B08_Attachment_7_-_Factor_1_PEQ_WRST_248940.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WRST 248940 - Replace Deficient WTP/Systems.
- Solicitation number
- 140P2024R0034
About this file
This document contains a project experience questionnaire submitted in response to solicitation 140P2024R0034 to replace the deficient water treatment plant and systems at a National Park Service visitor center and headquarters. The respondent lists experience on a prior project where its electrical subcontractor provided services for $XXX,XXX under a prime contract with an original schedule of XX calendar days that was completed in XX days for $X,XXX,XXX. A plumbing and mechanical subcontractor was also listed with original work valued at $X,XXX,XXX completed for $X,XXX,XXX over XXX days. The respondent describes the work performed, addresses relevant project experience elements from the solicitation, and notes reasons for changes to price and schedule along with how problems were addressed and similar issues would be handled. Means and methods from the prior project that would or would not be implemented on this project are also detailed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2024R0034 – WRST 248940
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror & Unique Entity ID No. |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone & Email: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
xxxx@xxx.xxx
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .