Attachment 0011 Risk Management Scoring Criteria and Reporting Template.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 158 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-19-R-0118
About this file
This document contains a risk management template and scoring criteria to be used for a federal contract solicitation for Type I Family of All Terrain Cranes (FOATC). The template includes sections for tracking active risks, top risks, issues, retired risks, and provides risk analysis rubrics. Key details include categories for risk level assessments of probability, severity, and current risk ranking on technical performance, cost, and schedule. It also includes fields to track risk identification, mitigation plans, progress, and expiry milestones. The document appears to be an attachment to a risk management plan providing guidance and templates for offerors to propose risk mitigation strategies for the FOATC contract.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 70 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Active Risks
| Type I FOATC | = Revised since last issue |
| Risk Register and Mitigation |
Risk No. Date Category Primary PD or SOW Reference Risk Title Risk Description Root Cause Consequence If-Then Status Risk Expiry Milestone PDR Exit CDR Exit
PRR
| Other | Assessment Before Mitigation | Responsible Organization | Mitigation Plan | Mitigation Progress | Current Assessment of In-Progress Mitigation | Assessment After Mitigation | |
| Program |
Technical (Performance) Cost Schedule Identified In Progress Mitigated Realized Retired Expired Probability (Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible
| 5 - Catastrophic | Risk | |
| Ranking | Probability |
(Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible 5 - Catastrophic Current Risk Ranking Probability (Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible 5 - Catastrophic Risk Ranking
&G Response to Solicitation No. W56HZV-15-R-0187 Risk Register and Mitigation
Proposal Date: 30 JAN 2016 Unclassified//For Official Use Only (U//FOUO) Volume 2: Attachment V2-029, Page &P
Top Risks
| Type I FOATC | = Revised since last issue |
| Risk Register and Mitigation |
Risk No. Date Category Primary PD or SOW Reference Risk Title Risk Description Root Cause Consequence If-Then Status Risk Expiry Milestone PDR Exit CDR Exit
PRR
| Other | Assessment Before Mitigation | Responsible Organization | Mitigation Plan | Mitigation Progress | Current Assessment of In-Progress Mitigation | Assessment After Mitigation | |
| Program |
Technical (Performance) Cost Schedule Identified In Progress Mitigated Realized Retired Expired Probability (Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible
| 5 - Catastrophic | Risk | |
| Ranking | Probability |
(Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible 5 - Catastrophic Current Risk Ranking Probability (Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible 5 - Catastrophic Risk
&G Response to Solicitation No. W56HZV-15-R-0187
Proposal Date: 30 JAN 2016 Unclassified//For Official Use Only (U//FOUO) Volume 2: Attachment V2-029, Page &P
Issues
| Type I FOATC | = Revised since last issue |
| Risk Register and Mitigation |
Risk No. Date Category Primary PD or SOW Reference Risk Title Risk Description Root Cause Consequence If-Then Status Risk Expiry Milestone PDR Exit CDR Exit
PRR
| Other | Assessment Before Mitigation | Responsible Organization | Mitigation Plan | Mitigation Progress | Current Assessment of In-Progress Mitigation | Assessment After Mitigation | |
| Program |
Technical (Performance) Cost Schedule Identified In Progress Mitigated Realized Retired Expired Probability (Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible
| 5 - Catastrophic | Risk | |
| Ranking | Probability |
(Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible 5 - Catastrophic Current Risk Ranking Probability (Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible 5 - Catastrophic Risk
&G Response to Solicitation No. W56HZV-15-R-0187
Proposal Date: 30 JAN 2016 Unclassified//For Official Use Only (U//FOUO) Volume 2: Attachment V2-029, Page &P
Retired Risks
| Type I FOATC |
| Risk Register and Mitigation |
Risk No. Date Category Primary PD or SOW Reference Risk Title Risk Description Root Cause Consequence If-Then Status Risk Expiry Milestone
PDR
CDR
PRR
| Other | Assessment Before Mitigation | Responsible Organization | Mitigation Plan | Mitigation Progress | Assessment of In-Progress Mitigation | Assessment After Mitigation | |
| Program |
Technical (Performance) Cost Schedule Identified In Progress Mitigated Realized Retired Expired Probability (Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible
| 5 - Catastrophic | Risk | |
| Ranking | Probability |
(Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible
| 5 - Catastrophic | Risk |
| Ranking | Probability |
(Likelihood) A - Not Likely E - Near Certainty Severity (Impact) 1 - Negligible 5 - Catastrophic Risk
Mitigated, Retired, or Expired Risks
&G Response to Solicitation No. W56HZV-15-R-0187
Proposal Date: 30 JAN 2016 Unclassified//For Official Use Only (U//FOUO) Volume 2: Attachment V2-029, Page &P
Rank Rubrics
| Maneuver Support Vessel (Light) |
| Risk Register and Mitigation |
| Risk Analysis per Government Risk Management Plan, Contract Attachment 0005 | |||||||||
| Notes: | Risk Analysis per Government Draft Risk Issue Opportunity Management Plan | ||||||||
| 1. Risk expiry is program milestone after which risk mitigation has been completed or risk is no longer valid. | |||||||||
| 2. Use table below to rank level of likelihood: | Qualitative Risk Analysis | ||||||||
| Probability of | |||||||||
| Occurrence | Description | Probability | |||||||
| Percentage | Likelihood/Probability | ||||||||
| Near | |||||||||
| Certainty | E | A risk item is nearly certain to occur. | > 90% | High – Risks weighted 20-25 are greater than 70% likelihood/probability of occurrence | |||||
| Highly | |||||||||
| Likely | D | A risk item is probable but may be avoided. | > 65% to 90% | Medium – Risk weighted 12-19 are between 30% and 70% likelihood/probability of occurrence | |||||
| Moderate | C | A risk item is equally likely to occur or not occur. | > 40% to 65% | Low – Risks weighted 1-11 are below 30% likelihood/probability of occurrence | |||||
| Low | B | A risk item is possible by will likely be avoided. | 10% to 40% | ||||||
| Not | |||||||||
| Likely | A | A risk item is unlikely to occur. | < 10% | Consequence/Impact | |||||
| 3. Use guidance below to rank level of technical (performance), schedule and severity. | High – (4/5) Risk that has the potential to greatly impact program cost, program schedule or performance | ||||||||
| Severity Level | Risk Type | Medium – (3/4) Risk that has the potential to slightly impact program cost, program schedule or performance | |||||||
| Performance | |||||||||
| Referring to all requirements designated in the PD and SOW. | Schedule | Cost | |||||||
| Referring to APB Cost Parameters | Low – (1/2) Risk that has relatively little impact on cost, schedule or performance | ||||||||
| Catastrophic | Program Success Jeopardized | 5 | Potentially fails KPP. | Cannot meet next major Milestone (A, B, C, FRP, IOC, FOC). | Impacted ≥ 10% | ||||
| Critical | Program Success in Doubt | 4 | Potentially fails KSA or shorts a critical mission need but expect no breech of KPP. | Cannot meet next major Program Event (including, but not limited to, CDR, TRR, vehicle delivery). | Impacted |
5% ≤ X ≤ 10% Moderate Limited Impact on Program Success 3 Performance below goal; moderate changes required. Schedule slip impacting another IPT and/or subsystem, with no impact to a major Program Event or Milestone. Impacted 2% ≤ X ≤ 5% Marginal Minor Impact on Program Success 2 Remedy will require minor performance trades. Schedule slip with no impact to another IPT and/or subsystem, with no impact to a major Program Event or Milestone. Impacted 1% ≤ X ≤ 2% Negligible No Impact on Program Success 1 Minimal consequence in technical performance. Minor schedule slip with minimal or no impact. Impacted < 1%
| Risk Rank Table from Government Original Risk Plan | |||||||
| Severity of Consequence | |||||||
| Negligible | Marginal | Moderate | Critical | Catastrophic | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| Probability of Occurrence | Near Certainty | E | 9 | 16 | 20 | 23 | 25 |
| Highly Likely | D | 6 | 13 | 18 | 22 | 24 | |
| Moderate | C | 4 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 21 | |
| Low | B | 2 | 7 | 11 | 14 | 17 | |
| Not Likely | A | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
&G Response to Solicitation No. W56HZV-15-R-0187
Proposal Date: 30 JAN 2016 Unclassified//For Official Use Only (U//FOUO) Volume 2: Attachment V2-029, Page &P image1.jpeg image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .