Attachment L-07 Past Performance Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- International Space Station Deorbit Capability Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80JSC022ISSDeorbit
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PPM-USDV
| Past Performance Matrix of Relevant Experience | ||
| Name of Team Member | Contract Name and Number | Contract Type |
(e.g. Core, IDIQ;
| FFP, CP, Hybrid; Fee type) | Period of Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (mm/dd/yyyy - mm/dd/yyyy) | Total Contract | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Value ($M) | Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) of Contracted Effort | Statement of Work (SOW) Sections | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.0 Overall General Requirements | 2.1 Program Management | 2.2 Business Management | 2.3 Configuration Management | 2.4 Information Technology (IT) | 2.5 Export Control Management | 2.6 NASA Insight & Approval | 2.7 Project Life Cycle Reviews | 2.8 Technical & Program Integration Meetings | 2.9 Design, Development, Test, & Evaluation (DDT&E) | 2.10 Software Management | 2.11 Safety, Reliability, Quality, & Mission Assurance | 2.12 Risk Management | 2.13 Launch Vehicle (LV) Integration | 2.14 ISS Integration | 2.15 Flight Operations | 3.0 Design, Development, Test, & Evaluation (DDT&E) Through Critical Design Review (CDR) (CLIN1) | 4.0 Production, Assembly, Integration, & Test (CLIN2) | 5.0 Dwell (CLIN3) | 6.0 Launch Vehicle Integration & Sustaining (CLIN4) | 7.0 Special Tasks & Studies (CLIN5) | ||||
| Considered More Relevant: Management, Development, Production, and Operation of a flight proven vehicle in a similar operating environment as the USDV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prime Contractor: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CONTRACT 1 (###) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CONTRACT 2 (###) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subcontractor 1: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CONTRACT 3 (###) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subcontractor 2: |
| Overall Team Assessment | ||
| Legend of Resources Provided for Past Performance of Parent/Affiliate: | ||
| u | Workforce | |
| S | Management |
Note to Offerors: The matrix "Roles" above should be considered an example only. Offerors should provide the matrix roles consistent with their proposal data. Additionally, in the contract rows, the Offerors shall identify up to 3 relevant contracts and place at least one "dot" (see legend example, multiple dots per cell is acceptable) in each appropriate cell per row indicating whether that Team Member (Prime, Subcontractor, Parent, Affiliate, etc.) has Past Performance for the specified SOW Section(s) that it is responsible for. Leave cells "blank" if there is no Past Performance for that Team Member for that contract. Additional rows are columns may be added as necessary. This matrix shall be consistent with Vol III Past Performance narrative information.
In the contractor rows, place a "x" in each appropriate cell per contractor row indicating which SOW Section(s), that Team Member will perform for the USDV contract. Leave cells "blank" if there is no support by the Team Member/Contractor for a particular SOW Section(s)/Focus Area(s).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .