CHARLES_Revisions from DRFP to RFP List.pdf

CHARLES RFP Updates

# Reference Page No. Applied Update

SOW 9.2.4.3 Handling, Storage, and Disposal of Excess Hazardous Materials and Wastes

Section C – Statement of Work JSC Page - 75

Inserted the following:

“9.2.4.3 Handling, Storage and Disposal of Excess Hazardous Materials and Wastes: The Contractor shall manage (identify, handle, store, package, preserve, deliver and ship) excess or spent hazardous materials and industrial solid wastes (ISW), including but not limited to hazardous wastes, universal wastes, fuels and lubricants/oils, in accordance with the processes contained in JPR 8550.1, JSC Environmental Compliance Procedural Requirements.

The contractor shall ensure that hazardous materials are procured, stored, used, handled and processed in ways that minimize waste generation, avoid cross contamination and prevent environmental pollution.”

SOW Acronym List Section C – Statement of Work JSC Appendix A Page - A2

Inserted the following:

“ISW (Industrial Solid Waste)”

Occupational Safety and Health Specialist

Section C – Statement of Work JSC Appendix C Page - C10

Inserted the following to the Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Job Description Guideline.

“Acts as point of contact with JSC Planning, Integration and Environmental Office. Basic knowledge of environmental regulations.”

Aircraft Electronics Technician

Section C – Statement of Work Appendix E WFF Page - E66

Deleted the following:

"Must have the ability to obtain and maintain a Government Security Clearance."

Aircraft Mechanic Helper Aircraft Servicer

Section C – Statement of Work Appendix E WFF Page - E67

Deleted the following for both the Aircraft Mechanic Helper and the Aircraft Servicer:

"Must have the ability to obtain and maintain a Government

Security Clearance."

NFS 1852.235-71 KEY

PERSONNEL AND

FACILITIES. (MAR

1989)

H-352/353

Revised the title of the following functional areas:

• From JSC Operations Team Lead To JSC Flight Operations Training Officer / Team Lead

• From GSFC/WFF Team Lead To GSFC/WFF AS Site Maintenance Manager

• From GSFC/WFF Production Manager To GSFC/WFF AS Production Manager

SLC titled updates have also been revised inside of Attachment L-4.

JPI 52.223-94

ENVIRONMENTAL

(AND ENERGY

CONSERVATION

REQUIREMENTS –

RESERVED) AND

HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS USE.

(JUL

2021) (JSC Procurement Instruction)

H-353/354

Inserted the following language in paragraph (d) of JPI 52.223- 94:

“(JF594 - Request for Waiver to Use a Prohibited or Restricted Chemical)"

Inserted the following language in paragraph (e) of JPI 52.223- 94:

“As applicable, the contractor shall submit a Request for Sustainable Acquisitions Waiver (JF1121) and obtain approval prior to procuring designated items that do not meet the applicate sustainability program specifications and content requirements.”

Inserted the following language at the end of the first sentence in paragraph (g) of JPI 52.223-94:

“and wastes”

Corrected the following language on the last sentence of paragraph (j) of JPI 52.223-94:

• From “The Contractor shall immediately notify the Contracting

Officer and the JSC Planning, Integration and Environmental Office (Mail Code JP) upon receipt of any official correspondence alleging noncompliance.” To The Contractor shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and the JSC Planning, Integration and Environmental Office (Mail Code JP111 and email JSC-Environmental-Office@nasa.gov) upon receipt of any official correspondence alleging noncompliance.

Inserted the following language at the end of paragraph (l) of JPI 52.223-94:

“The contractor shall be responsible for tracking and ensuring the overall performance and compliance of its subcontractors”

Wage Determination Section J-4 Wage Determinations have been updated in their entirety.

DRD-M05 NF533 DRD-M05 Draft version of NF533 has been replaced in its entirety with the final version of NF533.

Environmental Compliance Reports DRD-M12

Inserted the following inside Appendix 3 of J-2 Award Fee Plan:

• Category: Environmental Compliance

• Performance Standard: JPR 8550.1 JSC Environmental

Procedural Requirements; Sustaining commitment to Environmental Compliance; and Timely completion of corrective actions.

• Acceptable Quality Level: ≤ 1 JSC Planning, Integration, and Environmental (PIE) Office oversight finding (e.g.

JPERS, E-Track, NASA HQ EEFRs, OIG audits or similar) per month and ≤ 3 per six month period; Zero PIE oversight findings in overdue status; Zero contractor actions/inactions resulting in regulatory agencies enforcement actions against NASA (e.g. notice of violation, fines, etc)

• Surveillance Method: Contractor Provided Data, JSC PIE Office oversight compliance audit reports.

11 NFS 1852.215-81

PROPOSAL PAGE

LIMITATIONS. (APR

2015)

L-774

Replaced the following in NFS 1852.215-81 PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITATIONS. (APR 2015) paragraph (c):

From “See Table L-2” To “See Section L.32”

12 JPI 52.215-124

COMMUNICATIONS

REGARDING THIS

SOLICITATION (AUG

2018) (JSC

PROCUREMENT

INSTRUCTION)

L-780 Updated the date from May 25, 2022 to May 12, 2022.

Table L-1 Cross Reference from Section L to Section M

L-783

Replaced the following inside of the title and section column for TA3. Facility Clearance Level:

From “TA3. Facility Clearance Level” To “SEB Evaluation Factors for Award”

From “M.3.2, TA3” To “M.2”

52.215-113 PROPOSAL

FORMATTING

INSTRUCTIONS. (DEC

2019) (JSC

PROCUREMENT

INSTRUCTION)

L-781/782

Updated the following inside of PROPOSAL FORMATTING

INSTRUCTIONS. (DEC 2019) (JSCPROCUREMENT

INSTRUCTION) paragraph (b)(3):

From “Each volume of the proposal should be submitted as a separate electronic file” To “Each volume of the proposal should be submitted as a separate electronic folder.”

15 L.33.2 PROPOSAL

ARRANGEMENT,

PAGE LIMITATIONS,

COPIES, AND DUE

DATES

L-784 Updated the date from June 10, 2022 to June 1, 2022.

Updated the date from May 27, 2022 to May 16, 2022.

16 Table L-2: Overview of Proposal Volumes, Page Limitations, Copies, and Format

L-786/787 Replaced Table L-2 in its entirety with an updated version.

Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment L-3 Inserted the word “optionally” to the Executive Manager requirement on Past Performance Questionnaire.

Replaced the following language I its entirety:

From “The Offeror shall provide DRD-M01 Management Plan as a separate, self-contained, and standalone document. Upon approval, this DRD becomes a part of the CHARLES contract” To “The Offeror shall provide DRD-M01 Management Plan, items 8.c.i through 8.c.ixv, in a format consistent with DRD-M01.

If an offeror is selected for award, this DRD will become part of the CHARLES contract once the DRD is approved.”

L.33.4.1 OVERALL

MANAGEMENT

APPROACH (MA) -

MISSION

SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 1/MA2

L-788

Replaced the following language in its entirety:

From “The Offeror shall provide DRD-M15 Total Compensation Plan as a separate, self-contained, and standalone document. The Total Compensation Plan must correspond with the data provided in Volume III, Cost and Price. The Compensation Plan shall be consistent with the Management Approach and rationale. Upon approval, this DRD becomes a part of the CHARLES contract.”

To “The Offeror shall provide its Total Compensation Plan as prescribed in DRD-M15. All information proposed in the offeror’s Total Compensation Plan shall be fully consistent with the cost or price information it submits in Volume III for evaluation under the Cost and Price Factor. If an offeror is selected for award, this DRD will become part of the CHARLES contract once the DRD is approved.”

L.33.4.1 OVERALL

MANAGEMENT

APPROACH (MA) -

MISSION

SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 1/MA3

L-789

Replaced the following language in its entirety:

From “The Offeror shall provide DRD-M13 Contract Phase-in Plan as a separate, self-contained, and standalone document. The Contract Phase-In Approach shall be consistent with the Management Approach and rationale. Upon approval, this DRD becomes a part of the CHARLES contract.” To “The Offeror shall provide DRD-M13 Contract Phase-in Plan, items 8.c.i 1-6, in a format consistent with DRD-M13. The Contract Phase-In Approach shall be consistent with the Management Approach and rationale. If an offeror is selected for award, this DRD will become part of the CHARLES contract once the DRD is approved.”

20 L.33.4.2 TECHNICAL

APPROACH (TA) -

MISSION

SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 2/TA3

L-789

Inserted the following language:

“(Please refer to Section M.2 for evaluation approach for TA3.)”

L.33.4.3 SAFETY AND

HEALTH APPROACH -

MISSION

SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 3

L-790

Replaced the following in its entirety:

From “The offeror shall provide DRD-S02 Safety and Health Plan in Volume I. Upon approval, this DRD will become a part of the CHARLES contract.” To “The offeror shall provide DRD-S02 Safety and Health Plan in Volume I. If an offeror is selected for award, this DRD will become part of the CHARLES contract once the DRD is approved.”

L.33.5 PAST

PERFORMANCE

FACTOR - VOLUME II

L-790/791

Replace the following language inside of L.33.5 PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR - VOLUME II paragraph (j):

From “Offerors shall provide the following performance data with explanatory remarks on contracts performed in the last three years” To “Offerors shall provide the following performance data with explanatory remarks on contracts performed in the last five years”.

23 L.33.6 COST AND

PRICE FACTOR-

VOLUME

III/Attachment L-4

Section L.33.6/Attachment L-4

Updated Year 8 hours inside of Attachment L-4 EPM and the Year 8 hours inside of the specified resources tables located in section L.33.6.

L.33.7

RESPONSIBILITY

CONSIDERATIONS –

VOLUME IV (b)

L-810/811

Replaced the following in its entirety:

From “In accordance with FAR Subpart 9.5, Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest, the offeror and proposal will be reviewed for existing and potential OCI issues in relation to this procurement. The offeror shall submit the information required by the OCI Plan DRD-M20.” To “At this time, the CO has not identified any Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI). If an offeror identifies any OCI or potential OCI, the offeror shall submit the information required by the OCI Plan DRD-M20. In accordance with FAR Subpart 9.5, Organizational and Consultant.

Conflicts of Interest, the offeror and proposal will be reviewed for existing and potential OCI issues in relation to this procurement.”

M.3.1 OVERALL

MANAGEMENT

APPROACH (MA) -

MISSION

SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 1/MA2

M-818

Inserted the following:

“The Offeror’s Total Compensation Plan will be evaluated. In addition, information proposed by the offeror in its Incumbent Retention and Pay (IRAP) template and its Fringe Benefits Analysis of Compensation Plan (FBAC) template as part of Volume III will be included as part of this evaluation of the proposed Total Compensation Plan.”

26 M.3.2 TECHNICAL

APPROACH - MISSION

SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 2

M-818 Deleted the following in its entirety:

“TA3 Facility Clearance Level”

OVERALL

MANAGEMENT

APPROACH (MA) -

MISSION

SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 1

M-818

Inserted the following in OVERALL MANAGEMENT

APPROACH (MA) - MISSION SUITABILITY

SUBFACTOR 1 section MA2 Compensation Plan:

“The Offeror’s demonstrated in-depth understanding of the requirements (with supporting rationale) will be evaluated in Technical Approach subfactor elements. The Offeror’s response to TA1, TA2, and TA3 will be evaluated for overall demonstrated understanding, reasonability, feasibility, and completeness and any ensuing associated impact and risk to the Government. The following areas will be evaluated.”

M.6 RESPONSIBILITY

CONSIDERATIONS

(VOLUME IV)(b)

M-824

Replaced the following in its entirety:

From “The Government will perform an analysis to ensure an Organizational Conflict of Interest issue that cannot be mitigated does not exist. The OCI Plan will be assessed to verify the offeror is considered to be responsible for award. If it appears an OCI issue does exist that the offeror’s plan failed to mitigate, the government must notify the contractor, provide the reasons therefore, and allow the contractor a reasonable opportunity to respond. The contracting officer will make the final determination if the OCI issue exists and can be mitigated.” To “The Government will perform an analysis to ensure an Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) that cannot be mitigated does not exist.

If after proposal receipt the Government becomes aware of one or more OCI issues that may exist, the Government will carefully evaluate any OCI plan(s) submitted with the proposal to determine if all the identified OCIs have been mitigated. If a proposal did not include an OCI plan and the Government identifies an OCI or potential OCI after that proposal was received or if the plan submitted does not mitigate the OCI risk, the Government will notify the offeror about the identified OCI and provide the offeror a reasonable opportunity to respond. If an offeror did not self-identify the OCI and submit an OCI plan with its proposal, it may be required to submit an OCI plan subsequent to submission of its proposal. The OCI plan, if submitted, as well as any other information provided by the offeror regarding OCIs will be evaluated by the Government to assess whether or not those OCI issues have been mitigated as is required for an offeror to be determined a responsible party to receive award of a federal contract. The contracting officer will make the final determination if the OCI issue exists and can be mitigated.”