Bridge Inspection Rpt_5460-058P-2022.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-23-R-000019
About this file
This solicitation is for roadway improvement projects at Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The projects include full depth reclamation and asphalt concrete pavement work on 6.41 miles of Lakeview Drive East in Swain County, North Carolina, asphalt milling and overlay on 3.05 miles of roads including Newfound Gap Road and Sugarlands Headquarters Road in Sevier County, Tennessee, and thin lift asphalt concrete pavement on 6.13 miles including Heintooga Ridge Road and campground roads in Swain County, North Carolina. Additional work includes asphalt patching, stone masonry repointing, guardrail replacement, curb resetting, drainage structure cleaning and repair, ditch and shoulder reconditioning, sign replacement, pavement marking, concrete deck repairs, and deck overlay. The total project cost is estimated between $25-35 million, to be split among multiple schedules and contract options. Proposals from certified Small Business Concerns are due on or around February 22, 2023 as specified in Solicitation 693C73-23-R-000019 issued by the Federal Highway Administration.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE
MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS OVER FIGHTING CREEK
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/2022
ED
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P
MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
04 - TEE BEAM
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
6 - BITUMINOUS
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
4 - MASONRY
000000000000
2 - CONNECTOR ROAD
LOCATION
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
66.0 FT (20.1 M)
23 FT (7 M)
25.0 FT (7.6 M)
22.8 FT (6.9 M)
45 °
N
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 0.24 (KM PT 0.39)
STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 0.2 MILES FROM MAINTENANCE
AREA.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... MAINTENANCE CENTER
FEATURE INTERSECTED: FIGHTING CREEK
INSPECTION TEAM: O. Tariq, J. Valcheff
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Osama Tariq
REPORT REVIEW:
Zane Bailey 703-404-6242
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 10/26/2022
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete tee beam bridge is in fair condition. The main problems are widespread cracking with efflorescence and delamination and spalling with exposed rebar on the beams and site-related scour with exposed footings at upstream end of the south pier and at the downstream end of the north pier. The beams should be repaired to mitigate further deterioration and the scour at the piers should be stabilized with engineered riprap.
Other problems include cracking and deterioration of the wearing surface and approach pavement, deterioration of the approach parapet and wingwall masonry mortar joints with vegetation growth, deterioration of the joint sealant in the railing joints, the bearing block for the sewer line is broken at the abutments, accumulation of drift at the upstream side of the south pier, the embankment of soil upstream of the north span is restricting the flow, and a lack of reflective object markers at the ends of the parapets.
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P
MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022
The Structure Evaluation Summary continues on the following page.
It should be noted that the roadway has been restriped and some potholes have been repatched with asphalt since the last inspection.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P
MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 05/09/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.6,58.7, 60.3,60.6, 60.15
REMOVE VEGETATION FROM STRUCTURE AS
NECESSARY. 1 LS 4000 4000
222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET
ENDS 4 EA 250 1000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 5000
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.17 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP ALONG EXPOSED
FOOTINGS AT PIERS. 1 LS 10000 10000
59.2 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE ON BEAMS,
CLEAN REBAR, AND PLACE NEW CONCRETE
TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.
1 LS 10000 10000
61.4 REMOVE DRIFT FROM UPSTREAM END OF
SOUTH PIER AND EMBANKMENT UPSTREAM
OF NORTH SPAN.
1 LS 10000 10000
58.6,60.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT APPROACH PARAPET
AND WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS
NECESSARY.
1 LS 5000 5000
58.3,222.
SEAL CRACKING AND REPAIR DETERIORATION
OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND
APPROACH PAVEMENT.
1 LS 3000 3000
58.8 REPLACE BROKEN SEWER LINE BEARING
BLOCK AT ABUTMENTS. 1 LS 2000 2000
58.6 CLEAN AND SEAL RAILING JOINTS AT
ABUTMENTS. 1 LS 2000 2000
1 LS 4000 4000
4 EA 250 1000
1 LS 10000 10000
1 LS 10000 10000
1 LS 10000 10000
1 LS 5000 5000
1 LS 3000 3000
1 LS 2000 2000
1 LS 2000 2000
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P
INSPECTION DATE : 05/09/2022MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 23000 23000
65000PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * : .......................... 70000PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL : ...... 65000 (*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0 work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be
70000 used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
1 LS 23000 23000
65000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
65000
70000
70000
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-058P
MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/08/2022
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
F
G
G
G
G
G
P
N
F
N
N
N
N
N
N
G
F
N
G
F
N
F
N
1- SUFF
2 - MED
N
N
N
F
G
N
G
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS N
3. WEARING SURFACE F
F 5 FT
G
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
STONESSTRIPING/ VEGETATION
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION N
12.OTHER N
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
N
N
N
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G
N
G
G
F
G
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
58.1 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF DECK
UNDERSIDE.
58.3 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE ALONG CENTERLINE OF ROADWAY, NORTHBOUND LANE IN SOUTH SPAN. MODERATE CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE PARTIALLY SEALED OVER BOTH ABUTMENTS. SOME POTHOLES REPATCHED WITH ASPHALT SINCE LAST INSPECTION. ROADWAY HAS BEEN RESTRIPED SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
58.5
58.6
222.3
MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN RAILING JOINTS.
MINOR SCALING THROUGHOUT CURBS AND RAILINGS. WEST COPING STONE LOOSE AT NORTH APPROACH. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH. MINOR MOSS
GROWTH ON RAILINGS.
58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES.
58.8 UTILITY LINE ATTACHED TO EXTERIOR OF WEST RAILING. SEWER AND UTILITY LINES ALONG DECK UNDERSIDE BETWEEN BEAMS #3 AND #4; MINOR RUSTING OF PIPE, CONNECTION BRACKETS, AND HANGERS LEAVING RUST STAINING ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. BROKEN CONCRETE BLOCK FOR SEWER LINE SUPPORT AT ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. MINOR FLOOD DEBRIS
LODGED IN UTILITIES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
59.2 MINOR CRACKING WITH MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON SEVERAL BEAMS THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE; HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING ON BEAM SIDES, SOME EXTEND INTO DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR SCALING ON EXTERIOR SIDE OF
BEAMS #1 AND #7. MINOR SPALLING OF BEAM ENDS AT ABUTMENT BREASTWALL INTERFACE.
MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF NUMEROUS BEAM UNDERSIDES. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION LOSS ON EAST FACE OF BEAM #1 AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MODERATE SPALLING (20"L X 6"H X FULL WIDTH UNDER X 2"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION LOSS ON BEAM #2 IN NORTH SPAN AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (4'L X 2-1/2"H X 5-1/2" UNDER X 1-1/2"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 10% SECTION LOSS ON BEAM #7 IN NORTH SPAN AT MIDSPAN MINOR SPALLING (18"L X 2-1/2"H X 7" UNDER X 1"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 10% SECTION LOSS ON BEAM #7 IN CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER. MINOR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (4'L X 3-1/2"H X 7" UNDER X 1"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION LOSS ON BEAMS #1 AND #7 IN CENTER SPAN. MINOR DELAMINATION (16"L X 6"W) OF BEAM #5 IN CENTER SPAN NEAR MIDSPAN. MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (2'L X 7"H X 2" UNDER X 1-1/2"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND 20% SECTION
LOSS ON BEAM #1 IN SOUTH SPAN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT.
60.1 MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM BEAMS ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND PIER WALLS.
60.3 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT ENDS.
60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. MINOR SPALLING OF NORTH ABUTMENT
BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS #4 AND #5.
60.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION
GROWTH.
60.9 PREVIOUSLY NOTED SCOUR (UP TO 2'D) ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT NOT OBSERVED.
60.15 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON PIER BEARING SEATS; MODERATE MOSS GROWTH ON ENDS.
60.16
60.17
61.2
MINOR SCOUR (8'L X 4'W X 1'D) AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER ON NORTH SIDE WITH FOOTING EXPOSED. MINOR EROSION
AND SCOUR WITH FOOTING EXPOSED (12'L X 10"H) AT DOWNSTREAM END OF NORTH PIER.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 MODERATE DRIFT ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER. DRIFT RESTRICTS FLOW OF APPROXIMATELY 25% OF
CENTER AND SOUTH SPANS.
EMBANKMENT RESTRICTS FLOW INTO NORTH SPAN AND UP TO 4'H SILT/STONE ACCUMULATION BENEATH NORTH SPAN PREVENTS WATER FLOWING THROUGH SPAN. MINOR ACCUMULATION OF SILT/STONE ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER.
MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EAST SIDE OF NORTH SPAN.
222.4 MINOR DETERIORATION AND MODERATE CRACKING (UP TO 1/8"W) OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE OF APPROACHES; SOME PATCHED WITH ASPHALT SINCE LAST INSPECTION. MINOR POTHOLE IN SOUTHBOUND LANE OF NORTH
APPROACH.
222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT (UP TO 1") OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT AT ABUTMENTS.
222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT PARAPET ENDS.
36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 1'- 6-1/2" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.
H 27 24 46 42
HS 37 34 62 56
TYPE 3 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3S2 47 43 79 72
TYPE 3-3 62 56 104 94
2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
06/06/2016
NEGATIVE MOMENT
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS
BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5460-058 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 058P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................N. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3032A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
474 - TENNESSEE
47155 SEVIER
00000
1 6 8 00405 0
FIGHTING CREEK
MAINTENANCE CENTER ACCESS
5460058P0000000
0 2 MILES FROM MAINTENANCE
AREA.
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
0 24 (KM PT: 0.39 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
3 - MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR NATIONAL
REGISTER
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 04 - TEE BEAM (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............23 FT ( 7 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 66.0 FT ( 20.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............37.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 33.6
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............62.0 TONS ( 56.2 METRIC TONS)
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35 41' 24.2" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 22.8 FT ( 6.9 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 83 32 '15.40" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 25.0 FT ( 7.6 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 0 MI ( 0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 4 0 FT ( 1.2 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 4 0 FT ( 1.2 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1 (34) SKEW ANGLE:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2010 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 22.8 FT ( 6.9 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2030 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 54 FT ( 0.47 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 0 00 FT ( 0 M)
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............5 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO
PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 5000
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 65000
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
$ 5000
$ 65000
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
Inspector: Osama Tariq Structure Number: 5460058P0000000
Inspection Date: 05/09/2022 Facility Carried: MAINTENANCE CENTE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD NEWFOUND GAP ROAD
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE DRIFT ACCUMULATION AT SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE; NORTHBOUND LANE IN
SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN RAILING JOINTS; WEST SIDE AT NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT; SOUTH APPROACH
SHOWN; ALSO NOTE ASPHALT PATCHING SINCE LAST INSPECTION
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT ALONG ABUTMENTS; SOUTH
APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; CENTER SPAN; NOTE TYPICAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL HONEYCOMBING OF DECK UNDERSIDE; CENTER SPAN BETWEEN BEAMS #1
AND #2 AT SOUTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description SPALLING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXPOSED REBAR ON BEAM #2 IN NORTH SPAN AT
NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXPOSED REBAR ON BEAM #7 IN
NORTH SPAN AT MIDSPAN
PHOTO 14
Description SPALL ON NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS #4 AND #5; ALSO NOTE
TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; SOUTHWEST
WINGWALL SHOWN; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, NORTH SIDE
PHOTO 18
Description SCOUR AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER ON NORTH SIDE; NOTE EXPOSED FOOTING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description EXPOSED FOOTING AT DOWNSTREAM END OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 20
Description DRIFT ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description EMBANKMENT RESTRICTS FLOW THROUGH NORTH SPAN IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO 22
Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .