Attachment JL.16, QASP and Matrix.doc

DOC document 51 KB Posted

Attached to
Munitions Response Actions at Vieques, Puerto Rico
Solicitation number
N6247020R2004
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) and matrix for a federal contract solicitation. The solicitation is being advertised as a 100% small business set-aside for environmental remediation services with a NAICS code of 562910 and size standard of 750 employees. The Navy intends to award an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity cost plus award fee contract for munitions response actions at sites including former Navy facilities on Vieques, Puerto Rico and other locations within the Naval Facilities Engineering Command area of responsibility. The contract would include one base year and four option periods, not to exceed a total value of $95 million. Potential task orders may include investigations, removals, remedial actions, work plans, health and safety plans, explosives safety submissions, monitoring, innovative technology implementation, and coordination with other support contractors. Work may involve explosives safety, hazardous waste management, noise and air quality monitoring, risk assessment, and public health disciplines. The best value award will consider technical factors, past performance, and cost.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment JL.2A, Direct Labor Rate Escalation Submission (Amend 0004).xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment JL.2, Direct Labor Bid and Billing Rate Submission (Amend 0004).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment JL.21, Vieques Map #1.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.20, Vieques Program Overview PowerPoint Presentation.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.23, Vieques Map #3.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.22, Vieques Map #2.pdf PDF
N62470-20-R-2004 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
N62470-20-R-2004 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
N62470-20-R-2004 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
N62470-20-R-2004 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.11 Factor 1 Corp Exp IDIQ (Amend 0001).doc DOC document
Attachment JL.12, Factor 1 Corp Exp Standalone or Task Order (Amend 0001).doc DOC document
Attachment JL.8B, Vieques Sick Leave Cost.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment JL.14, Key Personnel Experience and Qualifications.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.2A, Direct Labor Rate Escalation Submission.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment JL.13 Specialized Technical Experience on Example Projects.docx DOCX document
Attachment JL.6, SCA & DBA Ceiling Labor Rates.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.2, Direct Labor Bid and Billing Rate Submission.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment JL.15, Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment J.19 Site Visit Map.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.11 Factor 1 Corp Exp IDIQ.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.18 SOP Field Data Collection and Management.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.9, Award Fee Plan Vieques.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.11 & JL.12, Instructions.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.5, Indirect Ceiling Rate Forms.doc DOC document
N6247020R2004_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment J.10 Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.12, Factor 1 Corp Exp Standalone or Task Order.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.8 & JL.8A, Vieques Cost Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment JL.1 Directives, Regulations, Definitions.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.3, Identification of Uncompensated Overtime Ratios.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.4, Indirect Ceiling Rates Build-Up Form.doc DOC document
Attachment JL.17, Commerical Vehicle and Truck Inspection Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment JL.7, Proposed, Historical, and Year-To-Date Indirect Rates.doc DOC document
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT JL.16

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

FOR

RFP N62470-20-R-2004

INTRODUCTION

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a general discussion of Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance that may be performed in each Task Order. A working QASP will be created for each Task Order under this contract. The QASP is designed to provide an effective surveillance method of monitoring contractor performance for each listed objective in the services contract.

This QASP is based on the premise that the Government desires to maintain a quality standard in Munitions Response Actions at Vieques, Puerto Rico and other sites in NAVFAC’s Area of Responsibility (AOR) and/or worldwide, and that a service contract to provide the service is the best means of achieving this objective.

The Contractor, not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. The role of the Government is quality assurance to ensure contract standards are achieved.

In the contract, the quality control program is the driver for product quality. The Contractor is required to develop a comprehensive program of inspections and monitoring actions. The first major step to ensuring a “self-correcting” contract is to ensure that the quality control program accepted at the beginning of the contract provides the measures needed to lead the contractor to success.

Once the quality control program is accepted, careful application of the process and standards presented in the remainder of this document will ensure a robust quality assurance program.

The oversight provided for in the contract and in this plan shall ensure service levels reach and maintain the required levels throughout the contract term. The Task Order QASP shall provide the Contracting Officer, or their designated representative, with a proactive way to avoid unacceptable or deficient performance, and provide verifiable input for the required annual past performance evaluations.

RESPONSIBILITIES

The Government resources shall have responsibilities for the implementation of this QASP as follows:

Contracting Officer – The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under the contract. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.

Project Manager - The Project Manager is responsible for overall project direction, including technical, contracting and customer-related issues and assures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance. The Project Manger is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the Contractor deems may affect contract, price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the Contracting Officer for action.

Project Team – The project team may include but is not limited to the Project Manager, UXO Site Manager, and Geophysicist. The Project Team will provide detailed technical oversight of the Contractor’s performance and reports his or her findings to the Project Manager in a timely, complete and impartial fashion to support the Project Manager’s technical administration activities. While the Project Team may serve as a direct conduit to provide Government guidance and feedback to the Contractor on technical matters, he or she is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the Contractor deems may affect contract, price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the Contracting Officer for action.

METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

The following list provides methods of surveillance that may be used in the administration of this contract. In addition to specific instructions that may be mentioned, the appropriate and standardized form that is to be used for documentation of QA surveillance may include but is not limited to the Quality Assurance Surveillance Matrix and the Surveillance Activity Check list prepared on a Task Order basis.

Customer Feedback – Customer feedback may be obtained either from the results of formal customer satisfaction surveys or from random customer complaints. Customer complaints, to be considered valid, must set forth clearly and in writing the detailed nature of the complaint, must be signed and must be forwarded to the Project Manager. The Project Manager shall maintain a summary log of all formally received customer complaints as well as a copy of each complaint in a documentation file. The Project Manager shall also keep the tabulated results of all customer satisfaction surveys on file and shall enter the summary results into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

100% Inspection - This level of inspection shall be accomplished by monitoring and documentation. The Project Manager, or if so designated the appropriate Contracting Officer Representative (COR) / Navy Technical Representative (NTR), shall review the generated documentation and enter summary results into the CPARS at the mid-point and the end of each task.

Periodic Inspection - Periodic inspections shall be conducted if and when specified in individual task orders in the Quality Assurance Surveillance Table. For the potential tasks that have been identified so far and included in this QASP, the appropriate COR / NTR typically performs the periodic inspection on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.

Random Monitoring - Random monitoring shall be conducted if and when specified in individual task orders. For the potential tasks that have been identified so far and included in this QASP, the random monitoring shall be performed by the Project Manager or by the appropriate designated Project Team member.

IDENTIFIED QA SURVEILLANCE TASKS

The Performance-Based Service Contract surveillance tasks are identified within the QASP for each Task Order. General Performance Metrics are provided in Section C, Part 7.0 – Performance Metrics and Quality Assurance. Specific Performance Metrics will be provided by Task Order.

STANDARD:

The performance thresholds established for each of the performance objectives are the number of defects permitted before the COR notifies the Contracting Officer for appropriate action in accordance with 52.246-5 Inspection of Services - Cost Reimbursement.

QASP MATRIX

Performance Requirements Summary

Contract Level

Desired Outcomes
Required Services
Performance Standards
Monitoring Method
Incentive/Disincentives

For Meeting or Not

Meeting the Acceptable

Quality Level

Quality Control/Assurance & Safety

Client satisfaction
Client satisfaction and quality
80% of comments express overall satisfaction
Feedback may be obtained via customer satisfaction survey
A Contractor not receiving satisfactory appraisals may be in danger of not having its option period exercised, adverse past performance report

Project Management

Key and UXO Personnel
Management of Key and UXO Personnel
Contractor submits 100% of all required personnel changes to the Contracting Officer for approval before changes made at the Contract and/or Task Order level. Required personnel are not routinely changed (more than 2 times) on one or more projects (or more than 3 times for required personnel overseeing base contract requirements over the life of the contract.
COR/NTR Surveillance
The Contractor may be in danger of not having its option period exercised due, adverse past performance report

Task Order Level – The performance requirements in this summary will be included in every task order. Other performance requirements may be included with the task order as appropriate for the particular project.

Desired Outcomes
Required Services
Performance Standards
Monitoring Method
Incentive/Disincentives

For Meeting or Not

Meeting the Acceptable

Quality Level

Quality Control/Assurance & Safety

Safety
Maintain high safety standards
Zero Class A Safety violations (CONUS only) where the contractor is determined at fault.
Submission of accident reports, adverse safety inspection reports, and similar documents.
Issuance of a cure notice and possible termination of task order or contract for continuous or uncorrected safety violations. Adverse past performance reports. The Contractor may be in danger of not having its option period exercised.
Performance
Compliance with PWS and referenced applicable regulations
No more than 5 CARs received by the Contractor within a given task order, unless otherwise specified.
COR/NTR Submission of CARs, COR/NTR report of failure to delivery acceptable product or service in accordance with Performance-Based Milestones/Objectives.

Issuance of a cure notice and possible termination of task order or contract for continuous or uncorrected performance deficiencies, or for failure to complete Performance-Based Milestones/Objectives. Adverse past performance reports. The Contractor may be in danger of not having its option period exercised,

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .