Addendum 1 20015.pdf
PDF 155 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 751/20015. TAP; Newberry Customer Service Center
- Solicitation number
- RFP - 171 - 230000001121
- Issued by
- Luce County, Michigan
About this file
This document is an Addendum to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Construction Management Services issued by the Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB) for the Newberry Customer Service Center project, File Number 751/20015.TAP. The addendum provides clarification on attachments referenced in the RFP, such as staffing and general conditions tables, as well as responses to various questions raised by proposers regarding the design and construction details of the project. The proposal due date is March 9, 2023.
The addendum covers topics such as the availability of a Revit or IFC model, specifications for various building materials, the coordination between the reflected ceiling plan and interior framing plans, and the expected finishes for the exposed timber framing and cross-laminated timber (CLT) roof and wall panels. The project is located in Luce County, Michigan, and the selected Construction Manager will be awarded the contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DTMB-0414 RFP (Rev 2/22)
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
State Facilities Administration Design and Construction Division
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL – CM SERVICES
PREPROPOSAL ADDENDUM NO. 1
This form identifies an Addendum to a Request for Proposal for Professional Services, and incorporates interpretations or clarifications, modifications, and other information into the Request for Proposals.
Addenda will be numbered by the Project Director and distributed through SIGMA Vendor VSS as an attachment.
TO:
ALL PROPOSERS
DATE ISSUED
March 2, 2023
PROJECT NAME
Newberry Customer Service Center
FILE NUMBER
751/20015.TAP
PROJECT DIRECTOR
Tom Pawlowski
PROPOSAL DUE DATE
March 9, 2023
ADDENDUM ITEMS: Questions received are repeated below and responses provided.
1) Attachments not provided as referenced in the RFP, specifically Attachment A Staffing and General Conditions table, and Attachment C which is referenced in regards to providing a Prelim Cost Estimate with the RFP.
Response: The “Attachment A: Staffing and General Conditions Tables” referenced in the RFP in Section IV – Attachments on page 15-17, refers to the attachment provided in SIGMA labelled “Attachment A – CM-RFP Part 2 – Cost Details – 4 pgs.xlsx”.
The Attachment C referred to in the RFP in Section III-13 Cost Estimating and Control on page 14- 17 refers to Attachment C: Existing Plans, Pictures, Schedule, Study Plans, Study Report shown in Section IV on page 15-17. SIGMA attachments include Attachments C1, C2, C3a-f, C4, C5 & C6, representing the compilation of the items listed in the RFP relative to Attachment C.
2) Can we get an updated structural Revit or .ifc model from the Architect or Engineer for review with MT suppliers/fabricators for pricing validation?
Response: Supplier to provide pricing from drawings. Revit Model will be issued to the selected CM awarded the Contract.
3) Provide Details, Spec or Product Information on the following items – Basis of Design:
a. Thermory Wood Siding
b. Concrete Wall Panels
c. Sun Shades @ Curtain Wall
d. Canopy at Entrance
Response: For items a-c see attached specifications. For item d Canopy, match window mullions color and material, the structural detail is being developed.
4) Reflected Ceiling & Interior Framing Plans do not align. Also do not align with Elevations provided.
a. Rooms show Interior Framing including Ceiling and Reflected Ceiling Plan does not - which takes precedence?
i. Rms 104, 111, 112, 113, 124 & 131 http://www.buy4michigan.com/
b. Full Height Walls noted on Int Framing Plan do not align with Elevations - some walls appear to be full height not indicated on the floor plans
i. Appears walls need to be adjusted – should they be coordinated with the ceiling plans
– possibly affect same rooms listed above?
Response: See attached Drawings A101-Floor Plan, A401-Reflected Ceiling Plan, and S1.11P-Structural Framing Plan
5) Roofing - please confirm 3/4" wood roof sheathing is to be installed over "2x4 Nom. Wood Blocking" per detail B5/B11 on sheet A221. Appears to be shown on section but not noted. Also concern with design not allowing proper ventilation?
Response: ¾” roof sheathing over 2x4 wood blocking. See attached Drawings A221 and A511. The design provides proper spacing for sufficient air space.
6) Flooring @ Fish/Wildlife - Epoxy?
Response: Install epoxy floor finish in Fish/Wildlife – Epoxy. See attached Drawing A701 – Interior Finish Plan.
7) Exposed Timber Framing and CLT Roof & Wall Panels – what finish is expected, Paint, Stain or
Sealer? Factory finish or field applied?
Response: See attached specification. Sealer at interior – factory finish. Stain at exterior – field applied.
This ends Addendum No. 1.
APPROVED BY:
PROJECT DIRECTOR Tom Pawlowski DATE 3-2-23
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .