Bridge Inspection Rpt_5460-040P-2022.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-23-R-000019
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for a construction project located in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The project consists of work on three schedules, including full depth reclamation and asphalt concrete pavement work on 6.41 miles of Lakeview Drive East in Swain County, North Carolina. It also includes asphalt concrete pavement milling, overlay, and reconstruction work totaling 3.05 miles on Newfound Gap Road, River Road, and Gatlinburg Bypass Road in Sevier County, Tennessee. An additional 6.13 miles of asphalt concrete pavement work is specified for Heintooga Ridge Road in Swain County, North Carolina. The total cost of the project is expected to be between $25-35 million. The solicitation number is 693C73-23-R-000019. Proposals from certified Small Business Concerns will be accepted and must include qualifications related to experience on similar projects. The request for proposals is expected to be issued on February 22, 2023, with the proposal due date and location specified in Block 13a.

View the file

Other files

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1

GATLINBURG BYPASS OVER WEST PRONG LPR

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/10/2022

ED

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/10/2022

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

06 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 230.0 FT (70.1 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 90 FT (27.4 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 36.0 FT (11 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

15A13, 15A28 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 30 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1996-ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE APPLIED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION

JOINTS INSTALLED. 2013-ROADWAY REPAVED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION

JOINTS INSTALLED.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 3.60 (KM PT 5.79)

STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE

10 (NEWFOUND GAP ROAD).FACILITY CARRIED: ......... GATLINBURG BYPASS

FEATURE INTERSECTED: WEST PRONG LPR

INSPECTION TEAM: D. Leondaridis, M. Putallaz

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Mike Putallaz

REPORT REVIEW:

Zane Bailey 703-404-6242

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 10/26/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder bridge is in fair to good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the asphaltic plug expansion joints over the abutments, collision damage to the east parapet at the south approach, debris accumulation in the curblines with clogged deck drains, exposed rebar due to insufficient concrete cover on the underside of the box girder, cracking of the approach pavement, and a lack of reflective object markers at the parapet ends and at the structure for the underpass roadway. Due to the vehicle scrapes on the underside of the box girder, consideration should be given to the installation of vertical clearance signs for the underpass roadway.

Consideration should be given to utilizing an underbridge inspection vehicle (UBIV) with traffic control at subsequent inspections to access the box girder interior.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 05/10/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET

ENDS. INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS FOR

UNDERPASS ROADWAY. INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT

MARKERS AT SOUTH ABUTMENT AND SOUTH PIER WALL

FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

12 EA 250 3000

58.5,58.6, 58.7,60.6

PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

VEGETATION GROWTH FROM SIDEWALKS, PARAPETS,

CURBLINES, DECK DRAINS, AND WINGWALLS.

1 LS 1000 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 4000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2 REPLACE ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION

JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS. 1 LS 40000 40000

222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT

APPROACH PAVEMENT. 1 LS 7000 7000

59.2 RESET DISPLACED MASONRY AND CLEAN AND

REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS ON EAST PARAPET

AT SOUTH APPROACH AS NECESSARY.

1 LS 3000 3000

59.2 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER AND COAT WITH APPROVED

SEALANT.

1 LS 1000 1000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 29000 29000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 80000

12 EA 250 3000

1 LS 1000 1000

1 LS 40000 40000

1 LS 7000 7000

1 LS 3000 3000

1 LS 1000 1000

1 LS 29000 29000

80000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 05/10/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

84000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

8400084000840004000

80000

84000

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

F

P

G

N

N

F

N

N

N

G

N

N

G

G

N

G

G

G

G

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

G

F

G

N

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE F

N 18 FT

G

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ROCK, SAND, STONES

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES F

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER CONDUIT/GRAFFITI G

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14.PILE BENTS

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER PIPE/GRAFFITI

G

N

N

N

G

G

F

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

58.1 UNABLE TO VERIFY MINOR CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE AND EXPOSED FORM TIES DUE TO LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX

GIRDER INTERIOR.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS AT PIERS.

58.2

58.3

MINOR DETERIORATION OF ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION JOINTS, SOME ASPHALT PATCHING PRESENT.

MINOR CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE IN SOME LOCATIONS.

58.5

58.6

58.7

MINOR SCALING OF SIDEWALKS AND PARAPETS. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON SIDEWALKS AND PARAPETS. MINOR

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON APPROACH SIDEWALKS.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE (8'L) ON EAST PARAPET AT SOUTH APPROACH WITH DISPLACEMENT (UP TO 5") OF MASONRY. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON APPROACH

PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES; DECK DRAINS CLOGGED.

59.2 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER; WATER LEAKAGE AND RUST STAINING NEAR MIDDLE OF CENTER SPAN. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF BOX GIRDER IN SOME LOCATIONS. VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER IN SOUTH SPAN. EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ON BOX GIRDER

UNDERSIDE IN SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR SPALLING OF BOX GIRDER BOLSTERS AT ABUTMENTS.

UNABLE TO VERIFY MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON FLOOR OF BOX GIRDER DUE TO LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX GIRDER

INTERIOR.

59.6 UNABLE TO VERIFY MINOR TOP CORNER SPALL ON INTERIOR OF CELL #4 OF SOUTH SPAN AT INTERSECTION OF DIAPHRAGM

AND WEB HAUNCH DUE LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX GIRDER INTERIOR.

60.1 MODERATE STAINING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO LEAKAGE BETWEEN BOX GIRDER BOLSTERS AND ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. TWO MODERATE VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKS (UP TO 1/16"W X FULL HEIGHT) ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL HAVE BEEN SEALED IN PAST; MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT

EAST SIDE.

60.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. FRACTURED STONE ON NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. MINOR HORIZONTAL FRACTURING OF MASONRY ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL. MODERATE

VEGETATION GROWTH ON AND ALONG WINGWALLS.

60.7 MODERATE FILL LOSS FROM ABUTMENT WEEP HOLES; SEVERAL PARTIALLY CLOGGED.

60.9

60.11

MINOR EROSION OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE; SMALL ANIMAL BURROW NEAR EAST END AT TOP.

GROUTED MASONRY SLOPE PAVING ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER.

60.12

60.19

UNABLE TO VERIFY UTILITY CONDUIT IN GOOD CONDITION IN CELL #4 OF SOUTH SPAN DUE TO LACK OF UBIV TO ACCESS BOX

GIRDER INTERIOR.

MODERATE CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERTS NEAR NORTH PIER.

GRAFFITI ON NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AND NORTH SIDE OF NORTH PIER.

60.13

60.15

CHLORIDE STAINING OF PIER WALLS FROM BEARING SEATS. MODERATE SCALING OF NORTH PIER WALL ON SOUTH SIDE AT

WATERLINE.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.2

61.3

GROUTED ROCK RETAINING WALL ALONG NORTH CHANNEL BANK TO SUPPORT GRAVEL ROAD; MINOR SCOUR ALONG BOTTOM

OF WALL. CLASS 3 RIPRAP IN PLACE ALONG CHANNEL SIDE OF SOUTH PIER.

222.3 STEEL-BACKED TIMBER GUARDRAIL AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH ONLY; ONE CONNECTION NUT MISSING.

222.4 MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING (UP TO 1/4"W) OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT.

222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT PARAPET ENDS OR AT SOUTH ABUTMENT AND SOUTH PIER WALL FOR

UNDERPASS ROADWAY. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS NOT PROVIDED FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

H 16 15 27 24

HS 22 20 37 34

TYPE 3 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3S2 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3-3 31 28 53 48

2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

08/16/2016

GIRDER SHEAR CAPACITY

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

GATLINBURG BYPASS BR DGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5460-040 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 040P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................N. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 15A13, 15A28

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

474 - TENNESSEE

47155 SEVIER

00000

1 6 3 00012 0

WEST PRONG LPR

GATLINBURG BYPASS

5460040P0000000

0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE

10 (NEWFOUND GAP ROAD).

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

3.60 (KM PT: 5.79 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 06 - BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

SINGLE OR SPREAD

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............90 FT ( 27.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 230. FT ( 70.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............22.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 20

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............37.0 TONS ( 33.6 METRIC TONS)

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

GATLINBURG BYPASS BR DGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35 41'41 20" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 83 31 '49 80" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 36.0 FT ( 11 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 5 MI ( 8 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 24.0 FT ( 7.3 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 6 - HIGHWAY - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2630 (34) SKEW ANGLE:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2893 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 2 8 FT ( 0.9 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 2 8 FT ( 0.9 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 6 - ALUMINUM

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................4.00 FT ( 1.22 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3 50 FT ( 1 07 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 14.42 FT ( 4.4 M)

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 4000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 80000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1996-ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE APPLIED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG EXPANSION JOINTS INSTALLED. 2013-ROADWAY REPAVED AND ASPHALTIC PLUG

EXPANSION JOINTS INSTALLED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT REQUIRED TO ENTER CONCRETE BOX. 9/16" SOCKET WRENCH AND UBIV NEEDED FOR HATCHES.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

$ 4000

$ 80000

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

Inspector: Mike Putallaz Structure Number: 5460040P0000000

Inspection Date: 05/10/2022 Facility Carried: GATLINBURG BYPASS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD PIGEON FORGE

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALTIC PLUG JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS, EXPANSION

JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE ASPHALT PATCHING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALTIC PLUG JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS, EXPANSION

JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE ASPHALT PATCHING

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE, NORTH SPAN SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON PARAPETS, WEST SIDE OF NORTH SPAN SHOWN;

NOTE TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH

PHOTO 10

Description COLLISION DAMAGE ON EAST PARAPET AT SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES, EAST

CURBLINE SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL CLOGGED DECK DRAIN, WEST SIDE OF SOUTH SPAN SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH, CENTER SPAN

PHOTO 16

Description GENERAL VIEW OF ACCESS HATCH ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, SOUTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, EAST SIDE

OF SOUTH SPAN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER, NORTH SPAN NEAR EAST SIDE SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER IN SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description SEALED VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKS ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; NOTE

TYPICAL STAINING ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO JOINT LEAKAGE

PHOTO 22

Description CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO; NOTE TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SEALANT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description FRACTURED STONE ON NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE TYPICAL

DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO 24

Description HORIZONTAL FRACTURING OF MASONRY ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE TYPICAL

VINE GROWTH ON WINGWALLS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ON AND ALONG WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

SHOWN

PHOTO 26

Description EROSION OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE

PHOTO 28

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERTS NEAR NORTH PIER

PHOTO 30

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .