7-Evaluation Score Sheet (final).pdf
PDF 146 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- USBE-MI27022-RFP
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation score sheet for a Request for Proposals issued by the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) for Utah Professional Practices Advisory Committee (UPPAC) Investigators under Solicitation Number USBE-MI27022-RFP. The RFP seeks to contract with qualified external, independent investigators who will be assigned on a rotating or random basis as hearings are required. The resulting contract is anticipated to run through June 30, 2027, with potential for four additional one-year renewal options. USBE reserves the right to terminate the contract at any time in accordance with standard terms and conditions.
The evaluation scoresheet uses a 0-10 point scale to assess proposals across technical and cost criteria. Technical evaluation comprises 71 percent of total points (250 points possible), divided into four weighted sections: Section 1 (40 percent, 100 points), Section 2 (28 percent, 70 points), Section 3 (20 percent, 50 points), and Section 4 (12 percent, 30 points). Cost evaluation comprises 29 percent of total points (100 points possible), calculated using a formula where the lowest-cost proposer receives 100 percent of price points and other proposers receive points based on the percentage difference from the lowest cost, with proposers exceeding 200 percent of the lowest cost receiving zero points. A minimum score of 162.5 points (65 percent of technical points) and 227.5 points overall (65 percent of total points) is required to pass evaluation. Scoreable criteria include potential conflicts of interest, educational law experience, investigator experience, writing samples, data protection protocols, and representation of educators facing UPPAC discipline.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Changing+Your+Time+Zone.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| 3-PII+Questionnaire (1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 8-RFP Prerequisites Document.pdf | ||
| 4-USBE Contractor COI Form.pdf | ||
| 2-GRAMA-business-confidentiality.pdf | ||
| 6-Cost Proposal Form (final).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 5-Att. A - USBE Standard TsCs for Goods and Services (rev. 8-2026).docx | DOCX document | |
| 11-USBE-MI27022-RFP Award Justification Statement.pdf | ||
| 9-SCOPE OF WORK (final).pdf | ||
| 12-USBE-MI27022-RFP - Award Memo.pdf | ||
| 10-Technical Evaluation Criteria (final).pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Scores will be assigned from 0-10 as follows:
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (0-10)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 10 40.0% 100.0 0.0 2 7 28.0% 70.0 0.0 3 5 20.0% 50.0 0.0 4 3 12.0% 30.0 0.0
100.0% 250.0 0.0
Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Evaluation
65% 162.5 0.0 0.0% Fail
RFP
Section
Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total Points
Possible Earned
Points Possible Points Earned
0% 100.0 0.0
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Possible
Points Earned
Minimum Percent
Required
Minimum Points
Required
Evaluation Result
71% 250.0 0.0 65% 162.5 FAIL
29% 100.0 0.0 N/A N/A N/A
100% 350.0 0.0 65% 227.5 FAIL
* USBE will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest total cost for the duration of the contract. The offeror with the Lowest Total Cost will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Total Cost is than the Lowest Total Cost. An offeror whose Proposed Total Cost is more than double (200%) the Lowest Total Cost will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Total Cost/Lowest Total Cost).
Required Score Threshold
Total Proposed Hourly Rate (from Cost Proposal Sheet)
Total Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Mandatory Minimum Requirements
SOLICITATION # USBE-MI27022-RFP
Scoreable Technical Criteria
NOTE: The requirements and criteria listed in this RFP score sheet may be abbreviated headings. Offerors should refer to the corresponding RFP section for a complete description of criteria.
UTAH PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (UPPAC) INVESTIGATORS
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
0 = the proposed solution does not meet requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
5 = the proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
10 = the proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Educational Law Experience Writing Sample
Writing sample Does not represent educators facing UPPAC discipline Protect student-level data
Investigator Experience
Scoresheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .