Attachment_35_-_Bldg_1130_Hazmat_Report.pdf

R-01

R-02

R-03

R-06 R-11

R-07 R-10

R-13

R-05

R-15

R-16 R-17

R-14

R-12

Q-13

R-04

Q-18

Q-16

Q-17

Q-19

Q-20

Q-22

Q-12

Q-08

Q-04

R-19

R-18

R-21

Q-15

Q

Q-02 Q-03

R-20

P-02

P-03

Q

Q-23

P-04

O-09

O-08

O-07 O-06 O-05 O-04 O-03 O-02

O-01

O-10 O-11

O-14 O-13

P-05

P-07 P-06

O-20

O-16 O-18

O-17

R-25

R-26

R-27 R-28

R-29

R-30

R-31

R-32

R-33

R-24

R-35

I N C I N E R A T O R

S-29

S

S-31

S-34

S-36S-33

S-37

S-38

S-11

S-10

S-09

S-05

S-07

S-08 S-06

S

S-32

S-03

S-16

S-19

S-01 S-02

S-44

S

S-43 S-41

S-39

S-40

Q-11

ROOF

HATCH

Q-10

Q

R-36

AIR UNIT

No. 7

O-19

P-05A

R-15A

R-15B

P-02A

R-09

R-14A

R-38

O-16

O-21

O-22

O-15

O-16

S-49

S-42S-45

S

S-48

MONOCOAT

MONOCOAT

MONOCOAT

A R E A

AREA 3

MONOCOAT-TAN

DESCRIPTIONDATENo.

REVISIONSDesigner

Checked

Date

Scale

Sheet

CONTINENTAL ENVIROTECH INC.

3041 N. NORFOLK STREET. SUITE 101 MESA, AZ 85215

PHONE (480) 844-1710~FAX (480)844-1752

NTS

08/27/07

SC

RH

1ST FLOOR-AREA 4

INTERIOR ACM LOCATIONS

ACM-06

BUILDING 1130

FIRST FLOOR

AREA 2

Attachment 35

Lead-Based Paint Survey Report

COMPOSITE MED (ID:1130)

Luke Air Force Base

L.uke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Prepared ,for:

MORRlScJN-KNUDSEN CORPORATION

17300 RED HBI...L AVENUE, SUITE 150

IRVINE, CA 92614

Project No.: 1629

Bl.eadmlBased Paint Suisvey Report

COMPOSITE bhED (BD:U 30) I.,eake Air Force Base

Luke Air Force Base, M 85389

Prepared for:

MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPOWTION

17300 RED t-IILL AVENUE, SUITE 1 0

IFPVIB\IE, @A 92614

Prepared by:

Environomics, Inc.

Project No. 1629

Prepared by::

Barry B~~rrows a Niton Certified >(WF Analyzer operator

Reviewed by:

Wick Bar-th Manager, Asbestos & Lead Services

1 .(I la~troduction & Material l-is1

2.0 I-.cad.-Based Paint: Sl~rvey by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrum Analyzer (XRF)

3.0 Summary of XRF Results

4.0 Disclosure

5.0 Listing of all X-1"Py Fluorescer~ce San-lple Results

APPENDICES:

Survey Drawings

Surveyor "Training Certificates

1.0 InQ:roduction & Material List

Or8 8430199, Barry Burrows, a Niton Ced:ified XRF' Analyzer operator frou-i Envircsr.aomics, Bnc. (ENVIRONOMICS) performed a lead-based paint inspection of the COMPOSITE:

MED located at Luke Air Force Base, AZ to identify lead-based paint. This report establishes lead concentrations in painted surfaces as a general guidance tool for the purpose of conducting safe renovation or de~nolitiorl activities at the building.

The 'followilig compo~'~e~iI: was f c ~ i ~ ~ i d by XRFz Analysis to contain lead in quantities greater than the I-IUWJEPA definition of lead based paint (~"Rg4cm2):

GROUNDS-FENCE-METAL-GRAY

This report was prepared for the express use and benefit of MORRISON-I<NUDSEl\l C69KF30r*TION, its agents and employees and may be used at its discretion in connection \/with the possible financing, refinancing, or notifications that pedain to the property referenced above. The information in this report or portions thereof, rnay be required to be included in no,tifications to the residents, employees, contractors, or other visitors to the building. This report is not intended to be used by the Owner or its agents as a specification or work plan for any of the work si~ggested or recommended herein.

This was a screening suwey only, so not all painted surfaces in all spaces were recorded. Represer~tative surfaces in selected spaces were sampled. Users of this report are urged to review all available results for the building before determining actual lead content of paint in any particular space. Just because a particular space is not listed in this report does not mean that there is notlor may not be lead paint in that space.

Environornics, Inc. shall 17ot be responsible for idelitifling OeatJ-containing paints located behind walls and/or colbnmns, beneath flooring, t ~ ~ ~ i e r carpeting, above solid ceilings, underground or in any other inaccessible areas.

Luke Air Force Base 1130 COMPOSITE MED k.ead Fbaint Su~vey

Section 1 Page 1

Listing sf Building Components Sohed by Location

The following table lists the sample results of each painted si.rrPace sofled by location. 88 multiple sarnples of a painted surfac:e were obtained, the highest reading for I:hat surface is used ta determine its I-IUDIEPA s,katus.

The "HUDIEPA Lead Status" column indicates whether the material meets their definition of lead-based paint (LBP). Lead content i r ~ excess of 1 microgram per centimeter squared (mglcm2) by XRF testing or 5,000 parts per million (pprn) by atomic absorption analysis is consisrlered lead*-based paint by HUD and the EPA.

'The "'lead Detected" colun-~n indicates if XFiF analysis detected any amount of lead for OSHA compliance purposes. OSHA defines lead paint as "paint containing organic lead" and regulates it under OSHA Lead in Construction Standard.

k4Mt Description

H IJ DIEPA I..ead Lead S l a l : ~ ~ Detected Risk

Color condition ('7.0 r"km2) ('0 mg/cm2) Factors

022 Grounds-fence-metal Grey 1 n tact L.BP Yes

016 Door-casing-metal White l n tact Non-LBP No

81 5 Wall--drywall White l n tact Non-LBP No

001 VVall--drywall White Intact Non-LBP Yes

002 Door-casing-metal Grey 1 nlact Non-LBP Yes

003 Wall--.cont:,rete White O ntact Non-LF3P N o

004 VVall--plaster Pink Intact Non-LBP Yes

005 Door-casillg-metal White Intact Non-LBP Yes . - - - . -- -- - - - --- - --- - -Pup--

ROOM 133 C- . - --- - -- - - Ad - - -- Floor: 'I

006 Wall--drywall White Intact Non-LBP No

007 Door - Metal Grey l n tact Non-LBP Yes

Luke Air Force Base 11 30 COMPOSITE IVlED Lead Paint Suwey

Section 1 -, List of Materials

H kl DIE PA Lead Lead Status Detected Risk

008 Wall--plaster White Intact Non-.LBP No

ROOM 138 - -

009 Wall--plaster White l n tact hlon-I-BP No

01 0 Wall--plaster White Intact Non-L.BP No

01 I Wall--plaster White Intact Non-LBP Yes

01 2 Uoor-casing-metal Grey Intact Non-LBP Yes

Floor: 'l

01 3 Wall--plaster White Intact Non-LBP Yes

660-M 55 FOOOO.: I j L.. .- .. - .......-... -. - ....... -

01 4 Wall--plaster Black In tact Non-LBP No

021 Wall--concrete White Intact Non-LBP Yes

023 Wall--concrete White Intact Non-LBP hl o

~ O M -. n . - - - Floor: 9 - -~ -- - -- -- -- - -

01 9 Wall--plaster White Intact Non-LBP Yes

ROOM 31 I

I -3

020 Door-casing-metal White Intact Non-LBP No

(310 Woor--lWetal White Intact Non-L.BP Yes

01 7 Wall--plaster White Intact Non-LBP No

Luke Air Force Base 11 30 COMPOSITE MED Lead Paint Survey

Section 1 - List of Rllaterials

2,,0 L,sadmsBased Pa~irlt Suwey hy >(-Ray Flluc~rescence SgcI:ruirn Analyzes (XRF)

'1"he XWF amit used for ,this suwc"2y irradiates the paint oru a giver1 sa~dace? causing the Bead in the paint, if present, to emit a characteristic-, freqt~ensy of )(muray radiation. The instrument identifies and counts these x-rays to determine a lead concentration. The inter~sity of this radiation is measured by the detector and is related to the amount of lead in the paint. The lead concer~tlratiican results are repsded in micrograms per square centimeter (rng/cm2).

Wl-~ile ,the sample is beirlg measured, the lead concentration is displayed 017 the XRF's display. ''$he reading and spectn~rn data are stored in tlae device. -The XRF ar~alyaer provided information on the "K-shell" (high energy) and 'I-shell" (low energy) lead. In most XRF analyzers, the K-shell lead reading reflects the amount of lead present in the older layers of pain,t, and the L--shell reading reflects the arnomrrt in the sulrFace layers of paint.

I\r8easur'ements vvere taken at points representative of all paint and varrais%\ed sudaces in the areas inspected. In order to obtain a reading, the XRF analyzer is placed with the face of the instrument flush against the surface to be tested. It is then held in place for the duration of the sample taking, approximately 20 source seconds or until the measurernent has reached an acceptable range of accuracy as determined by the inspector. The sarnpling time is dependant on the age of the radioactive source inside the XRF and the accuracy desired by the inspector. The radioactive source ,for the Nitors XL. Spectrum Analyzer used at this pm~perty is 10 ~nillicurie Cadrnium '1 89. As the Cadmium109 source ages, longer sampling times are neeessay to maintain the same level of accuracy.

Luke Air Force Base 1130 COMPOSITE MED Lead Paint Survey

Section 2 Page 1

3.0 Summaw of XRF Results

A total of ,twentptl~a.ee (23) >(RF samples waslwere cca0lea:tssl on this survey. Orre (1) paint sample(s) Isad lead caarlter~t above the le~lel that the US Depa~ment of k.Bousing asad Urban developrner~t (MUD) corisiders to be lead-based paint. (1 "0 mglcm2) Refer to the Appendices for a complete listing of all >(RF sample results.

This table summarizes the total number of samples of each building component and the number that tested positive based on the I-4kJDSEPA standard.

1 Description I XRF Samples 1 Positive Samples 1

Luke Air Force Base 1130 COMPOSITE MEB Lead Paint Survey

Surr~rnary of XRF Results

5. Listing of all X-Ray FBusrescence Sample Results a ~ ! j e 8 a ~ 0% 00'0 6'0Z aUQM !3elu! v Jalseld lleM ZZ 1 LtO 1 9 WOo'd a ~ ! l e G a ~ sak ~ 0 . 0 9'8 a l !U ! I ~ ~ Y J I 3 ielaW JOOa iooa EZ 1 810 L 8E YVOO8 a ~ ! $ e E e ~ o~ 00'0 9's al!qM l3elul 3 ]elay\l bu!se3 JOOQ SZ 1 OZO 1 1E WOOH arilgafiap~ $a,\ ZO'O 6'0Z al!qM 13elill 3 ~a$se;d IleM t7Z 1 6b0 -L- iz WGOX an!jeGai\i GN 00'0 LZ al!4M pep1 a ala~3uo3 lfeM 8Z 1 EZO 1 €91 VdOO8 a ~ ~ e 6 a g cap. 10'0

- ~- .~ . .. Z'9 ~~ al!qM ..... ~- . ~ ~ -. pelul ~ - . ~ 8 a~a~3uo3 IleM 9Z 1 LZO 1 €9 1 NOOH a ~ ! g e 6 a ~ ON 00'0 . a's Y3e18 l3ejul a ~a+seld lleM 9 i i $I0 1 SS1 kxooa a~! le6ax s a ~ aU4M 82.0 .x PeYl 3 ~ajse!d IleM St L €10 i zs1 no08 ai\!jeBa~ saA 10'0 S'8k ha:% V lelek4j Bu!se3 J O O ~ P t 1 ZLO 1 PPL WOO8 a ~ ! j e 6 a ~ s a ~ SO'O 1'9 al!qM pejcrl v ~alsa ld 1I"M EL t 1iO t €PI ROO8 a~!leEax o~ 00'0 6'0Z a l ! q ~ w l u l v ~ ~ l s e l d I I~M z I 1 010 1 6E1 a008 a~ge6ap.j old 00'0 STL aUilM 13elul v ~a$se?$ lleM ll 1 600 t 8E1 MI008 a ~ ! l e G e ~ o~ 00'0 i ' 9 aU4M Iaelul V ~alse ld lleM 0 1 1 800 9. 9E L WOO8 a ~ ! l z 8 a ~ sah PO'O Z'OS A a ~ s Velul 3 I~ laW JOO~J ~ o o a 6 I - LOO 1 PE 1 WOO8 a~!jeSa& o~ 00'0 9.81 al!qM lselul 3 I lervik g l i "FA 8 1 900 1 EEL WOO8 a ~ ! $ e B a ~ s e ~ 81.0 9 . 5 ~ YU!d i3elul 3 Jalseld !leM - 9 t PO0 1 9Z1 WOO8 a ~ ~ e 6 a ~ SSA € 0 ~ 0 6'OZ al!'-iiV, !3e!Ui 3 lelafl bu!se3 ~ o o a L 1 SO0 1 9Z1 64GOtl e~!ge6sj\j o~ 00'0 9 i al!qM J ~ E ~ J I 3 a ~ a ~ ~ r r o 3 ileM S t €00 1 3PZL PJOOtl a ~ ~ e 6 e ~ s a ~ €0'0 8.02 ~ U Y M pelui v I I ~ ~ C I I I ~M E 1 LOO L 123. w O C ~ a~,;;eEaly sah PO'O 1'CL A a ~ 3 l3elul V a 6u!se3 ~ o o a P I ZOO I. 1ZL 64008 a ~ ! $ e B a ~ o~ 00'0 9 1 aU4M l3elul v ~ l e ~ , O a ileM OZ !. S10 1

11 l4008 a ~ ~ e f i a g oly 00'0 6'01 aU4M Pelul V leqafi 6u!se3 JOO@ 1Z 1 910 1 0 1 WOCk!

a~iysod s a ~ 00'9 << 2.8 A a ~ 3 p e y l g lelaifll a3uaj spuno~3 LZ i ZZO 1 €91 ~ Q I S L ~ O sn;ejS Pai333fJ ( / ~ 3 / 6 ~ ) (38s) ~0103 uo!g!puo3 a p g ale~lsqng amlead n p n q ~ 'ON MIH l O o l j ajdweg pep3 jualus3 ""!!eJWI d t l ~ aidaeg

Vd=l Peal I Q ~ H ZY '35388 33JQd J!V eW7 "0s & C) G 3 B 311SOdM03 us!$~3o7 Rq payog sllnsaa eldwag aauaasa~onlj A B ~ X I@B 40 Bui%s!q

June 29, 2009

Mr. Chris Paul Quality Control U.E.C.

5425 Antioch Drive Merriam, KS. 66202-1021

Re: Medical Building 1130 1st floor asbestos containing materials:

Dear Mr. Paul:

Continental Envirotech, Inc. (CEI) is pleased to provide Environmental Programs Flight, Luke A.F.B.

with this updated asbestos survey letter for the above referenced site. There have been additional materials located at the site during demolition activities. These materials consist of HVAC rope gaskets (located between walls @ duct penetrations). The addition of this material is being added to the original inspection performed by CEI on July 30, 2007. The following materials have been identified as ACM for the project and consistent with the first floor demolition activities.

HVAC mastic and seam mastic: located in the mechanical rooms in various areas.

Monocoat / Fireproofing: previously tested positive. Additional testing by CEI and the original sampling indicated all negative results. The fireproofing was abated by the base and all subsequent sampling has been negative.

HVAC rope gaskets: These gaskets were discovered on the third floor during the first phase of construction. They have been added to the original inspection through the NESHAP update survey conducted on February 13, 2009. These materials have been addressed during demolition activities as they come in contact with them. They have been removed using the non disturbance glove bag technique.

TSI pipe hangers: TSI pipe hangers were discovered via additional sampling on the first phase of the first floor. All pipe hangers were removed via non disturbance glove bag technique.

For more information regarding the asbestos survey originally performed by CEI on July 30, 2009, please consult CEI Project Report No. 07-13164. I have enclosed the EPA/AHERA Inspector certification for the update inspection. If you have any questions or need further information or assistance, please contact me at 480/ 844-1710.

Sincerely, Continental Envirotech, Inc.

Steven Chamberlain Field Services Manager

1.7 ....na/)'siII of Bul1l: s.mples

As:lestOS tll.!t; iSaysa was peffiJrmed on aD of I!>e """'P'et bV In1I!rJI3llOl'Il lesli"lg Labol.lOfy (IATL) kx:aOOd al 16000 11orttoI, W;q, Un~ 100, ,1'1 Moun! lalJreoI, New Jer5ey. tAll is a N\IlAP acc:rediIl!'d laboralory Polarized lilll'll MIcroscopy (PLM) IS~ EPAS~ metllod lor analyzing DlJlk miI\er1il1S lor asbe~lOS, F'lM uliizes a light microocopl! ~uipped with poIarirt1g Mer.;

The identifialhon of asbestos ~00r burldlelltl determined by the visual properties displayed when the HVllp!e is lrwt'ld ""ltl various di$pe(tlon stai1'li.ng ~ids The a:tuBI SlTUetur-.of the fibef and the ef'leel of poIarizOO ighl on ltoe fiber, all of whocl\ is view'8:l by • !l'aned lIiICtlnldBll, sWsl3rIlJBte idenl4ir:alion. Th& li'na 01 d!!IN:fIDn 01...........,., isBP~one pen:>enI (1%) by "IN.

Rewlls~ II'Il! anaIysi$ by lATl 01 SBIllpI!!s~ by Cominern:al EfIwotudl.Inc. S¥nple b;atioo~ aesa~i', elc., wem ptO'oided by CtlnIineMill EnwotecIl, inc. The latoc..... "~ CC1rn::t be used by tho!

clent r;. dBlm prodUd endcnement by NVI..AP or any agency of ttte U.S GcMiImment

3.7 ....nalyais of Buk SMTlples (Continued)

ContinenltJl En~irotech, Ire, Il!commeruls Il!anillysis by In. poilt count method for a more accurate qUlll1t1f1ca1ion of asbestos CCfltenl. or Tranil11~ EteelrQll Mi~P'I (TEM) lor enhanced detection capabililJes. of asbesro6 in mille/ii1ls rf!9~ted by EPAINESHAP IIlat m-o to<.m to cootain less IIlan ten percent «10%) as'-!OlI by PLM.

3..11 Summaory of ....eM

3.10 Ml1eria1s Not Sampled

Materials not sampled Il'ICIudeod terrau:o lIoofirl9' ceramoe ~le, oora~ tile grout and ""'*'9 rnaterial!l.

Materials IOcalOO in tile basement aawl$paee were not sampled due Illfl aroe ooing a c.oo!il'leo space. AI material, lOcated in tJ1is area $IlOUkJ be c.onsklered I""'itive Ul'Ilil teoltoo.

3.1 t Anum-:<> of ~p.dorAa:nld1Utlon nus IS a t.IalemenI of MSlnnCe ID lha wnam CWIIef oIlt>f1 IUbjed property lhallhe pllISOII(t) inYolloed il the Wtspedion M1d manegememr~ lIftI fUlli'ne ""' ......;88. of this fi'm. TheM empIoye85 have af:leolded and s........sluty completed fom1III EP.... approYell OOUIWll fa( ,>,HERA. SuiloXlg lnspec;lor atlO AHERA.

Management Planner.

Comply willl !hEl State BOO Faclat31 req~immenlS lor demclilbrire"OVabon projects wni!:;h are presented il EPAJNESHAP and AHERA, aswe_ as an app1ie8b1e OSHA "'9'Jlalbn~, The be!1~fied "ShM/1)$ QJl1t3iJllng malf!Iials Of mateMls alilitlmed 10 be asbe&1Ds shoold be removedJa!laled pril:W to demoli:ion Of renowlilXl~ lila!~ (Io;lurb \tie mateMIs. The maklnals should be fenDYeCl ;rod hanclled by in~ la.nltil B$bes'nS abatemenIlXll ,ba:!oo' The ll'lDorie('l !Ihol*l be ;jIba\ed i1 so.dl , ".,.,.... lIS ID prevent any release of i!S/:edo!; fibers illD tl'e ilf Fw1t."ue. !he ITIiIIliIriaI(s) &IIOll1r:l be hMaliid, SlIlfed and disposed of Pf'OpeI'ly perCily, Count;, Slae. and F~reg.mD1s

Too samplin~ of tl1is site WilS planned, developed, and 'fnplernerlled based on prevbus exper1encoll pililooi,io~ buidilg 1i<l'Vey& for ACBM or ACM, Ths surwy WlIS ooMocted In conformance wi1l1 our Scope of Wodt and accepted Q,urenl: stilndards of practice kr idlInti~ and eviftJatlng ACBM a ACM i1 bu*lilg$.

Conbflenllll Enviroled'l, Inc. cant1IOI Wilil'ili1l Ihe building d<lK noI c:ontilin AC6M or N:Nt in Il:lcalioM ok IhiIn I'lOIed i1 a.. report.

~I EffliUech, Inc's_~ ci !he~ risk eX exp?" ft! III ACeM or /lDI, IIientdied dlDlll ,.

suNt)' 15 b<Ised on ooro:f~ ob$erYed "'!he tine of IhIo tulVey and kIk10ws EPA .. leltlcdoIugy generally .....oepte<l 38 approprlated lor rt.s purpose. COntinenl<II EnvirI:I(Iech, Inc:. ~1lflOI be iespoo~bIe for chang~ conOi!iorIs lhal~a~er this relat,ve exposu... risJ( lor futum eha~ i'l ac;eepted melhodoklgy

Tnefe cannot be a guarantee lI1at sl ""bestos COf'ltairJing building maWiais nave been bated lind identif~, Material <Xlil(106'lb'l c:ft.!!Il v~ The POSSd;MJity does "xisl iNIt !he IlllIIefIai <;empositlon of the s&mples ~ maV d/flef~ IJI)()'l !he Ioca!ion rmm VItlr;tl lhe sampIM wen Iaken. This \$ tnJe. i'l some l35eS. for sarnJ*!S~ !rom lhe same~ area.

~ Ille llliIternIIIs specified III this IWpa1 __ tested. Maleoels not SiI/Y1lI8d shoUd ;iwsys be alISllmed po6ilM! b"1ISlv>sr$~ unlll flirtnet' sampling and tl!Sling nfca'.I!S oI!leNtilte we h;rve performed our service'llor this ptq!I(:t ""a.::co"hi\Oe with 0lI" "!IrMmeI~anti ~lilndingWl\Jl CD' cloot Thill docln'enl: and il'lformalion CCfltBlrted herein Mve been prepared solely Ior~, lI'e 01 our e>ents and lhe~ assigned parties, C01MP88UT'E nAED (ID: d"1Q38)

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE

Luke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Prepared for:

IWBRRISBN-KNUDSEN CORPBMTIBN

17300 Red I-lill Avenue, Suite "10

IRVINE, CA 92614

Prepared by:

Enviranars~ics, Inc.

December 23, 7 999

Project Number: "O629

Prepared By:

Barry Burrows an AHERA accredited asbestos inspector

ETCASBBI R08699

Reviewed By:

Russ Nassof an AtiERA accredited asbestos inspector

C 3441

Table 08f Contents

Section: .----,,--,,-, -

Exec~ltive Summaw

I~ntroductiion

Description of Building Construction and Systems

S ~ ~ m m a ~ g l of Findings for Sunspeef Materials inaterial Information Tables

5 Remo~sal Cost Estimate Summay

De,finltions of 'Terms and Assessnsent Criteria

Bulk Sampling Protocol and Analytical Methods l.absratoy Bulk Sampling Reports

Summav of Regnmlatoy Requirements

Drawings Indicating Asbestos Sample Locations

Er~virone~rnia:~, Inc. (En\lironovnics) was re'lained by MClRUr31SQNe-IKU$BQJI&:JCjEE$Ji @C4F%PC>RATION to perform an disbestos I-llazard Ermsrgency Rcisponse Act (AkiEW)/ National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) style asbestos sirwey of the CONIPCISI'TE MED (Building ID: 1130), to c-letermhns t h e locations of accessible and to the ewlepat fc?asible, i~%aclcessible friable ancl non&iabRe asbesteps ~:oaa&ainir-ag balilding materials (ACBM).

Friable materials are rrnaterials that can be reduced to powder with hancl pressure such as fireproofing, sprayed-on acoustic ceilings, pipe and thermal system insulation. A11 other rna.terials such as floor tile, ceiling tile, adhesives, plaster, stucco, and sheet rock mudding compounds are considered non-friable ma1:erials. !Friable materials are of greatest concern .frosn a health and safety yesirat of view because of their ease of fiber release.

Asbestos was detecyted ira the followir~g friable (or jacketed friable) materials::

Pipe Insulation

Asbestos was dete:cted or as:;umied in the f:c)lla;gwing rnoaa,-friable materials:

Adhesive Ceramic Tile Ur~derlayment Fire Door F'loor Pile Sink ill r~derc;oating 'Tile Grout

Site ID: LUI<E BASE Building ID: 1130 COMPOSITE MED Asbeslos Sulvey Report

Executive Summary Page 1

Section 1 Intrc:~dla,~stlor~iIi~ctit~r~

Ern\/irorrorraIcs, Inc. (E.r-ovirc~r~c~~mi~s) ~1e~f~~3rrned an ~4~kSesf:os kjazarsl Ein~ergeir~c;y Rssl~onse Act (AkIE.11U4)/ Na.tioa'lal Err~issioa'ls S,tar~dard fo~r b lazziprs Air P~:~llutants (NESI-d,AI;>S) s,Lyle asbestos survey of the COMPOSUmTE MED located at Luke Air' Force Base, AZ to identify AACBM. 'This report iden,li.fies the locations and asbestos content of friahle and non-friable ACBM, provides assessment of the friable ACBM in rela'kion to the inaterial's hazard potential to building oa;cupar~l:s and provides removal cost estim~ates.

Friable materials are materials that car) be reduced to powder witD-a hand Frressure serctn as fireproofir~g, sprayed-c~n acoustic ceiling:;, pipe and thermal systeni insulation. All other materials such as floor tile, ceiling tile, adhesives, plaster, stucco, and sheet rock mudding compounds are considered non-friable materials. Friable material:; are of grsatc?st concern from a l~ealltk and safety point of view because of Iheir ease of fiber release.

MII identi,fied suspect ashestos~-containing materials are sumrrrarized in Se6:tior) 3.

Materials testing positive far asbestos incl~~ding makerial assessments, recommended response actions, and quantities are described in Section 4. Removal cost estimates for asbestos-cor~tainiw materials are included in Section 5.

It is not our recoui~nendatic~n to remove these rnatc?rials unless they are beyond repair, adr plarmnetl slermolitiova or reno\!atiots activities will disturb "re rr~atesiaOs.

Estimates are based on recent pricing we have received from con2rad:ors [~e~orrn ing similar work and may vary from actual cos1.s obtained due to the scope of work, prevailing wage, quantity of material removed, control measures specified and contractor work loads.

On Mornday, August 30, '1 999 Dar~ l j B~~rrows ( E - ~ C A S E F 8 6 9 9 ) , an Al4EWA accredited asbestos inspector, from Enviror~omics, performled an as83estos suwey sf the building in accordance with .the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Resr~onse Act of 'I 987 (AHEFIA).

DISCLAIMER

This report is prepared for the express use and benefit of OMORRISON-KhIUDSEDV CCPRPORATION, its agents and employees. 'Tkne inf:e~rrnalior~ in this report: or portions .thereof rnay be required tco be included in notificatior~s to ernple~yees, contractors or other visitors to the building(s). This report is not intended to be used by the Owner or its agents as a specification contract document or work plan for any of the work suggested or recommended in the report.

This report is based ilpori condifior~s observed at the property arid in"forma.tion made available .is the surveyor. -$his report d61ss no'k intend 'to identify all environaiental hazards, nor to indir:ate that other hazards do not exist at the premiises.

Site ID: LUKE RASE Building: COMPOSITE MED Asbestos Suwey Report

Section 1 Page 1

Ernv"a~sgroorr.aic~~; has lraerformed this sunley in accor'dlaoace ~~ifS"PJjjl.a~I~sf:ry standarals ;387%:l has used best effc~fls to determir~e ,the location trl" irmaa:cessibIe ACBRA. Enviror~ounics shall not be resl,>onsib!e fb~r identi'fyiir~g all AC$BNl located belaind ~[all ls and or' columns, beneath flooring, above solid ceiling, underground or any otb~er inaccesssible areas.

Site ID: LUKE BASE Building: COMPOSITE MED Asbestos Survey Report

Section 1 Page 2

Seae8t!on 2 EBescrlption of BuiWdir~g Constrwactloma and Systems w mm

IMrrrnbe~r OF FUla~ons: 3 Year Built: 19'74. lli omtaQ Square Footalje: '1 25, *li 09

Structural components consist of: Concrete Foundation Steel Columns

E:xterior Wall1 construction corrrpone~~ts consist of: S~O,IGGO

Irrterior VVaPH construction componew~'ts corbsist o'F: llrywall Plaster (2oncrete

Interior ceiling cc~~~~ponemts conslst of: Ceilirig Tile [3rywaII Plaster

Roofing consturuactian components consis't of: Rolled Gornposite 'Tar&FeIt

Heating and nsleachancial systen~s Imu:ll~ids: Chillers Ce~oling Tower Air' klaradling LJni ts Ducted Supply Sprinltler' Systems

Comments:

THE FIREPROOFING HAS BEEN ABATED AND NEW FIREFSROC)FINC? I-lAS BEEEN APPL..IED ("OW) AS PER NICK DUR6_lNGER, \N\-II'TE UI.BCT MASUTI@ ASSLJMED POSITIVE ABO\IE P&.ENWM AND

NCjN-ACCESSABL-E AI'SE!AS.

Site ID: LUKE BASE:

Building: COMPOSITE MED

Asbestos Survey Ftepori

Section 2 Page 'i

Section 3 Summaw of Findings for Suspect Materials

The following fable is 131 list 01: all materials at this builclirng \~hia;h were tested for the presence o'f asbes1:os allorlg ~1if8-i OVE:IFIIU san~ple rt2sults. Cornplste infarmatiom on asbes'tos ccarllainir~g materials is ip-acl!,~ded in Sectiat:~r.~ 4. of ,this repor.8:.

BWaterials are listed by Horr.aoger.leous Sampling Area (I-iM). Each ur~ ique ~~at:erial within the buildir~g is assigned a unique I-BM nurwber by the suweyor at the time the suwey is performed.

Section 3 arid Section 4 are gsrganizctd by building, surfacing, therrrial syste~ms insi.jlation, flooring, v\~alls, ceilings, roofing arltj miscellaneous materials, Site b7formafion CON1PbSSI'TE WUECB (Site OD: LUKE BASE)

Luke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Swvey Pe~forrned By Environomics, Inc.

Inspeclor Barry Elurrows

Client Information MOF31IISON-KNblDSEiNI CORPORATION

1'7300 RED HILL AVENUE, SUITE 150

IKVINE, CA 92614

Inspection Dale Job Number Monday, August 30 , 1999 1629

:juspect Material Category I-IM Number Material Location(s) Floor Asbestos Present?

PLASTER Surfacing PI-.-7 PENTHOUSE

HALLWAY

ROOM 1

ROOM 2

ROOM 5

I300M 58 FtOOM 6

ROOM 7

ROOM 78

ROOM 8

ROOM 9

ROOM 10

ROOM 11

ROOM 12

IIOOIV 13

F700M I 4

ROOM 15

ROOM 16

HALL I

ROOM 17

ROOM 20

HALL 2

ROOM 21

IROOIV 22

HALL 3

ROOM 23

ROOM 24

ROOM 248

HALL 4

ROOF No

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 1 Licensed lo: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 05016

Site Information

COhBlWSlTE HIED (Sits ID: 1.LIKE Br4SE) Survey Parformed By

E=-1ivironornic~, Iric.

Inspection Date

Monday, hugc~st 30, 199Q

Category tfM Number Matetiel L.ocation(s)

Surfacing k.IAL.L,.WAY

ROOM 1

ROOM 2

RO01V13

ROOM 4

ROOM 5

FXOCIM 5B

ROOM 6

I3C)C)M 7

ROOM 7B

ROOM 10

ROOM 12

ROOM 13

ROOM 14

ROOM 16

I?OOM 18

F7OC)M 19

ROOM 20

HAI-I. 2

ROOM 21

ROOM 22

HALL 3

ROOM 23

ROOM 24

ROOM 21B

HALL 4

ROOM 25

UAI..I.. 5

ROOM 26

DUCT INSULATION TS I Dl-9 MECHANICAL ROOM 2 N o

MECHANICAL ROOM 2 1

MECI-IANICAL. ROOM 3 1

MECHANICAL ROOM 4 1

TS I PI-'14 CRAWL SPACE 1 Yes

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 2 Licensed lo: Envil.onomics, Inc.. Phoenix. AZ, 85016

COMPOSITE MED (Site ID:: L,.L;RKE BASE) Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Inspection Date illlonday, August 30,1999

12X12 MAUVE FZLOOR TILE Flooring l q . . . 1 :YrAl FtWEL,J~. 3 No

I-IALLVVAV 3

R(:)OM 'I

ROOM 2

ROOM 3

ROOM 4

ROOM 5

ROOIW 58

ROOM 6

IR(3C)AA 7

ROOM 7B

ROOM 10

ROOM 11

ROOM 16

fiOOM 20

ROOM 21

ROOM 22

HAL.L 3

ROOM 23

ROOIVI 248

RESTROOIVIS

ROOM 31

RCIOM 36

ROOM 37

ROOM 38

ROOM 40

ROOM 41

ROOM 47

HALL. 6

12x12 GRAY FLOOR TILE Flooring FT-10 HALL 4

ROOM 32

ROOM 34

Seclion 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 3 Licensed to: Environomics. Inc.. Phoenix, A2, 85016

Site lnfonation

CORAPOSIT'E MED (Site ILR: LU,JKEZ BASE) Survey Performed By

Enviuonorni~s, IIIC.

Inspection Data

Monday, Amg~,~st 30, '1 999

BASEHOARD ADI4E8111E Flooring S'TABHW11F:LI.

C.IAI.L.WAY

ROOM I

ROOM 2

ROOM 3

ROOM 4

IROOM 5

ROOM 513

RQOI'arl 5

ROOM 7

ROOM 713

ROOM 8

ROOM 10

ROOM 11

ROOM 12

ROOM 16

IIALI. 1

HOOM 17

ROOM 19

ROOM 20

HALL 2

ROOM 21

ROOM 22

HALL 3

ROOM 23

ROOM 24

ROOM 243

I-IAI-L 4

RQOM 25

--pp--"----,- -. .----.----"--------,"---

12>('12 PURPLE MARBLE FLOOR Flooring FT-20 ROOM 44 1 N o

TILE (NO MASTIC)

ROOM 63

ROOM 10% 'I

-- --~-.-------- .---------"--,,m--mm,----,m-,-,--~--m"v--,,-,-----,-~------ ~ - ~ ~ - - - - ~ , - w , " - , , - " - - - , , ~ " m , n - m . . - , - , m , m m , " ~ m - , - ~ - . - , - " - n - , m - , , ~ , ~ -

GLOSSY LlNOLElJlVl Flooring LN-24 ROOM 39 1 N o

ROOM 40 1

WHITE I-~OLEILIM Flooring LN-25 ROOM 42 1 N o

(;RAY LINOI-EUM Flooring ROOM 8

ROOlVl 13

ROOM 14

ROOM 15

Section 3 Summary of Findings (or Suspect Materials Page 4 Licensed lo: Environomics. Inc.. Phoenix, AZ. 85016

Silo flfortnalion

COMPOSBTE WED (I#.Le ID: L.&UKE BASE) Survey Performed By

Environornics, Inc.

lrrspoclion Data

Monday, A L I ~ U S ~ 30, 1999

M a l e h l Description Material Number Asbestos Present7

1 CEMMIC TILE UNflER1.AYMEMT cu-43 Yes (assu~ned)

Material Category

FlooringNValls Friable Classification

Non-Friable EPA Category

ICategory I Total Quantity

44,733 Unit of Measure

Square Feet

General Condition

Good Damage Category Overall Material Assassment

I Rocommended Response

Manage in Place

General Material Cornmenfs

I_- ~ -.- .- - ~. ...~ ...................................... .. ~.

Material Localion(s) Floor Location Quantity Location Cond~lion Material Comments (by Location)

ROOM I 3 280

ROOM 23 2 175

KITCHEN 1 4.200

lDlNIN6 AREA 1 2,600

ROOM 33 1 336

ROOM 51 1 96

ROOM 901 1 1,904

Section 4 Page 25 Licensed to: Environornics, Inc.. Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Section 4 I1Material lb~fonmatiosr 'Tables

Site Informalion

GOIIVIPOSI0TE MED (Site 1D: l..!JKE BASIE) Survey Performed By

EEnviirc7nomics, Inc.

Inspection Dale

IWonrlay, August 30, '1999

ROOM 121 1 64

biOiD1bl 1258 1 384 .. ..p-pp-.-----.--p.----p---ppp-.-- ~ -~ ~

Sample ID(s) Sample Locabon(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Result Layer@) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

Material Description

; WALL COVERING

Material Category Friable Classification €PA Categoiy

:Walls

General Contlitio~l Damage Category Overall Material Assessment p d -

General Material Comments

L.

Mabrial Location(s)

Malerial Number Asbestos Present?

IWC-1 8

Tolal Quanlily Unit of Measure

20,723 Square Feet L L liecommended Response

N o Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Floor Location Quanlity Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

3 8,160

HALL 7 1 2,980

Sample ID(s) Sample Location(s) Floor Analyzed Overail Result Layer@) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

'wC-18-1 KITCHEN 1 Yes &I.D I) WC Below limit of detection

2)

ROOM 4.9

3)

1 Yes BLD I ) WC 2) 3)

Below limit of detection

I WC-'18-3 ROOM 66B 1 Yes BLD 1) WC 2) 3)

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 26 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc.. Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Siection 4 Material Information "Fabil~rs

Site lnforfnafio~i

COMIPOSI'T'IE MED (Sit8 OD: LllBKE EDASE) Sutvey Performed By

IEnvirorromics, Inc.

Inspection Dale

Mrsr~day, August 30, 1999

-1-

Maferial Descripfion Mafariel Number Asbeslos Present? I GYPSUM WALLBOARIB 'w-2'l

Material Category Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantify Unit of Measure Walls Category II Square Feet

Ganeral Conditk~n Damage Calegory Overall Material Assessmenl Recommended Response

Good

<;enera1 ivlsterial Co~nments

Material l.ocation(s) Floor Location Quantity Localion Condition Material Comments (by Location)

(STAIRWELL 3 4,560

ROOM 6 1 792

ROOM 19 2 500

ROOM 20 2 1,040

ROOM 265 1 90

ROOM 31 1 260

ROOM 33 1 570

MECHANICAL. ROOM 3 1 1,050

Section 4 Page 27 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Sectionri~ 4. Material Onafosm~ation "Tables

COMIVOSUTE MED (Slte BD: L..UCCE DA,SE) Inspection Data

Moo~day, Augllst 30, 1999

(ROOM 5'r 1 464

ROOM 66B 1 '144

ROOM 69 1 2,080

(ROOM 71 1 2,960

ROOM a2 I 2,960

ROOM 73 1 880

ROOM as I 330

(ROOM 82 1 360

ROOM 91

(ROOM 93 1 1,056

ROOM 94

(ROOM 948 1 960

Section 4 Page 26 Licensed to: Environomics, inc., Phoenix, N, 65016

Section 4 lBaaterial laufornuatio~r~ Tables

Q:OMPOSITE MED ($;it@ ID: ILIJKE BASE) Inspection Wale

IVlonday, August 30, 1999

Sample ID(s) Sample Locatfon(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Resuit Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

JW-21-1 L ROOM 6 3 Yes BLD 1) JW Below limit of detection 2)

3) --.-pp-.-p-..pp pp--p.-p-p-. . -

ROOM 4. 3 Yes 13L.D 1) JW Below limit of detection 2)

3)

JW-21-3 ROOM 9 2 Yes BLD I) JW Below limit of detection 2)

3)

JW-21-4 ROOM 19 2 Yes BLD 1) JW Below limit of detection 2)

3) .. . - -- - ..-p

JW-21-5 ROOM 26B 1 Yes BLD 1) JW Below limit of detection 2)

3)

ROOM 104 'I Yes RLD 1) J w 2)

3)

ROOM 96 1 Yes BLD 1) JW 2) 3)

Below lirr~it of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Category

JWalls

Material Description Material Number Asbestos Present?

Friable Classification

Non-Friable

DRYWALL JQIN'I' COMPOUND

General Condition Damage Category

/Good d6-22 /No-

General Ma teh ! Comments I

Overail Material Assessment Recommended Response

INo Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

€PA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

Material Losalion(s)

ISTAIRWbbELI, Category I I

Floor Location Qoanfity Location Condition Malerial Comrnents (by Location)

3 4,560

08,088 Square Feet

(ROOM 4 3 8,480

ROOM 6 1 792

Section 4 Page 29

COBV1LF'XC)Zil'B'E 1MED (Site ID: L.UKE BPLSE) Survey Perforrr~cd fly

E~~vironomics, Irmc.

Inspection Dale

Monday, August 30, 1999

ROOM 19 2 500

ROOM 20 2 ,1,040

DINING AREA 1 525

1 -ppp.p

ROOM 31 1 260

(MECHANICAL ROOM 3 1 1,050

ROOM 41 1 380

ROOM 48 1 165

ROOM 56 1 2,010

ROOM 56B

ROOM 57 1 464

IRBOM 65

ROOM 66

(ROOM 69 1 2,080

ROOM 70 1 680

Section 4 Page 30 Licensed to: Environornics, inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Section 4 Material Rnafornrvatiovr "sT'a~bBes

Survey Perforn~ed By

Environoanics. Inc.

Inspection Date

Monday, August 30,1999

ROOM 7-7 1 1,600

ROOM 86 'I 300

ROOM 87 1 350

ROOM 89 1 720

ROOM 94 1 600

ROOM 948 1 960

ROOM 90 1 800

ROOM 99 1 2,176

Section 4 Page 31 Licensed to: Environomics. Inc.. Phoenix. AZ, 85016

Sa3ctlon 4, Iflaterial Information 'Tables

COMPOSlTE IVIED (Sits! ID: !..LIKE BBiSE) Survey Perlormed By

E~~viror~om~ics, Inc.

Inspectio~i Date

Monday, 14ugust 30, 1999

Sample ID(s) Sample Locofionjs) Floor Analyzed OvoraN Result Layer($ Reported by Lab Resulls by Layer

DC-22-1 ROOM 6 3 Yes BLD 1) D C Below limit of detection

2) L-.-- DC.22-2 ROOM 4 3)

L 3 Y e s RL.D I) D C Below limit of detection 2)

3)

- -- -~ .-.---------p......-p-------... 1 DC-22-3 R O O N l 9 2 Yes &I-U 1) D C Below limit of detection

2)

I _ ...-pp.-p--- - 3)

/ DC-22-4

ROOM 1 9 2 Yes BLD 1) D C Below limit of detection 2)

1 ~

3)

I DC-22-5 ROOM 26R 1 Yes BLD 1 ) D C Below limit of detection 2)

3)

DC-,22-6 R O O M 104 1 Yes BLII I) D C Below limit of detection 2)

3)

DC-22..7 ROOM 96 1 Yes BLD I) D C Below limit of detection 2)

3)

Material Description

I 'TEXTILlRlNG COMPClllND

Material Category Friable Classification EPA Category

VValls N o n - F r i a b l e C a t e g o r y II

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

Good I -

General Material Comments

Material Number Asbesfos Present7 tc-23 /!No

Total Ouanbly Und of Measure

Isquare F e e t

Recommended Response

INo R e s p o n s e Required, No A s b e s t o s D e t e c t e d

Material Locationjs)

STAUKWELI..

Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Material Comments (by L.ocation)

3 4,560

ROOM 4 3 8,480

ROOM 6 1 792

Section 4 Page 32 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ. 85016

Site Infortns!iot~ Survey Perfornied By

COMPOSBT'E WWED (Site OD: I..UME BASE) Er~vironomics, Inc.

ROO111 30 1 4.00

Inspeclion Dale

Monday, Augi~st 30, '1999

DINING AREA 1 525

(MECHANICAL ROOM! 3 1 1,050

(ROOM 4,8 1 165

ROOM 55 1 4,890

ROOM 66 1 8,152

ROOM 74 1 480

(ROOM 7i' 1 1,600

Section 4 Page 33 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc.. Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Section 41 Material Ilnfornu~atiasna Tab! es

Site In$ormafion

COMPQOSUTE IRE13 (Site AD: LUKE BASE) Survey Peflomed By

Envirorrcamics, Inc.

Inspection Dale

Monday, August 30, ,1999

(ROOM 82 1 360

ROOM 90 1 460

(ROOM 948 1 960

ROOM 95

ROOM 96

(ROOM 99 1 2,176

ROOM 100 1 440

Sample ID(s) Sample Local~on(s) Floor Analy,zed Ovarall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Resulfs by Layer

TC-23-1 L ROOM 6 3 Yes BLD I ) T C Below limit of detection 2)

3)

TC-23-2 ROOM 4 3 Yes BLB 1) T C Below limit of detection 2)

3)

2 Yes BI..D 1 ) T C 2)

Below limit of detection

:3)

Y e s BLD 1) T C Below limit of detection 2)

TG-E3-4 ROOM 19

3)

1 Yes BLD 1) T C 2) 3)

Below limit of detection TC-23-5 ROOM 268

ROOM 101 Yes BLD 1) T C 2) 3)

Yes BLD 1) T C 2)

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 34 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 05016

Section 4 Material Unforrnation 'Il'a bles

COUUPOSQ'TE MED (Site ID: L.UKE BASE) Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Inspection Dale

Monday, August 30, '1999

Material Description

2x2 ROlJGH CEILING 'TILE

Material Categofy Friable Classification

/Ceilings Friable L General Condition Darnage Categofy Overall Material Assessmenf

Good I ~ L - - . 1 General Material Comments

Material Number Asbestos Present?

EPA Categofy Total Quantity Unit of Measure Friable 22,264 Square Feet I . L L

Recommended Response

Floor Locafion Quantity Location Condibon Material Comments (by Location)

3 3,200

HALL 3 2 944

(DINING AREA 1 2,600

(ROOM 54 1 540

ROOM 62 1 1,584

ROOM 87 1 276

Sample lD(s) Sample l.ocalion(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Resuit Layer(s) Reporled by Lab

I CT-3-1 ROOM 19 2 Yes ElLD 1) C T

2)

3)

Results by Laye!

Below limit of detection

1 CX-3-2 HALL 2

I CT-3-3

ROOM 87

2 Yes BLD 1) C T 2)

3)

1 Yes BI..D 1 ) C T 2)

3)

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 35 Licensed lo: Environomics. Inc.. Phoenix. AZ, 85016

Sectiori 4 Material lrnfonrnatiow "BTables

S ~ ~ r v e y Performed By

Environs~mics, Inc.

lnspacfiorl Date

Monday, Aangtast 30, 1999

Material Description

2x2 SMOOTH CIEILORIG TILE

Matenal Category Friable Classification

Ceilings

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

Good

General Matori~~l Cornments

Material Number Asbestos Present? p

EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

F:riable 77,520 Square Feet I Recommended Response

No Response Required, No Asbestos Detectcsd

Material Location(s)

ROOM 1

Floor Location Quant~ly Locat~on Cond~tron Maferral Comments (by Locatron)

ROOM 3 3 680

ROOM 6 1 920

ROOM 7 3 792

ROOM 10 1 360

ROOM 21 2 1,980

(ROOM 23 2 2,596

Section 4 Page 36 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ. 85016

Section 4 Material $aafos.m.~~ation Tables

Site hformalion

COMBPOSUE IUED (Site ID: IL&IKE BASE) Survey Performed By

Envirc)nom1i6:~, in@.

Inspection Dale

Monday, August 30,1999

ROOM 27 I 528

ROOM 28 1 220

RESTROOMS 1 264

ROOM 29 1 300

(ROOM 38 1 308

(ROOM 441 1 336

HALL 8 1 1,000

Section 4 Page 37 Licensed to: Environomics. Inc., Phoenix. AZ. 85016

Survey Pr#n'ormed By

Envirlonornics, Ir~ca, ROOM 66 1 1,680

ROOM 67 1 192

ROOM 71 1 744

(ROOM 73 1 384

I

1 HALL 10 1 820

ROOM 79 '1 120

(ROOM 83 1 108

HALL 11 1 376

ROOM 93

Section 4 Page 38 Licensed to: Environornics, Inc.. Phoenix. AZ, A5016

Section 4 [daterial Onforrrratioln "Tables

Site Inlonnslion Survey Perfanned By

C(>lblRIPOSI"II'E MBZD (Si.l.e! 10:: I,UB<tIl BASE) Environomics, Irrc:.

ROOM 94 1 704-

1nspe1:tion Dele

Mcanday, A ~ ~ g ~ r r s t 30, '1 999

ROOM 95 1 576

ROOM 99 1 672

ROOM 'I Ui 1 1,904

ROOM 106 1 1,584

ROOM 113 .I 264

ROOM 116 1 312

ROOM 118 1 352

Sample ID($

1 CT-8-'1

Sample Localion(s)

ROOlbl 2

Floor Analyzed Overall Result Laycr(s) Reporied by Lab Rosults by Layer

Below limit of detection Yes

ROOM 20 2 Yes BLD 1) CT 2) 3)

BI-D I) CT

2)

3)

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection ROOM 124 1 Yes

Section 4 Page 39 Licensed lo: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix. AZ. 85016

Site lriformation

CCIMPOSII'E !/!ED (Site R B I : : L.IJKE BASE) Survoy Pehrmed By

Envirc~nornics, lnc.

1n:;pection Date

Monday, August 30, 1999 m n m m

Mate&$ Description Material Number Asbestos Present?

ROCIFIN6 PAR

k 6 L______

Material Category Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantity

Ho Unit of Measure p f i n g Non-Friable Category I 6,365 Square Feet -- L L L.- L

Genenl Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assossmerit I?ecommended Response

Good No Response liequ~red, No Asbestos Detected L I L I General Material Cornments

Material Location(s) Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Matorial Comments (by Location)

IROOF ROOF 1,840

Sample ID(s) Sample Location(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

RB-6-1 ROOF ROOF Yes BLD 1) RT 2)

3)

Below limit of detection

2-RF Yes RLD 1) RT 2)

Below limit of detection

L 3) --- RT-6-3 ROOF-2 2-RF Yes BLB I) RT Below limit of detection

2)

3)

Material Description

"82)(12 RllAlJVE FLOOR TILE ADHESIVE

Matodal Category Friable Classification

Miscellaneous (Non-Friable

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

L Genenl Material Comments

Materi$3l Number Asbestos Present?

ad-2

EPA Category Total Quantity

INe Unit of Measure

Category 1 1 44,731 Square Feet

Recommended Response

No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected L-____ --

Material Location(~)

ISTAIRWELL

Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

3 1,980

ROOM 1 3 1,920

ROOM 2 3 480

ROOM 78 3 2,376

Section 4 Page 40 Licensed to: Environomics. Inc.. Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Section 4 Material Irlformation Tables

Site lnformalion

COUPCbSIT'E MED (Site ID: L.UKWE BASE) Survey Perfornled By

EZ~~vironomics, Inc.

Inspection Date

Monday, August 30, I999

ROOM 11 1 120

ROOM 22 2 340

HALL 3 2 944

ROOM 248 2 330

ROOM 37 1 240

ROOM 38 1 308

ROOM 55 1 1,040

ROOM 56 1 1,240

ROOM 66 1 84 0

ROOM 72 1 744

ROOM 80 1 108

Section 4 Page 41 Licensed to: Environomics. Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Sectiorr~ 4 IVlaterlall Ir~fsranatioieu Tables

Silo Inforrr~;rlio~~ Su~vey l'erfor~nod By

(CD"61UM F"3SB'T"E IVIED (Siit~? ID:: Il..UKEE BA,SE) Envir~or~osnim, Inc.

ROOM 83 1 108

Inspection Dale

IMonday, Augus1: 30,1999

ROOM 889 1 357

ROOM 96

ROOM 1110 1 144

Sarnple ID(s) Sa~nple Localion(s) Floor Analyzed Overall ResuM Layer@) Reporled by Lab Results by Layor

ROOMI 10 2 Y e s BLD 1) AD Below limit of detection 2 )

STAIRWELL 3 Yes

3)

BLD I) AD

2 ) 3)

Below limit of detection

AI3-2-3 RESTROOMS 'I Yes BL.D I ) AD 2) 3)

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 42 Licensed to: Environornics. Inc.. Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Section 4 !Material Informnation "Tables

Site Infor~nation

COMPCl81'11'1E Survey Perfornied By

Environc~rnics, Inc.

inspection Date

Monday, Iiugust 30, '15399 m m 1 1 m m ~ m ~ o ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ w 1 o 1 1 o 1 m ~ m u a m w m o ~ ~ m U a U a U a m m m n ~ ~ m ~ m ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ m m ~ ~ m ~ m m ~ ~ u u m u u u u m w m w w w w w w ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ m w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w w ~ ~ m m ~ ~ m m ~ m m m ~ ~ m

Male&/ llascription Meten'al Nufnhor Asbestos Present?

~INU3OV\nDCDC9R GI..KZING\@AUL.KING CQMPC388PUD wp-4 No 1 L ----

Material Category Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

Catego~y II Square Feet

Genoral Cor~dition Damage Category Overall Material Assessrnent Recommended Response bestos Detected

General Meleriai Comments

Material Localion(s)

EXTERIOR

Floor Location Quanlity Location Condition Material Co~nments (by Location)

1 60

Sample ID(s) Sample Location's) Floor Analyzed Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

W P-4-1 ROOM 106 1 Yes BB.D I) WP Below limit of detection

2) 3)

EXTERIOR 1 Yes IRLD . I) WlP Below limit of detection 2)

I 3)

ROOM 49 1 Yes BLU I) WP Below limit of detection 2)

3)

Material Description Material Number Asbestos Present?

'BZX1Z GRAY FL.OOK TILE ADHESIVE

p&!l -- I!?--

Material Calegory Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

General Condition

L General Material Cornmenls

Damage Category I

Square Feet

Overall Material Assessment Recommended Response

N o Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

/:loor Location Quantity Locatiori Condition Material Comments (by Location)

1 1,840

Sample ID(s) Sample Location(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Result Leyer(s) Reporfed by Lab Results by Layer

AD-'1 'I -'I L HALL 4 1 Yes €31-La 1) AD Below lirnit of detection 2) 3)

AD-1 1 -2 HjlrLl.. 4 1 Yes BL.D 1) AD Below limit of detection 2) 3)

AD-'I 1-3 I-lA1.L. 4 1 Yes BLD 1) AD Below limit of detection 2) 3)

Section 4 Page 43 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, N. 85016

Section 4 i\hate~ruaQ llr~formation Tables

Site Informatio~~

C:OIMPOSn'E MED (Site ID: R..UKE BASE] Inspection Dale

Maarclay, August 30, 11999 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r n m ~ , I ~ m m , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r n m m r n r n - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ m m ~

Material Description Malerial Number Asbestos Plssenf?

1 SINK UNDERCOATING sBr.4 2 IKes

Materiel Category Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

Miscellaneous Non-Friable Category I L-- L I 1 UNI'T

- _ L L - - -

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessmont Recommended Respo~iso I Manage in Place

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

ROQNl 33

Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

1 1

Salnple ID(s) Sample Location(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Result Lay+) Reported by Lab

I Yes 7 1) SK 2) 3)

ResuMs by Layer

7.0 % Chrysotile

Yes

ROOM 33 1 Yes

7.0 % Chrysotile

7.0 % Chrysotile

Material Description

BL-ACK SINK UNDEiRCOATING

Material Category Friable Classificabon

1Miscellaneous Non-Mable

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

/Good I L

General Material Comments

Material Number Asbestos Pres~~nt?

sk-15

EPA Category Total Ql~mt i ty llnil of Measure

Category I 13 -

UNIT

Recommended Response

No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Material Localion(s)

ROOM 37

Floor Location Quantity Location Condilion Material Comments (by Location)

1 1

Sample ID@) Sample Location(s)

ROOM 37

Floor Analyzed Overall Result Layer(* Reported by Lab Resulfs by Layer

1 Yes 5LD 1) SK Below limit of detection 2) 3)

SK-I 5-2 ROOM 37 1 Yes 51-D 1) SK Below limit of detection 2) 3)

SK-15-3 ROOM 37 1 Yes BLD 1) SK 2) 3)

Helow limit of cletection

Section 4 Page 44 Licensed lo: Environomics, Inc.. Phoenix. AZ, 85016

Se!cmtion 4, Material Inforamation Tables

Site lnforn?ation

BZAJMFQOSITE OWIEII ( . M a ? ID: L-sJKE BASlz) So~vey Performed 13y

E n v i r o r 1 ( 3 r n i ~ s , Bnc.

Inspection Date

Monday, A L J ~ u E ~ ~ : 311, 19E)Y

Molerial Description Material Number Asbesfov Present' 1 EXTERIOR STUCEEO

Material Category Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

Miscellaneous Non-Friable Square Feet L L General Condition Danlage Category Overall Material Assessment f?ecommer~ded Response

Good No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected L 1 ~ - . - - -. . .

GeneralMaterial Conrments

Material Location(s)

EICTERIQR

Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Material Commenls (by Location)

1 55,500

Sample ID(s) Sample Location(s) Fioor Anaiyred Overall Result Layer($ Reported by Lab Results by Layer

ES-'16-1 IEXTERIOR 1 Yes BL,D 1) ES Below limit of detection

L---- 2)

3)

ES-16-2

E)CTERIOR 1 Yes BL.U 1) ES ~ e l o w ~ i i of detection

2)

3)

ES-I 6-3 EXTERIOR E--- 1

Yes BLD I) ES Beiow limit of detection 2)

3)

ES-16-4 EXTERIOR 1 Yes BLD 1) ES Below limyt of detection 2) 3)

EXTERIOR

EXTERIOR

1 Yes BL.D r ) ES 2) 3)

1 Yes BLD I) ES 2) 3)

EXTERIOR 1 Yes BLD 1 ) E S 2)

3)

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

13elow limit of detection

Material Number Asbestos Present?

ad-17' Yes

Material Description

RESIDUA!.. BLACK ADHESIVE

Materlal Category Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

Miscellaneous Category I 680 ;Square Feet L-

Non-Friable

Recommended Response

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

(;ood _. L-- L

(;enoral Material Comments

Floor Location Qoantity Location Condition Malarial Comment:r (by i.ocafio~i)

1 220 Beneath Carpet

(ROOM 43 1 80

Section 4 Page 4 5 Licensed to: Environomics. Inc., Phoenix. AZ. 85016

Sec:tlon 4 Material Informbation 'Tables;

Site 1nlormal;on

COMPOSI'I"IE fiAlED (Site IE3n I..UKE BASE)

Sample ID(s) Sample Location(sJ

ROOM 30

Sunfey Performed By

Envimnomics, Inc.

lnspecfion Dale

AAnwday, August 30, '1999

Floor Analyzed Overall Result Layer@) Reporled by Lab Resulfs by Layer

1 Yes 15 1) AD 15.0 % Chysotile 2) 3)

1 Yes 1 5 I) AD 2)

3)

15.0 % Chysotile

ROOM 43 1 Yes 15.0 % Chrysotile

Material Description Material Number Asbestos Present?

112x12 WHITE FLOOR TILE ADHESIVE ad-28 (Yes I - .- - - -- I I . --

Material Category Friable Cla.ssilication EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure Miscellaneous Non-Friable Category I 1,224 p a r e Feet.

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

Good- L L General Material Comments

Recommended Response

Manage in Place

Material Locafion(s)

(ROOM 26

Floor Location Quantity Location Condilion Material Comments (by Location)

1 300

Sample ID@) Sample Locafion(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Result Layer@) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

ROOM 29 1 Yes

ROOM 46 1 Yes

5 1) AD 5.0 % Chrysotile 2) 3)

5 I) AD 5.0 % Chrysotile 2)

3)

' AD,-28-3 1100M 46 1 Yes 5 I) AD 5.0 % Chrysotile 2)

3)

Material Description Material Number Asbestos Present?

12x12 TAN FLOOR TII-E ADHESIVE a d 9 0 Yes L --

Material Category Friable Classiricalion EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

~iscellaneous Cjategory I 1976 Square Feel

Goners1 Condition Damage Category Overall Malarial Assessmef?t Recon~rnended Response

Good 1 Manage in Place

General Material Comments I

Material Location(s) Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 46 Licensed to: Environornics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Site lrrfofrnafion Sirrvey Perfor~rreri By

600881POSlTE 8b9EgEI (Site? [ID: L.IBKE t3ASE) Ealvironownics, Inc.

R80WA 66s 'I 144

Sample ID($ Sample Location(s) Floor Analyzed Ovemll Result Layer($ Reported by Lab Results by Layer

AD-30-1 ROOM GGB 1 Yes 5 1) AD 2 ) 3)

5.0 % Chrysotile

ROOM 25

HALL 5

Yes

Yes 5 1) AD

3)

5.0 % Chrysotile

5.0 % Chrysotile

Material Description Material Number Asbestos Presenl7 1 FIRE DOOR fd-31

- .- L -__- Yes--.

Material Calegofy Friable Ciassiflcafion EPA Categoiy Total Quantity Uflit of Measure

Miscellaneouy Each

General Cor~dition Damage Category

Good

General Material Comments

Overall Material Assessment Recommended Response

Manage in Place

Material Location(s) Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Sample ID($ Sample Location(s) Floor Analyzed Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

1 Yes 60 I) F D

2) F D

40.0 % Chrysotile

20.0 % Amosite

L ---p----.---------p----.---p-.--.--p

I'D-31-2 HALL 6 1 Yes 1EIL.D 1 ) I - D Below limit of detection 2)

I .- 3)

FD-3'1-3 HALL 4 1 Yes BLD 1) F D Below limit of detection

3)

Ma1er;al Description Material Number Asbestos Present?

ItlESIDUAI. biT3ldESIVE ad-33 Ma1 -- - L _ _ _ _ _ ---

Matorial Category Friable Clasoification fiPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

Miscellinn~oua Nor-I-Friable Category I 720 JSqua-rs Feet I--: L Genoral Condition Damago Category Overall Material Assessment Recornmended Response

Good 1 1 N o Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

General Material Comments

Material 1-ocation(s) kIAB.I, a Floor Location Quantity Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

1 720

Seclion 4 Page 47

Sectiorl4 Material Information Tables

Survey Performed By

Envi~cbni3rnics, Inc.

lnspecliorr Dale

Monday, in,ugusl:IO, ,1999

Samplo 1Dj.s) Samplo Localion(s) Floor- Analyzed OveraN Result Layer(s) Raporled 61y Lab Results by Layer

AD-33-1 L ROOM 46 'I Yes BLD 1 ) A D Below limit of detection 2) 3)

ROOM 46 .I Yes BkD I) AD be lo^^ limit of detection 2)

3) I _ . . - . ~.~ ~-~ ~ ~

1 AD-33-3 ROOM 46 'I Yes k31-R) 1) AD Below limit of detection

I 2) 3)

Material Description Material Number Asbestos Present?

WINDOWDOOR GLAZING\CAULKING COMPOUND L - .. ...- - - ... . - . .-

Material Category Friable Classification EPA Category Total Quantity Unit of Measure

Non-Friable Category II L- L

General Co~~ditlon Damage Category Ovorall MaterialAsst~s.smf?oI Recommended Response

Good L- No Response…