Attach_3.pdf

MEMORANDUM FOR

The 4th Contracting Squadron at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base of the Air Force Air Combat Command is in the process of selecting a contractor for a requirement for Simplified Acquisition of Base Civil Engineering Requirements program (SABER IX).

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response to the past performance questionnaires to be forwarded as soon as possible, but no later than the date the proposals are due. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and "faxed" to (919) 722-5424, attention SrA Devin Powner. Please call SrA Powner at (919) 722-1766 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become part of the official Source Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection

KYLE G. DONAH

Contracting Officer

Attachment 3, Pg 1 of 7

Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire, FA4809-14-R-0001

FA4809-14-R-0001, SABER IX

Attachment 3, Page 1 of 7

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE ON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

1. The contractor named in paragraph 3 is being considered for award of the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) IX, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract at Seymour Johnson AFB, NC, with a maximum capacity of $49,000,000.00 for a base and four option year periods. The contractor will be required to provide contract performance consisting of multi-discipline construction projects of varying complexity at Seymour Johnson AFB, Dare County Bomb Range, and Ft Fisher, NC.

2. A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s performance on recent and relevant projects consisting of multi-discipline construction projects of varying complexity. Recent projects is defined as being performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. This includes contracts that were awarded prior to this period, but still had performance during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Relevant past performance is contract performance consisting of multi-discipline (civil, architectural, structural, fire protection, mechanical, and electrical) design and construction projects of varying complexity ($250,000 and above utilizing at least 3 of the disciplines above ranging from new facility construction to site/utility work to facility renovation) within the recency timeframe shown above.

Please make every effort to be thorough and expound upon your answers/comments.

3. GENERAL INFORMATION (The contractor being evaluated)

Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________________________

Address: __________________________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: ____________________ Point of Contact: _____________________________________

4. RESPONDENT INFORMATION (The organization who is preparing this questionnaire)

Name: _________________________________ Title: __________________________________________

Organization & Address: ____________________________________________________________________

Telephone: _______________ Fax: ___________________ Email: _________________________________

5. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON:

Contract Number/Title: ______________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________________

Dollar Amount of Contract: __________________________________________________________________

The contractor was ( ) was not ( ) the prime.

Scope of work performed: ___________________________________________________________________

Attachment 3, Page 2 of 7

6. RELEVANCY: In your opinion, is the scope of work described in paragraph 1 similar in nature, complexity and magnitude to the work that the contractor performed for you? ___________________________________

7. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: When responding to the following questions, choose the letter on the below scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. If the question is not applicable, circle the letter "N". Comments are encouraged for all questions; however, if you respond with either an “E” or “U”, please explain in the lines below the question.

(E) Exceptional The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceed many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

(N) Neutral Not applicable - No performance record identifiable; unable to provide a score.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Quality Control

a. Describe the quality of workmanship, adequacy of the contractor’s quality E V S N M U control (CQC), quality of CQC documentation, and implementation of the CQC plan.

b. Were required materials properly submitted, delivered, and stored? E V S N M U

c. Were as-builts drawings accurate and submitted when required? E V S N M U

Attachment 3, Page 3 of 7

d. Was identification/correction of deficient work accomplished in a timely E V S N M U manner? Were suggested solutions adequate and did the contractor display initiative to implement solutions?

e. Did the contractor provide effective quality control that resulted in a E V S N M U quality finished product?

Timely Performance

a. Was the required performance period of the contract met? E V S N M U

b. Were submittals proper and were they provided in a timely manner? Did the E V S N M U submittals match the contract requirements?

c. Were realistic progress schedules developed? Were established progress E V S N M U schedule dates met?

d. Were updated and revised progress schedules submitted to resolve delays? E V S N M U

e. Did the contractor correct punch list items in a timely manner? E V S N M U

Management Effectiveness

a. Did the contractor provide experienced managers and supervisors that E V S N M U possessed the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements?

b. Were experienced subcontractors hired? Were subcontractors/suppliers paid E V S N M U in a timely manner?

Attachment 3, Page 4 of 7

c. Did the contractor have sufficient personnel available at all times with E V S N M U authority to make decisions or take action during project performance?

d. Was accurate, complete and reasonable supporting price/cost information E V S N M U provided for modifications (not over inflated or under estimated)?

e. Was all contract work completed prior to requesting final inspection? E V S N M U

f. Were timely and satisfactory responses to warranty issues provided after E V S N M U project completion?

g. Did the contractor ensure compliance with all contract requirements? E V S N M U

h. Did the contractor pay subcontractors and suppliers timely? E V S N M U

i. Did contractor cooperate to resolve problems by attending meetings E V S N M U (as applicable) and were communications maintained to assure satisfactory resolution?

Pricing

a. Were design/drawings prepared by the contractor in adequate/sufficient detail E V S N M U to estimate and construct the project requirement?

b. Did the contractor design and estimate the project(s) within the stated dollar E V S N M U magnitude?

Attachment 3, Page 5 of 7

c. Were modifications required due to contractor design errors? E V S N M U

d. Were the design(s) and estimates prepared and submitted within the E V S N M U timeframes identified in the contract?

e. Were the contractor’s initial estimates for quantities fair and reasonable? E V S N M U

f. How was the contractor’s overall pricing performance? E V S N M U

Management/Superintendent

a. Did the Site Manager/Superintendent ensure compliance with contract E V S N M U requirements and safety regulations? Did they act promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality?

b. Did the Site Manager/Superintendent have sufficient authority to make E V S N M U decisions or take action during project performance? Were they consistently present on site while work was being performed?

c. How was the overall Management/Effectiveness of the performance? E V S N M U

Compliance with Labor Standards

a. Did the contractor submit complete and correct payrolls in a timely manner? E V S N M U

b. Did the contractor comply with all applicable labor laws and regulations? E V S N M U

Attachment 3, Page 6 of 7

Compliance with Safety Standards

a. Was the contractor’s safety plan adequate, implemented properly and enforced E V S N M U by the contractor throughout performance of work?

b. Were there any safety violations or accidents/injuries? Is so, please describe. E V S N M U

Overall Performance Evaluation of the Contractor E V S N M U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

Other Considerations:

I would definitely ( ), would possibly ( ), would not ( ) enter into another contract with this contractor.

Printed Name and Signature of Completing Individual Telephone Number

Date__________________

Please return completed questionnaire via facsimile to: 919-722-5424, or email to devin.powner@us.af.mil

Attachment 3, Page 7 of 7