70Z02324R77100001 Amendment 0005 Changes Summary 2024 04 26.pdf
PDF 148 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z02324R77100001
About this file
This document is an amendment to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Joint Requirements Integration and Management System (JRIMS) Capabilities Documents for the United States Coast Guard, Solicitation Number 70Z02324R77100001. The RFP is for program management and technical support services to support all phases of the requirements generation process. Key changes in this amendment include:
- Revisions to the description of the IDIQ Program Manager position and requirements for onsite presence
- Clarifications on the evaluation of lessons learned, preventative/corrective actions, and management approach in the technical proposal
- Updates to the NAICS code and labor category descriptions in the solicitation
- Deletion of the Operations Research Analyst labor category and addition of a Data Analyst position
The Government intends to award a single Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Firm-Fixed-Price contract for these support services, with a base period of one year and four one-year ordering periods. This is a total Service Disabled, Veteran Owned (SDVO) Small Business Set-Aside requirement managed by the United States Coast Guard.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Commandant United States Coast Guard
2703 Martin Luther King, Jr. Ave SE Stop 7828 Washington, DC 20593-7828 Staff Symbol: CG-91 Phone: (206) 815-1304 Email: Robert.Budlong@uscg.mil
Request for Proposal 70Z02324R77100001 Joint Requirements Integration and Management System (JRIMS) Capabilities Documents for the United States Coast Guard Amendment 0005
RFP Summary of Changes
This summary of changes is provided to assist offerors to find edits in the solicitation documents. It may not identify some minor spelling changes, correction of typographical errors, or minor formatting changes. Changes in Addendum 1 are highlighted in blue.
1. In Section H (Special Contract Requirements), subsection 9.0 (9.0 IDIQ CONTRACT AND
TASK ORDER KEY PERSONNEL),
FROM:
IDIQ contract level key personnel are those Contractor personnel considered to be essential to the performance of the IDIQ contract and all of its Task Orders. For this contract, the
Program Manager is designated as key personnel. The Program Manager shall have at least five (5) years of management experience, four (4) years as a primary scheduler utilizing
Integrated Master Schedules (IMS) for major projects and ten (10) years of total experience related to requirements generation per subsection C.2 above and experience performing IMS.
They will have experience in the acquisition process and with strategic document management. The Government prefers that the Program Manager have a master’s degree in a relevant or related field such as a Master of Project Management or Master of Business
Administration. To the extent that any conflict or delta exists between this section and
Attachment J-1, the text herein shall have primacy.
TO:
Description of IDIQ Program Manager has been moved to Attachment J-1 – Labor
Category / Descriptions. See revised Attachment J-1 for details.
The IDIQ Program Manager shall be onsite three (3) days per week. The IDIQ
Program Manager may telework the remaining two (2) days per week.
2. In Section L (Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents), subsection
L.2.3.1 (Factor 1-Corporate Experience) [page 78 of 89] of Addendum 1, change paragraph 2 as follows:
Lessons Learned: Offerors shall discuss their lessons learned from their corporate experience and how the benefit to the Government. The offer will discuss how the lessons learned will benefit all phases of the requirements generation process.
Washington, DC 20593-7828 Staff Symbol: CG-91
Lessons Learned: Offerors shall discuss their lessons learned from their corporate experience and how they benefited the Government. The offer will discuss how the lessons
3. In Section L (Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents), subsection
L.2.3.1 (Factor 1-Corporate Experience) [page 78 of 89] of Addendum 1, change paragraph 3
Preventative and Corrective Actions: Offerors shall explain how preventative and corrective actions taken. The Offeror will discuss the relationship between each of these measures and the degree to which each one improved or mitigated outcomes.
actions have been taken. The Offeror will discuss the relationship between each of these measures and the degree to which each one improved or mitigated outcomes.
4. In Section L (Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents), subsection
L.2.3.1 (Factor 1-Corporate Experience) [page 78 of 89] of Addendum 1, change paragraph 5 actions taken. The Offeror will discuss the relationship between each of these measures and the degree to which each one improved or mitigated outcomes.
actions have been taken. The Offeror will discuss the relationship between each of these
5. In Section L (Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents), subsection
L.2.4.1 (Factor 3-Management Approach Oral Presentation) [page 80 of 89] of Addendum 1 in Bullet #3, in the 3rd sentence before “Key Personnel”, delete “vision for this contract is for the”, and after “Key Personnel” replace “to” with “shall”. In the 4th sentence, after “IPT Government stakeholders who”, replace “will typically” with “shall”. See revised bullet #3 as follows:
Washington, DC 20593-7828 Staff Symbol: CG-91
3. The Offeror’s methodology for managing its proposed team. The Offeror must describe their method of effectively interfacing with its organization, subcontractors, and the different divisions within the directorate for the Assistant Commandant for Capability (CG-7). The vision for this contract is for the Key Personnel to be onsite while the team completing the task orders’ work is offsite. The approach to management of and interface / communications with the offsite team shall be evaluated on how it ensures clear communication between the various offsite Offerors task order teams and the IPT Government stakeholders who will typically work at USCG Headquarters.
3. The Offeror’s methodology for managing its proposed team. The Offeror must describe their method of effectively interfacing with its organization, subcontractors, and the different divisions within the directorate for the Assistant Commandant for Capability (CG-7). The Key Personnel shall be onsite while the team completing the task orders’ work is offsite. The approach to management of and interface / communications with the offsite team shall be evaluated on how it ensures clear communication between the various offsite Offerors task order teams and the IPT Government stakeholders who shall work at USCG Headquarters.
6. In Section M (Evaluation Factors for Award), subsection M.2.1. (Factor 1-Corporate
Experience) [page 84 of 89] of Addendum 1, in paragraph 2 is changed as follows;
Lessons Learned: The evaluation will assess lessons learned from their corporate experience and the benefit to the Government. The evaluation will assess the level that the lessons
Lessons Learned: The evaluation will assess lessons learned from their corporate experience and how they benefited the Government. The evaluation will assess the level that the lessons
7. In Section M (Evaluation Factors for Award), subsection M.2.1. (Factor 1-Corporate
Experience) [page 84 of 89] of Addendum 1, in paragraph 5, add “taken” in first sentence and delete “on stated dimensions”. See changes below.
Preventative and Corrective Actions: The evaluation will assess preventative and corrective actions. Specifically, the evaluation will assess the relationship between each of these
Washington, DC 20593-7828 Staff Symbol: CG-91 measures and the degree to which each one improved or mitigated outcomes on said dimension.
Preventative and Corrective Actions: The evaluation will assess preventative and corrective actions taken. Specifically, the evaluation will assess the relationship between each of these
8. In Section M (Evaluation Factors for Award), subsection M.2.2. (Factor 2-Key Personnel) [page
85 of 89] of Addendum 1, in paragraph 1, change as follows:
The evaluation will assess the Program Manager's credentials for experience, training and education in preforming contract that are in line with the Government's Requirement. The evaluation will assess the Program Manager's roles and responsibilities and how they will manage the contract.
The evaluation will assess the Program Manager's credentials for experience, training, and education in preforming contracts that are similar to the Government's requirement.
The evaluation will assess the Program Manager's roles and responsibilities and how they will manage the contract.
9. In Section M (Evaluation Factors for Award), subsection M.2.2. (Factor 2-Key Personnel) [page
85 of 89] of Addendum 1, in paragraph 5, Delete paragraphs 3 in its entirety.
10. In Section M (Evaluation Factors for Award), subsection M.3.1. (Factor 3-Management
Approach Oral Presentation) [page 85 of 89] of Addendum 1, in bullet #3, in the 3rd sentence, after “The Government”, replace “anticipates” with “requires”, after “The Government requires that”, replace “a Contract Management Team” with “the Key Personnel”, and after “the Key Personnel” replace “will” with “shall”. In the 4th sentence, after “IPT Government stakeholders who”, replace “will typically” with “shall”. See revised bullet #3 as follows:
FROM:
3. The Offeror’s methodology for managing its proposed team. The Offeror must describe their method of effectively interfacing with its organization, subcontractors, and the different divisions within the directorate for the Assistant Commandant for Capability (CG- 7). The Government anticipates that a Contract Management Team will have onsite presence while the teams completing individual task orders work offsite. The approach to management of and interface / communications with the offsite team shall be evaluated
Washington, DC 20593-7828 Staff Symbol: CG-91 on how it ensures clear communication between the various offsite Offeror task order teams and the IPT government stakeholders who will typically work at USCG Headquarters.
3. The Offeror’s methodology for managing its proposed team. The Offeror must describe their method of effectively interfacing with its organization, subcontractors, and the different divisions within the directorate for the Assistant
Commandant for Capability (CG-7). The Government requires that the Key
Personnel shall have onsite presence while the teams completing individual task orders work offsite. The approach to management of and interface / communications with the offsite team shall be evaluated on how it ensures clear communication between the various offsite Offeror task order teams and the IPT government stakeholders who shall work at USCG Headquarters.
11. Update the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes in all the CLINS for the SF-1449 to 541611, Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.
12. Attachment J-1 – Labor Categories / Descriptions: Added IDIQ Program Manager and related description.
13. Attachment J-1 – Labor Categories / Descriptions: deleted LCAT for Operations Research
Analyst.
14. Attachment J-1 – Labor Categories / Descriptions: Added Data Analyst.
******************* End of Summary of Changes for Amendment 0005 *******************
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .