5570-500P28.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
693C73-20-B-000007
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

This document contains details for a federal contract solicitation for bridge preventative maintenance work on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The solicitation is open only to certified Small Business Concerns and is for sixteen bridge maintenance projects located in Hinds and Madison Counties, Mississippi. Work includes repair of expansion joints, cleaning and sealing of asphalt cracks, concrete repairs, and miscellaneous tasks. The total project cost is estimated between $500,000 to $1,000,000 and will be split into multiple schedules. Bid documents will be issued on October 22, 2019 with the bid due date and location specified in the solicitation. The work is to be completed for the National Park Service on the Natchez Trace Parkway.

Bridge Inspection Report

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Natchez Trace Parkway, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results of Bid Opening - NATR BMS FY19(1).pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
5570-482P6875.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
NEPA_CE.pdf PDF
5570-472P6875.pdf PDF
5570-503P4583.pdf PDF
5570-135P2750.pdf PDF
5570-471P13750.pdf PDF
5570-499P1528.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf PDF
5570-484P3438.pdf PDF
5570-501P13750.pdf PDF
5570-474P3438.pdf PDF
5570-502P6875.pdf PDF
5570-473P4583.pdf PDF
5570-477P1964.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf PDF
5570-479P1528.pdf PDF
5570-475P2750.pdf PDF
5570-498P1719.pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).doc DOC document
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

PINEHAVEN DRIVE BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/6/17

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

N/A

CONCRETE

NATR 3P9 / B0014

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

221.1 FT (67.4 M)

140.5 FT (42.8 M)

48.6 FT (14.8 M)

34.1 FT (10.4 M)

N/A

28 °

N/A

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 88.98 (KM PT 143.20)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 1.44 MILES NORTH OF I-20.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. PINEHAVEN DRIVE

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time.

These include debris accumulation in the deck expansion joints; evidence of ponding along the west curbline near midspan and clogged curb inlets; deterioration of the relief joint sealant at the north approach; cracking of the asphalt wearing surface and pavement at the approaches; and joint sealant deterioration and cracking of the concrete slope protection at both abutments.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: P. JORDAN (SEH), M. COEN (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

PAUL J. JORDAN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.3, 222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STRUCTURE

AND PAVEMENT AT APPROACHES.

60.11 RESEAL JOINTS BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION.

222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINT AT NORTH APPROACH.

58.2,7, 59.2 PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM DECK

EXPANSION JOINTS, CURBLINES, AND BOX GIRDERS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

G1. DECK SLAB

F2. EXPANSION JOINTS

F3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

F5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

P7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

G

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

1. BEARING DEVICES

G

N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.1 DECK SURFACE COVERED WITH ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE. MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT END

DIAPHRAGMS. LEAKAGE NOTED ON OVERHANG UNDER SIDEWALK.

58.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION JOINTS OVER

ABUTMENTS. SEE ALSO 58.1 AND 60.1.

58.3, MINOR ALLIGATOR, TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING

222.2,4,6 OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER

ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS AND APPROACH SLABS. PAVEMENT

SAW CUT AND SEALED OVER APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH

SLABS; MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT WITH MINOR

SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT.

58.5,6 MINOR MAP AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS, RAILINGS, AND

PEDESTRIAN PARAPET, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. SEVERAL

ANCHOR BOLT NUTS NOT FULLY SEATED IN PEDESTRIAN RAILING.

SIDEWALK ALONG WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE: MODERATE

DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STEEL

DECK HEADERS AT ABUTMENTS. MINOR (1") SETTLEMENT OF

ASPHALT SIDEWALK AT SOUTH APPROACH.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG

CURBLINES AND PEDESTRIAN PARAPET; MOST CURB INLETS

CLOGGED ALONG WEST ROADWAY CURBLINE. EVIDENCE OF

PONDING ALONG WEST CURBS NEAR MIDSPAN. RUNOFF GOING

INTO HOLE AT SOUTH END OF BRIDGE BARRIER.

59.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NEST DEBRIS INSIDE BOX GIRDER

AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON

INTERIOR SIDE OF EAST WALL OF CELL #4 AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR SCALING WITH RUST STAINS ON UNDERSIDE AT WEST END

OF GIRDER #1 AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

ABUTMENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. F

WEEP HOLES 7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F

OTHER (LIGHTING) 12. G

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N

FOUNDATIONS 16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

F N F G F G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

59.6 MINOR VERTICAL, HORIZONTAL, AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF END

DIAPHRAGMS, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS. WATER STAINING ON WEST SIDE OF BOTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO DECK JOINT LEAKING ABOVE.

60.4 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING ON WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BACKWALL.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS,

SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR PEELING OF FINISH COAT.

MINOR CRACKING AT CHEEKWALLS. MINOR SPALL NEAR

NORTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGES.

60.11 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN JOINTS BETWEEN

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION. MINOR

TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLOPE PROTECTION PANELS AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS.

60.12 LIGHTING ATTACHED TO BOTH ABUTMENTS UNDER BRIDGE IS IN

GOOD CONDITION. (NOT ON DURING INSPECTION.)

222.7 5" X 16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT

AT RAILING ENDS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 34 31

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 35 32 59 54

TYPE 3S2 40 36 66 60

TYPE 3-3 42 38 70 64

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... PINEHAVEN DRIVE BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 049 - HINDS

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-500P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... PINEHAVEN DRIVE

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 500P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570500P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.44 MILES NORTH OF I-20.

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. RIDGELAND (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NATR 3P9 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 88.98 (KM PT 143.20)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... B0014 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

140.5 FT (42.8 M)

221.1 FT (67.4 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 1 - CONCRETE

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 01 - SLAB

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°21'21.80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°19'22.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 48.6 FT (14.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 04 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 9100 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 28 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2013 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 10920 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.7 FT (10.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2033 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 10.7 FT (3.3 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 11.1 FT (3.4 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.58 FT (0.79 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 16.41 FT (5.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION

JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING

SURFACE, NORTHBOUND LANE NEAR NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ALLIGATOR CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING

SURFACE, NORTHBOUND LANE NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL MAP AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND

RAILINGS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, EAST CURB AND RAILING AT

MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL ANCHOR BOLT NUTS NOT FULLY SEATED IN

PEDESTRIAN RAILING, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND MOSS GROWTH

ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE AT MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CURB INLET CLOGGED ALONG WEST ROADWAY

CURBLINE, CURBLINE AT MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH

PAVEMENT, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH

PAVEMENT OVER ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS, SOUTH APPROACH

SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - DETERIORATION OF RELIEF JOINT SEALANT AT NORTH

APPROACH; NOTE SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT

PHOTO #14 - SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT SIDEWALK AT SOUTH

APPROACH

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS AT ABUTMENTS,

BEARING #1 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING

NORTH, CELL #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, CELL #3 NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, CELL #2 AT SOUTH END

DIAPHRAGM SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF END

PHOTO #20 - DIAGONAL CRACKS IN UPPER FILLET IN EAST INTERIOR

WALL OF GIRDER #4 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NEST DEBRIS INSIDE

BOX GIRDER AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS, CELL #3 NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON INTERIOR SIDE OF EAST

WALL OF CELL #4 OF BOX GIRDER AT NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF

WINGWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, SOUTH WEST WINGWALL

SHOWN

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN JOINTS

BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION,

SOUTH ABUTMENT NEAR WEST END SHOWN

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .