32 RFP Atch J9 Questions and Answers (Added by Amendment 0008).pdf
PDF 140 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA520919RA0060007
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to solicitation number FA520919RA0060007 for an Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity Multiple Award Construction Contract to provide construction services at U.S. Army installations within Honshu, Japan and Yokota Air Base. The contract will be awarded by the Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces and have a period of performance from May 2020 to May 2030. Eligible vendors can apply to be added to the existing pool of fourteen awardees through an on-ramp procedure. A pre-proposal conference will be held on December 18, 2023 at the Yokota Air Base Enlisted Club to answer questions, with a deadline of December 8 to submit attendee names and a limit of three attendees per company. Questions on the solicitation are due by December 11 prior to the conference and December 22 after the conference. The Mock Project required as part of the evaluation is for evaluation purposes only and will not result in an actual task order.
View the file
Other files
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
No. reference Questions Answers 1 section J- list of attachments attachment J3c1 Regarding MOC Project, is submission requirement J-3c1 only? Yes.
2 section J- list of attachments attachments J-4b
Do you require the original to submit? Otherwise email PDF is acceptable? Emailing PDFs is not prohibited. But it is the most unfavorite method to submit your proposal. Please review the slide number 52 of "Attachment 1. MACC Preproposal Briefing Slides 18 Dec 23 - 2nd ON RAMP" updated on SAM.GOV.
3 section J- list of attachments attachments J-1 8.K002
Is bonding capacity over \800,000,000 acceptable? Yes. Please review the slide number 29 of "Attachment 1.
MACC Preproposal Briefing Slides 18 Dec 23 - 2nd ON RAMP" updated on SAM.GOV.
4 FA520919RA0060007 Page 31 of 37 (c) PPI
Do you accept the past performance of Joint Venture project? If your intent is to participate this project as a prime contractor, your firm shall submit past performance solely for your firm.
The Government will accept your firm's past performance as a prime contractor. If your firm is proposing as a JV, please refer to L-100, para B.3.(e). Please see QA#4 on the attachment 26 RFP Atch J6 QAs - FA520919RA006.
5 section J- list of attachments attachments J-1 8.K003
What amount of Duty or Tax Excluded in Yen do you need？Is the amount accumulated amount in the MOC project?
Yes. It is for the Mock Project.
6 section J- list of attachments attachments J-1 8.K004
Is the signer in (a) same signer in standard form 1442, 20a,20b? Yes.
7 pre-proposal conference Please provide list of attendance if possible. The attendees' information is used only for a recoding purpose of the Government. It will not be disclosed to offerors.
8 submission colud you provide the guide how to submit via DoDSAFE? Is the DoDSAFE email what you are usuing eamail address?
1. Please go to the site: https://safe.apps.mil/
2. Please click "Request a Drop-off"
3. Please insert all applicable information including the POC name and Email Address (yuki.watabe.jp@us.af.mil).
4. Please click "Send the Request" bottom
9 General Regarding Personnel Assignment within JV:
Please confirm that JV can assign their own qualified personnel to any positions to perform duties by their own discretion depending on their corresponding shares. In an extreme case, a JV member whose corresponding share is 0% in the Task Order may not provide its staff to the JV, if the Government has no compulsive requirement for such managerial formation. We expect this extreme assumption may happen when the Joint Venture is formed between Building Contractor and Design firm under Design-Bid-Build Task Order, where the share and personnel assignment by the Design firm to the said Task Order JV may be zero.
Subcontracting among MACC holders are not explicitly restricted. However, each MACC holder shall comply with FAR 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination for this RFP and Request for Quotation of individual task orders
10 General Regarding Utilization of MACC competitor as subcontractor(s):
Can an awardee of a task order utilize other MACC members to subcontract to effectively perform the required works?
It depends on rationale and business ethics of the Contractor.
But at least the contractor shall comply with FAR clause 52.236-1.
11 General Actualization of MOC Project:
Please confirm the MOC project is for evaluation purposes only, and the subject project will not be actualized as an actual task order to applicants.
Yes, it is for evaluation purpose only.
12 Block 13, SF1442 Regarding RFP due date:
We have reviewed the Bidding Documents and carried out the preliminary assessment of the overall requirements for preparation of our Offer. We have determined that, taking in consideration of Christmas and new year holidays, we expect that our subcontractors will have more detailed questions at a later date and we need further time to make such high quality of several documents comprising all the requirements in these Bidding Documents. Could you extend the inquiry and offer due date for approx. 4 weeks?
Please see the amendment 0008.
QUESTION & ANSWER FORM
FOR
FA520919RA006 Amendment 0008 Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC), U.S. Army Installations within Honshu, Japan and Yokota Air Base and its Geographically-Separated
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .