ATTACHMENT 5 PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY 70B01C21R00000008 2-12-21 .docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70B01C21R00000008
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for a contractor providing maintenance, repair, and improvement services for tactical infrastructure assets in the Tucson Sector for Customs and Border Protection. The contractor was responsible for roads, bridges, fences, gates, concertina wire, vegetation control, debris removal, border lighting, electrical systems, drainage, and tunnel remediation. Respondents were asked to rate the contractor on quality of service, timeliness of performance, and business relations using a scale of 0 to 5, and indicate if they would recommend the contractor again for future work. Responses were due by March 19, 2021.
View the file
Other files
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY
Please complete the following questionnaire and return via email to Kevin.P.Sarff@cbp.dhs.gov on or before March 19, 2021 @ 4pm ET
This survey pertains to: ________________________________________________ Department/Component: _______________________________________________ Contract Number: _______________________ Date of Survey: ________________ Name of Person Completing Survey: _____________________________________ Signature of Person Completing Survey: __________________________________ Your Company/Agency: ________________________________________________
| Your Role in this Contract (circle one): | Contracting Officer, Contract Specialist, |
| Project Officer or Other ________________ |
Contract Value (including options): $______________________ Performance Period: ___________________________________ (including option periods) Type of Contract: ______________________________________ Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s): ____________%
Information on subcontractor(s) (where more than __________% of work was completed by the subcontractor):
| ________________________ | _____________________ | _______________ | |
| Subcontractor | Program Manager | Phone | |
| ________________________ | _____________________ | _______________ | |
| Subcontractor | Program Manager | Phone | |
| ________________________ | _____________________ | _______________ | |
| Subcontractor | Program Manager | Phone |
General description of products/services required under the contract:
RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.
Commentary to support rating shall be noted on page 4.
Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle "N/A" (not applicable/no opinion).
QUALITY OF SERVICE__________________________________________________
1. Compliance with contract requirements 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. Accuracy of reports 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Effectiveness of personnel 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Technical Excellence 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
OMB Clearance No. 9000-0142 Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE_________________________________________
1. Met interim milestones 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. Reliability 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Responsive to technical direction 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
5. Met delivery schedules 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
6. Liquidated damages assessed: Yes No (circle one)
BUSINESS RELATIONS_________________________________________________
1. Effective management, including management of subcontracts 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Responsive to contract requirements 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Notification of problems 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
5. Flexibility 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
6. Pro-active instead of reactive 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction.
Yes No (circle one)
2. Would you recommend selection of this firm again?
Yes No (circle one)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
RATING GUIDELINES
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE |
| COST CONTROL |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| 0-Unsatisfactory |
| Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives |
| Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective |
| 1-Poor |
| Major problems have been encountered |
| Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective |
| 2-Fair |
| Some problems have been encountered |
| Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective |
| 3-Good |
| Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified |
| Contractor is usually effective in managing costs |
| Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective |
| 4-Excellent |
| Contractor is in compliance with Contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services |
| Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete |
Billings
| Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective |
-Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above four categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .