Bridge Inspection Rpt_5460-058P-2022.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-23-R-000019
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for roadway improvement projects at Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The projects include full depth reclamation and asphalt concrete pavement work on 6.41 miles of Lakeview Drive East in Swain County, North Carolina, asphalt milling and overlay on 3.05 miles of roads including Newfound Gap Road and Sugarlands Headquarters Road in Sevier County, Tennessee, and thin lift asphalt concrete pavement on 6.13 miles including Heintooga Ridge Road and campground roads in Swain County, North Carolina. Additional work includes asphalt patching, stone masonry repointing, guardrail replacement, curb resetting, drainage structure cleaning and repair, ditch and shoulder reconditioning, sign replacement, pavement marking, concrete deck repairs, and deck overlay. The total project cost is estimated between $25-35 million, to be split among multiple schedules and contract options. Proposals from certified Small Business Concerns are due on or around February 22, 2023 as specified in Solicitation 693C73-23-R-000019 issued by the Federal Highway Administration.

View the file

Other files

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE

MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS OVER FIGHTING CREEK

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/2022

ED

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P

MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

04 - TEE BEAM

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

6 - BITUMINOUS

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

4 - MASONRY

000000000000

2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

LOCATION

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

66.0 FT (20.1 M)

23 FT (7 M)

25.0 FT (7.6 M)

22.8 FT (6.9 M)

45 °

N

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 0.24 (KM PT 0.39)

STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 0.2 MILES FROM MAINTENANCE

AREA.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... MAINTENANCE CENTER

FEATURE INTERSECTED: FIGHTING CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: O. Tariq, J. Valcheff

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Osama Tariq

REPORT REVIEW:

Zane Bailey 703-404-6242

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 10/26/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete tee beam bridge is in fair condition. The main problems are widespread cracking with efflorescence and delamination and spalling with exposed rebar on the beams and site-related scour with exposed footings at upstream end of the south pier and at the downstream end of the north pier. The beams should be repaired to mitigate further deterioration and the scour at the piers should be stabilized with engineered riprap.

Other problems include cracking and deterioration of the wearing surface and approach pavement, deterioration of the approach parapet and wingwall masonry mortar joints with vegetation growth, deterioration of the joint sealant in the railing joints, the bearing block for the sewer line is broken at the abutments, accumulation of drift at the upstream side of the south pier, the embankment of soil upstream of the north span is restricting the flow, and a lack of reflective object markers at the ends of the parapets.

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P

MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022

The Structure Evaluation Summary continues on the following page.

It should be noted that the roadway has been restriped and some potholes have been repatched with asphalt since the last inspection.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P

MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 05/09/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.6,58.7, 60.3,60.6, 60.15

REMOVE VEGETATION FROM STRUCTURE AS

NECESSARY. 1 LS 4000 4000

222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET

ENDS 4 EA 250 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 5000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

60.17 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP ALONG EXPOSED

FOOTINGS AT PIERS. 1 LS 10000 10000

59.2 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE ON BEAMS,

CLEAN REBAR, AND PLACE NEW CONCRETE

TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.

1 LS 10000 10000

61.4 REMOVE DRIFT FROM UPSTREAM END OF

SOUTH PIER AND EMBANKMENT UPSTREAM

OF NORTH SPAN.

1 LS 10000 10000

58.6,60.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT APPROACH PARAPET

AND WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS

NECESSARY.

1 LS 5000 5000

58.3,222.

SEAL CRACKING AND REPAIR DETERIORATION

OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND

APPROACH PAVEMENT.

1 LS 3000 3000

58.8 REPLACE BROKEN SEWER LINE BEARING

BLOCK AT ABUTMENTS. 1 LS 2000 2000

58.6 CLEAN AND SEAL RAILING JOINTS AT

ABUTMENTS. 1 LS 2000 2000

1 LS 4000 4000

4 EA 250 1000

1 LS 10000 10000

1 LS 10000 10000

1 LS 10000 10000

1 LS 5000 5000

1 LS 3000 3000

1 LS 2000 2000

1 LS 2000 2000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P

INSPECTION DATE : 05/09/2022MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 23000 23000

65000PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * : .......................... 70000PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL : ...... 65000 (*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0 work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be

70000 used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

1 LS 23000 23000

65000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

65000

70000

70000

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P

MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/08/2022

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

G

G

G

G

P

N

F

N

N

N

N

N

N

G

F

N

G

F

N

F

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

N

F

G

N

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE F

F 5 FT

G

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

STONESSTRIPING/ VEGETATION

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

N

G

G

F

G

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

58.1 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF DECK

UNDERSIDE.

58.3 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE ALONG CENTERLINE OF ROADWAY, NORTHBOUND LANE IN SOUTH SPAN. MODERATE CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE PARTIALLY SEALED OVER BOTH ABUTMENTS. SOME POTHOLES REPATCHED WITH ASPHALT SINCE LAST INSPECTION. ROADWAY HAS BEEN RESTRIPED SINCE LAST INSPECTION.

58.5

58.6

222.3

MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN RAILING JOINTS.

MINOR SCALING THROUGHOUT CURBS AND RAILINGS. WEST COPING STONE LOOSE AT NORTH APPROACH. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH. MINOR MOSS

GROWTH ON RAILINGS.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES.

58.8 UTILITY LINE ATTACHED TO EXTERIOR OF WEST RAILING. SEWER AND UTILITY LINES ALONG DECK UNDERSIDE BETWEEN BEAMS #3 AND #4; MINOR RUSTING OF PIPE, CONNECTION BRACKETS, AND HANGERS LEAVING RUST STAINING ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. BROKEN CONCRETE BLOCK FOR SEWER LINE SUPPORT AT ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. MINOR FLOOD DEBRIS

LODGED IN UTILITIES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

59.2 MINOR CRACKING WITH MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON SEVERAL BEAMS THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE; HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING ON BEAM SIDES, SOME EXTEND INTO DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR SCALING ON EXTERIOR SIDE OF

BEAMS #1 AND #7. MINOR SPALLING OF BEAM ENDS AT ABUTMENT BREASTWALL INTERFACE.

MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF NUMEROUS BEAM UNDERSIDES. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION LOSS ON EAST FACE OF BEAM #1 AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MODERATE SPALLING (20"L X 6"H X FULL WIDTH UNDER X 2"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION LOSS ON BEAM #2 IN NORTH SPAN AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (4'L X 2-1/2"H X 5-1/2" UNDER X 1-1/2"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 10% SECTION LOSS ON BEAM #7 IN NORTH SPAN AT MIDSPAN MINOR SPALLING (18"L X 2-1/2"H X 7" UNDER X 1"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 10% SECTION LOSS ON BEAM #7 IN CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER. MINOR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (4'L X 3-1/2"H X 7" UNDER X 1"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION LOSS ON BEAMS #1 AND #7 IN CENTER SPAN. MINOR DELAMINATION (16"L X 6"W) OF BEAM #5 IN CENTER SPAN NEAR MIDSPAN. MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (2'L X 7"H X 2" UNDER X 1-1/2"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION

LOSS ON BEAM #1 IN SOUTH SPAN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.1 MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM BEAMS ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND PIER WALLS.

60.3 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT ENDS.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. MINOR SPALLING OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS #4 AND #5.

60.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION

GROWTH.

60.9 PREVIOUSLY NOTED SCOUR (UP TO 2'D) ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT NOT OBSERVED.

60.15 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON PIER BEARING SEATS; MODERATE MOSS GROWTH ON ENDS.

60.16

60.17

61.2

MINOR SCOUR (8'L X 4'W X 1'D) AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER ON NORTH SIDE WITH FOOTING EXPOSED. MINOR EROSION

AND SCOUR WITH FOOTING EXPOSED (12'L X 10"H) AT DOWNSTREAM END OF NORTH PIER.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 MODERATE DRIFT ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER. DRIFT RESTRICTS FLOW OF APPROXIMATELY 25% OF

CENTER AND SOUTH SPANS.

EMBANKMENT RESTRICTS FLOW INTO NORTH SPAN AND UP TO 4'H SILT/STONE ACCUMULATION BENEATH NORTH SPAN PREVENTS WATER FLOWING THROUGH SPAN. MINOR ACCUMULATION OF SILT/STONE ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER.

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EAST SIDE OF NORTH SPAN.

222.4 MINOR DETERIORATION AND MODERATE CRACKING (UP TO 1/8"W) OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE OF APPROACHES; SOME PATCHED WITH ASPHALT SINCE LAST INSPECTION. MINOR POTHOLE IN SOUTHBOUND LANE OF NORTH

APPROACH.

222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT (UP TO 1") OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT AT ABUTMENTS.

222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT PARAPET ENDS.

36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 1'- 6-1/2" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

H 27 24 46 42

HS 37 34 62 56

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 47 43 79 72

TYPE 3-3 62 56 104 94

2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

06/06/2016

NEGATIVE MOMENT

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS

BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5460-058 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 058P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................N. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3032A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

474 - TENNESSEE

47155 SEVIER

00000

1 6 8 00405 0

FIGHTING CREEK

MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS

5460058P0000000

0 2 MILES FROM MAINTENANCE

AREA.

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

0 24 (KM PT: 0.39 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

3 - MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR NATIONAL

REGISTER

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 04 - TEE BEAM (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............23 FT ( 7 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 66.0 FT ( 20.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............37.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 33.6

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............62.0 TONS ( 56.2 METRIC TONS)

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35 41' 24.2" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 22.8 FT ( 6.9 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 83 32 '15.40" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 25.0 FT ( 7.6 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 0 MI ( 0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 4 0 FT ( 1.2 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 4 0 FT ( 1.2 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1 (34) SKEW ANGLE:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2010 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 22.8 FT ( 6.9 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2030 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 54 FT ( 0.47 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 0 00 FT ( 0 M)

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............5 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 5000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 65000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

$ 5000

$ 65000

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

Inspector: Osama Tariq Structure Number: 5460058P0000000

Inspection Date: 05/09/2022 Facility Carried: MAINTENANCE CENTE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD NEWFOUND GAP ROAD

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE DRIFT ACCUMULATION AT SOUTH PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE; NORTHBOUND LANE IN

SOUTH SPAN SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN RAILING JOINTS; WEST SIDE AT NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT; SOUTH APPROACH

SHOWN; ALSO NOTE ASPHALT PATCHING SINCE LAST INSPECTION

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT ALONG ABUTMENTS; SOUTH

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; CENTER SPAN; NOTE TYPICAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL HONEYCOMBING OF DECK UNDERSIDE; CENTER SPAN BETWEEN BEAMS #1

AND #2 AT SOUTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description SPALLING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXPOSED REBAR ON BEAM #2 IN NORTH SPAN AT

NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXPOSED REBAR ON BEAM #7 IN

NORTH SPAN AT MIDSPAN

PHOTO 14

Description SPALL ON NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS #4 AND #5; ALSO NOTE

TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 16

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL SHOWN; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, NORTH SIDE

PHOTO 18

Description SCOUR AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER ON NORTH SIDE; NOTE EXPOSED FOOTING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description EXPOSED FOOTING AT DOWNSTREAM END OF NORTH PIER

PHOTO 20

Description DRIFT ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description EMBANKMENT RESTRICTS FLOW THROUGH NORTH SPAN IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO 22

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .