4 - PPQ _PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE FA486125R0003.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
SABER IDIQ
Solicitation number
FA486125R0003
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract solicitation number FA486125R0003 for Nellis Air Force Base, Creech Air Force Base, and Nevada Test and Training Range. The PPQ is designed to evaluate contractor performance across three key areas: quality, schedule, and management, using a rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory.

The associated federal contract opportunity reveals this is a competitive HUBZone procurement limited to qualified small businesses, with a maximum ceiling amount between $100M and $250M ($185M specified in one version). The five-year contract will support various engineering and construction projects including carpentry, road repair, roofing, electrical, HVAC, plumbing, demolition, and infrastructure alterations. Task orders are estimated between $15,000 and $4,000,000, with the solicitation anticipated to be issued electronically on SAM.gov around 15 August 2025 and proposals due by 12 November 2025. The contract requires in-house or readily accessible design capabilities for project execution.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
51_RFI Log_ SABER Seed RKMF 2400010 Reno Honor Guard 99 FSS B10250.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
45 - Attachment Contract Information Sheet.pdf PDF
44 - SABER SOO RKMF240010 Renovate Honor Guard 99 FSS B10250_14Feb2025.pdf PDF
36 - AF 3000 Material Approval Submittal - 01 Sep 2003.pdf PDF
33 - AF Form 3065 Progress Report Template - 01 Apr 1996.pdf PDF
30 - AF Form 103 Base Civil Engineering Work Clearance Request - 01 Aug 1994.pdf PDF
28 - Nuclear Gauge Form 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
22_RUS Bulletin 1728F-806 UG Main VEA Standard - 18 October 2018.pdf PDF
20_UT1-UT5 Modified Trenching Drawing - Aug 2016.pdf PDF
15 - Hazardous Material Management Guidance Document 2023-06-03.pdf PDF
14_ACC Sole Source EMCS Letter.pdf PDF
10_Nellis-Creech Utility Meter Req 2019-09-13.pdf PDF
2 - Price Schedule 23 September 25.pdf PDF
52 - 99 SFS - Mass Pass Request Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 50_RFI Log_General Solicitation and Non-SABER Seed Related Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
42 - General Decision Number NV20240001 Bldg NTTR.pdf PDF
40 - General Decision Number NV20240058 Highway Clark County.pdf PDF
31 - AF Form 3052 Cost Estimate Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
24_UG3.3 Three Phase Six Bushing Pad-mounted Transformer - Aug 2016.pdf PDF
18 - Nellis Supplement to DAFI 31-218 Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision - 23 Mar 2023.pdf PDF
17 - Installation Plan 12 - Hazardous Waste Management Plan 27 Sep 23.pdf PDF
16_USAF Integrated Cultural Resources Mgmt Plan 32-7065 ICRMP - 06 Nov 2019.pdf PDF
9_Nellis-Creech Mech-Plumb Req 2020-07-07.pdf PDF
8_Nellis-Creech Lighting Req 2019-01-22.pdf PDF
49 - As-Builts.pdf PDF
48 - Example SABER Design Intent Drawing Sets_28 Nov.pdf PDF
47 - Example SABER Design Intent Drawing Set Level 2_20 Nov.pdf PDF
41 - General Decision Number_NV20240038 Building Clark County.pdf PDF
39 - Form SS-PER-007-003 Internal Combustion Engine Worksheet.pdf PDF
37 - BUILDER Inventory Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
35 - AF 66 Schedule of Material Submittals.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
32 - AF 3064 Progress Schedule Template - 01 Apr 1996.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
27 - NTTR Visit Request - 27 Jan 2023.pdf PDF
25 - UH1.2 - Grounding Assembly for Pad-mounted Transformers and Enclosures 2 Rods - Aug 2016.pdf PDF
19_UF3.PC Concrete Pad for Three Phase Requirement - Aug 2016.pdf PDF
13 - Work Clearance Triggers.pdf PDF
6 - Nellis-Creech Comm Req NC 2710 - Jun 2023.pdf PDF
3 - Self Score Worksheet SABER_23 Sept 2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
34 - Schedule of Values Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1 - SABER SOW 25 Sep 25.pdf PDF
23_Power Trench Sand and Backfill Requirements - Apr 2013.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA486125R0003.pdf PDF
46 - Example SABER Design Intent Drawing Set Level 1_20 Nov.pdf PDF
43 - General Decision Number_NV20250024 Heavy Clark County.pdf PDF
38_NTTR Automated Information System _AIS_ Equipment Form.pdf PDF
29 - Nuclear Gauge Form 2.docx DOCX document
26 - Connection Charge Agreement - 22 Feb 23.pdf PDF
21_US3.PJ Single and Three Phase Primary Junctions - Aug 2016.pdf PDF
12 - Env Permit-ATP Guidance 2023.pdf PDF
11_Nellis-Creech Plant List.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104

NELLIS FA4861125R0003 SABER

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

The contractor, which is named below, requires this PPQ to be completed for a proposal for a Solicitation. This solicitation is in support of Nellis AFB, Creech AFB and Nevada Test and Training Range. The solicitation in question is FA4861125R0003 for a Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) IDIQ.

Submission of this form is mandatory for the evaluation of Contractor past performance if CPARS are not available. No other form of past performance evaluation will be considered for evaluation.

A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Return the completed questionnaire to the referenced contractor:_________________ at_____________________________.

Please refer any questions to: Corrine Lemon at (702-652-6196) or (corrine.lemon@us.af.mil)

A. GENERAL INFORMATION OF CONTRACTOR (completed by Offeror) Contractor Name:_______________________________________________________________

CAGE:_______________________ UEI:____________________________________________

Telephone Number:_______________ Point of Contact:_________________________________ B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION (completed by evaluating Contracting Officer) Name:_______________________________________________________________________ Title:________________________________________________________________________ Organization:__________________________________________________________________ Address:_____________________________________________________________________ Telephone_______________________________ Email:_______________________________

C. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number:______________________________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________________________________ Was this contract an Air Force SABER?___________________________________________ Was this contract a MACC or Design Build Contract?________________________________ Period of Performance:____________________ Dollar Amount of Contract:_______________

Description___________________________________________________________________

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

For the section below, please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by highlighting in the appropriate block code using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODEPERFORMANCE RATING
EXEXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the benefit of the customer. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VGVERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SAT SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

M MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNS UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Please use the above ratings to describe the contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. Quality

Assess the contractor’s performance in terms of quality. Consider how effectively they managed their quality control program and upheld construction standards. This includes their consistency in performing accessory testing, executing the three-phase inspection process, and maintaining thorough Contractor Quality Control (CQC) documentation. The contractor’s ability to promptly identify and correct deficient work reflects their commitment to excellence and accountability.
EX
VG
SAT
M
UNS

ATTACHMENT 4- PAST PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE FA486125R0003

2. Schedule

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance). This rating of the contractor’s adherence to the required delivery schedule should include the contractor’s efforts during the evaluation period that contribute to or affect the schedule variance. Also, consider the significance of scheduled events and assess the effectiveness of contractor corrective actions.
EX
VG
SAT
M
UNS

3. Management

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract/order, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts.
EX
VG
SAT
M
UNS

I certify that I am a Contracting Officer or contract professional responsible for the subject contractor evaluation. All information provided is true and valid to the best of my knowledge.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .