5570-500P28.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000007
About this file
This document contains details for a federal contract solicitation for bridge preventative maintenance work on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The solicitation is open only to certified Small Business Concerns and is for sixteen bridge maintenance projects located in Hinds and Madison Counties, Mississippi. Work includes repair of expansion joints, cleaning and sealing of asphalt cracks, concrete repairs, and miscellaneous tasks. The total project cost is estimated between $500,000 to $1,000,000 and will be split into multiple schedules. Bid documents will be issued on October 22, 2019 with the bid due date and location specified in the solicitation. The work is to be completed for the National Park Service on the Natchez Trace Parkway.
Bridge Inspection Report
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NATR BMS FY19(1).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| 5570-482P6875.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| NEPA_CE.pdf | ||
| 5570-472P6875.pdf | ||
| 5570-503P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-135P2750.pdf | ||
| 5570-471P13750.pdf | ||
| 5570-499P1528.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| 5570-484P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-501P13750.pdf | ||
| 5570-474P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-502P6875.pdf | ||
| 5570-473P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-477P1964.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| 5570-479P1528.pdf | ||
| 5570-475P2750.pdf | ||
| 5570-498P1719.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).doc | DOC document |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
PINEHAVEN DRIVE BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/6/17
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
BITUMINOUS
SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
N/A
CONCRETE
NATR 3P9 / B0014
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
221.1 FT (67.4 M)
140.5 FT (42.8 M)
48.6 FT (14.8 M)
34.1 FT (10.4 M)
N/A
28 °
N/A
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 88.98 (KM PT 143.20)
STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 1.44 MILES NORTH OF I-20.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. PINEHAVEN DRIVE
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time.
These include debris accumulation in the deck expansion joints; evidence of ponding along the west curbline near midspan and clogged curb inlets; deterioration of the relief joint sealant at the north approach; cracking of the asphalt wearing surface and pavement at the approaches; and joint sealant deterioration and cracking of the concrete slope protection at both abutments.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: P. JORDAN (SEH), M. COEN (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
PAUL J. JORDAN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.3, 222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STRUCTURE
AND PAVEMENT AT APPROACHES.
60.11 RESEAL JOINTS BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION.
222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINT AT NORTH APPROACH.
58.2,7, 59.2 PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM DECK
EXPANSION JOINTS, CURBLINES, AND BOX GIRDERS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
G1. DECK SLAB
F2. EXPANSION JOINTS
F3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
F5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
P7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
G
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
1. BEARING DEVICES
G
N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
N7. PAINT
N8. FASCIA(E)
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
58.1 DECK SURFACE COVERED WITH ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE. MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT END
DIAPHRAGMS. LEAKAGE NOTED ON OVERHANG UNDER SIDEWALK.
58.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION JOINTS OVER
ABUTMENTS. SEE ALSO 58.1 AND 60.1.
58.3, MINOR ALLIGATOR, TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
222.2,4,6 OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER
ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS AND APPROACH SLABS. PAVEMENT
SAW CUT AND SEALED OVER APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH
SLABS; MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT WITH MINOR
SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT.
58.5,6 MINOR MAP AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS, RAILINGS, AND
PEDESTRIAN PARAPET, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. SEVERAL
ANCHOR BOLT NUTS NOT FULLY SEATED IN PEDESTRIAN RAILING.
SIDEWALK ALONG WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE: MODERATE
DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STEEL
DECK HEADERS AT ABUTMENTS. MINOR (1") SETTLEMENT OF
ASPHALT SIDEWALK AT SOUTH APPROACH.
58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG
CURBLINES AND PEDESTRIAN PARAPET; MOST CURB INLETS
CLOGGED ALONG WEST ROADWAY CURBLINE. EVIDENCE OF
PONDING ALONG WEST CURBS NEAR MIDSPAN. RUNOFF GOING
INTO HOLE AT SOUTH END OF BRIDGE BARRIER.
59.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NEST DEBRIS INSIDE BOX GIRDER
AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON
INTERIOR SIDE OF EAST WALL OF CELL #4 AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
MINOR SCALING WITH RUST STAINS ON UNDERSIDE AT WEST END
OF GIRDER #1 AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
ABUTMENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. F
WEEP HOLES 7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F
OTHER (LIGHTING) 12. G
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N
FOUNDATIONS 16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N
OTHER 19. N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS N
F N F G F G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
59.6 MINOR VERTICAL, HORIZONTAL, AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF END
DIAPHRAGMS, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS. WATER STAINING ON WEST SIDE OF BOTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO DECK JOINT LEAKING ABOVE.
60.4 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING ON WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
BACKWALL.
60.6 MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS,
SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR PEELING OF FINISH COAT.
MINOR CRACKING AT CHEEKWALLS. MINOR SPALL NEAR
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGES.
60.11 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN JOINTS BETWEEN
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION. MINOR
TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLOPE PROTECTION PANELS AT BOTH
ABUTMENTS.
60.12 LIGHTING ATTACHED TO BOTH ABUTMENTS UNDER BRIDGE IS IN
GOOD CONDITION. (NOT ON DURING INSPECTION.)
222.7 5" X 16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT
AT RAILING ENDS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 34 31
HS 36 33 60 55
TYPE 3 35 32 59 54
TYPE 3S2 40 36 66 60
TYPE 3-3 42 38 70 64
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... PINEHAVEN DRIVE BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 049 - HINDS
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-500P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... PINEHAVEN DRIVE
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 500P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570500P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.44 MILES NORTH OF I-20.
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. RIDGELAND (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NATR 3P9 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 88.98 (KM PT 143.20)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... B0014 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
140.5 FT (42.8 M)
221.1 FT (67.4 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 1 - CONCRETE
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 01 - SLAB
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°21'21.80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°19'22.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 48.6 FT (14.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 04 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 9100 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 28 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2013 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 10920 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.7 FT (10.6 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2033 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 10.7 FT (3.3 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 11.1 FT (3.4 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.58 FT (0.79 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 16.41 FT (5.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-500P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION
JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING
SURFACE, NORTHBOUND LANE NEAR NORTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ALLIGATOR CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING
SURFACE, NORTHBOUND LANE NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL MAP AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND
RAILINGS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, EAST CURB AND RAILING AT
MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL ANCHOR BOLT NUTS NOT FULLY SEATED IN
PEDESTRIAN RAILING, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND MOSS GROWTH
ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE AT MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CURB INLET CLOGGED ALONG WEST ROADWAY
CURBLINE, CURBLINE AT MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH
PAVEMENT, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH
PAVEMENT OVER ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS, SOUTH APPROACH
SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - DETERIORATION OF RELIEF JOINT SEALANT AT NORTH
APPROACH; NOTE SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT
PHOTO #14 - SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT SIDEWALK AT SOUTH
APPROACH
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS AT ABUTMENTS,
BEARING #1 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING
NORTH, CELL #2 SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, CELL #3 NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, CELL #2 AT SOUTH END
DIAPHRAGM SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF END
PHOTO #20 - DIAGONAL CRACKS IN UPPER FILLET IN EAST INTERIOR
WALL OF GIRDER #4 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NEST DEBRIS INSIDE
BOX GIRDER AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS, CELL #3 NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON INTERIOR SIDE OF EAST
WALL OF CELL #4 OF BOX GIRDER AT NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF
WINGWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, SOUTH WEST WINGWALL
SHOWN
PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN JOINTS
BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION,
SOUTH ABUTMENT NEAR WEST END SHOWN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .