_6 _Past_Performance_Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 62 KB Posted

Attached to
Dyess AFB MACC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4661-15-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

From the source

Draft Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Dyess AFB MACC, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Attachment__8 _Fan_Coil_Unit_Spec_for_Sample.pdf PDF
FA4661-15-R-0002-0002.pdf PDF
1-Prototypical_3_Story_Dorm_(Bldgs_7232_ _7233)_-_Initial_Construction_-_1954.pdf PDF
3-Bldg_7233_-_Available_As-Built_Drawings_after_Initial_Construction.pdf PDF
4-Bldg_7223_-_Available_As-Built_Drawings.pdf PDF
2-Bldg_7232_-_Available_As-Built_Drawings_after_Initial_Construction.pdf PDF
Response_to_Questions_29_June_15.pdf PDF
_7 _Sample_Project_Bid_Schedule.docx DOCX document
Slides.pdf PDF
Q A_Post_18_June_15.pdf PDF
FA466116R0002_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
SignIn_Sheet.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf PDF
_4 _Past_Performance_Questionaire.pdf PDF
_3 _Sample_Project_Drawings.pdf PDF
Dyess_AFB_MACC_FY15_Solicitation.pdf PDF
_5 _Site_Visit_Registration.doc DOC document
_6 _Question_Submission.doc DOC document
_2 _Sample_Project_Specifications.pdf PDF
_1 _General_MACC_Specifications.pdf PDF
_6 _Question_Submission.doc DOC document
_2 _Sample_Project_Specifications.pdf PDF
_4 _Past_Performance_Questionaire.pdf PDF
_1 _General_MACC_Specifications.pdf PDF
_3 _Sample_Project_Drawings.pdf PDF
_5 _Site_Visit_Registration.doc DOC document
Dyess_AFB_MACC_FY15_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Clarification_on_Draft_Documents_6_May_15.pdf PDF
MACC_FY15_Draft_RFP.doc DOC document
_7 _Site_Visit_Registration.doc DOC document
_2 _Seed_Project_1.pdf PDF
_5 _Seed_Project_4.pdf PDF
_8 _Question_Submission.doc DOC document
_1 _General_MACC_Specifications.pdf PDF
_4 _Seed_Project_3.pdf PDF
_3 _Seed_Project_2.pdf PDF
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

7TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (ACC)

381 THIRD STREET

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 79607-1581

Attachment 6: MACC Solicitation FA4661-15-R-0002 30 Apr 2015

MEMORANDUM FOR PROSPECTIVE EVALUATORS

FROM: 7 CONS/LGCA

381 Third Street Dyess AFB TX 79607-1581

SUBJECT: Solicitation FA4661-15-R-0002, MACC, Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The 7th Contracting Squadron is conducting a proposal evaluation for subject solicitation at Dyess AFB, TX. Under the solicitation, the Air Force will perform a Tradeoff evaluation. The contractor listed in Section A of the attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate the contractor’s past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office.

2. The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of performance rendered should complete the survey. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge with the judgment of others in their organization.

3. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible and providing comments wherever applicable. For any rating of N, we request you provide an explanatory narrative and attach to your response. The narratives need not be lengthy, but should be detailed and descriptive. Use separate evaluation forms for each contract/order being evaluated.

4. Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated. The requested information is critical to our evaluation. Please complete and return the completed package as quickly as possible but not later than 2:00 PM CST 1 June 2015. You may email a scanned copy to megan.vanhorn.1@us.af.mil or mail it to the following address:

7th Contracting Squadron
Attn: 2Lt Megan VanHorn
381 Third Street
Dyess AFB TX 79607

5. If you have any questions, please call 2Lt Megan VanHorn at (325) 696-2288. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

RONALD G. MILLER

Director of Business Operations Contracting Officer

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing. NOTE: Contractor shall also include a verbatim copy of each SECTION A (completed and mailed to the proposed respondents) and corresponding respondents’ name/address in VOLUME II (Past Performance), Refer paragraph L-4) A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Point of Contact:

C. Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address:

D. Contract number:

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project:

F. Contractor’s Role (Prime, sub, designer, etc.) _______________________________________________________________________

G. Contracting or Procurement Official (Name & Contact information): ____________________________________________________

H. Project Designer of Record (Name & Contact information): ____________________________________________________________

I. Contract Type: |_| Firm-Fixed-Price |_| Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Task Order |_| Cost-Reimbursement

J. Project Award Date: Scheduled Completion Date:

Current/Final Completion Date:

K. Project Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount:

L. Comments (if desired): _________________________________________________________________________________________

M. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire.

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent.)

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

Address:
(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.

Performance Evaluation Instructions

· When responding to the descriptive statements, select the letter, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. If the contractor has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question, select “Neutral.”

· A – High Confidence

Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the successful offeror will successfully perform its required effort.

· B – Significant Confidence

Base on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

· C – Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

· D – Unknown Confidence

No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.306(a)(2)(iii) & (iv))

· E – Little Confidence

Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary on order to achieve contract performance.

· F – No Confidence

Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

A
B
C
D
E
F
High Confidence
Significant Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Unknown Confidence
Little Confidence
No Confidence

EVALUATION AREAS

I.
QUALITY CONTROL:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1.
Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedule(s).
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
5.
Contractor designs were all concise, accurate and captured all details of the site visit.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
6.
Contractor thoroughly reviewed design package proposals for accuracy, completeness and compliance with contract requirements
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
II.
TIMELY PERFORMANCE:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1.
Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time, as scheduled.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if Liquidated Damages were assessed)
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
5.
Contractor provided on-time submittals as required.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
6.
Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractors’ employees as required and scheduled.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
7.
Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
III.
MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1.
Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
5.
Contractor ensured the site manager was consistently present on site when work was performed.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
6.
Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
7.
Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
8.
The contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
IV.
PRICING:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1.
The contractor submits proposals that accurately represent the work required.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
The contractor’s supporting price/cost information for modifications is accurate, complete and reasonable (not over inflated or under estimated).
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
How would you rate the contractor’s overall Pricing performance.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
V.
MANAGEMENT/SUPERINTENDENCE:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1.
Site Manager ensured compliance to contact requirements and safety regulations.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Site Manager acted promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Site Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
Site Manager consistently present on site when work was performed.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
VI.
COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1.
Submitted payrolls in a timely manner.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Payrolls were complete and correct.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to the Davis-Bacon Act.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
VII.
COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1.
Adequacy of Safety Plan.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Implementation of Safety Plan.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
VIII.
GENERAL PERFORMANCE:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON SUCCESSFULY MANAGING MULTIPLE PROJECTS/TASK ORDERS IN THE FOLLOWING MAGNITUDES: ($500K - $750K) AND ($750K AND ABOVE)AT ANY GIVEN TIME AND IF SO, PLEASE LIST THE NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND BRIEFLY DESCRIBE.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
$500K - $750K
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
$750K and Above
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE ON PROJECTS/TASK ORDERS. (EXAMPLE: WERE ANY NOT ACCEPTED DUE TO THE QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP?)

(If yes, please briefly explain circumstances in comments section below)

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY COMPLIED WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON FOD (FOREIGN OBJECT DAMAGE) AND THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSE TO FOD ISSUES.

(If yes, please briefly explain circumstances in comments section below)

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY ADHERE TO BASE STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES. (EXAMPLE: SITE CLEANED UP)

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY CONDUCT AND DOCUMENT DAILY SELF-INSPECTIONS.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THE COMPLY WITH SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. (EXAMPLE: DOES THE CONTRACTOR INSTALL/USE THE MATERIALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL OR DO THEY SUBSTITUTE "OTHER MATERIALS" NOT APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENT WITHOUT NOTICE?)

Comments:

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON "MAJOR DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS" AND HOW THEY ROUTINELY IMPLEMENT/NEGOTIATE CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON THE VOLUME OF CHANGE ORDERS AND IF THEY ARE ROUTINELY REQUESTED/INITIATED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY WORK WITH BASE DRAFTING TO PROVIDE FINAL AS-BUILT DRAWINGS IN BASE STANDARD ELECTRONIC FORMAT IN ADDITION TO HARDCOPIES.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTORS DESIGN CAPABILITIES.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW QUICKLY THEY RESPOND TO WARRANTY REPAIR CLAIMS.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY ROUTINELY FIND MORE COST/EFFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION METHODS (EXAMPLE: LADDERS INSTEAD OF SCAFFOLDING, FRONT END LOADER INSTEAD OF BULLDOZER, ETC.) DURING NEGOTIATIONS.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

WHEN THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS SALVAGE OF MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED, PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW THEY TAKE CARE TO REMOVE THEM IN AN UNDAMAGED CONDITION AND PROMPTLY DELIVER THEM TO THE GOVERNMENT.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY ADEQUATELY REVIEW THE GOVERNMENT STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES (SOO) AND NOTE ANY DEFICIENCIES AND/OR CONCEPT DESIGN ERRORS. ADDITIONALLY, IF THE CONTRACTOR NOTES ANY DEFICIENCIES AND/OR CONCEPT DESIGN ERRORS, HOW WELL DO THEY COORDINATE AND WORK WITH GOVERNMENT TO IDENTIFY SOLUTIONS PRIOR TO THEIR SUBMISSION OF INITIAL STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) PROPOSAL PACKAGES?

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR'S SOW PACKAGES ON HOW THEY ROUTINELY INCLUDE COSTS, DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN DESIGN PROPOSAL OF SUFFICIENT DETAIL FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO EASILY PERFORM A TECHINICAL EVALUATION AND VERIFY:

- PROJECT REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE MET

- ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS WERE

INCORPORPATED (ASBESTOS ABATEMENT, STORM WATER PERMITS, ETC.)

- "QUANTITIES" OF LINE ITEM COSTS WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPOSED

CONSTRUCTION

- IDENTIFIED ANY DEVIATIONS FROM GOVERNMENT SOO AND REASON

- DRAWINGS (INITIAL) ARE ADEQUATE TO SUPPORT GOVERNMENT INSPECTOR'S

EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IN REGARDS TO COMPLIANCE WITH EPA RULES AND REGULATIONS.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED) PROJECTS COMPLETED AT YOUR FACILITIES.

Please rate the contractor in this area.
A
B
C
D
E
F
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

Global Power For America

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .