DRAFT_HSHQDC-17-R-000xx_RPM_RP_RFP-2016-10-07_Atch8_Delivery_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FINAL RFP HSHQDN-17-R-0002 DNDO RPM RP
- Solicitation number
- DRAFT_RFP_HSHQDN-17-R-000XX_RPM-RP
About this file
ATTACHMENT 8 DELIVERY PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 54 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HSHQDC-17-R-000xx
Attachment 8
DELIVERY PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the following questionnaire and return it via your organization email system to the attention of the individual(s) named below, no later than Month Day, 2016 12:00 PM Eastern Time (ET):
The Subject line for the return email shall clearly indicate “DNDO RPM Delivery Past Performance Questionnaire Submission for [fill in name of Offeror]”
Tisha Blue, Contracting Officer tisha.blue@hq.dhs.gov or 202-254-6751
This survey pertains to: __________________________________________________________ Department/Component: _________________________________________________________ Solicitation Number: ____________________________________________________________ Date of Survey: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Person Completing Survey: _______________________________________________ Signature of Person Completing Survey: _____________________________________________ Your Company/Agency: _________________________________________________________ Your Role in this Contract: _______________________________________________________ Survey Period of Performance: ____________________________________________________ General description of products/services required under the contract: ______________________
RATINGS
For each of the six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose one (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the applicable box. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. For any rating that is checked Not Applicable, please explain why it does not apply.
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT
Rating Adjectival Rating Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with mailto:tisha.blue@hq.dhs.gov some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared satisfactory or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contains a serious problem or problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
2. SCHEDULE
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared satisfactory or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contains a serious problem or problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective.
3. COST CONTROL
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared satisfactory or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contains a serious problem or problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared satisfactory or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contains a serious problem or problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared satisfactory or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contains a serious problem or problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective.
6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS
Exceptional
Exceeded all statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had exceptional success with initiatives to assist, promote, and utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB), and service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB). Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small business in mission-critical aspects of the program. Went above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan and other small business requirements of the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract reports in an accurate and timely manner.
Very Good
Met all statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had significant success with initiatives to assist, promote, and utilize SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met or exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small business in mission-critical aspects of the program. Endeavored to go above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract reports in an accurate and timely manner.
Satisfactory
Demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all negotiated subcontract goals in the various socio-economic categories for the current period. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order.
Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract reports in an accurate and timely manner.
Marginal
Deficient in meeting key subcontracting plan elements. Deficient in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract reports in an accurate and timely manner. Failed to satisfy one or more requirements of a corrective action plan currently in place;
however, does show an interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level, and has demonstrated a commitment to apply the necessary resources to do so. Required a corrective action plan.
Unsatisfactory
Noncompliant with FAR 52.219-8 and 52.219-9, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order.
Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract reports in an accurate and timely manner. Showed little interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level or is generally uncooperative. Required a corrective action plan.
PROVIDE APPROPRIATE CONTRACT/TASK/DELIVERY ORDER NUMBER(S):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .