Bridge Inspection Rpt_5460-040P-2022.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-23-R-000019
About this file
This solicitation is for a construction project located in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The project consists of work on three schedules, including full depth reclamation and asphalt concrete pavement work on 6.41 miles of Lakeview Drive East in Swain County, North Carolina. It also includes asphalt concrete pavement milling, overlay, and reconstruction work totaling 3.05 miles on Newfound Gap Road, River Road, and Gatlinburg Bypass Road in Sevier County, Tennessee. An additional 6.13 miles of asphalt concrete pavement work is specified for Heintooga Ridge Road in Swain County, North Carolina. The total cost of the project is expected to be between $25-35 million. The solicitation number is 693C73-23-R-000019. Proposals from certified Small Business Concerns will be accepted and must include qualifications related to experience on similar projects. The request for proposals is expected to be issued on February 22, 2023, with the proposal due date and location specified in Block 13a.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1
GATLINBURG BYPASS OVER WEST PRONG LPR
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/10/2022
ED
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/10/2022
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
06 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 230.0 FT (70.1 M)
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 90 FT (27.4 M)
6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 36.0 FT (11 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .
15A13, 15A28 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 30 °
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
1996-ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE APPLIED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION
JOINTS INSTALLED. 2013-ROADWAY REPAVED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION
JOINTS INSTALLED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 3.60 (KM PT 5.79)
STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE
10 (NEWFOUND GAP ROAD).FACILITY CARRIED: ......... GATLINBURG BYPASS
FEATURE INTERSECTED: WEST PRONG LPR
INSPECTION TEAM: D. Leondaridis, M. Putallaz
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Mike Putallaz
REPORT REVIEW:
Zane Bailey 703-404-6242
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 10/26/2022
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete box girder bridge is in fair to good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the asphaltic plug expansion joints over the abutments, collision damage to the east parapet at the south approach, debris accumulation in the curblines with clogged deck drains, exposed rebar due to insufficient concrete cover on the underside of the box girder, cracking of the approach pavement, and a lack of reflective object markers at the parapet ends and at the structure for the underpass roadway. Due to the vehicle scrapes on the underside of the box girder, consideration should be given to the installation of vertical clearance signs for the underpass roadway.
Consideration should be given to utilizing an underbridge inspection vehicle (UBIV) with traffic control at subsequent inspections to access the box girder interior.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 05/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET
ENDS. INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS FOR
UNDERPASS ROADWAY. INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT
MARKERS AT SOUTH ABUTMENT AND SOUTH PIER WALL
FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
12 EA 250 3000
58.5,58.6, 58.7,60.6
PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND
VEGETATION GROWTH FROM SIDEWALKS, PARAPETS,
CURBLINES, DECK DRAINS, AND WINGWALLS.
1 LS 1000 1000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 4000
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.2 REPLACE ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION
JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS. 1 LS 40000 40000
222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT
APPROACH PAVEMENT. 1 LS 7000 7000
59.2 RESET DISPLACED MASONRY AND CLEAN AND
REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS ON EAST PARAPET
AT SOUTH APPROACH AS NECESSARY.
1 LS 3000 3000
59.2 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF
BOX GIRDER AND COAT WITH APPROVED
SEALANT.
1 LS 1000 1000
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 29000 29000
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 80000
12 EA 250 3000
1 LS 1000 1000
1 LS 40000 40000
1 LS 7000 7000
1 LS 3000 3000
1 LS 1000 1000
1 LS 29000 29000
80000
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 05/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0
84000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
8400084000840004000
80000
84000
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
G
G
G
F
P
G
N
N
F
N
N
N
G
N
N
G
G
N
G
G
G
G
N
1- SUFF
2 - MED
N
N
G
F
G
N
G
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS F
3. WEARING SURFACE F
N 18 FT
G
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
ROCK, SAND, STONES
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES F
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION G
12.OTHER CONDUIT/GRAFFITI G
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14.PILE BENTS
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER PIPE/GRAFFITI
G
N
N
N
G
G
F
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
58.1 UNABLE TO VERIFY MINOR CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE AND EXPOSED FORM TIES DUE TO LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX
GIRDER INTERIOR.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS AT PIERS.
58.2
58.3
MINOR DETERIORATION OF ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION JOINTS, SOME ASPHALT PATCHING PRESENT.
MINOR CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE IN SOME LOCATIONS.
58.5
58.6
58.7
MINOR SCALING OF SIDEWALKS AND PARAPETS. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON SIDEWALKS AND PARAPETS. MINOR
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON APPROACH SIDEWALKS.
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE (8'L) ON EAST PARAPET AT SOUTH APPROACH WITH DISPLACEMENT (UP TO 5") OF MASONRY. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON APPROACH
PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES; DECK DRAINS CLOGGED.
59.2 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; WATER LEAKAGE AND RUST STAINING NEAR MIDDLE OF CENTER SPAN. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF BOX GIRDER IN SOME LOCATIONS. VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER IN SOUTH SPAN. EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ON BOX GIRDER
UNDERSIDE IN SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR SPALLING OF BOX GIRDER BOLSTERS AT ABUTMENTS.
UNABLE TO VERIFY MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON FLOOR OF BOX GIRDER DUE TO LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX GIRDER
INTERIOR.
59.6 UNABLE TO VERIFY MINOR TOP CORNER SPALL ON INTERIOR OF CELL #4 OF SOUTH SPAN AT INTERSECTION OF DIAPHRAGM
AND WEB HAUNCH DUE LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX GIRDER INTERIOR.
60.1 MODERATE STAINING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO LEAKAGE BETWEEN BOX GIRDER BOLSTERS AND ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. TWO MODERATE VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKS (UP TO 1/16"W X FULL HEIGHT) ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL HAVE BEEN SEALED IN PAST; MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT
EAST SIDE.
60.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. FRACTURED STONE ON NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. MINOR HORIZONTAL FRACTURING OF MASONRY ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL. MODERATE
VEGETATION GROWTH ON AND ALONG WINGWALLS.
60.7 MODERATE FILL LOSS FROM ABUTMENT WEEP HOLES; SEVERAL PARTIALLY CLOGGED.
60.9
60.11
MINOR EROSION OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE; SMALL ANIMAL BURROW NEAR EAST END AT TOP.
GROUTED MASONRY SLOPE PAVING ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER.
60.12
60.19
UNABLE TO VERIFY UTILITY CONDUIT IN GOOD CONDITION IN CELL #4 OF SOUTH SPAN DUE TO LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX
GIRDER INTERIOR.
MODERATE CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERTS NEAR NORTH PIER.
GRAFFITI ON NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AND NORTH SIDE OF NORTH PIER.
60.13
60.15
CHLORIDE STAINING OF PIER WALLS FROM BEARING SEATS. MODERATE SCALING OF NORTH PIER WALL ON SOUTH SIDE AT
WATERLINE.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.2
61.3
GROUTED ROCK RETAINING WALL ALONG NORTH CHANNEL BANK TO SUPPORT GRAVEL ROAD; MINOR SCOUR ALONG BOTTOM
OF WALL. CLASS 3 RIPRAP IN PLACE ALONG CHANNEL SIDE OF SOUTH PIER.
222.3 STEEL-BACKED TIMBER GUARDRAIL AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH ONLY; ONE CONNECTION NUT MISSING.
222.4 MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING (UP TO 1/4"W) OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT.
222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT PARAPET ENDS OR AT SOUTH ABUTMENT AND SOUTH PIER WALL FOR
UNDERPASS ROADWAY. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS NOT PROVIDED FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
H 16 15 27 24
HS 22 20 37 34
TYPE 3 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3S2 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3-3 31 28 53 48
2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
08/16/2016
GIRDER SHEAR CAPACITY
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
GATLINBURG BYPASS BR DGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5460-040 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 040P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................N. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 15A13, 15A28
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
474 - TENNESSEE
47155 SEVIER
00000
1 6 3 00012 0
WEST PRONG LPR
GATLINBURG BYPASS
5460040P0000000
0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE
10 (NEWFOUND GAP ROAD).
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
3.60 (KM PT: 5.79 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 06 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
SINGLE OR SPREAD
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............90 FT ( 27.4 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 230. FT ( 70.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............22.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 20
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............37.0 TONS ( 33.6 METRIC TONS)
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
GATLINBURG BYPASS BR DGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35 41'41 20" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 83 31 '49 80" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 36.0 FT ( 11 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 5 MI ( 8 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 24.0 FT ( 7.3 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 6 - HIGHWAY - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2630 (34) SKEW ANGLE:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2893 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 2 8 FT ( 0.9 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 2 8 FT ( 0.9 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 6 - ALUMINUM
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................4.00 FT ( 1.22 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3 50 FT ( 1 07 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 14.42 FT ( 4.4 M)
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 4000
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 80000
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1996-ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE APPLIED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION JOINTS INSTALLED. 2013-ROADWAY REPAVED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG
EXPANSION JOINTS INSTALLED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT REQUIRED TO ENTER CONCRETE BOX. 9/16" SOCKET WRENCH AND UBIV NEEDED FOR HATCHES.
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
$ 4000
$ 80000
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
Inspector: Mike Putallaz Structure Number: 5460040P0000000
Inspection Date: 05/10/2022 Facility Carried: GATLINBURG BYPASS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD PIGEON FORGE
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALTIC PLUG JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS, EXPANSION
JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE ASPHALT PATCHING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALTIC PLUG JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS, EXPANSION
JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE ASPHALT PATCHING
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE, NORTH SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON PARAPETS, WEST SIDE OF NORTH SPAN SHOWN;
NOTE TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH
PHOTO 10
Description COLLISION DAMAGE ON EAST PARAPET AT SOUTH APPROACH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES, EAST
CURBLINE SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL CLOGGED DECK DRAIN, WEST SIDE OF SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH, CENTER SPAN
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF ACCESS HATCH ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, SOUTH SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, EAST SIDE
OF SOUTH SPAN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ON UNDERSIDE OF
BOX GIRDER, NORTH SPAN NEAR EAST SIDE SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER IN SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO 20
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description SEALED VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKS ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; NOTE
TYPICAL STAINING ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO JOINT LEAKAGE
PHOTO 22
Description CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO; NOTE TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SEALANT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description FRACTURED STONE ON NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE TYPICAL
DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE
PHOTO 24
Description HORIZONTAL FRACTURING OF MASONRY ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE TYPICAL
VINE GROWTH ON WINGWALLS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ON AND ALONG WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
SHOWN
PHOTO 26
Description EROSION OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE
PHOTO 28
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERTS NEAR NORTH PIER
PHOTO 30
Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .