About this file

This document summarizes a request for proposals from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center for the MARS SAMPLE RETURN (MSR) CAPTURE, CONTAINMENT AND RETURN SYSTEM (CCRS) EARTH ENTRY SYSTEM (EES) SPIN EJECT MECHANISM (SEM). NASA seeks to procure all hardware, materials, facilities, services, labor, equipment, analyses and management activities necessary for the preliminary design, final design, fabrication, integration and testing, delivery and post-delivery support of the Spin Eject Mechanism. The solicitation requests proposals by October 12, 2021. NASA anticipates awarding a cost-plus-fixed-fee completion contract by March 2022 for work to be performed offsite at the contractor's facilities over a 27 month period. The North American Industry Classification System code is 336414 and the small business size standard is 1,250 employees. The related document provides responses to questions about requirements documents and revisions for the Spin Eject Mechanism.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MARS SAMPLE RETURN (MSR) CAPTURE, CONTAINMENT AND RETURN SYSTEM (CCRS) EARTH ENTRY SYSTEM (EES) SPIN EJECT MECHANISM (SEM) Request for Proposals Amendment 5, newest first.
File Type Posted
SEM RFP QA Response Document for Posting 051722.pdf PDF
A.2 Continuation Pages 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 5.pdf PDF
B. SF33 14a 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 5.pdf PDF
MSRCCRS-ERM-CDRL-0002_Rev-_RevA Compare.pdf PDF
MSR-CCRS-ERM-SOW-0001_Rev-_RevA Compare.pdf PDF
MSRCCRS-SEM-SPEC-0002_Rev-_RevA Compare.pdf PDF
A.1 SF30-16c 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 5.pdf PDF
A.2 Continuation Pages 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 4.pdf PDF
C. ENCLOSURE 1 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Sections B-M Amendment 4.pdf PDF
A.1 SF30-16c 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 4.pdf PDF
B. SF33 14a 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 4.pdf PDF
C. ENCLOSURE 1 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Sections B-M Amendment 4 tracked changes.pdf PDF
SEM RFP QA Response Document Amendment 3.pdf PDF
C. ENCLOSURE 1 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Sections B-M track changes Amendment 3.pdf PDF
C.6 Attachment F_IT Security Applicable Documents List Rev 2021.pdf PDF
C.2 Attachment B MSRCCRS-SEM-SPEC-0002B_03-28-2022.pdf PDF
C.3.1 Attachment C MSRCCRS-ERM-CDRL-0002B_03-28-2022compare.pdf PDF
A.2 Continuation Pages 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
B. SF33 14a 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
C.1 Attachment A MSRCCRS-ERM-SOW-0001B_03-28-2022.pdf PDF
C.3 Attachment C MSRCCRS-ERM-CDRL-0002B_03-28-2022.pdf PDF
F. EXHIBIT 2 SEM Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
_MSR-CCRS-SYS-SPEC-0004-DRAFT.pdf PDF
_MSR_D-105140_JPPMP_201215_final_w-sigs1.pdf PDF
B. SF33 14a 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
C. ENCLOSURE 1 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Sections B-M Amendment 2.pdf PDF
A.2 Continuation Pages 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
A.2 Continuation Pages 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
MSR-CCRS-SYS-SPEC-0004-DRAFT.pdf PDF
A.1 SF30-16c 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
C. ENCLOSURE 1 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Sections B-M Amendment 2.pdf PDF
B. SF33 14a 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
A. 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Cover Letter Amendment 1.pdf PDF
SF30-16c 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
B. SF33-14a 80GSFC21R0039 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
80GSFC21R0039 RFP Questions Response Document Amendment 1.pdf PDF
C. ENCLOSURE 1 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Sections B-M Amendment 1.pdf PDF
C. ENCLOSURE 1 80GSFC21R0039 RFP Sections B-M.pdf PDF
C.2 Attachment B_MSR-CCRS-ERM-SPEC-0002.pdf PDF
C.4 Attachment D_MSR-CCRS-SMA-REQ-0003-_04-09-2021 (1).pdf PDF
C.7 Attachment G_ SEM Small Business Subcontracting Plan.pdf PDF
C.9 Attachment I_ SEM Quality Assurance Plan.pdf PDF
C.10 Attachment J_ SEM Contractor Proposed Enhancements.pdf PDF
B. SF33-14a.pdf PDF
C.1 Attachment A_MSR-CCRS-ERM-SOW-0001.pdf PDF
C.3 Attachment C_MSR-CCRS-ERM-CDRL-0002-_09-07-2021.pdf PDF
C.6 Attachment F_IT Security Applicable Documents List.pdf PDF
A. RFP Cover Letter.pdf PDF
E. EXHIBIT 1 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN GOALS.pdf PDF
C.5 Attachment E_Financial Management Reporting Requirements.pdf PDF
Show all 50

MARS SAMPLE RETURN (MSR) CAPTURE, CONTAINMENT AND RETURN SYSTEM (CCRS) EARTH ENTRY SYSTEM (EES) SPIN EJECT MECHANISM (SEM) Request for Proposals Amendment 5 has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Question # Document Section Page Subject Question/Comment Government's Response

1 Spin Eject Mechanism SOW/SPEC/DILS N/A N/A Spin Eject Mechanism Requirements Documents For comparison is it possible to see all revisions to the

SOW/SPEC/DILS?

The substantive changes made to the requirements were done going from Rev. – to Rev. A. With Amendment 5, the

Government will post the revisions to the SOW/SPEC/DILS captured in Rev. A., for the purpose of tracking changes. Rev. B.

remains the latest versions of these documents.

C.2 Attachment B

MSRCCRS-SEM-

SPEC-0002B_03-28-

Section 2.6.4 2-13 Spin Eject Mechanism Technical Specification

In reference to SPEC section 2.6.4 SEM Activation ("shall be energized one at a time"), what is the driver behind this requirement? Is it based on timing criticality or some other concern?

The driver for this requirement is the current limit of the power source. Certain assumptions had to be made when writing the specification to bound the range of possible solutions for the electrical architecture while also retaining power safety margins, which necessitated the serial release requirement. Depending on the actual release devices selected, it’s possible this requirement could be re-visited. However, maintaining nominal asynchronous firing also reduces complexity and carries the mechanical benefit of ensuring the as-designed system is robust to faulted (delayed) release mechanism actuation and still meet the flight dynamics performance requirements.

3 Spin Eject Mechanism SOW/SPEC/DILS N/A N/A Spin Eject Mechanism Requirements Documents What were the drivers to the revisions in the

SOW/SPEC/DILS.

In the several months between when the original requirements documents were written and the updates were published, higher-level project requirements were updated that had to be flowed down. Additionally, progression in system-level analysis efforts allowed the team to write better SEM requirements that were more accurate than what was previously published. In some cases, errors in the original documents were identified and corrected.

MSR CCRS EES SEM PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO 80GSFC21R0039

Response Document

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .