Bridge Inspection Rpt_5460-001P-2022.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

WEST PRONG LPR BRIDGE AT HEADQUARTERS

NEWFOUND GAP ROAD OVER WEST PRONG LITTLE PIGEON RIVER

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-001P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/2022

EU

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-001P

WEST PRONG LPR BRIDGE AT INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022

HEADQUARTERS

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

11 - ARCH - DECK

N - NOT APPLICABLE

N - NA

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE

1A4

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

2012 (EST.) - ROADWAY REPAVED.

LOCATION

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

164.0 FT (50 M)

48 FT (14.6 M)

41.3 FT (12.6 M)

37.3 FT (11.4 M)

0 °

N

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 1.50 (KM PT 2.41)

STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 13.0 MILES NORTHWEST FROM

NEWFOUND GAP.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NEWFOUND GAP ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: WEST PRONG LITTLE PIGEON

INSPECTION TEAM: O. Tariq, J. Valcheff

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Osama Tariq

REPORT REVIEW:

Zane Bailey 703-404-6242

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 10/26/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete arch bridge is in fair to good structural condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the vertical joint filler material with vegetation growth, a loose coping stone at the end of the northeast wingwall, undermining of the downstream apron at the south pier, and missing object markers at the ends of the parapets.

Other problems include cracking throughout the asphalt pavement over the structure and approaches, cracking of the arch underside with efflorescence, vegetation growth along the wingwalls, erosion at the west end of the north pier and south abutment, and accumulation of drift in center span.

The Structure Evaluation Summary continues on the following page.

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-001P

WEST PRONG LPR BRIDGE AT INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022

HEADQUARTERS

It should be noted that the loose coping stone at the northwest wingwall has been reset since the last inspection.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-001P

WEST PRONG LPR BRIDGE AT HEADQUARTERS INSPECTION DATE : 05/09/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.6,60.6 REMOVE VEGETATION FROM PARAPETS AND ALONG

WINGWALLS. 1 LS 1000 1000

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT ENDS

OF PARAPETS. 1 LS 1000 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 2000

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

58.6,60.8 CLEAN AND RESEAL VERTICAL EXPANSION

JOINTS. 1 LS 15000 15000

59.3 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKS ON ARCH

UNDERSIDE AS NECESSARY. 1 LS 5000 5000

60.6 RESET LOOSE COPING STONE AT END OF

NORTHEAST WINGWALL. 1 LS 4000 4000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 16000 16000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 40000

1 LS 1000 1000

1 LS 1000 1000

1 LS 15000 15000

1 LS 5000 5000

1 LS 4000 4000

1 LS 16000 16000

40000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-001P

WEST PRONG LPR BRIDGE AT HEADQUARTERS INSPECTION DATE : 05/09/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

42000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

420002000

40000

42000

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-001P

WEST PRONG LPR BRIDGE AT HEADQUARTERS INSPECTION DATE: 05/08/2022

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N

10.OTHER:

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

N

G

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

F

N

N

N

N

G

G

G

N

F

F

G

F

F

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

N

G

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE F

N

FLOOD GAUGE

8 FT

G

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

STONES

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14.PILE BENTS

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER STONE APRON

G

N

N

N

F

G

G

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

58.3

222.4

MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT OVER STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES.

58.6 MINOR CRACKING OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON STONES. MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON PARAPETS. SEVERE DETERIORATION OF FILLER MATERIAL IN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS ON PARAPETS.

59.3

59.8

MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE.

MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON ARCH UNDERSIDE. MINOR LEAKAGE THROUGH CENTER SPAN ARCH, EAST SIDE, NEAR SOUTH PIER.

EXPOSED REBAR (2"L) ON ARCH UNDERSIDE ON EAST SIDE OF CENTER SPAN.

MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES AND ON SPANDRESL WALLS.

60.1

60.6

MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM RING STONES ON ENDS OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL MASONRY.

MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS. ONE LOOSE COPING STONE AT END OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL HAS BEEN RESET SINCE LAST INSPECTION. ONE LOOSE STONE AT END OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL. MODERATE

DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF FILLER MATERIAL AND MODERATE VINE GROWTH IN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS WITH MODERATE VINE GROWTH; TREE GROWING FROM VERTICAL JOINT ON BOTH SIDES OF NORTH PIER.

60.9 MODERATE EROSION (10'L X 6'W X 3'D) AT WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.17

60.19

61.1

61.2

61.4

HEAVY BUILD-UP OF STONES AND SOIL IN NORTH AND CENTER SPANS; FLOW IS THROUGH SOUTH SPAN AGAINST SOUTH PIER.

MODERATE SCOUR ALONG SOUTH PIER EXPOSING APRON; UNABLE TO VERIFY PREVIOUSLY NOTED UNDERMINING DUE TO

HIGH FLOW.

MODERATE EROSION (20'L X 10'W X 3'D) AT WEST END OF NORTH PIER.

SEVERAL FALLEN TREES ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH SPAN. MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DRIFT IN CENTER SPAN.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.5 FLOOD GAUGE ATTACHED TO SOUTH ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE. CONDUIT IS LOOSE; INSULATION WRAPPING AROUND CONDUIT

HAS COME OFF.

222.5 MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTHWEST PARAPET.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST, AND SOUTHWEST PARAPET ENDS.

H 15 14 25 23

HS 19 17 32 29

TYPE 3 17 15 29 26

TYPE 3S2 28 25 47 43

TYPE 3-3 33 30 56 51

2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

06/20/2019

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

WEST PRONG LPR BR DGE AT HEADQUARTERS INSPECTION DATE: 05/08/2022

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............WEST PRONG LPR BRIDGE AT

HEADQUARTERS

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5460-001 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 001P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................N. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 1A4

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........1120C

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

474 - TENNESSEE

47155 SEVIER

00000

1 6 7 00010 0

WEST PRONG LITTLE PIGEON RIVER

NEWFOUND GAP ROAD

5460001P0000000

13.0 MILES NORTHWEST FROM

NEWFOUND GAP.

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

1 50 (KM PT: 2.41 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

3 - MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR NATIONAL

REGISTER

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 11 - ARCH - DECK (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............48 FT ( 14.6 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 164. FT ( 50 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. N - NA

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. N - NA

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. N - NA

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... N - NOT APPLICABLE

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............19.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 17.2

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............32.0 TONS ( 29 METRIC TONS)

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

WEST PRONG LPR BR DGE AT HEADQUARTERS INSPECTION DATE: 05/08/2022

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35 41' 15.1" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 37.3 FT ( 11.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 83 32 ' 07.6" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 41.3 FT ( 12.6 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 90 MI ( 145 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 44.5 FT ( 13.6 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 29.5 FT ( 9 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 7 0 FT ( 2.1 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 8 0 FT ( 2.4 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............7265 (34) SKEW ANGLE:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................7990 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 37.3 FT ( 11.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

3 - PARAPET ONLY(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 9 - OTHER

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................0.0 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.67 FT ( 0 81 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0.0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(58) DECK:.......................................N (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 40000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2012 (EST ) - ROADWAY REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

$ 2000

$ 40000

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

Inspector: Osama Tariq Structure Number: 5460001P0000000

Inspection Date: 05/09/2022 Facility Carried: NEWFOUND GAP ROA

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD NEWFOUND GAP

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT, NORTHBOUND LANE OVER SOUTH PIER SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS, WEST PARAPET IN

CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL JOINT FILLER MATERIAL ON PARAPETS, WEST

PARAPET AT SOUTH PIER SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description LOOSE COPING STONE AT END OF NORTHWEST WIGNWALL

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT;

SOUTHBOUND LANE AT NORTH APPROACH SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL HONEYCOMBING ON ARCH UNDERSIDE, SOUTH SPAN AT SOUTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF INSULATION WRAPPING ON CONDUIT FRO

FLOOD GAUGE

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH, SOUTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE, CENTER SPAN AT NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE, EAST SIDE OF SOUTH

SPAN SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES, EAST SIDE OF NORTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF

ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description EROSION AT WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; NOTE TYPICAL

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN;

NOTE TYPICAL MISSING OBJECT MARKERS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF FILLER MATERIAL IN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS EAST

SIDE AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description EROSION AT WEST END OF NORTH PIER, CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO 22

Description ACCUMULATION OF DRIFT IN CENTER SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO 24

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL