Attach 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

49 KB Posted

Attached to
Whiteman AFB - FY27 Airfield Pavement
Solicitation number
FA462526Q1062
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire designed to evaluate contractor performance on relevant past contracts as part of the source selection process for the Whiteman AFB Airfield Pavement IDIQ program. The questionnaire serves as a template for references and past customers to provide detailed assessments of a bidding contractor's capabilities and performance history.

The evaluation focuses on a five-year option contract (base year plus four one-year options) to provide comprehensive maintenance, repair, and minor construction services for runway and airfield pavements at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. Respondents are asked to rate contractor performance across five key categories: Management (12 criteria including staffing, supervision, problem-solving, and payment practices); Schedule (2 criteria addressing schedule development and adherence); Quality (4 criteria covering quality control and deficiency correction); Regulatory Compliance (2 criteria related to federal requirements and permitting); and Overall Performance (assessed on a scale ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory). The questionnaire requests supporting information for each rating and includes yes/no questions regarding cure notices and future contract willingness. Responses should be submitted via email to the 509th Contracting Squadron point of contact, SrA Nathaniel Smith, with contact information provided. Upon completion, the questionnaire becomes part of the official source selection record and is controlled as Source Selection Information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA462526Q1062 Combo Synopsis Solicitation 02Sept26.pdf PDF
Attach 12 - Solicitation Questions and Answers 02Sept26.pdf PDF
FA462526Q1062 Combo Synopsis Solicitation.pdf PDF
FA462526Q1062 Combo Synopsis Solicitation 26Aug26.pdf PDF
Attach 11 - Solicitation Questions and Answers 26Aug26.pdf PDF
FA462526Q1062 Combo Synopsis Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attach 11 - Solicitation Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
Attach 10 - Site Visit Sign In and Meeting Minutes 10Aug26.pdf PDF
FA462526Q1062 Combo Synopsis Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attach 1 - SOW Airfield Pavement 4 Aug 2026.pdf PDF
Attach 9 - SOW SEED Taxiway Golf 4 Aug 2026.pdf PDF
Attach 1 - SOW Airfield Pavement 4 Aug 2026.pdf PDF
Attach 8 - Airfield Pavements Bid Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA462526Q1062 Combo Synopsis Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attach 9 - SOW 1157746 Repair Airfield Spalling DV Ramp 15 july 2026.pdf PDF
Attach 8 - Airfield Pavements Bid Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach 6 - General Decision Number MO20260001 18May2026.pdf PDF
Attach 7 - Provisions and Clauses.pdf PDF
Attach 1 - SOW Airfield Pavement 15 July 2026.pdf PDF
Attach 4 - SOW Atch 3 - TSPWG M 3-250-04.97-05 12 August 2019.pdf PDF
FA462526Q1062 Combo Synopsis Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attach 2 - SOW Atch 1 - WAFB - Security Procedures for Construction Contracts.pdf PDF
Attach 3 - SOW Atch 2 - WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE Supplement (16 August 2023).pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT 5 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The 509th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Global Strike Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the Whiteman AFB Airfield Pavement IDIQ program. The work accomplished for this requirement consists of providing all labor, supplies, materials, supervision, transportation, equipment and all else necessary to execute the maintenance and repair of Airfield Pavements contract at Whiteman AFB, MO, as defined in the Statement of Work (Base year and 4 one-year options). Projects consist of a broad range of maintenance, repair, and minor construction of runway and airfield pavements. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the offerors’ past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts or work efforts. Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil, caleb.kirchhoff@us.af.mil, james.mccoy.17@us.af.mil, and nathaniel.smith.68@us.af.mil. Please call SrA Nathaniel Smith at 660-687-2592 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official record. Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this evaluation.

Signature

Section 1: Contract Identification A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

E. Program Title:

H. Period of Performance

Original Schedule:
Beginning Date: _________________ through _________________
Current Schedule:
Beginning Date: _________________ through _________________

Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

Original contract dollar value:
$
Final contract dollar value:
$

Reasons for difference (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
L. Contractor’s Role:
[ ] Prime Contractor [ ] Subcontractor [ ] Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification A. Customer or agency name:

(e.g., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands) Section 3: Respondent Identification A. Respondent’s name/title:

Section 4: Performance Information In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Performance Rating Scale Definitions E - EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V - VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S - SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M - MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U - UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A - NOT APPLICABLE: Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Management

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

4. Provided adequate project supervision.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

5. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

6. Identified problems as they occurred and displayed initiative to solve them.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

7. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

8. Was responsive to contract changes.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

9. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

10. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

11. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

12. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

Schedule

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A
13. Developed realistic progress schedules.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

14. Met established project schedules.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

Quality

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A
15. Followed approved quality control plan.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

16. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

17. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

18. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

Regulatory Compliance

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A
19. Complied with regulatory requirements (Buy American Act, Construction Wage Rate Requirements, etc..)
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

20. Received all necessary permits/approvals prior to commencement of work.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE:

Overall Performance

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract? (E, V, S, M, U, N/A)
Rating: [ ]

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
[ ] Yes [ ] No

EXPLANATION:

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor?
[ ] Yes [ ] No

EXPLANATION:

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance! Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil, caleb.kirchhoff@us.af.mil, james.mccoy.17@us.af.mil, and nathaniel.smith.68@us.af.mil Controlled Unclassified Information When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW RFO 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire: FA462526Q1062 Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (FA462526Q1062) Page 1 of 2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .