Questions and Answers 30 July 2020.pdf

PDF 93 KB Posted

Attached to
Modernize Electrical and HVAC Redundancy
Solicitation number
FA4855-20-R-0012
Issued by

About this file

This document contains questions and answers regarding a solicitation for the modernization of electrical and HVAC redundancy at Building 848. The solicitation calls for establishing a redundant electrical power system, replacing two 200-ton primary chillers with air-cooled chillers, and installing dedicated HVAC for ground control station bays. The estimated period of performance is 570 calendar days for a project magnitude between $5 million and $10 million. This total small business set-aside is being conducted by the Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command utilizing lowest price technically acceptable procedures. Key clarifications provided include allowing two representatives each from the prime contractor and subcontractor to participate in the site walk, prohibiting cameras or recordings during the site walk, confirming a single relevant project may be acceptable pending an aggregate assessment of past performance, and clarifying requirements regarding contract values, roles, and completion dates for past performance references.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
(Updated) Questions and Answers 24 August 2020.pdf PDF
Final Questions and Answers 18 August 2020.pdf PDF
Site Visit Photo 004.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 007.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 0011.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 001.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 002.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 003.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 005.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 0010.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 008.JPG JPG image
List of Site Visit Attendees.pdf PDF
Site Visit Photo 006.JPG JPG image
Site Visit Photo 009.JPG JPG image
Attachment 11- 100 percent Specifications 31 July 2020.pdf PDF
Summary of Changes Memorandum.pdf PDF
Attachment 12- 100 percent Drawings 31 July 2020.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment 0001 (FA4855-20-R-0012-0001).pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 7 August 2020.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 4 August 2020.pdf PDF
Appendix C3. AF Form 3065 Progress Reports (SOW Appendix).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3- 95 percent Drawings 17 June 2020.pdf PDF
Appendix C1. DD Form 1354 (SOW Appendix).pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Past Performance Information Sheet 17 July 2020.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7- WBS 8 July 2020.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire 17 July 2020.docx DOCX document
Solicitation FA4855-20-R-0012.pdf PDF
Appendix D2. Architectural Compatibility Guide (SOW Appendix).pdf PDF
Appendix D1. Contractor Base Briefing Pamphlet (SOW Appendix).pdf PDF
Appendix D4. COMM Labeling Standards (SOW Appendix).pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment 10 - Consent Form 17 July 2020.pdf PDF
Appendix D3. Fire Protection Fire Prevention (SOW Appendix).pdf PDF
Attachment 1- Statement of Work 17 July 20.pdf PDF
Attachment 2- 95 percent Specifications 17 June 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 8- RESERVED 17 July 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Past Performance Cover Letter 08 July 2020.pdf PDF
Appendix D6. As-built Submittal Guidelines (SOW Appendix).pdf PDF
Attachment 4-Wage Determination 24 January 2020.pdf PDF
Appendix C2. AF Form 3064 Progress Schedule (SOW Appendix).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix D5. AEC CAD Standards (SOW Appendix).pdf PDF
Show all 40

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Question Answer

1. Per the solicitation, only 2 representatives per company can participate in the site walk. Can 2 personnel from one company come, along with 2 from a potential subcontractor? Or is the Government only permitting 2 persons per team?

1. The Government is permitting 2 per company, not per team; thus 2 persons from a potential subcontarctor can participate as long as the Government is notified and confirmed by contracting.

2. Are cameras permitted on the site walk? 2. No, no recording media, phones, or cameras are permitted on the site walk.

3. If my company only has 1 relevant project (in accordance with the definition set forth in the soliciation) may we still participate in the RFP? Can the Government provide advice.

3. The solicitation instructions state “Submit no more than three (3) in total relevant projects for the prime and no more than one (1) per critical subcontractor”.

In addition the solicitation also states: “NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered "acceptable."” The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Information in the aggregate in addition to an individual basis.

Therefore, three projects would be the absolute maximum number of references to submit with your proposal. It is the Governments prerogative to make an assessment of whether or not your individually referenced contracts are sufficiently relevant, in the aggregate, to receive a rating of “acceptable” for the past performance factor as a whole. In other words, a single contract reference, not found to be relevant, may not necessarily result in a rating of unacceptable for the past performance factor as a whole.

The Government cannot advise your company as to whether you should submit a proposal in response to the solicitation, that is a business decision your company will have to make.

4. Please confirm that past performance projects MUST be completed prior to submission of this proposal.

4. Projects do not need to be completed prior to submission.

Section M, Volume III Past Performance Factor, section C1. General dictates, “For purposes of this evaluation, recency is defined as active or completed efforts performed within the past five (5) years from the issuance date of this solicitation.”

5. Please confirm that past performance projects MUST be between $5 and $10 million dollars. 5. No.

Section M, Part C Volume III, Past Performance Factor, Number 3, Relevancy Definitions states that if a submitted contract meets essentially the same technical complexities, but involves only some of the programmatic/logistical scope and magnitude of effort, a lesser relevancy rating may be assigned.

6. Are past performance projects acceptable if the contractor was not the prime contractor? 6. The Offeror who is intending to compete for the requirement as the prime contractor cannot submit past performance on work they performed as a subcontractor. Offerors may submit past performance for a proposed critical subcontractor in which the past performance performed was in the role of a subcontractor.

Per Section L, Part D Volume III, Past Performance, section 3 Past Performance Submissions, subsection iii and iv: Projects performed by contractors other than the Offeror (such as teaming partners) will not be evaluated as construction experience by a prime contractor unless those other contractors are part of a joint venture for this solicitation as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement. For projects in which your firm or a joint venture partner firm performed the role of a subcontractor, this will not count as experience as a prime contractor.

Per Section L, Part D Volume III, Past Performance, section 3 Past Performance Submissions: Offerors may submit no more than 3 total relevant projects for the prime and no more than 1 per critical subcontractor.

Questions and Answers Solicitation FA4855-20-R-0012 Modernize Electrical and HVAC Redundancy Bldg 848

Sheet1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .