AMENDMENT ONE TO FA2521-07-R-8506 1 FEB 08.doc

FA2521-07-R-8506

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0004

The CLIN extended description has changed from PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1OCT 08 THROUGH 30 SEP 09 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________. to PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1OCT 08 THROUGH 30 SEP 09 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2The total not to exceed amount is $170,000.00 for this CLIN. Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________..

CLIN 0005

The CLIN description has changed from CONTRACTOR PROVIDE VEHICLES FY 09 to CONTRACTOR VEHICLES FY 09.

CLIN 1004

The CLIN extended description has changed from PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 09 THROUGH 30 SEP 10 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________. to PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 09 THROUGH 30 SEP 10 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2The total not to exceed amount is $170,000.00 for this CLIN. Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________..

CLIN 1005

The CLIN description has changed from CONTRACTOR PROVIDE VEHICLES FY10 to CONTRACTOR VEHICLES FY10.

CLIN 2004

The CLIN extended description has changed from PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 10 THROUGH 30 SEP 11 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________. to PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 10 THROUGH 30 SEP 11 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2The total not to exceed amount is $170,000.00 for this CLIN. Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________..

CLIN 2005

The CLIN description has changed from CONTRACTOR PROVIDE VEHICLES FY 11 to CONTRACTOR VEHICLES FY 11.

CLIN 3004

The CLIN extended description has changed from PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 11 THROUGH 30 SEP 12 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________. to PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 11 THROUGH 30 SEP 12 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2The total not to exceed amount is $170,000.00 for this CLIN. Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________..

CLIN 3005

The CLIN description has changed from CONTRACTOR PROVIDE VEHICLES FY 12 to CONTRACTOR VEHICLES FY 12.

CLIN 4004

The CLIN extended description has changed from PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 12 THROUGH 30 SEP 13 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________. to PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 OCT 12 THROUGH 30 SEP 13 NONPERSONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE ALL DIRECTED CORROSION CONTROL/REPAIR FOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT TO INCLUDE LABOR AND ANALYSIS WORK/EFFORT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPHS 1.2 and 2.4.7.2The total not to exceed amount is $170,000.00 for this CLIN. Additionally, provide your fully burdened hourly labor rate for this effort/CLIN in the space provided: $__________..

CLIN 4005

The CLIN description has changed from CONTRACTOR PROVIDE VEHICLES FY 13 to CONTRACTOR VEHICLES FY 13.

The following have been added by reference:

The following have been added by full text:

52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2007) (DEVIATION)

(a) Comptroller General Examination of Record. The Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of this paragraph (a) if the contract was awarded using other than sealed bid, is in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, and does not contain the clause at 52.215-2, Audit and Records-Negotiation.

(1) The Comptroller General of the United States, or an authorized representative of the Comptroller General, shall have access to the right to examine any of the Contractor's directly pertinent records involving transactions related to this contract.

(2) The Contractor shall make available at its offices at all reasonable times, the records, materials, and other evidence for examination, audit, or reproduction, until 3 years after final payment under this contract or for any shorter period specified in FAR Subpart 4.7, Contractor Records Retention, of the other clauses of this contract. If this contract is completely or partially terminated, the records relating to the work terminated shall be made available for 3 years after any resulting final termination settlement. Records relating to appeals under the disputes clause or to litigation or the settlement of claims arising under or relating to this contract shall be made available until such appeals, litigation, or claims are finally resolved.

(3) As used in this clause, records include books, documents, accounting procedures and practices, and other data, regardless of form. This does not require the Contractor to create or maintain any record that the Contractor does not maintain in the ordinary course of business or pursuant to a provision of law.

(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of any other clause in this contract, the Contractor is not required to flow down any FAR clause, other than those in paragraphs (i) through (vii) of this paragraph in a subcontract for commercial items. Unless otherwise indicated below, the extent of the flow down shall be as required by the clause--

(i) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (MAY 2004) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)), in all subcontracts that offer further subcontracting opportunities. If the subcontract (except subcontracts to small business concerns) exceeds $500,000 ($1,000,000 for construction of any public facility), the subcontractor must include 52.219-8 in lower tier subcontracts that offer subcontracting opportunities.

(ii) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (MAR 2007) (E.O. 11246).

(iii) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans (SEP 2006) (38 U.S.C. 4212).

(iv) 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (Jun 1998) (29 U.S.C. 793).

(v) 52.222-39, Notification of Employee Rights Concerning Payment of Union Dues or Fees (DEC 2004) (E.O. 13201)

(vi) 52.222-41, Service Contract Act of 1965 (Nov 2007) (41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.).

(vii) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (AUG 2007) (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (f) of FAR clause 52.222-50.

(viii) 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products (DEC 2007) (42 U.S.C. 8259b) (Unless exempt pursuant to 23.204, applies to contracts when energy-consuming products listed in the ENERGY STAR Program or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) will be--

(A) Delivered;

(B) Acquired by the Contractor for use in performing services at a Federally-controlled facility;

(C) Furnished by the Contractor for use by the Government; or

(D) Specified in the design of a building or work, or incorporated during its construction, renovation, or maintenance.)

(ix) 52.222-51, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment--Requirements (Nov 2007) (41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.).

(x) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial Vessels (FEB 2006) (46 U.S.C. Appx 1241(b) and 10 U.S.C. 2631). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (d) of FAR clause 52.247-64.

(xi) 52.222-53, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Certain Services--Requirements (Nov 2007) (41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.).

(xii) 52.247-64, Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial Vessels (Feb 2006) (46 U.S.C. Appx. 1241(b) and 10 U.S.C. 2631). Flow down required in accordance with paragraph (d) of FAR clause 52.247-64.

(c) While not required, the contractor May include in its subcontracts for commercial items a minimal number of additional clauses necessary to satisfy its contractual obligations.

(End of clause)

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2007)

(a) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard. The NAICS code and small business size standard for this acquisition appear in Block 10 of the solicitation cover sheet (SF 1449). However, the small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, but which proposes to furnish an item which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Offers may be submitted on the SF 1449, letterhead stationery, or as otherwise specified in the solicitation. As a minimum, offers must show--

(1) The solicitation number;

(2) The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers;

(3) The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror;

(4) A technical description of the items being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements in the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary;

(5) Terms of any express warranty;

(6) Price and any discount terms;

(7) "Remit to" address, if different than mailing address;

(8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(l) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically);

(9) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments;

(10) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information); and

(11) If the offer is not submitted on the SF 1449, include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 30 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(d) Product samples. When required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted at or prior to the time specified for receipt of offers. Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, these samples shall be submitted at no expense to the Government, and returned at the sender's request and expense, unless they are destroyed during preaward testing.

(e) Multiple offers. Offerors are encouraged to submit multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions or commercial items for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. Each offer submitted will be evaluated separately.

(f) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers:

(1) Offerors are responsible for submitting offers, and any modifications, revisions, or withdrawals, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation. If no time is specified in the solicitation, the time for receipt is 4:30 p.m., local time, for the designated Government office on the date that offers or revisions are due.

(2)(i) Any offer, modification, revision, or withdrawal of an offer received at the Government office designated in the solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the Contracting Officer determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition; and--

(A) If it was transmitted through an electronic commerce method authorized by the solicitation, it was received at the initial point of entry to the Government infrastructure not later than 5:00 p.m. one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of offers; or

(B) There is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of offers and was under the Government's control prior to the time set for receipt of offers; or

(C) If this solicitation is a request for proposals, it was the only proposal received.

(ii) However, a late modification of an otherwise successful offer, that makes its terms more favorable to the Government, will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.

(3) Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date stamp of that installation on the offer wrapper, other documentary evidence of receipt maintained by the installation, or oral testimony or statements of Government personnel.

(4) If an emergency or unanticipated event interrupts normal Government processes so that offers cannot be received at the Government office designated for receipt of offers by the exact time specified in the solicitation, and urgent Government requirements preclude amendment of the solicitation or other notice of an extension of the closing date, the time specified for receipt of offers will be deemed to be extended to the same time of day specified in the solicitation on the first work day on which normal Government processes resume.

(5) Offers may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers. Oral offers in response to oral solicitations may be withdrawn orally. If the solicitation authorizes facsimile offers, offers may be withdrawn via facsimile received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers, subject to the conditions specified in the solicitation concerning facsimile offers. An offer may be withdrawn in person by an offeror or its authorized representative if, before the exact time set for receipt of offers, the identity of the person requesting withdrawal is established and the person signs a receipt for the offer.

(g) Contract award (not applicable to Invitation for Bids). The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

(h) Multiple awards. The Government may accept any item or group of items of an offer, unless the offeror qualifies the offer by specific limitations. Unless otherwise provided in the Schedule, offers may not be submitted for quantities less than those specified. The Government reserves the right to make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit prices offered, unless the offeror specifies otherwise in the offer.

(i) Availability of requirements documents cited in the solicitation. (1)(i) The GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29, and copies of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained for a fee by submitting a request to--GSA Federal Supply Service Specifications Section, Suite 8100, 470 East L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC

20407, Telephone (202) 619-8925, Facsimile (202) 619-8978.

(ii) If the General Services Administration, Department of Agriculture, or Department of Veterans Affairs issued this solicitation, a single copy of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained free of charge by submitting a request to the addressee in paragraph (i)(1)(i) of this provision. Additional copies will be issued for a fee.

(2) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites:

(i) ASSIST (http://assist.daps.dla.mil).

(ii) Quick Search (http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch).

(iii) ASSISTdocs.com (http://assistdocs.com).

(3) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point (DoDSSP) by--

(i) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard (http://assist.daps.dla.mil/wizard);

(ii) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or

(iii) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone (215) 697-2667/2179, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(4) Nongovernment (voluntary) standards must be obtained from the organization responsible for their preparation, publication, or maintenance.

(j) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number. (Applies to all offers exceeding $3,000, and offers of $3,000 or less if the solicitation requires the Contractor to be registered in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database. The offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the annotation “DUNS” or “DUNS +4” followed by the DUNS or DUNS +4 number that identifies the offeror's name and address. The DUNS +4 is the DUNS number plus a 4-character suffix that may be assigned at the discretion of the offeror to establish additional CCR records for identifying alternative Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) accounts (see FAR Subpart 32.11) for the same parent concern. If the offeror does not have a DUNS number, it should contact Dun and Bradstreet directly to obtain one. An offeror within the United States may contact Dun and Bradstreet by calling 1-866-705-5711 or via the internet at http://www.dnb.com. An offeror located outside the United States must contact the local Dun and Bradstreet office for a DUNS number.

(k) Central Contractor Registration. Unless exempted by an addendum to this solicitation, by submission of an offer, the offeror acknowledges the requirement that a prospective awardee shall be registered in the CCR database prior to award, during performance and through final payment of any contract resulting from this solicitation. If the Offeror does not become registered in the CCR database in the time prescribed by the Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer will proceed to award to the next otherwise successful registered Offeror. Offerors may obtain information on registration and annual confirmation requirements via the Internet at http://www.ccr.gov or by calling 1-888-227-2423 or 269-961-5757.

(l) Debriefing. If a post-award debriefing is given to requesting offerors, the Government shall disclose the following information, if applicable:

(1) The agency's evaluation of the significant weak or deficient factors in the debriefed offeror's offer.

(2) The overall evaluated cost or price and technical rating of the successful and the debriefed offeror and past performance information on the debriefed offeror.

(3) The overall ranking of all offerors, when any ranking was developed by the agency during source selection.

(4) A summary of the rationale for award;

(5) For acquisitions of commercial items, the make and model of the item to be delivered by the successful offeror.

(6) Reasonable responses to relevant questions posed by the debriefed offeror as to whether source-selection procedures set forth in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities were followed by the agency.

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM to 52.212-1 -- Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial Items (Nov 2007)

1. Submit signed and dated offers to:

Mr. John A. Warner, Contracting Officer

1201 Edward H. White II, Street, MS 7200

Patrick AFB, FL 32925-3238

2. Hand carried proposals must be delivered to Bldg 423, Rm. N-204, Patrick AFB, FL 32925. The sealed package used to submit your proposal must show the solicitation number, time and date specified for receipt of offers, the name, address and telephone number of the offeror. Offeror’s need to submit the name, type of vehicle and tag number of the individual and vehicle that is going to be utilized for Request for Proposal to the Contracting Officer five days prior to offer delivery date for access to the base. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at Patrick AFB, PRIOR to the time specified for receipt. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with 52.212-1 paragraph (f) above.

3. To ensure consideration, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. The response shall consist of two (2) separate volumes; Volume I – Present and Past Performance and Volume II – Price and Model Contract Information.

A. VOLUME I – PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 1) - Submit original and four (4) copies.

(45 page limitation)

(1) This portion of the evaluation will consider the Offeror's performance including prime contract and subcontractor experience, and the Offeror’s proposed subcontractors, teaming partners, key personnel and predecessor companies.

(2) Provide not more than ten (10) recent and relevant performance citations for the Prime Team (includes citations for both prime and subcontractors) in the format requested below. Submit present/past performance information in accordance with the format and instructions contained in Attachment L-4 on all efforts included in the Relevancy Matrix.

(3) Relevancy. Relevant means the performance being considered must have logical connection to the work, described in the solicitation. Normally, relevance would include such aspects as the product or service similarity, product or service complexity, contract type, program or lifecycle phase, contract environment, division of company proposing, subcontractor interaction and magnitude. Offeror must explain why each past performance citation is relevant to this acquisition. Identify the role of each proposed subcontractor, teaming partner and key personnel to permit the evaluation team to appropriately attribute relevance to the past performance.

(4) Organizational Structure Change History. Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant present or past efforts or between conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what present/past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a “roadmap” describing all such changes in the organization of your company. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for present/past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider present and present/past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the Offeror(s), your “roadmap” should be both specifically applicable to the efforts you identify and general enough to apply to efforts to which the Government receives information from other sources. Include Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) codes for any predecessor companies to facilitate Government research

(5) Consent Letters. Consent letters executed by each joint venture partner and/or subcontractor, authorizing release of adverse present/past performance information so the Offeror can respond to such information. A sample consent letter is in Attachment 212-1-1

(6) Client Authorization Letters. Client authorization letters for each identified effort for a commercial customer authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror’s performance (see sample letter at Attachment 212-1-2).

(7) Relevancy Matrix. Provide a completed relevancy matrix including each teaming contractor and/or joint venture partner and proposed subcontractor (see format in Attachment 212-1-3). Do not identify present/past performance for proposed team members in areas they are not proposed to perform.

(8) Questionnaires. Offerors are responsible for sending out Past Performance Questionnaires, Attachment L-6 for each citation. Completed questionnaires should be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer by 19 Feb 08. Once the Past Performance Questionnaires are completed, the information contained therein shall be considered sensitive and shall not be released to you, the Offeror. A sample cover letter for transmitting the questionnaire is provided at Attachment 212-1-5. Questionnaire recipients (Customer POC’s) shall be listed as required in Attachment L-6. Offeror shall verify the POC information is current and valid.

(9) Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs). Offerors are requested to indicate in the Present/Past Performance Volume whether this information exists (and in which database it resides) and are encouraged to provide additional information regarding the work effort to clearly describe how it relates to the PWS requirements. If a CPARS or other evaluation form has been accomplished on the Offeror’s existing work, but has not yet been posted to an automated system, the Offeror is requested to advise the CO and provide a point of contact and phone number from which the information may be obtained. This information should be provided to the CO at the same time the Present/Past Performance Volume is submitted. Also include information on cited contracts that have been captured in a database other than those used by DoD or other federal agencies.

B. VOLUME II – COST/PRICE (FACTOR 2) AND MODEL CONTRACT INFORMATION - Submit original and three (3) copies. No page limitation.

(1) Complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a, b, and c of the SF 1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.

(2) Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Pricing Schedule. The proposal(s) must be submitted for the base year plus all four (4) Option Years.

(3) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions.

4. Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

5. Product samples are not required.

6. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number applies.

Attachment 212-1-1, Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Letter for the Release of Past and Present Performance Information to the Prime Contractor

Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent. Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime contractor during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government’s Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent letter be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.

Attachemnt 212-1-1

SAMPLE

Dear “Contracting Officer:”

We are participating as a (subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, Patrick Air Force Base, Request for Proposal FA2521-07-R-8506 for the Vehicle Operations and Maintenance Services (VOMS) contract.

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent letter to allow you to discuss our past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Company Name:

Address:

Attachment 212-1--2, SAMPLE CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER Past performance information concerning private sector contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners cannot be disclosed to the government without their consent. Client authorization letters are required for each identified effort for a commercial customer. This letter will authorize release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance. The government will need that consent before contacting commercial customers to assess the offeror’s past performance. In an effort to assist the Government's Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following client authorization letter be completed by any commercial customers identified in your proposal. The completed client authorization letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.

Offerors should send with their list of references a letter similar to the following authorizing the reference to provide past performance information to the Government.

Dear “Client:”

We are responding to a Department of the Air Force, Patrick AFB and Cape Canaveral Air Station, FL, Request for Proposal FA2521-07-R-8506 for the Vehicle Operations and Maintenance Services contract.

In their acquisitions, the government is placing increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor. They are requiring those clients of entities responding to their solicitation to be identified, and their participation in the evaluation process is requested. In the event that you are contacted for information on work performed, you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries.

We have identified Mr./Ms.____________________________ of your organization as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge of our work. Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to

Sincerely, ATTACHMENT 212-1-3, RELEVANCY MATRIX

Offerors must identify for each citation which aspect is relevant to by marking an “X” in the appropriate column. Each effort will be evaluated in each of the categories identified in the relevancy matrix to determine the degree to which it involved the magnitude and complexity of effort the solicitation requires. Each prime effort and subcontracts cited by the Offeror will be entered into the matrix by the Offeror. Do not identify past performance for proposed team members in areas they are not proposed to perform.

I

CITATION #

(Includes contract # and short title) Technical

Performance

Of

Small Business

Prime Contracts

Cited by Offeror

Subcontracts

Cited by Offeror

Attachment 212-1-4, PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of past efforts submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth at Paragraph 3.A(2) above.

A.

Offeror Name (Company/Division) ____________________

CAGE Code___________________________

DUNS Number__________________________________ (NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the Offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume).

B.

Program Title___________________________________________

C. Contract Specifics:

1. Contracting Agency or Customer_____________________________________________

2. Contract Number/Delivery Order Number______________________________________

3. Contract Type__________________________

4. Period of Performance__________________________

5. Original Contract $ Value_________________ (Do not include unexercised options)

6. Current Contract $ Value_________________ (Do not include unexercised options)

7. Average Annual Contract $ Value____________

8. Total Contract $ Value____________ (Include unexercised options)

9. If Amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

D. Brief Description of Effort as __Prime or __Subcontractor

(Please provide a short description of the effort you are citing.)

E. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles).

1.

Program Manager and/or Name

Site Manager

Office

Address

Telephone

FAX Number ____________________

E-mail

2.

Contracting Officer:

Name

3.

Quality Assurance

Name

Evaluator

F.

Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered unique.

G.

Illustrate how your experience on this program applies to the evaluation criteria included in the VOMS solicitation.

H.

Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this program and are proposed to support the instant acquisition. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions.(If FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, is included in Section I of the solicitation, insert the paragraph below to comply with the past performance evaluation requirement of DFARS 215.305(a)(2).)

(If FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, is included in Section I of the solicitation, insert the paragraph below to comply with the past performance evaluation requirement of DFARS 215.305(a)(2).)

Attachment 2112-1-5, PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The 45th Space Wing of the Air Force Space Command is in the process of selecting a contractor for Vehicle Operations and Maintenance Services. The purpose of the program is to provide of the 45th Space Wing Vehicle Operations and Maintenance services.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. As discussed in our initial phone contact with your office, our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than seven calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of formal source selection.

To assist you in preparing your response, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and forwarded electronically to: john.warner@patrick.af.mil or if completed by hand it must be mailed in hard copy form to the following address:

45 CONS/LGCZC

ATTN: John A. Warner

Contracting Officer

1201 Edward H White II Street

MS 7200

Patrick AFB, FL 32925

Please call John Warner at (321)-494-5560 prior to mailing or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

1 Atch

Signature

Questionnaire

VEHICLE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES (VOMS)

RFP FA2521-07-R-8506

ATTACHMENT 212-1-6

Past Performance Questionnaire The Offeror is responsible for sending the Past Performance worksheet to respondents.

45 CONS at Patrick Air Force Base, FL is inquiring about the performance of contract vehicle operations and maintenance service provided by _________________________ (company name). They are proposing on an acquisition for vehicle operations and maintenance services. Please assist us by answering a few questions about their performance.

When responding to the questions below, please circle the letters that most accurately describes your confidence in the contractor's performance or situation based on the definitions below. If the contractor has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question, please circle “N.”

The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

****Please use the comments section at the end of the survey to elaborate on any question. ***** Company/Offeror Name:

Contract Number:

Contract Type

Period of performance

Total Contract Value

How would you rate the following questions on the contractor’s performance?

1. Rate the Offeror’s initial start-up for vehicle/equipment maintenance and operations contract services.

(Did the contractor meet 100% of all requirements by start time deadline(s)?)

2. Rate the Offeror’s attentiveness to overall health and safety, and their ability to control lost time incident rate. (Were there any major safety concerns during contract operations?)

3. Rate how the Offeror handled turnover of employees and how they provided qualified replacements in a timely manner in vehicle/equipment maintenance and vehicle operations.(Was contract performance affected?)

4. Rate the Offeror’s effectiveness and utilization of their quality control plan.

5. Rate the Offeror’s identification and notification of deficiencies concerning vehicle maintenance.

6. Rate the Offeror’s follow-up process to ensure non-recurrence of deficiencies in vehicle operations and maintenance.

7. Rate the Offeror’s resolution of contract problems.

(Was this accomplished in a timely manner?)

8. Rate the Offeror’s structure/organization for managing the contract. Did they bring the right mix of experience for successful operations and maintenance services? (Was management efficiently organized to facilitate operations in the field?)

9. Rate the Offeror’s management, cooperation, and interaction with the Government or other customers?

10. Rate the Offeror’s ability to manage its workload for vehicle/equipment operations and maintenance.

11. Rate the Program Manager’s performance.

(How well qualified/knowledgeable was the PM of contract/PWS requirements? Was the PM an active and integral part of contract management and communication between contractor and customer? Was the PM an efficient problem-solver?)

12. Rate the Offeror’s requests for modifications, did they request multiple adjustments to the contract due to inefficiencies that were proven to be on their part?

(Did the company request an excessive number of modifications? If so explain in the comments section below.)

13. Rate the Offeror’s overall performance in accordance with the performance work statement.

(Did the Offeror demonstrate an effective approach to meeting the overall requirements of the contract for successful execution?)

14. Rate the Offeror’s ability to control government furnished property. Were they able to track and manage government provided equipment/facilities in an efficient manner? (Was property inventoried effectively?)

15. Was their vehicle in commission rate kept with-in standards as laid out in the PWS or accompanying instructions?

(Did the contractor demonstrate a responsive customer service system or process?)

16. Rates how well the Offeror was able to staff qualified personnel to accomplish the requirement, were their any times that the contractor was not able to perform due to not planning in advance for personnel vacancies?

17. Rate the Offeror’s Contingency/Strike Plan.

(Did it demonstrate a comprehensive approach for continuing contract performance in the event of a labor strike?)

18. Rate how well the Offeror attained labor efficiency in negotiating with organized labor.

19. Rate how well the Offeror implemented any techniques or practices to gain labor efficiencies.

20. Rate the Offeror management team’s ability to identify and resolve problems.

21. Rate the Offeror’s management team in flexibility for changes/fluctuations to workload due to new requirements.

22. Rate the Offeror’s ability to identify and implement quality improvement processes.

23. Rate how well did the Offeror display innovation in meeting requirements. (Describe any significant innovations implemented.)

24. Rate how the Offeror handled contingency operations such as maintenance and operational surges.

25. Rate how well the Offeror maintained equipment assigned to them as Government furnished property?

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

E VG S M U N

26. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

27. Given the opportunity, if you were able to hire this contractor again, would you?

Please Circle One:

Definitely Most Likely Might Might Not Definitely Not

Explain:

28. Type of licenses/certifications required/obtained for performance?

COMMENTS:

Please fill in the information below and e-mail the completed questionnaire to john.warner@patrick.af.mil or FAX to (321) 494-9954.

If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact John Warner at (321) 494-5560. Thank you for your cooperation.

A.

Evaluator's name: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B.

Company or organization: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

C.

Evaluator's title: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

D.

Evaluator's phone/email: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

E.

Number of years that evaluator worked on subject contract: ________________________________________________________________________

(End of Provision Addendum)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

ADDENDUM to PROVISION 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Jan 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offer or whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

FACTOR 1: Present/Past Performance

FACTOR 2: Cost/Price

(b) BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD. This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing Offerors’ past performance history will be evaluated on a basis approximately equal to cost or price considerations. The government will trade-off price and past performance and may select a contractor with a higher price that provides a higher confidence rating in the area of past performance. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified below as evaluation factors. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

1. Present/Past Performance (FACTOR 1). The Performance Confidence Assessment represents the evaluation of Offeror’s present and past work record to assess the Government’s confidence in the Offeror’s likelihood of successfully performing as proposed. The Government past performance evaluation team, known as the Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) will accomplish the past performance evaluation by reviewing the quality of an Offeror’s recent and relevant present and past performance, focusing on and targeting effort that is relevant to the Past Performance and Cost/Price Factor of this solicitation; however, all aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered.

a. To assess the Past Performance Confidence Rating the government is not limited to information provided by the Offeror and will consider a variety of sources to obtain past performance information. Each Performance Citation submitted by the Offeror and each additional citation obtained by the Government will be reviewed and recency determined. Each recent citation will be assessed and assigned a relevancy rating. All aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered. Past performance information will be obtained through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), similar systems of other Government departments and agencies, questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of this acquisition and provided as an attachment to the RFP, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), interviews with program managers and contracting officers, and other sources known to the Government, including commercial sources. The Government intends to use both data provided by the Offeror and data obtained from other sources.

b. Recency. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. For purposes of this source selection, recent past performance is defined as contracts performed within three (3) years of the date of the issuance of this solicitation.

c. Relevancy. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving vehicle operations and maintenance services that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation.