Attachment 0026 LMI Summary Worksheet NMWR Data.pdf
PDF 118 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-19-R-0118
About this file
This document contains a Level of Maintenance Work Requirement (NMWR) data summary worksheet and a related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The NMWR worksheet provides instructions for contractors to document component-level maintenance data for a government-approved list. Contractors must include maintenance data elements such as Mean Time Between Failures, part numbers, and Source, Maintenance and Recoverability codes. Additional required data elements include functional group codes, maintenance levels, cost data, warranty information, and a recommendation for organic or contractor repair. The data summary must be provided in a Microsoft Excel-compatible format.
The related solicitation is for the procurement of 265 Type I Family of All-Terrain Cranes along with ancillary items, services, and logistics data over a potential nine-year requirements contract from the Department of the Army Materiel Command. Offer submissions are due by March 17, 2021 for this full and open competition solicitation, which will result in firm-fixed-price orders under contract number W56HZV-19-R-0118.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 70 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 0026
LMI Summary Worksheet – NMWR DATA
MIL PRF 49506 LMI Summary Worksheet 1
SUMMARY TITLE: National Maintenance Work Requirement (NMWR) Level of Repair Analysis SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS: The contractor shall document a NMWR Data Summary for each component on the government approved NMWR candidate list. The summary will be in the contractor’s format, in end item hardware breakdown sequence (Top-down Breakdown). The final Summary will provide source data for the government to analyze and identify which components (parts) will have a NMWR prepared. The analysis will include a conclusion for each component that clearly recommends the best source of repair (government or contractor) for the component. The following data elements are required. The contractor may add additional data elements as desired.
DATA IN LMI SPECIFICATION (Please provide the data product title):
LMI 1520 COMMERCIAL GOVERNMENT ENTITY(CAGE) CODE
LMI 2790 ITEM NAME
LMI 3270 MEAN TIME BETWEEN FAILURES (MTBF) *
LMI 4400 REFERENCE NUMBER (Part Number)
LMI 4830 SOURCE, MAINTENANCE AND RECOVERABILITY (SMR) CODE
DATA NOT IN LMI SPECIFICATION (Please provide the data product title, its definition and its format):
1. Functional Group Code (FGC).
2. Level of Maintenance, they are: Field (which includes: C-Crew, O-Service and F-Field) and Sustainment
(which includes H-Below depot, L-Special Repair activity and D-Depot).
3. Component Cost (US Dollars, Based on a Lot of 100 Pieces).
4. Government cost to buy rebuilt/remanufactured (US Dollars, Based on a Lot of 100 Pieces).
5. Contractor cost to rebuild/remanufacture broken down as follows (US Dollars, Based on a Lot of 100
Units):
a. Labor hours to; tear down, remove/replace parts, any machining, rebuild, inspection, and testing.
b. Packing, shipping and any storage requirements.
c. Cost of any mandatory replacement parts and parts that will most likely be replaced.
d. Listing of any special tools or test equipment required to perform this work and cost of this equipment.
6. Identify whether it is directly available from the contractor through the same supply and distribution channels as all other parts/components.
7. Identify the standard to which the component will be remanufactured, rebuilt or otherwise refurbished:
a. like-new condition, using only new components,
b. Using nonstandard (oversize/undersize) bearings or other components which may vary from the original component configuration.
8. Describe the length and type of warranty, if different from a new component
9. Identify the method used to distinguish between new vs. rebuilt/remanufactured component, such as part number difference, etc.
10. Identify whether a commercial reusable container is available for the NMWR component candidate(s), and whether the container has a long life (20+ trips) or a short life (10 trips).
11. Make a recommendation as to whether the component should be organically repaired at sustainment level or contractor repaired and returned to government stocks through a long term contract.
* The required Mean Time Between Essential Function Failure (MTBEFF) of 120 hours can be used if MTBF is unknown.
SUMMARY LAYOUT: Contractor provided in Microsoft Excel compatible format
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .