5570-475P2750.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
693C73-20-B-000007
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

This solicitation is for bridge preventive maintenance repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The project consists of repairs at sixteen bridges located in Hinds and Madison Counties, Mississippi. Work includes repairing deteriorated expansion joints, cleaning and sealing asphalt pavement cracks, concrete repairs, and other miscellaneous tasks. The total project cost is expected to be between $500,000 and $1,000,000, which will be split among multiple contract options. Sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns are due on a date specified in the solicitation, which is available for download from the Federal Business Opportunities website. The solicitation is issued by the Federal Highway Administration for the Department of Transportation.

Bridge Inspection Report

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Natchez Trace Parkway, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results of Bid Opening - NATR BMS FY19(1).pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
5570-482P6875.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
NEPA_CE.pdf PDF
5570-472P6875.pdf PDF
5570-503P4583.pdf PDF
5570-135P2750.pdf PDF
5570-471P13750.pdf PDF
5570-499P1528.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf PDF
5570-484P3438.pdf PDF
5570-501P13750.pdf PDF
5570-474P3438.pdf PDF
5570-502P6875.pdf PDF
5570-473P4583.pdf PDF
5570-477P1964.pdf PDF
5570-500P28.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf PDF
5570-479P1528.pdf PDF
5570-498P1719.pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).doc DOC document
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

LIVINGSTON ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 1/17/17

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 211.5 FT (64.5 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 133.5 FT (40.7 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 37.0 FT (11.3 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... NPS / NATR3O10 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 28 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006 (EST.)-ROADWAY REPAVED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 98.03 (KM PT 157.76)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 3O PROJECT SECTION.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LIVINGSTON ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the relief joint sealant with asphalt breaking up at the approaches, erosion along the abutment slope protection, erosion and undermining of the drop inlet, a lack of sealant in the joint between the abutment slope protection and the breastwalls, accumulation of debris with evidence of leakage at the deck expansion joints, and a lack of vertical clearance signs for the underpass roadway.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M.L. AGNES, S.R. ROTH (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MATTHEW L. AGNES, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 5/31/17

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.2,7 REMOVE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINTS AND

CURBLINES. RESEAL DECK EXPANSION JOINTS.

222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINTS AT BOTH APPROACHES.

60.9, 222.5 FILL AND STABILIZE AREAS OF EROSION ALONG SLOPE PROTECTION. FILL AND

STABILIZE EROSION AND UNDERMINING AT DROP INLET.

60.11 CLEAN AND SEAL JOINTS BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE

PROTECTION.

222.7 INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON STRUCTURE AND AT UNDERPASS

APPROACHES.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N G N N G

N G

F G G G G N

N

F

G

G

58.1 PREVIOUS CRACKING AND PATCHING OF DECK NO LONGER VISIBLE

DUE TO ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

OVERHANGS; MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST SIDE AT

NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND DIAGONAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR

HONEYCOMBING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN

ALL CELLS NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT. TIMBER FORMWORK

REMAINS IN PLACE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN CENTER CELL NEAR

MIDSPAN.

58.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN

DECK EXPANSION JOINTS. MODERATE WATER STAINS ON

ABUTMENTS BREASTWALLS INDICATE LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS.

58.3 MINOR TO MODERATE LONGITUDINAL AND RANDOM CRACKING OF

WEARING SURFACE. MINOR DELAMINATION OF WEARING SURFACE

ALONG CURBLINES.

58.5,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND POPOUTS ON CURBS AND

RAILINGS. MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RAIL

POSTS AT SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE TO ENDS OF

RAILINGS.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CURBLINES.

59.1 ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS AT NORTH ABUTMENT CONTRACTED

1/4" AND DEFLECTED LATERALLY 1/2" WEST AT 70 DEGREES

FAHRENHEIT.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. G

WEEP HOLES 7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N

FOUNDATIONS 16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N

OTHER 19. N

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

(DROP INLET)

N F N F G G G G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.2,6 FORM TIE BOLTS LEFT IN PLACE ON INTERIOR OF BOX GIRDER AND

DIAPHRAGMS AT SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR DAMAGE TO SCREENS

OVER DRAINS INSIDE BOX GIRDER AT SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF INTERIOR WEB WALLS EXTENDING

FROM OPENINGS. MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING

OF END DIAPHRAGMS AT ABUTMENTS.

WIDESPREAD MINOR MAP AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF BOX

GIRDER UNDERSIDE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR SIDES OF BOX GIRDER WEBS AT

BOTH ABUTMENTS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF EXTERIOR

SIDES OF BOX GIRDER WEBS AT BOTTOM.

COLLISION DAMAGE (7"W X 4"H X 2"D) TO BOTTOM OF BOX GIRDER

ON WEST SIDE OVER EASTBOUND LANE.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS. MINOR WATER STAINING AT BOTH ENDS OF

SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; MODERATE ALONG FULL LENGTH

OF NORTH ABUTMENT.

60.4 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT

BACKWALLS; MODERATE AT WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT AND

EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.6 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS AT ABUTMENT

BEARING SEATS. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AT WINGWALL AND CHEEKWALL CONSTRUCTION

JOINTS.

60.9 MINOR EROSION ALONG WEST SIDE OF SLOPE PROTECTION AT

BOTH ABUTMENTS.

60.11 NO SEALANT PRESENT IN JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION

AND ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. VEGETATION GROWTH IN SOUTH

ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION JOINT NEAR EAST END. MINOR

SPALLING OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION CURB ON

WEST SIDE AT BOTTOM.

222.1 MINOR CRACKING OF BOTH APPROACH SLABS (NO LONGER

VISIBLE DUE TO PAVEMENT).

222.2,4,6 MINOR CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT. PAVEMENT SAW CUT

AND SEALED AT APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS; SEALANT

DETERIORATED WITH PAVEMENT BREAKING UP. MINOR

SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT IN SOUTHBOUND LANE AT SOUTH

APPROACH RELIEF JOINT.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AND UNDERMINING (3'L X 6"H X 1' UNDER) OF

DROP INLET AT SOUTH END OF WEST RAILING.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT RAILING ENDS.

VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS NOT PRESENT AT UNDERPASS APPROACHES.

222.9 DROP INLET AT SOUTH END OF WEST RAILING.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 33 30 56 51

TYPE 3S2 38 34 63 57

TYPE 3-3 40 36 67 61

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LIVINGSTON ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 089 - MADISON

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-475P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LIVINGSTON ROAD

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 475P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570475P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3O PROJECT SECTION.

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. RIDGELND (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NPS (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 98.03 (KM PT 157.76)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NATR3O10 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

133.5 FT (40.7 M)

211.5 FT (64.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 1 - EPOXY COATED REINF.

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (55.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°25'20.26" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°11'58.09" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 37.0 FT (11.3 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 210 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 28 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 231 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 0 - N/A

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.58 FT (0.79 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 15.08 FT (4.60 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2006 (EST.)-ROADWAY REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:90�11'58.09 http:32�25'20.26

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF

DEBRIS IN DECK EXPANSION JOINTS; NORTH

JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND

RANDOM CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE;

SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF

DEBRIS IN CURBLINES; WEST CURBLINE NEAR

NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

RELIEF JOINT SEALANT WITH ASPHALT

BREAKING UP; SOUTH APPROACH RELIEF

JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO;

ALSO NOTE SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH

PAVEMENT

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT

APPROACHES; SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL MOWER DAMAGE TO ENDS OF RAILINGS; NORTH

END OF WEST RAILING SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - EROSION WITH UNDERMINING OF DROP INLET AT SOUTH

END OF WEST RAILING

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER ELASTOMERIC (FIXED)

BEARINGS; EAST SIDE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL BEARING CONTRACTION AND LATERAL

DISTORTION; BEARING #3 AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING

SOUTH, CENTER CELL

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

ON DECK UNDERSIDE; WEST CELL AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL HONEYCOMBING OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH

EXPOSED REBAR; EAST CELL NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF INTERIOR WEB

WALLS EXTENDING FROM OPENINGS; EAST WALL OF CENTER CELL

NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER

PHOTO #20 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK OVERHANGS; WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

DECK OVERHANG ON EAST SIDE AT NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF EXTERIOR SIDES

OF BOX GIRDER WEBS AT BOTTOM; WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

ABUTMENT BACKWALLS AT ENDS; EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND

DIAGONAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT

BACKWALLS AT ENDS; WEST END OF NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT CONSTRUCTION

JOINTS IN WINGWALLS AND CHEEKWALLS;

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #29 - EROSION ALONG EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

SLOPE PROTECTION

PHOTO #30 - EROSION ALONG WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT

SLOPE PROTECTION

PHOTO #31 - SPALLING OF SLOPE PROTECTION CURB ON WEST SIDE

OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION AT BOTTOM

PHOTO #32 - TYPICAL UNSEALED SLOPE PROTECTION JOINT AT

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .