Attachment S-3_Foreign ACP Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USS LEWIS B. PULLER (ESB-3) FY25 Voyage Repair
- Solicitation number
- N6817125R0003
About this file
This is a Foreign National Access Control Plan (ACP) questionnaire attachment (S-3) for the USS LEWIS B PULLER FY25 Voyage Repair contract (N6817125R0003). The questionnaire outlines security requirements and protocols that contractors must follow regarding foreign national employees working on U.S. Navy vessels, focusing on badge identification systems, access control, background checks, and escort procedures.
The document details specific contractor obligations including maintaining rigid badge accountability, providing employee passport information, conducting background checks, complying with OPSEC requirements, and obtaining commanding officer authorization before allowing foreign national access. It emphasizes that contractors are responsible for subcontractor compliance, must report foreign national data changes, and understand that noncompliance may result in contract termination. The questionnaire is formatted as yes/no questions and is related to work to be performed in Taranto, Italy during February 27 - March 13, 2025.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USS LEWIS B PULLER FY25 Voyage Repair Attachment S-3 Foreign National Access Control Plan
NAVSEA M-5510.2.C
| Questions |
| Yes or No |
Does the contractor have a badge or pass identification system that controls access and movement control that must be worn or displayed on the outer garment at all times?
Are badges easily recognizable to facilitate quick and positive identification?
Contractors will wear assigned badge/pass as briefed by the escort?
Is there a control system that provides rigid accountability procedures for handling of lost, damaged, forgotten, and no longer required badges?
EXPLAIN:
Does the contractor understand and will comply with all entry control check point requirements, and that they are subject to being searched prior to being granted entry.
The contractor will provide a copy of employee passports for ascertaining citizenship?
Has an official favorable background check been conducted on all contracted personnel?
Will the contractor comply with the local standard operating procedures for ship and or shore based operations?
Will the contractor comply with all OPSEC and anti-terrorism requirements as briefed by the escort?
Do employees understand that they must stay with the assigned escort at all times?
Do employees understand not to discuss activities taking place at the jobsite or disclose priority information to third parties?
Does the contractor understand that they must contact and update the cognizant Contract Administration Officer of any foreign national data changes?
Does the contractor understand that all subcontractors must conform to the provisions of the primary contractor’s ACP?
Does the contractor understand that in order to receive approval for foreign national employees, the contractor shall include in their ACP the following employee data: full name, place of birth, citizenship, number of years employed by the contractor, and position?
Does the contractor understand that the local ship or shore facility commanding officer will make individual determinations of desirability of access for foreign nationals?
USS LEWIS B PULLER FY25 Voyage Repair Attachment S-3: Foreign National Access Control Plan
NAVSEA M-5510.2.C
| Questions |
| Yes or No |
Does the contractor understand that until written authorization from the commanding officer is received, foreign nationals will be denied access to the ship or shore facility?
Does the contactor understand that this ACP only applies to current job orders awarded under this agreement?
Does the contractor understand that they must comply with the approved ACP, and that noncompliance may result in termination of the contract if it is not in the best interest of the United States Government?
Does the contractor understand that the United States Government reserves the right to cancel the contract when determined to be in the Government’s best interest?
Does the contractor understand that the use of foreign nationals without an approved ACP or when a previously authorization has been cancelled, will be considered a violation of the security regulations, and upon confirmation by the CAO of such violation, the contract, agreement or job order issued under this agreement may be terminated for default?
Does the contractor understand that they are responsible for the actions by all subcontractors, technical representatives and other persons granted access to U.S. Navy vessels, and adjacent areas and work sites?
Submitted by:
Request for Proposal (RFP) Number: N6817125R0003
Approved by:
COR or Designated Representative
Security Manager/Officer
Contract Administration Office
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .