B.08.02 Solicitation Attachment B Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 39 KB Posted

Attached to
SHAPE International School, Belgium
Solicitation number
W912GB24R0015
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor and details of a solicitation for construction of a new school facility at SHAPE International Schools in Belgium.

The past performance questionnaire is a template for clients to evaluate and provide feedback on a contractor's previous work. It requests information on contract details and performance ratings in areas such as quality, schedule, management, and safety. The ratings are on a scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. The solicitation is for construction of a new three-story, 5,500 square meter classroom building to replace existing facilities at SHAPE in Belgium. The project scope includes administrative offices, classrooms, recreational areas, infrastructure upgrades, and meeting all relevant Belgian codes. The estimated value is between $10-25 million. Interested vendors must submit an SF 550 form by March 8th, 2024 to be eligible to attend an optional site visit scheduled for March 20th, 2024.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B.08.03 Amendment 04.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_AE509 - Detailed Building Section H 3 and4.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_AE310 - Building Section H.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_AE207 - Exterior Building Elevation North.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_AE206 - Exterior Building Elevation South.pdf PDF
RFIs and Responses.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_AE510 - Detailed Building Section K 1 and 2.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_ASTI_technical_specifications_26APR2024.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_AE312 - Building Section K.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_Specifications_Index_26APR2024.pdf PDF
AmmNo4_AE311 - Building Section J.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AE205-BE.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AE206-BE.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AF102-BE.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AE410-BE.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A_GI102_Color shedule.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_indexs of comments_specifications.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AE201-BE.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AE207-BE.pdf PDF
B.08.03 Amendment 03 W912GB24R0015-A0003.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AE202-BE.pdf PDF
AmmNo3_328030A-AE204-BE.pdf PDF
B.08.03 Amendment 02 W912GB24R0015-A00002.pdf PDF
Amd 2 Soil Contamination Survey_FR.pdf PDF
I.01.11 Site Visit Sign In.pdf PDF
B.08.03 Amendment 01 W912GB24R0015-0001.pdf PDF
PreProposal Slides.pptx PPTX presentation
B.08.02 Solicitation Attachment A Offeror Experience Form.docx DOCX document
General.pdf PDF
Electrical.pdf PDF
Plumbing.pdf PDF
Add6_Table of external influences.pdf PDF
Add5_Acoustical study_BEL.pdf PDF
Add3_Table manholes_BEL.pdf PDF
Add1_Soil Investigation Report.pdf PDF
Vol 2 - Health and Safety Plan.pdf PDF
SF 550 Fillable SHAPE access blank Site Visit.pdf PDF
B.02.14 W912GB24R0015.pdf PDF
Mechanical.pdf PDF
Architecture.pdf PDF
Civil.pdf PDF
Soil Contamination Survey_EN.pdf PDF
Add4_Siphonic roof drainage system.pdf PDF
Fire protection.pdf PDF
Structural.pdf PDF
140229-SPM-RMS SUBMITTAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
231114_Permis Unique.pdf PDF
ADDENDUM2_convector_fan_coil_list.pdf PDF
technical_specifications.pdf PDF
Division 00 - 01.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code: Address: Address:DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work:HighMedRoutine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATINGDEFINITIONNOTE
(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate

when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
EVGSMUN

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
EVGSMUN

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction
EVGSMUN

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
EVGSMUN
c) Government Property Control
EVGSMUN
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
EVGSMUN
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
EVGSMUN
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
EVGSMUN

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
EVGSMUN
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
YesNo

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .