Attachment J007 PSS QASP AMENDMENT 3.pdf
PDF 249 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES 693KA9-20-R-00001 AMENDMENT #5 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693KA9-20-R-00001
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for program support services. The Federal Aviation Administration intends to award multiple contracts to support four directorates within its Program Management Organization. Services include systems engineering, software engineering, hardware engineering, human factors engineering, information security, safety management, strategic planning, program management, configuration management, business and acquisition support, administrative management, training, testing, logistics, implementation support, facilities support, operations support, performance analysis, meteorological support, and communications support. Responses were due by April 8, 2020. The incumbent contractors are Oasis Systems, Science Applications International Corp., and General Dynamics Information Technology. The potential value of the contracts is $41.5 million. The period of performance is seven years with option periods to extend up to 10 years. The agency will evaluate responses based on labor rates, past performance, and subcontracting plans.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
(QASP)
1) Title: Work Order, Attachment 1
2) Work Requirement: Contractor efforts under this Work Order are defined within the Statement of Work (SOW).
3) Performance Standards: Pursuant to contract provision number H.8 “Task Order
Performance Evaluation”, the contractor’s performance will be monitored in the following areas:
a. Technical Performance
b. Schedule Compliance
c. Deliverable Quality
d. Cost Control
e. Responsiveness to Customer Requirements
4) Method of Surveillance: The Method of Surveillance is specified under section 5, below.
5) Performance Requirements Summary Matrix: The following table provides the performance factor, standard, acceptable quality level, method of surveillance and incentive.
Performance Area
Standard Acceptable Quality Level
Method of Surveillance
(a) Technical
Performance
All task requirements met with little to no rework/ re-performance required and with few minor or no significant problems
No significant rework or re-performance required during reporting period.
Any minor issues successfully addressed.
Periodic inspection of contractor performance, status reports and invoices.
(b) Schedule
Compliance
Contractor provides deliverables on or before due dates and meets or exceeds project milestones or schedules.
No more than one minor deliverable submitted late per reporting period. No significant late deliveries or missed milestones.
Inspection of deliverable and milestones against schedule.
(c) Deliverable
Quality
Deliverables are complete, accurate and compliant with task order requirements.
No more than one minor rejected deliverable per reporting period. No significant deliveries rejected or missed milestones.
Review and acceptance procedures for deliverables and accomplishment of milestones per task order criteria.
(d) Cost Control Successful delivery of all
Task Order requirements within budgeted cost
No requests for additional funding per reporting period beyond budget without FAA requested new scope.
Contractor correspondence with the Contracting
Officer.
(e) Responsiveness to Customer
No significant Customer complaints received
No more than one minor complaint per quarter. No
Observation and written or oral complaints.
requirements. concerning Contractor’s performance major complaints per reporting period.
6) Acceptable Quality Level (AQL): The AQL for this project is defined in the table above for each performance area.
7) Evaluation Method: The Government will monitor the contractor’s performance in accordance with the method of surveillance noted above. The Government will review all activities cited in the table above to ensure accuracy, completeness, and quality of services provided.
8) Incentives (Positive and/or Negative): The contractor’s performance, both positive and negative, will be a consideration in the PSS Program Office Task Order award process. In addition, contractor’s performance assessments may be used as past performance assessments for other Government business opportunities.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .