Bridge Inspection Rpt_5460-101P-2021.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

NOLAND CREEK BRIDGE

LAKEVIEW DRIVE OVER NOLAND CREEK

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LOOKING EAST

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/17/2021

SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

NOLAND CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2021

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS -

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

6 - BITUMINOUS

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE

9A3

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

9/05-UBIV INSPECTION.

LOCATION

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

367.7 FT (112.1 M)

82.5 FT (25.1 M)

33.5 FT (10.2 M)

30.2 FT (9.2 M)

9 °

N

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. .00 (KM PT 0)

STATE: .............................. 374 - NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: .... 6.2 MILES FROM BEGINNING OF NPS

ROUTE 9A (LAKEVIEW DRIVE).FACILITY CARRIED: ......... LAKEVIEW DRIVE

FEATURE INTERSECTED: NOLAND CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: K. Baptiste, G. Goodlin

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Gary Goodlin

REPORT REVIEW:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/07/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include erosion with undermining at the west abutment breastwall, southwest wingwall, and the east side of the Pier # 2. The erosion will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

Additional problems include deterioration of the asphalt wearing surface and approach pavement; rusting of the bearing devices; and construction formwork left in place inside the box girders.

Other problems include deterioration of the wingwall/guardwall masonry mortar joints; debris accumulation in the expansion joints, with some missing and/or broken expansion joint cover plates and bolts; soil and debris accumulation in the curblines, deck drains, and on the bearing seats; missing reflective object markers from the bridge corners; and vegetation growth at the west approach.

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

NOLAND CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2021

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. Consideration should also be given to replacing the timber approach guardrail with a system meeting current safety standards.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

NOLAND CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 05/17/2021

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.2,58.7, 60.3

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM EXPANSION JOINTS, CURBLINES,

DECK DRAINS, AND BEARING SEATS.

58.6 TRIM VEGETATION FROM AROUND BRIDGE AS

NECESSARY.

222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE

CORNERS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.3,222.

REPLACE WEARING SURFACE WITH MODIFIED

CONCRETE OVERLAY. REPAVE BOTH

APPROACHES.

60.5,60.9 FILL AND STABILIZE SLOPE EROSION AND

UNDERMINING AT WEST ABUTMENT,

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL, AND PIER # 2.

59.2 REMOVE FORMWORK FROM INSIDE BOX

GIRDER.

59.1 CLEAN AND PAINT BEARINGS.

60.6,222.

CLEAN AND REPOINT WINGWALL/GUARDWALL

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY.

58.6 INSTALL FILTERS IN WEEP HOLES TO PREVENT

LOSS OF EMBANKMENT.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

NOLAND CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 05/17/2021

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C

58.6 INSTALL ANCHOR BOLT NUT ON FOURTH RAIL

MOUNT FROM EAST END ON SOUTH SIDE.

REPLACE MISSING RAIL SET SCREWS IN

SEVERAL LOCATIONS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

Remarks :

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

NOLAND CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/16/2021

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

F

G

G

F

G

N

F

G

N

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

G

G

N

G

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

F

F

G

N

F

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE F

N 51 FT

F

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

STONES, ROCK

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS G

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER COUNTERFORTS G

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14.PILE BENTS

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER TREES

G

N

G

N

F

G

G

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK OVERHANGS.

58.2 EXPANSION JOINT COVER PLATES HAVE LOOSE/MISSING BOLTS WITH NO BOLTS PRESENT ALONG APPROACH EDGES.

EXPANSION JOINT COVER PLATES RATTLE UNDER LIVE LOAD . WEST EXPANSION JOINT COVER PLATE LOOSE AT SOUTH CURB AND AT NORTH CURB OF EAST EXPANSION JOINT. MINOR TO MODERATE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION JOINTS.

WATER LEAKAGE THROUGH EXPANSION JOINTS ONTO BEARING SEATS.

58.3

222.4

222.6

ROADWAY STRIPING HAS AREAS OF MINOR DETERIORATION. MODERATE MAP CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT. VEGETATION GROWTH THROUGH CRACKS AT APPROACHES, MAINLY ON SHOULDERS. MODERATE

SETTLEMENT WITH PATCHING AND ASPHALT RAMPING AT BOTH APPROACHES.

58.4 ROUGH RIDE AT APPROACHES DUE TO SETTLEMENT AND LOOSE EXPANSION JOINT COVER PLATES (SEE 58.2, 222.6).

58.5

58.6

MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CONCRETE CURBS AND PARAPETS. MINOR DETERIORATION OF

CURB JOINT SEALANT.

BRIDGE RAIL POST ANCHOR BOLT NUT MISSING ON POST # 4 OF SOUTH RAILING. VEGETATION OVERGROWING SOUTH RAILING

AT WEST APPROACH.

58.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES, MODERATE AT APPROACHES. MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINES. SEVERAL PARTIALLY CLOGGED DECK DRAINS. SEVERE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN

ROADWAY DRAINAGE DITCH AT NORTH SIDE OF WEST APPROACH.

59.1 MODERATE RUSTING OF BEARING DEVICES.

59.2 MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR SCALING AND MOSS GROWTH UNDER DECK DRAINS. MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE, MOISTURE, AND RUST STAINING NEAR WEST ABUTMENT. MINOR SEASONAL VEGETATION GROWTH ON BOX GIRDER

UNDERSIDE NEAR WEST ABUTMENT. MINOR SPALL ON NORTH SIDE OF BOX GIRDER, SPAN # 3.

UBIV REQUIRED TO ACCESS BOX GIRDER INTERIOR. 2005 SNOOPER INSPECTION REVEALED FORMWORK STILL IN PLACE INSIDE

BOX (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).

60.1 MODERATE STAINING ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT CENTER WEEP HOLE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MODERATE MOSS GROWTH, VINE GROWTH, AND LEAKAGE ON SOUTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. MODERATE SCALING BELOW WEEP HOLE ON SOUTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEATS. SEE ALSO 58.2.

60.5

60.9

60.12

SEVERE EROSION AND UNDERMINING (FULL LENGTH X 2' H X UP TO 3'-11" OF UNDERMINING) OF WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL WITH COUNTERFORT AND SPREAD FOOTING EXPOSED (8' L X UP TO 1'-9" H); HOWEVER, FOOTING IS LARGELY FOUNDED ON ROCK. MODERATE EROSION AT NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT WITH EXPOSED TREE ROOTS WITH SOME ASPHALT IN PLACE

OVER TOP OF AREA.

MINOR EROSION TRENCH BEGINNING AT SOUTH DECK DRAIN ON EAST ABUTMENT SLOPE, STONE IN PLACE DIRECTLY BENEATH DRAIN. MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION ALONG LENGTH OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL WITH SOME STONE IN PLACE.

EROSION EXPOSING SOUTHWEST WINGWALL FOOTING WITH UNDERMINING (UP TO 6' EXPOSED WITH APPROXIMATELY 1'-3" OF

EROSION AND 2' OF UNDERMINING)

60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS/GUARDWALLS. MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH MINOR EFFLORESCENCE AND MINOR MOSS GROWTH IN

JOINTS.

60.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN WEEP HOLES AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.

60.11 ROCK SLOPE AT WEST ABUTMENT HELD BACK BY METAL RODS AND WASHERS (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).

60.13 MINOR CRACKING OF PIER COLUMNS. SEVERAL MINOR SPALLS IN PIER COLUMNS WITH EXPOSED STEEL REINFORCEMENT DUE

TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER.

GRAFFITI AT BASE OF PIER # 1 COLUMN BOTH FACES, AT BASE OF PIER # 2 COLUMN WEST FACE, AND AT BASE OF PIER #3

COLUMN WEST FACE.

60.17 MODERATE SLOPE EROSION AT PIER #2 COLUMN, EAST SIDE.

60.19 TREE GROWING AGAINST PIER # 3 COLUMN, NORTH SIDE. TREES GROWING AGAINST UNDERSIDE AND BOTH SIDES OF

STRUCTURE. MINOR VINE GROWTH ON PIER # 2 AND # 3 COLUMNS.

222.3 MODERATE DECAY AND WEATHERING OF TIMBER GUARDRAILS; MODERATE MOSS GROWTH ALSO PRESENT. MINOR TO MODERATE DECAY IN NORTHEAST TIMBER APPROACH RAIL POSTS; DECAYED AREAS UP TO 4" IN DIAMETER IN CENTER OF TOP

1' OF POSTS (POST DIMENSIONS ARE 1' H X 7" W).

222.7 MISSING REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.8 BRIDGE AND APPROACHES ON CURVED ALIGNMENT. REVERSE CURVE AT WEST APPROACH.

36.B

36.C

MASONRY GUARDWALLS AND TIMBER GUARDRAILS AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS; GUARDRAIL IS NOT STEEL- BACKED. NEITHER GUARDWALLS NOR GUARDRAILS ARE CONNECTED TO BRIDGE RAIL. GUARDRAIL HEIGHT AS LOW AS 1'-4"

DOES NOT MEET CURRENT MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 21 19 36 33

HS 24 22 41 37

TYPE 3 23 21 39 35

TYPE 3S2 32 29 54 49

TYPE 3-3 38 34 64 58

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 12/01/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............NOLAND CREEK BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5460-101 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................S. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 9A3

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3401A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

374 - NORTH CAROLINA

37173 SWAIN

00000

1 6 4 00001 0

NOLAND CREEK

LAKEVIEW DRIVE

5460101P0000000

6 2 MILES FROM BEGINNING OF NPS

ROUTE 9A (LAKEVIEW DRIVE).

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

.00 (KM PT: 0 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 06 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

SINGLE OR SPREAD

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............005 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............82.5 FT ( 25.1 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 367. FT ( 112.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............24 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 21.8

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............41 TONS ( 37.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2021 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-101P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35 27'30 30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 30.2 FT ( 9.2 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 83 31 '38.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 33.5 FT ( 10.2 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 99 MI ( 159 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2000 (34) SKEW ANGLE:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2009 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2200 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 30.2 FT ( 9.2 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2029 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 6 - ALUMINUM

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................10.00 FT ( 3.05 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 96 FT ( 0.9 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................8 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 0 0 N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 13000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 900000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

9/05-UBIV INSPECTION.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

SNOOPER REQUIRED FOR HATCH ACCESS.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

13000

$ 900000

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5460101P0000000

Inspection Date: 05/17/2021 Facility Carried: LAKEVIEW DRIVE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING WEST TOWARD FORNEY CREEK

PHOTO 4

Description NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description DECK OVERVIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO 6

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN 2 LOOKING WEST

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT WEARING SURFACE

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT WEARING SURFACE, SPAN #1 IN EASTBOUND

LANE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT WEARING SURFACE, NEAR WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL MAP AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, WEST

APPROACH SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL MAP AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, EAST APPROACH

SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINTS, EAST ABUTMENT JOINT SHOWN;

NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN JOINT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL MISSING BOLTS IN ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINT COVER PLATES, WEST

ABUTMENT JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description LOOSE EXPANSION JOINT COVER PLATE AT NORTH CURB OF EAST ABUTMENT JOINT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION JOINT, EAST ABUTMENT JOINT AT

NORTH SHOULDER SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description VEGETATION GROWTH ON SOUTHWEST WINGWALL/GUARDWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBS, NORTH CURBLINE NEAR

EAST END SHOWN; ALSO NOTE MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPET

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL CLOGGED DECK DRAIN ALONG SOUTH CURB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN ROADWAY DRAINAGE DITCH

AT NORTH SIDE OF WEST APPROACH

PHOTO 20

Description TYPICAL DECAY AND WEATHERING OF TIMBER APRROACH GUARDRAILS, NORTH

RAILING AT EAST APPROACH SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER NEAR WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 22

Description TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER NEAR WEST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 24

Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description EROSION AND UNDERMINING OF WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; NOTE EXPOSED

COUNTERFORT AND SPREAD FOOTING

PHOTO 26

Description HEAVY VEGETATION, MOSS, AND WATER STAINING AT SOUTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description SCALING WITH DEBRIS FROM SOUTH WEEP HOLE OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO 28

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT WEST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO 30

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

MOSS GROWTH THROUGHOUT WINGWALLS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER COLUMNS, WEST FACE OF PIER #3 SHOWN

PHOTO 32

Description TYPICAL SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN PIER COLUMNS, NORTH FACE OF PIER #3

SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 33

Description EROSION AROUND WEST FACE OF PIER #1

PHOTO 34

Description EROSION CHANNEL UNDER SPAN #2 AND AROUND PIER #2

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 35

Description MINOR EROSION AND VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO 36

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 37

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM