RFP Atch 7 - PPQ.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4830-23-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a federal contract opportunity for Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) services at Moody Air Force Base in Georgia. The PPQ is to be completed by references for offerors on the competitive acquisition and submitted no later than July 21, 2023 to evaluate past performance on factors such as project management, technical performance, safety, customer satisfaction, change control, quality control, and overall performance. The SABER contract will be for a broad range of design-build, maintenance, alteration, repair, renovation, and minor construction projects throughout the Moody AFB community.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER), newest first.
File Type Posted
2. Summary of Changes_Atch 1_Amend02.pdf PDF
1. SF30_Amend02_FA483023R0001.pdf PDF
Consolidated Q-A3.pdf PDF
Atch 3_SABER Pre-Prop Conf Slides.pdf PDF
SABER Pre-Proposal Conference Minutes.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 3a - B326 Floor Plan 1.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 4 - Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Atch 1_Pre-Prop_Site Visit Attend Sheet.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 9 - Q - A Form.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 10 - Client Authorization Ltr.docx DOCX document
Atch 2_Consolidated Q-A1 (Site Visit).pdf PDF
RFP Atch 3 - Seed Project SOW QSEU 20-0171.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 5 - Base Pass Template.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 6 - AF Form 66.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Atch 11 - Subcontractor Consent Ltr.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 12 - SABER Ordering Guide.pdf PDF
RFP FA483023R0001.doc.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 1 - SABER Specifications.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 2 - MAFB A-E Design Guide.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 3b - B326 Floor Plan 2.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 8 - PPPI.docx DOCX document
Amendment Atch 2_Consolidated Q-A2.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 1_(Rev1) SABER Specifications.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 12_(Rev1) SABER Ordering Guide.pdf PDF
SF30_FA483023R00010001.pdf PDF
Amendment Atch 1_Summary of Changes.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 3_(Rev1) Seed Project SOW QSEU 20-0171.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 3c_Bldg 326 Furniture Inventory.pdf PDF
Site Visit Pre-Registration Form.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 1 - SABER Specifications.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal_Site Visit Invite.pdf PDF
RFP FA483023R0001.doc.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 5 - Base Pass Template.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 9 - Q - A Form.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 11 - Subcontractor Consent Ltr.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 3 - Seed Project SOW QSEU 20-0171.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 4 - Wage Determination.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 6 - AF Form 66.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Atch 8 - PPPI.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 12 - SABER Ordering Guide.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 2 - MAFB A-E Design Guide.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 3a - B326 Floor Plan 1.pdf PDF
RFP Atch 7 - PPQ.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 10 - Client Authorization Ltr.docx DOCX document
RFP Atch 3b - B326 Floor Plan 2.pdf PDF
Show all 45

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

***Please DO NOT send the completed PPQ back to the contractor. Please e-mail directly to the following individuals no later than 21 July 2023, 4:00 PM (EST).

2Lt Hannah Hidalgo
AND
Mr. Steve Davis

hannah_camille.hidalgo.1@us.af.mil steven.davis.58@us.af.mil

23 CONS/PKA1

23 CONS/PKA1

4380 Alabama Road

4380 Alabama Road

Moody AFB GA 31699

Moody AFB GA 31699

Tel: (229) 257-2959

Tel: (229) 257-4708

DSN: 460-2959

DSN: 460-4708

1. This Acquisition is for the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) program consisting of a broad range of design-build, maintenance, alteration, repair, renovation, and minor construction projects affecting real property throughout the Moody Air Force Base (AFB), Georgia community.

2. As part of the source selection process, this questionnaire is provided to assist the 23rd Contracting Squadron (23 CONS) in the performance evaluation of offerors pertaining to the competitive acquisition for the SABER that will result in the award of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and as complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up queries by the evaluators. Please complete the attached questionnaire using the following guidance:

E
VG
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

FA4830-23-R-0001

Attachment 7 Source

Selection

Information

See

FAR

2.101 and

3.104

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

For Official Use Only Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT AND PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor:

b. Contractor’s CAGE Code:

c. Contract / Task Order (TO) Number:

d. Contract Type (e.g. FFP, Cost, T&M):

e. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No

f. Period of Performance:

g. Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor

h. Initial (at the time of award) Contract Value (if it was a Task Order, indicate the TO value: $

i. Current or Final Contract/TO Value (include all modifications): $

j. Project Title and Brief Description of Work:

k. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARS) or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract or task order? Yes No

SECTION 2: RATER INFORMATION:

Primary
Alternate
Name of Rater:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Title:
Agency:
Agency:
Office Symbol:
Office Symbol:
Telephone Number:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Email Address:

Note: Once the PPQ is complete, it is considered to be Source Selection Information.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

For Official Use Only Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

SECTION 3: PROGRAM RELEVANCY

A. To help determine program relevancy, please indicate below the work the contractor has or is performing under this contract by marking the applicable box with X or √ or N/A.

A-E Design work

Civil (pavements, site utilities) work

Structural work (including roofing)

Electrical and/or Communications work

Mechanical (plumbing, HVAC) work

Fire Protection work

Security (secure rooms for classified work) and/or Force Protection work

New Construction (including building additions)

Interior renovation (including flooring)

Interior/Exterior painting

B. Was this an Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) type contract with multiple task orders? YesNo
C. Was it a design-build contract/task order?YesNo

D. Geographic description of work under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, or other commands:

SECTION 4: PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Please mark the appropriate column with “X” or “√” using the definitions matrix set forth in the instructions, and provide a narrative explanation for ratings of E, VG, M or U.

A.
Project Management:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
A1.
Provides a good project management structure, to include a single point of contact with responsibility for all contract requirements.
A2.
Communicates effectively with Government team and with on-site supervisors to ensure accurate/timely information flow.
A3.
Requires minimal Government direction regarding contract and technical requirements already available to them (i.e., they read/understand the contract in its entirety).
A4.
Hires, trains, and applies a qualified workforce to this effort.
B.
Technical Performance:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
B1.
Complies with technical requirements and contract objectives.
B2.
Adheres to contract performance schedule.
B3.
Provides complete and timely submission of design submittals and all supporting documents.
B4.
Provides complete and timely submission of construction submittals and other required documents.
B5.
Provided post-construction documents (manuals, warranties, as-built drawings, etc.) in a timely manner.
B6.
Contractor was responsive to warranty calls and quickly fixed legitimate problems.
C.
Safety/Labor Compliance:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
C1.
Provides a Safety Program compliant with OSHA and contract requirements.
C2.
Demonstrates safety awareness and performance.
C3.
Complies with labor laws/standards.
D.
Customer Satisfaction:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
D1.
Overall commitment to customer satisfaction.
D2.
Contractor is reasonable and cooperative in dealing with customer.
D3.
Responds to customer questions concerning technical/service/administrative issues.
D4.
Demonstrates professionalism and courtesy in dealing with customers.
E.
Change and Cost Control Management:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
E1.
Contractor did not try to “nickel and dime” the customer with numerous change order requests.
E2.
Flexibility and efforts made to accommodate the customer within the terms of the contract.
E3.
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution.
E4.
Meets and performs within originally awarded contract costs.
E5.
Alerts Government of potential unforeseen costs/changes before they occur.
E6.
Submits reasonable supportable costs for change requests.
E7.
Submits timely, accurate, and complete invoices.
F.
Quality Control Program:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
F1.
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.
F2.
Adequacy of design quality control process.
F3.
Adequacy of construction quality control process.
F4.
Performs quality work with minimal rework needed.
F5.
Monitors and controls performance of subcontractors.
F6.
Ensures poor performance by subcontractors or in-house personnel is not repeated.
G.
Overall Contract:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
G1.
How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance for this contract?
G2.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES
NO
G3.
For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES
NO
G4.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES
NO

Remarks:

PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER (see POCs on Page 1)

**DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR**

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .