520920R0001
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
10 Q&As for the RFP FA520920R0001 as of 7 Jan 20.pdf PDF
Amendment 0005 - FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
Amendment 0004 - FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
3. Appendix C - (Amend 0004) Estimated Square Footage and Cleaning Level.pdf PDF
8 Exhibit (Amend 0004) - Price Schedule for FA520920R0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 0003 - FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
10. Q&As for the RFP FA520920R0001 as of 13 Dec 19.pdf PDF
3. Appendix C - (Amend 0003) Estimated Square Footage and Cleaning Level.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
6. PPQ (Amendment 0002) FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
10. Q&As for the RFP FA520920R0001 as of 10 Dec 19.pdf PDF
10. Q&As for the RFP FA520920R0001 as of 5 Dec 19.pdf PDF
3. Appendix C - (Amend 0001) Estimated Square Footage.pdf PDF
2. Appendix A - (Amend 0001) Air Force Common Levels of Service Standards.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
Atc 1 Base Map.pdf PDF
Atc 2 Q&As for the RFP# FA520920R0001 as of 20 Nov 19.pdf PDF
Site Vist Conf Minutes 20 Nov 19.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
2 Appendix A - AFCOLS Custodial Standards.pdf PDF
9 Government Furnished Property List.pdf PDF
Notice to Offerors FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
7 Govt Policy Ltr.pdf PDF
1 PWS FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
6 PPQ FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
8 Exhibit - Price Schedule for FA520920R0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3 Appendix C - Estimated Square Footage and Cleaning Level.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment 5 Solicitation No. FA520920R0001

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST

Name of Offeror:

The following Three (3) contracts are the most relevant contracts (similar in scope, size and complexity) performed for US Government agencies, Government of Japan, and Commercial customers performed within the last 5 years of the solicitation release date, or is currently in progress (see Solicitation Provision 52.212-1):

Contract No. 1

(1) Company/Division name

(2) Product/Service

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer

(4) Contract Number

(5) Contract Dollar Value

(6) Period of Performance

(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)

(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

Contract No. 2

(1) Company/Division name

(2) Product/Service

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer

(4) Contract Number

(5) Contract Dollar Value

(6) Period of Performance

(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)

(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of

Contract No. 3

(1) Company/Division name

(2) Product/Service

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer

(4) Contract Number

(5) Contract Dollar Value

(6) Period of Performance

(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)

(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .