Attachment 104 Course and Instrutor Reviews Critiques.pdf
PDF 247 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MSC Underway Replenishment Training Center (MUTC) Service Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N3220522R4039
About this file
This document contains a course and instructor evaluation form and details of a related federal contract opportunity for MSC Underway Replenishment Training Center services. The evaluation form collects student feedback on course content, instruction, training materials, and facilities through a series of rating questions. The federal contract opportunity is a non-personnel services solicitation to provide instructor support for in-house and exportable Military Sealift Command training courses at locations in Virginia. Services include equipment maintenance at the MSC Underway Replenishment Training Center. The contracting agency is the Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
MSC Underway Replenishment Training Center (MUTC) Service has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
M S C U N R E P T r a i n i n g C e n t e r
Course and Instructor Evaluation
Course: Instructor:
Training Location: Date:
Student Name: Unit:
We welcome your comments about the time you have spent training with us. Please complete the following details so that we can continue to offer the best service possible. Pass them to your instructor at the end of the course.
Please place a check mark in the appropriate box for your answer. When you are finished with this side please complete the sections located on the back of this form.
Poor Average Good Excellent
Course overall:
How easy was the course to understand?
Was the content suited to your requirements?
Were the topics covered in sufficient detail?
Would you recommend this course to others?
Overall rating of the course?
Poor Average Good Excellent
Courseware:
Clarity of the training content?
How well did the course materials follow the course?
Overall quality of training materials?
Overall rating of the courseware?
Instructor:
Ability to provide real world experience?
Ability to respond appropriately to questions?
How well prepared was the instructor?
Knowledge of subject matter?
Presentation abilities?
Overall rating of instructor?
M S C U N R E P T r a i n i n g C e n t e r
Training Center:
Professionalism of staff at center?
Was the classroom comfortable and conducive to learning?
Was the standard of the equipment satisfactory?
Were the standard of the training rooms as you expected?
Were you satisfied with the refreshment facilities?
Summary Comments
What, if anything, would you have improved on the course?
What other types of training do you feel should be made available?
Is there anything else you would like to know?
Instructor Corrective Action Comments:
(Instructor Comments Only)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .