70Z04720RTYBEDB_ Amend 0005_ pgs2-11.pdf

Amendment 0005

70Z04720RTYBEDB

SOLICITATION 70Z04720RTYBEDB IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The text that reads “Separate shops / work bays / large assembly and other occupied spaces with assemblies having a minimum STC of 65” in Section 01800 Paragraph 1.7.2.6.1 of the RFP Guide

Specifications dated June 2020 shall be deleted and replaced with “Separate shops/work bay areas from office areas and other occupied spaces with assemblies having an STC rating 60 or higher”.

2. In Section 01800, Paragraph 1.17.4 of the RFP Guide Specifications dated June 2020, DELETE the following: “The manufacturer shall also hold a current GSA contract for the products selected”.

3. In Section 01800, Paragraph 1.12.1.3 of the RFP Guide Specifications dated June 2020, DELETE

"Weld Shop, Pompano Storage," from the first paragraph.

4. In Section 01800, Paragraph 1.12.1.7 of the RFP Guide Specifications dated June 2020, DELETE

"Weld Shop, Pompano Storage," from the first paragraph.

5. In Section 01800, Paragraph 1.12.1.15 of the RFP Guide Specifications dated June 2020, DELETE paragraph in its entirety.

6. DELETE drawing A-103 and REPLACE with amended A-103 as a separate attachment to this amendment.

7. ADD Draft NEPA EA document to “Attachment J”. Draft NEPA EA document is included as a separate document.

8. In Paragraph 1.17.13.100 of the RFP Guide Specifications dated June 2020, DELETE:

REPLACE WITH:

9. DELETE “OFFICE FURNITURE, REFER TO FF & E SPEC. SECT. 01800, PARA 1.17” on page 292 of the RFP Guide Specifications dated June 2020 on the Individual Space Criteria Sheet (ISCS) and

REPLACE with N/A.

10. DELETE Section 01110, Paragraph 1.16 of the RFP Specifications dated June 2020 page 14 of 304 and

REPLACE with amended Specification 1.16 which is attached as a separate document.

THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WERE RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO THE SOLICITATION:

1. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.12 HVAC mentions a Weld Shop and Pompano Storage. These two rooms are not included in the Space Criteria and RFP drawings. Please confirm these rooms are not required

RESPONSE: Those rooms were deleted, see amendment.

2. QUESTION: For the category IV portion of the structure, ASCE 24 requires the lowest floor to be located at the greater of the 100 year flood plan plus 2 feet or the 500 year flood plain. Please confirm that the indicated finished floor elevation of 16.2’ shown on the provided drawings satisfies the finished floor requirements of ASCE 24.

RESPONSE: RFP Drawing C300 indicates a finished floor elevation of 16.2+/-. Also, refer to

RFP Specification Section 01800, Paragraph 1.4.6 Finished Floor Elevation (FFE). It states the following:

“The FEMA Map for the project site is Map Number 13051C0195G, dated August 16, 2018. The accompanying Flood Insurance Study Numbers are 13051CV001D-

13051CV004D. Flood zones on the site range from Zone VE (EL 14 NAVD88) at the waterfront to Zone VE (EL 12 NAVD88) to Zone X. The Contractor shall determine the most efficient and economical main building FFE based upon the flood elevations, the International

Building Code and ASCE 24-14. It is anticipated that the FFE will be approximately EL 16.2

NAVD88 based upon the conceptual site layout.” The FFE may vary slightly from that shown on the RFP drawings as the FEMA map shows the boundary between Zone VE12 and Zone X

(Special Flood Hazard Areas) near the perimeter of the existing station building. If the

Contractor and/or the Contractor’s Designer of Record determines that a portion of the new structure is within a VE Zone, appropriate measures should be taken to meet the requirements of

ASCE 24.

3. QUESTION:. UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings is not listed in RFP section 1.1.3 References, Codes, and Standards. The only specific reference to the UFC is in RFP section

1.4.9.4 in regards to dumpster locations. Please confirm ATFP requirements within UFC 4-010-01 do not apply, aside from the dumpster locations

RESPONSE: ATFP Standards apply. See previous response to RFI question #7 in Amendment 0003.

4. QUESTION: Can the Government confirm that progressive collapse in accordance with UFC 4-010-01 is a requirement of the RFP for this project?

RESPONSE: Yes, see previous response to RFI question #7 in Amendment 0003.

5. QUESTION: Can the Government confirm that on the room definition sheets where painted concrete walls are referenced the term is interchangeable with painted CMU (i.e. Room 115 MK Shop calls for painted concrete; however, adjacent Rooms 112 Station Hazardous Storage, 113 Station Hazardous Waste, and 114 Flammable Storage calls for CMU Painted)?

RESPONSE: Yes, see previous response to RFI question #5 in Amendment 0004.

6. Section 01110, 1.3 list the order of precedence for contract documents. Can the Government confirm what takes precedence if there are differences between the RFP Specifications and the Space Criteria

Sheets?

RESPONSE: If there’s a conflict between the RFP specification and the space criteria sheets, contractors should notify the Government.

7. QUESTION: UFC 4-010-01 was added in Amendment 0003 and contains specific requirements for mail rooms. However, these requirements do not apply if mail is first delivered to a central handling facility at the station. Is there a central mailing facility or space at USCG Station Tybee?

RESPONSE: There is not a central handling facility at Station Tybee. The requirements of UFC

4-010-01 do not apply because all mail entering Station Tybee is processed at a central mail handling facility prior to entering the station.

8. QUESTION: Does the USCG want to expedite the proposal process by including the price into this proposal as well? Please add three (3) weeks to the due date if so.

RESPONSE: No, the proposal process will remain two (2) phase with the non-price (technical) proposal separate from the price proposal.

9. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.16.7.8 states to “Provide three (3) equipment racks in the 1st

Floor Telecommunications Equipment Room, and one (1) equipment racks in the 2nd Floor

Telecommunications Room.” The provided floor plans do not include a Telecom Room on the first floor.

There is only one space, the C4 IT room, identified in the building. Please confirm quantity of spaces on the building per floor.

RESPONSE: Paragraph 1.16.7.8: has been corrected to read 2nd Floor Telecommunications

Space as the primary Telecommunications Entrance Facility, 3rd floor requires a smaller telecommunications space, added requirement for 3rd Floor (1 rack needed), space requirements in 1.16.18. See Amended specification 1.16 included as a separate attachment.

10. QUESTION: Please confirm where the new TELCO demarcation is being requested. Per the provided drawings, the new facility only consists of a single IT room, the C4 IT room, located on the 2nd Floor. Is this C4 IT room meant to be the TELCO demarcation room or is the TELCO demarcation room required to be accessible from the exterior of the building and on the ground floor.

RESPONSE: Telco Demarc will be located in the Telecommunications Entrance Facility on the

2nd Floor. All Outside plant conduit shall terminate to this room. See Amended specification

1.16 attached

11. QUESTION: Section 18001, Paragraph 2.11.3.1 states to “Provide a telecommunications structured cabling systems (SCS) that includes outside plant underground and/or aerial backbone fiber optic and copper cabling (6 strands of 62.5um multimode indoor/outdoor fiber optic cable and 25 pair of outside plant

Category 3 cabling) from the existing main telecommunications room in the Administration Building to the telecommunications backboard in one of the temporary trailers. Feed the other temporary trailers from this trailer with fiber optic and copper cabling.” If the existing main telecommunications room in the

Administration Building is to be demolished prior to building the new building being constructed, wouldn’t the temporary trailers need to feed directly from the service provider or from another building not being demolished?

RESPONSE: Added requirements 1.16.37.1.6 and 1.16.37.1.7 for Telco conduit access into the temporary facility and run cabling needed by local telco. Yes, confirmed incur costs of working with local Telco provider (Local service provider is AT&T for telephone. Network service provider is Verizon Business) to provide new cabling to inside the trailers Contractor to work with local TELCO, ETCS Christopher Green (C5I project officer, 402-710-0628, Christopher.j.green@uscg.mil), and Mr. Bobby Eckel (C5I D7 DAR, 757-647-5241, Robert.w.eckel@uscg.mil) to confirm all requirements, schedule, and installation. See Amended specification 1.16.

12. QUESTION: Section 18001, Paragraph 2.11 only provides guidance for temporary services to the temporary trailers. Since the existing engineering building and mechanic building are to remain in operation until the new main building is constructed, do these also require temporary services, or are they currently fed directly from the service provider with no existing connection to the existing main building that will be demolished.

RESPONSE: - All service to Engineering and Mechanics (ANT) buildings are fed by the administration building through the engineering building telecommunications room. See

Amended specification 1.16.

13. QUESTION: There does not appear to be any specific documentation being requested to confirm compliance with FAR 52.204-24(c) ? Can the Government confirm if a simple statement that the offeror is in compliance would be acceptable?

RESPONSE: The offeror can confirm representation by indicating in a statement that “It □ will,

□ will not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract or other contractual instrument resulting from this solicitation.”

14. Page 9 of the TOA, 2nd paragraph under Specific Submission Requirements for Phase 2: states "The

Contractor shall be required to respond to its representation in accordance with FAR Provision 52.204-24(c)

Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

(AUG 2020). Can the Government confirm where in the proposal the offeror is to include this response?

RESPONSE: The statement referenced in the response to question 13 above can be included as a separate page attached to the offeror’s technical proposal.

mailto:Christopher.j.green@uscg.mil mailto:Robert.w.eckel@uscg.mil

15. Section 01800, Paragraph 1.7.2.6 Acoustic Requirements states STC 65 is required for shops, work bays, large assembly, and other occupied spaces. Can the Government confirm the STC 65 is correct (as this seems very high), and elaborate on what is considered "other occupied spaces."? For example, would this include berthing rooms, training rooms, and offices?”

RESPONSE: Shop space shall be separated from office spaces with a STC rating of 60 or higher.

See amendment.

16. QUESTION: In accordance with Section 01800, Paragraph 1.7.2.6 Acoustic Requirements, can the

Government confirm that doors do not need to meet the STC 65 rating as specified for the rooms as noted as these door assemblies are not commercially readily available?

RESPONSE: Confirmed, doors do not need to have a STC 65 rating.

17. QUESTION: Are door assemblies need to meet the STC rating specified for the wall, partition and floor/ceiling assembles?

RESPONSE: No

18. QUESTION: If doors are required to meet STC 65 we have only been able to locate a door assemblies rated at STC 70 which is a double door system. If required, can the Government provide a basis of design manufacturer to meet this requirement?

RESPONSE: Doors do not need to have a STC 65 rating.

19. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.7.2.6 states that at a minimum the acoustic requirement for all walls, partitions, and floor/ceiling assemblies separating occupied spaces from each other and adjacent public areas shall be STC 50 (laboratory) or 45 (if tested in the field*). Can the Government identify which rooms (if any) require field testing and clarify what the * in (if tested in the field*) is referencing?

RESPONSE: To verify that the appropriate STC ratings are met. The DOR has the option to use laboratory test data or field test data.

20. QUESTION: In accordance with Section 01800, Paragraph 1.5.2, can the Government confirm that the contractor is to bid the project based upon the foundation type shown in the geotechnical site survey and any change to this foundation type will be a differing site condition?

RESPONSE: The Geotechnical Investigation listed in RFP Specification Section 01800, Paragraph 1.5.1 (RFP Attachment B) is provided for information purposes. The Contractor is not required to base their bid upon any foundation recommendation provided within this document. RFP Specification Section 01800, Paragraph 1.5.2 includes the statement, 'The

Contractor shall bear all costs of the actual foundation provided, except under circumstances where adjustments in contract award price may be made under the provisions of Contract Clause

FAR 52.236-2, "Differing Site Conditions".' It is important to emphasize that the Contractor shall bear all costs of the actual foundation. If the Contractor's site investigation demonstrates that the site conditions constitute a 'Differing Site Condition' as described Contract Clause FAR

52.236-2, then a price adjustment can be made.

21. QUESTION: In accordance with Section 01800, Paragraph 1.17, the RFP requires that the manufacturer have a current GSA contract for the product selected. Please provide a GSA letter for this project so that furniture can eventually be priced at GSA prices for Phase 3?

RESPONSE: GSA requirement no longer applicable. See amendment

22. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.13.3 requires the contractor to provide electrical service to new Station Tybee facility from service provider and to make all arrangements for this. Please confirm that the contractor is to coordinate, design, and pay for the new electrical service from the local utility provider?

If so, it is recommended that for Phase 3 the Government either provide an allowance in the contract for the electrical utility provider's work or the Government carry the cost separate from the TO contract.

RESPONSE: There is an existing point of service at Station Tybee. The contractor is not required design, and pay for the new electrical service from the local utility provider. See 01110, paragraph 1.16.5.

23. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.13.11.8 requires the contractor to provide dedicated special purpose outlets or hard wired connections for specific shop equipment. Can the Government provide a list of equipment requiring dedicated special purpose outlets or hard wired connections along with location and quantity so that this requirement can be coordinated for proposal design and pricing?

RESPONSE: No other special purpose outlets are known at this time. See note 5 Sheet A-101.

24. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.14 appears to require the contractor to install a complete IDS and CCTV system. Can the Government please confirm that this is correct? If so, can the Government provide additional information about the existing system such as manufacturer, maintenance / service provider, etc.?

RESPONSE: Yes, contractor is to install IDS and CCTV. Manufacturer of IDS system is DPM.

The manufacturer of the CCTV is REVO.

25. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.15 appears to require the contractor to provide a complete

Cable TV or Satellite TV system and to make arrangements and coordinate the system installation with the local CATV service provider. Can the Government please confirm that this is correct? If so, can the

Government provide additional information about the existing service and service provider? It is recommended that for Phase 3 the Government either provide an allowance in the contract for the CATV utility provider's work or the Government carry the cost separate from the TO contract.

RESPONSE: Yes, contractor is to provide CATV service. Currently, Direct TV is the provider.

26. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.16.5.2 requires the contractor/subcontractor performing campus, backbone, and horizontal telecommunications cabling installations to be a certified BICSI ITS

Installer 2 or hold an industry equivalent certification or higher. Please clarify that this certification is only required for the subcontractor "company" and not meant that every worker installing cable must hold the required certification.

RESPONSE: The lead installation technician or "subcontractor" actually performing the installation is required to be certified BICSI ITS Installer 2 or hold industry equivalent or higher.

This is not required for every person on scene.

27. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.16.3 appears to require the contractor to make arrangements and incur all costs for the installation of the TELCO new facility access cabling. Can the Government please confirm that this is correct? If so, can the Government provide additional information on the existing telephone service and service provider? It is recommended that for Phase 3 the Government either provide an allowance in the contract for the TELCO utility provider's work or the Government carry the cost separate from the TO contract.

RESPONSE: Yes, confirmed that contractor will work with local telco service provider to install new demarcation point, at a minimum required cabling. Local service provider is AT&T for telephone. Network service provider is Verizon Business. Contractor to work with local

TELCO, ETCS Christopher Green (C5I project officer, 402-710-0628, Christopher.j.green@uscg.mil), and Mr. Bobby Eckel (C5I D7 DAR, 757-647-5241, Robert.w.eckel@uscg.mil) to confirm all requirements, schedule, and installation. (CGreen)

28. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.16.5.3 requires the contractor/subcontractor performing campus, backbone, and horizontal telecommunications cabling testing to be done by a certified BICSI ITS

Technician or hold an industry equivalent certification or higher. Please clarify that this certification is only required for the subcontractor "company" and not meant that every worker involved in telecommunications testing must hold the required certification.

RESPONSE: The lead installation technician or "subcontractor" actually performing the installation is required to be certified BICSI ITS Installer 2 or hold industry equivalent or higher.

This is not required for every person on scene.

29. QUESTION: Section 01802, Paragraph 2.10 requires whole building commissioning and is very specific about the requirements for the commissioning plan and report. The various sections require commissioning for all HVAC systems and equipment as well as all fire protection systems and equipment.

Can the Government confirm that electrical systems will not require commissioning?

RESPONSE: Electrical systems will require testing as outlined in section 01800-1.13, which should be part of the commissioning plan and scope per section 01800-1.3.3

30. QUESTION: For the category IV portion of the structure, ASCE 24 requires the lowest floor to be located at the 100 year flood plan plus 2 feet or the 500 year flood plain whichever is greater. Based on our research, the 500 year flood plain would put the Ground Floor at elevation 17.5’ which is 1.3’ higher than the 16.2’ elevation shown in the RFP’s conceptual drawings. Can the Government confirm which elevation we are to set the Ground Floor (17.5' or 16.2')?

RESPONSE: The requirements of RFP Specification Section 01800, Paragraph 1.4.6 must be met.

31. QUESTION: Section 01800 paragraph 1.2.3.1 and 1.2.3.2 discuss prescriptive and performance based criteria. Besides specific code requirements can the Government provide any additional prescriptive design criteria?

RESPONSE: There is no additional prescriptive design criteria.

mailto:Christopher.j.green@uscg.mil mailto:Robert.w.eckel@uscg.mil

32. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.3.2.4 list mandatory USCGB LEED-BD&C credits for this project. Section 01800, Paragraph 1.3.2.5 lists Rainwater Management and Daylight credits as not being mandatory. This appears to conflict with Paragraph 1.3.2.4 as there are some mandatory requirements that may overlap with Rainwater Management and Daylight credits such as Paragraph 1.3.2.4 (d) and (s). Can the Government clarify what parts of Rainwater Management and Daylight credits are mandatory?

RESPONSE: Meeting EISA requirements for stormwater management may not be technically and/or economically feasible due to a number of constraints presented by the site. However, stormwater management should be provided to the maximum extent feasible. Therefore, meeting the Rainwater Management credit is deemed highly desirable but not mandatory. The Contractor is encouraged to meet the Rainwater Management Credit if the design and the site allows meeting this credit without adverse effect to the budget and is technically feasible.

Daylighting is similar to the storm water requirement above. In some occasions the requirements of the project may hinder meeting the full requirement of the LEED Credit Daylight. As such, per

01800-1.3.2.4(s), daylighting opportunities should be maximized for the building that does not interfere with project requirements, building function or CG mission. The Contractor is encouraged to meet the LEED Daylight Credit (highly desirable but not mandatory) if achievable without adverse effect to the project scope, building function or CG mission.

33. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.17 and Drawing A-102: All of the equipment listed in the

“Galley Space” portion of paragraph 1.17 does not seem to appear in Galley Room 223 and Mess Deck

Room 225 on Drawing A-102. Please confirm the Galley equipment to be included, and please clarify the locations of the equipment on the drawing.

RESPONSE: What is shown on the RFP drawings is not a final design. Section 1.17 outline typical equipment required in a standard galley. We illustrated the location of major pieces of equipment in order to more accurately to size the galley space. We did not attempt to locate smaller items such as coffee pots, tea dispensers, etc. The DOR has to finalize the design of the galley space.

34. QUESTION: Drawings A-101, A-102, and A-103: Please clarify if any of the stairways shown are program requirements above what would be needed for life safety.

RESPONSE: Government did not do a detailed life safety analysis of this 15% concept design.

Ultimately, the DOR is responsible for the life safety analysis in a D/B project. The stairways shown on the RFP drawing satisfy operational requirements.

35. QUESTION: Appendix F, Individual Space Criteria Sheets: Please confirm if CMU is a required wall

Galley 223, Office 224, Dry Storage, Scullery, Typical Berthing Rooms, and Laundry 307.

RESPONSE: Exterior walls, mechanical and electrical room walls shall be cmu or concrete.

Interior partition walls are not required to cmu but they must meet the STC requirements.

36. QUESTION: Appendix F, Individual Space Criteria Sheets: Please confirm if Concrete is a required wall material in the following spaces: C4IT Room 219, Janitors Closet 222 & 310, Main Mechanical Room

308, Main Electrical Room 309. Please confirm CMU is acceptable.

RESPONSE: Exterior walls, mechanical and electrical room walls shall be cmu or concrete.

Interior partition walls are not required to cmu but they must meet the STC requirements.

37. QUESTION: Appendix F, Individual Space Criteria Sheets: Please clarify if any FF&E items are required in Rec Room 220. None are shown on Drawing A-102, and Section 01800, Paragraph 1.17 is unclear.

RESPONSE: See Amendment drawing A-102 and amended ISCS pg 292

38. QUESTION: Section 01800, Paragraph 1.11.3.11 and Paragraph 1.17.13.100: Paragraph 1.11.3.11 calls for emergency eyewash/shower combination units, while Paragraph 1.17.13.100 shows a graphic of an eyewash station without shower. Please confirm which type is required

RESPONSE: Eyewash/shower is preferred. See Amendment.

39. QUESTION: Appendix F, Individual Space Criteria Sheets: Several spaces on the first floor list FRP doors and frames, while others list HM doors and frames. Please confirm that it will be acceptable to have different door materials adjacent to one another. Examples are: Mail Room 124 (HM) and Locker Rooms

126 & 127 (FRP), and General Building Storage 121 (FRP) and Battery Storage 123 (HM)

RESPONSE: Please see 01800, 1.7.3.1.2. Only exterior doors need to be FRP.

40. QUESTION: Appendix F, Individual Space Criteria Sheets: Please confirm that in Battery Storage 123, batteries will only be stored, and that no charging or maintenance of batteries is to be planned for.

RESPONSE: The Room will be used for storage and charging.

41. QUESTION: Drawing A-101: Please confirm that a separate room for the air compressor serving the shop spaces is not required.

RESPONSE: The air compressor can be located in the forklift storage area.

42. QUESTION: Drawing A-101: Please confirm that a water service entrance room, or other utility space, is not required at the ground floor.

RESPONSE: What is shown on the RFP drawings is not a final design. Please see

“ATTENTION” note on drawings.

43. QUESTION: Please indicate if any other permitting processes (other than NEPA) that have been started. Have there been any preliminary activities performed relative to the Wasteland Allocation Request

(WLA) or NPDES process?

RESPONSE: No permitting processes have been started. Please refer to RFP Spec Section 1800

– 1.18.2 Project Related Environmental, Permits, Consultations, and Certifications. See amendment for draft EA.

44. QUESTION: For bidding purposes, the Design-Builder is to assume that a package sewage treatment plant will be required. Please indicate if the users have a preferred location on the site for the package sewage treatment plant, or if the location is to be proposed by the Design-Builder.

RESPONSE: Locations for the package treatment plant are limited. Refer to Note 12 on RFP

Drawing C300, RFP Specification Section 01800, Paragraph 1.4.8 and RFP Attachment I.

45. QUESTION: Drawing C201 – Keynote 21, Please confirm that the existing drain field (part of the sanitary sewage system) is to be removed. Please provide the depth of the existing drain field.

RESPONSE: The existing drain field is to be removed as noted. Based upon the original 1982 design drawings, assume that the inverts of the drain field laterals are 3 feet below existing grade.

46. QUESTION: Amendment 004 - Reference Amendment 0004 Question 2. Please confirm that the CAD files provided are the extent of the total files available, or will the successful design-builder be provided with additional CAD documents.

RESPONSE: Confirmed. CAD files provided with Amendment 004 are everything we currently have. If additional files become available we will provide.

47. QUESTION: Drawings A101-A103 indicate a specific 3-story building massing. Will the Government accept alternative massing of the building if the proposed design meets the requirements of the RFP?

RESPONSE: The Government will consider an alternative massing so long as proposed alternative massing concepts meet RFP requirements.

48. QUESTION: During Phase 2 of the Solicitation, the Design-Builder Bidder will submit a proposed design. If selected to continue to the Phase 3 Pricing, will the Design-Builder Bidder be allowed to make any changes to their design that was submitted in Phase 2. If yes, will a revised technical proposal be included with the Phase 3 Pricing?

RESPONSE: No changes to the design shall be allowed for those contractors who continue to

Phase 3 Pricing.

49. QUESTION: C200 - Please provide additional information on how sanitary sewerage is pumped from the vessels at the pier. Does the sewage get pumped to a holding tank adjacent to the entrance to the pier? Is the holding tank periodically emptied by a third party or does the sewage get pumped to the existing drain field? What is the intention for the new system or will the existing system remain without modification

RESPONSE: The vessels pump sewage to a lift station at the head of the pier. From there, it is pumped to the septic tank and drain field. The lift station was replaced in 2019 and the intention is for it to remain.

Note

Failure to acknowledge amendments may be cause for rejection of your of