Attachment J Contract Historical Data.pdf

PDF 203 KB Posted

Attached to
DRAFT RFP - Repairs, Operations, Maintenance, and Engineering (ROME) Services - DRAFT RFP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GSFC22R0011-DRFP
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center

About this file

This document provides historical data and labor category descriptions for a draft request for proposal for repairs, operations, maintenance, and engineering services. The solicitation seeks these services for facilities at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland and Wallops Flight Facility in Wallops Island, Virginia, including facilities operations and maintenance, architect-engineering, construction, and information resources support. Services will cover office buildings, technical facilities, laboratories, launch facilities, an airfield, and warehouses along with their utility systems. The attachment specifies the labor category data, descriptions, rates, and expenditures that the incumbent contractor must provide to NASA within 30 days of request to support a potential follow-on competitive solicitation. This includes direct labor hours and rates by category, indirect labor estimates, non-labor expenditure breakdowns, and category identification as exempt, non-exempt, or union. Consolidated data for the prime and significant subcontractors is preferred.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DRAFT RFP - Repairs, Operations, Maintenance, and Engineering (ROME) Services - DRAFT RFP, newest first.
File Type Posted
ROME E-Library Documents.zip ZIP file
Attachment D DD254-ROME.pdf PDF
Attachment F Quality Control Plan.pdf PDF
O.2 Wage Determination SCA VA 2015-4327.txt TXT text file
Appendix 12 As-Built.pdf PDF
Appendix 10 - ROME Specifications.pdf PDF
Appendix 1 - ROME SRD -2021 .pdf PDF
Appendix 14 Snow and Ice Removal GB.pdf PDF
Appendix 18 Snow Removal Area 200 GB.pdf PDF
80GSFC22R0011 ROME DRFP.pdf PDF
Exhibits 15-15E A-E Const IDIQ Pricing.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1 ROME RTO1 Greenbelt OM IR.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 ROME RTO2 WFF OM IR.pdf PDF
Enclosure 4 ROME QA Surveillance Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure 5 IT Security Management Plan Template.pdf PDF
Attachment I OCI Avoidance Plan Outline.pdf PDF
Attachment L ROME FINANCIAL REPORTING 533.pdf PDF
Attachment M Collective Bargaining Agreement.pdf PDF
M.2 WD CBA 2022-134 Virginia.pdf PDF
Attachment O Wage Determinations SCA.pdf PDF
Appendix 8 - RESERVED.pdf PDF
Appendix 16 Snow Removal Sidewalks GB.pdf PDF
Appendix 4 - List of Facilities final.pdf PDF
80GSFC22R0011 SF33 ROME DRFP.pdf PDF
Appendix 4 - List of Facilities.pdf PDF
Appendix 7 - Navy SCSC Assets.pdf PDF
Exhibit 14 ROME Past Perf Questionaire.pdf PDF
Enclosure 3 ROME RTO3 Navy OM IR.pdf PDF
Attachment C1 - GB List of IAGP.pdf PDF
Attachment C2 - Wallops List of IAGP.pdf PDF
Attachment H IT Security Management Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment K Safety and Health Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment N Wage Determinations Building.pdf PDF
N.2 Davis Bacon Wage Determination VA 20220007.txt TXT text file
Appendix 17 Snow Removal Area 100 GB.pdf PDF
Appendix 20 Snow Maps WFF.pdf PDF
Appendix 13 - ROME Position Qualifications.pdf PDF
Appendix 9-SUBMITTAL REGISTER.pdf PDF
Appendix 11 - Application Systems List (Admin and OT).pdf PDF
Appendix 15 Snow Removal Roads Parking GB.pdf PDF
Appendix 19 Snow Removal Area 300 and 400 GB.pdf PDF
80GSFC22R0011 Cover Letter.pdf PDF
Exhibits 1-13A ROME COST.pdf PDF
Attachment A - ROME Contract SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment B IDIQ Cost-Fixed Price Rate Matrix All IDIQ Contract.pdf PDF
Attachment C - List of IAGP.pdf PDF
Attachment D DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment E A-E Const IDIQ Pricing.pdf PDF
Attachment G IT Security Applicable Documents List.pdf PDF
M.1 WD CBA 2022-99 Maryland.pdf PDF
Show all 50

DRAFT RFP - Repairs, Operations, Maintenance, and Engineering (ROME) Services - DRAFT RFP has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT J

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

MARCH 2015

DRFP 80GSFC22R0011

CONTRACT TBD

Contract TBD Attachment J

(03/2015)

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

NASA may issue a competitive solicitation for a follow-on effort for services similar to those provided under this contract. As part of this follow-on competition, NASA may include historical labor category descriptions, work year equivalents (WYEs), weighted average direct labor rates, and other information from this contract in the follow-on solicitation for use by all potential offerors. Including this data in the solicitation is intended to ensure a comprehensive and fair evaluation of competitive proposals and increase the probability that realistic pricing is provided in future proposals submitted. Minimizing the potential risk for unrealistic or unsubstantiated pricing materially reduces the risk that cost/price could become an inappropriate discriminator among competing offerors.

Based on the written request from the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall provide all of the following historical data from this contract within 30 days this request:

(1) All labor resources employed under this contract in the last twelve months, by

Contract Labor Category as specified in Attachment B, Direct Labor Rates, Indirect Rates and Fee Matrices. For each labor category, provide the number of WYEs or the total labor hours incurred for that position over the preceding 12 months, the current weighted average wage rate (unburdened “straight time” rate), and the average seniority level;

(2) For each labor category , identify the most recent date that wages were escalated and provide the percentage by which wages were escalated;

(3) For each labor category, identify whether the category is “exempt,” “non-exempt,” or “union” as governed under the Service Contract Labor Standards;

(4) For each labor category, provide a brief position description in sufficient detail to indicate the duties of each category and any minimum education and experience requirements.

Example Table of Requested Data

Labor Category

Number of *WYE by Labor Category

**Current Weighted Avg.

Unburdened Hourly Rate for this Category

Average Seniority for this Category

Date and Amount of Last Rate Escalation

Identification “Exempt,”

“Non-Exempt,” or “Union”

Engineer 4 9 $18.20 18 months April 2005 (2.8%) Exempt

*1 WYE equals the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours. Example: Four contractor employees each working 1,000 hours per year, divided by the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours, equals the Contractor’s Number of FTEs.

**Straight time labor rates only, not bid rates or burdened rates

Contract TBD Attachment J

(03/2015)

(5) Actual non-labor (i.e. other direct costs (ODCs)) expenditures for the prior twelve months, delineated by each of the following cost elements: materials, equipment, travel, supplies, and any other individual recurring ODCs based on an established cost estimating relationships (e.g. computer usage, program management, depreciation, administrative support.);

(6) Estimate of the number of WYEs, including associated labor category titles/descriptions, for those personnel currently supporting this contract that are accounted for as indirect. This may include administrative employees (e.g., accounting or clerical personnel), management employees and/or technical employees (e.g. computer support personnel);

(7) Provide the Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours for exempt and non-exempt employees; and

(8) The information required in (1) through (7) above shall be provided for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors. Significant subcontractors are those subcontractors that have performed at least “TBD” percent of the cumulative contract effort (in terms of dollars) as of the time of the Contracting Officer’s request for this data. A single, consolidated response for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors is preferred, wherein labor rate data is a total contract average by position (and labor categories where both the prime and subcontractor are providing labor for that position are weighted averages). If such a consolidated response is not feasible due to restrictions over disclosure of company-sensitive cost data between the prime and any subcontractors, then an alternative approach should be discussed with the Contracting Officer at the time of the request for this data.

(End of Attachment)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .