Attachment_20_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Simplified Acquisition Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA441719RA002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for respondents to evaluate a contractor's performance on Solicitation Number FA441719RA002, the Simplified Acquisition Base Engineer Requirements Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract awarded by the Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command. The past performance questionnaire requests information from respondents on quality, schedule, management, utilization of small businesses, regulatory compliance, liquidated damages, and an overall performance rating for a contractor. Respondents are asked to provide narrative explanations for any unsatisfactory or marginal ratings. Completed questionnaires must be returned by the closing date and time of the solicitation to the identified contracting officer and contract specialist.

Attachment 20

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Simplified Acquisition Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_09c_Revised_SEED_Project_SOW_Replacing_Split_Systems_TLF_Bldg_90372,_90374_and_90375.pdf PDF
FA441719RA0020005_SF_30_Amendment.pdf PDF
Attachment_09b_-_REVISED_26_Feb_2019_SOW_Replace_Split_Systems_TLF_Bldgs_90372,_90374_&_90375.pdf PDF
FA441719RA0020004_SF_30.pdf PDF
Attachment_24_-_AF_Form_3064.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_01a_-_SABER_IDIQ_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_-_FA441719RA002.pdf PDF
Attachment_25_-_AF_Form_3065.pdf PDF
Attachment_23a_-_Addendum_Sections_L_and_M_Instructions_to_Offeror_and_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_1_MAR_19.pdf PDF
FA441719RA0020003_SF30.pdf PDF
MFR_given_to_KTRS.doc DOC document
SABER_Solicitation_Site_Visit_-_26_FEB_19_1030_CST.pdf PDF
Attachment_09a_-_Revised_SEED_Project_SOW_Replacing_Split_Systems_TLF_Bldgs._90372,_90374,_and_90375.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA441719RA0020002_SF_30.pdf PDF
Attachment_23_-_Addendum_Sections_L_and_M_Instructions_to_Offeror_and_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_11_FEB_19.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA441719RA0020001_SF_30.pdf PDF
Solicitation_-_FA441719RA002.pdf PDF
Attachment_03_-_Sample_Project_-_SOW_-_Repair_Room_102_Bldg_X.pdf PDF
Attachment_02_-_Hurlburt_Base_Master_Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_07_-Sample_Project_Drawing_M1-Layout1.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_-_SEED_Project_Drawing_M-3.pdf PDF
Attachment_05_-_Sample_Project_Drawing_A1-Model.pdf PDF
Attachment_23_-_Addendum_Sections_L_and_M_Instructions_to_Offeror_and_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_-_SEED_Project_WORK_TIME_ANALYSIS.pdf PDF
Attachment_21_-_Financial_Reference_Worksheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment_17_-_SEED_Project_Drawing_P-2.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_-_SEED_Project_Drawing_A-2_Floor_Plan_and_Finish_Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment_09_-_SEED_PROJECT_SOW_Replace_Condensing_Units_TLF_Bldgs.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_-_SEED_Project_Drawing_A-1_Floor_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_04_-_Sample_Project_-_WORK_TIME_ANALYSIS.pdf PDF
Attachment_22_-_Additional_Contractor_Information.pdf PDF
Attachment_18_-_SEED_Project_Drawing_P-3.pdf PDF
Attachment_01_-_SABER_IDIQ_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
Attachment_06_-_Sample_Project_Drawing_E1-Model.pdf PDF
Atch_19_-_Wage_Determination_-_Building_FL217_-_Heavy_FL127_-_Highway_FL179_-_Residential_FL76.pdf PDF
Attachment_08_-_Sample_Project_Drawing_T1-Model.pdf PDF
Attachment_14_-_SEED_Project_Drawing_M-2.pdf PDF
Attachment_16_-_SEED_Drawing_Project_P-1.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_-_SEED_Project_Drawing_M-1.pdf PDF
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Past/Present Performance Questionnaire

FA4417-19-R-A002

ATTACHMENT 20

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

1. Contractor’s Name and Address:

2. Point of Contact:

3. Phone Number:

4. Contract Number:

Contract Type:

5. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)

1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:

2. Respondent’s Name:

3. Phone Number:

Fax Number:

E-Mail:

4. Award Amount:

Final Amount:

5. Project Title:

Project Number:

6. Brief Project Description:

7. Period of Performance:

Start Date:

End Date:

SECTION C: EMAIL OR FAX COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO:

Contract Specialist:
Lukas Anderson
Email:
lukas.anderson@us.af.mil
Contracting Officer:
Charles Carnley
Email:
charles.carnley@us.af.mil

THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: The closing date and time of solicitation.

SECTION D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS.

E
V
S
M
U
N

Exceptional (Outstanding) Very Good (Above Average)

Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Available

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

1. QUALITY: Access conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of Good Workmanship. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.

☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. SCHEDULE: Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the established schedule.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3. MANAGEMENT: Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements. Adequately coordinate and controlled performance of subcontractors. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

4. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS: Contractor complied with terms and conditions for Small Business Participation. Achieved Small Business Goals.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: Contractor complied with Financial, Environmental, Safety, and Reporting Requirements. Contractor was compliant with labor standards, posting of EEO, labor rates, minimum wage.

Payrolls were completed properly and received in a timely matter. Paid subcontractors in a timely manner Contractor had an adequate safety plan and it was implemented properly. No safety discrepancies were noted.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? ☐YES ☐NO (If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

7. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? ☐YES ☐NO

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

Signature of Respondent: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .