Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire 17 July 2020.docx

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 6: Past Performance Questionnaire The 27th Special Operations Contracting Squadron, Cannon Air Force Base, NM is in the process of competitively selecting a source to support a contract titled “Modernize Electrical and HVAC Redundancy.”

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than no later than 26 August 2020. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to Kathryn Ryan, at kathryn.ryan.1@us.af.mil, and SSgt Alexandra Counts, at Alexandra.Counts@us.af.mil or by mail to the 27th Special Operations Contracting Squadron, 110 E Alison Ave Bldg 600, Cannon Air Force Base, NM 88103 (Attention: Kathryn Ryan). Please contact SSgt Alexandra Counts at alexandra.counts@us.af.mil prior if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

\\Signed\\ Lee Mutschler, GS14, DAF Contracting Officer

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

1. Provided experienced managers/supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. Specifically, the Project Manager, the Superintendent, the Quality Control Manager, and the Site Safety and Health Officer.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. Specifically, the Project Manager, the Superintendent, the Quality Control Manager, and the Site Safety and Health Officer.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. Specifically, managers and supervisors on site were able to make decisions in the field on behalf of the company in order to keep progress on construction.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems, and was responsive to the Government. Specifically, the home office got involved when on-site staff was unable to satisfactorily resolve the problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. Deficiencies were identified by the Quality Control Manager prior to Government Quality Assurance findings.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred to the Contracting Officer. Used the RFI process to document discussions and decisions on identified problems.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules. When schedules had to be changed, was able to clearly explain and defend project schedule changes. Changes did not negatively affect overall mission operations.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. Construction efforts caused no or minimal disruption to daily mission operations in or around the construction area.

22. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

23. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

24. Would you award another contract to this contractor?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If no, explain.

EXPLANATION:

25. Would you award a highly complex project which required multiple levels of phasing in order to keep a facility operational during construction to this contractor?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If no, explain.

EXPLANATION

IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

27th Special Operations Contracting Squadron, 110 E Alison Ave Bldg 600, Cannon Air Force Base, NM 88103 (Attention: Kathryn Ryan).

E-Mail to: Kathryn Ryan, at kathryn.ryan.1@us.af.mil, and SSgt Alexandra Counts, at Alexandra.Counts@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 8