Atch_52_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 60 KB Posted

Attached to
Nellis AFB Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Solicitation
Solicitation number
FA4861-16-R-A100
Issued by

About this file

Atch 52_Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SYNOPSIS_OF_AWARD.docx DOCX document
Bldg16_CAD.zip ZIP file
AutoCADcombined.dwg DWG drawing
Atch_61__AF_Facility_Metering_Policy.pdf PDF
FA4861-16-R-A100-0006_Updated_Docs_Technical_QnA.pdf PDF
Atch_53_Statement_of_Work _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16_Revision_2.pdf PDF
Atch_62__Nellis_Creech_AFB_Facility_Metering_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_43_Schedule_of_Values_Template_UNLOCKED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_56_Asbestos_ _LBP_Reports _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16 _Mar_2016.pdf PDF
Atch_60_ETL_07-04_AF_Carpet_Standard.pdf PDF
16RA100_Tech_QA_(Part_3).pdf PDF
Atch_01_MACC_SOW_Revision_1.pdf PDF
Atch_54_Demolition_Plan _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16.pdf PDF
Atch_48_Teaming_List.doc DOC document
16RA100SignInRosters.pdf PDF
FA4861-16-R-A100-0005_General_QnA.pdf PDF
16RA100_General_Q As_(Part_2).pdf PDF
16RA100_Q A_(Part_1).pdf PDF
Atch_53_Statement_of_Work _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16_Revision1.pdf PDF
FA4861-16-R-A100-0004_Amend_Demo_SOW_QnA.pdf PDF
Atch_59_Concept_Floor_Plan _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16.pdf PDF
FA4861-16-R-A100-0003_Amendment.pdf PDF
FA4861-16-R-A100-0002_Amendment.pdf PDF
FA4861-16-R-A100-0001_Amendment.pdf PDF
Atch_41_AF_3064_Progress_Schedule.xfdl XFDL file
Atch_11_AFI_23-204_Material_Management.pdf PDF
Atch_01_MACC_SOW_20160505.pdf PDF
Atch_37_Nuclear_Gauge_Form_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_18_NAFB_Plan_32-7086_Hazardous_Materials_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Atch_32_UM17-2_XFMR-Profile_A-size.pdf PDF
Atch_54_Demolition_Plan _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16.pdf PDF
Atch_51_Sample_Client_Authorization_Letter.doc DOC document
FA486116RA100_Solicitaion.pdf PDF
Atch_43_Schedule_of_Values_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_42_Contract_Progress_Report_Template.xfdl XFDL file
Atch_40_AF_3052_Construction_Cost_Estimate_Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_56_Asbestos_ _LBP_Reports _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16.pdf PDF
Atch_13_AFI_32-1024_Standard_Facility_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_33_UM33-Profile_A-size.pdf PDF
Atch_05_Environmental_Permit_ATP_Guidance.pdf PDF
Atch_21_AFMAN_32-1084_Facility_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_23_(CREECH)_UR2_(S).pdf PDF
Atch_58_Bid_Schedule _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16.doc DOC document
Atch_48_Teaming_List.doc DOC document
Atch_25_3PH__CJE_CREECH_4in-Profile_A-size.pdf PDF
Atch_55_Facility_Photos _RKMF_16-0062_Rpr_Courtroom _Bldg_16.pdf PDF
Atch_24_1PH_CJE-Profile_A-size.pdf PDF
Atch_29_Trench_Sand.pdf PDF
Atch_10_ACCMAN32-7051_hollomanafbsup_1.pdf PDF
Atch_16_AFI_32-7042_Waste_Management.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 81 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA4861-16-R-A100

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104

NELLIS MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC)

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code under which contract was performed:

C. Contract number / Program Title:

D. Contract type (ex: FFP, Cost, T&M):

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes

No

F. Was it a design-build contract? Yes

G. Period of Performance:

H. Performs duties as: prime contractor _________ sub-contractor________

I. Initial (at time of award) contract value:

(Basic plus all options)

J. Current/final contract value:

(Basic plus exercised options)

K. Reasons for differences between initial contract value and final contract value:

L. Description of work provided:

M. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Evaluation or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract? Yes

N. To help determine program relevancy, please indicate below the work the contractor has or is performing under this contract by placing an “X” in the appropriate block:

A-E Design work

Civil (pavements, site utilities) and/or Structural work

Electrical and/or Communications work

Mechanical (plumbing, HVAC) work

Fire Protection work

Security (secure rooms for classified work) and/or Force Protection work

New Construction (including building additions)

Interior renovation

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name: ____________________________________________________ B. Customer or Agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator’s name:

B. Evaluator’s title:

C. Evaluator’s phone/fax number:

D. Evaluator’s email address: ___________________________________________ E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by marking the performance scale indicated in the appropriate block. The scale is defined as follows:

* Please provide comments for each response you indicated as “Did Not Meet” or “Exceeded” in response to the questions below.

A. Management:

Did Not Meet*
Met
Exceeded*

A1. Communicated with Government team and with on-site supervisors to ensure accurate/timely information flow.

A2. Required minimal Government direction regarding contract and technical requirements already available to them (i.e. they read/understand the contract in its entirety).

Remarks:

B. Schedule

Did Not Meet*
Met
Exceeded*

B1. Adhered to contract performance schedule, to include timely submission of submittals, close-outs, etc.

B2. Contractor was responsive to warranty calls and quickly fixed legitimate problems.

C. Cost Control

Did Not Meet*
Met
Exceeded*

E4. Met and performed within originally awarded contract costs.

E5. Alerted Government of potential unforseen costs/changes before they occur, and submitted cost proposals timely.

D. Quality

Did Not Meet*
Met
Exceeded*

F1. Complied with quality control plan and followed contract quality assurance requirements.

F2. Complied with technical requirements and contract specifications.

F3. Ensured poor performance by subcontractors or in-house personnel is not repeated.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

ATTACHMENT 52

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .