5570-475P2750.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000007
About this file
This solicitation is for bridge preventive maintenance repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The project consists of repairs at sixteen bridges located in Hinds and Madison Counties, Mississippi. Work includes repairing deteriorated expansion joints, cleaning and sealing asphalt pavement cracks, concrete repairs, and other miscellaneous tasks. The total project cost is expected to be between $500,000 and $1,000,000, which will be split among multiple contract options. Sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns are due on a date specified in the solicitation, which is available for download from the Federal Business Opportunities website. The solicitation is issued by the Federal Highway Administration for the Department of Transportation.
Bridge Inspection Report
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NATR BMS FY19(1).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| 5570-482P6875.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| NEPA_CE.pdf | ||
| 5570-472P6875.pdf | ||
| 5570-503P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-135P2750.pdf | ||
| 5570-471P13750.pdf | ||
| 5570-499P1528.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| 5570-484P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-501P13750.pdf | ||
| 5570-474P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-502P6875.pdf | ||
| 5570-473P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-477P1964.pdf | ||
| 5570-500P28.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| 5570-479P1528.pdf | ||
| 5570-498P1719.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).doc | DOC document |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
LIVINGSTON ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 1/17/17
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 211.5 FT (64.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 133.5 FT (40.7 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 37.0 FT (11.3 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... NPS / NATR3O10 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 28 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006 (EST.)-ROADWAY REPAVED.
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 98.03 (KM PT 157.76)
STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 3O PROJECT SECTION.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LIVINGSTON ROAD
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the relief joint sealant with asphalt breaking up at the approaches, erosion along the abutment slope protection, erosion and undermining of the drop inlet, a lack of sealant in the joint between the abutment slope protection and the breastwalls, accumulation of debris with evidence of leakage at the deck expansion joints, and a lack of vertical clearance signs for the underpass roadway.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: M.L. AGNES, S.R. ROTH (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
MATTHEW L. AGNES, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 5/31/17
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.2,7 REMOVE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINTS AND
CURBLINES. RESEAL DECK EXPANSION JOINTS.
222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINTS AT BOTH APPROACHES.
60.9, 222.5 FILL AND STABILIZE AREAS OF EROSION ALONG SLOPE PROTECTION. FILL AND
STABILIZE EROSION AND UNDERMINING AT DROP INLET.
60.11 CLEAN AND SEAL JOINTS BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE
PROTECTION.
222.7 INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON STRUCTURE AND AT UNDERPASS
APPROACHES.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
G G N N N G N N G
N G
F G G G G N
N
F
G
G
58.1 PREVIOUS CRACKING AND PATCHING OF DECK NO LONGER VISIBLE
DUE TO ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
OVERHANGS; MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST SIDE AT
NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND DIAGONAL
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR
HONEYCOMBING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN
ALL CELLS NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT. TIMBER FORMWORK
REMAINS IN PLACE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN CENTER CELL NEAR
MIDSPAN.
58.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN
DECK EXPANSION JOINTS. MODERATE WATER STAINS ON
ABUTMENTS BREASTWALLS INDICATE LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS.
58.3 MINOR TO MODERATE LONGITUDINAL AND RANDOM CRACKING OF
WEARING SURFACE. MINOR DELAMINATION OF WEARING SURFACE
ALONG CURBLINES.
58.5,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND POPOUTS ON CURBS AND
RAILINGS. MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RAIL
POSTS AT SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE TO ENDS OF
RAILINGS.
58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CURBLINES.
59.1 ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS AT NORTH ABUTMENT CONTRACTED
1/4" AND DEFLECTED LATERALLY 1/2" WEST AT 70 DEGREES
FAHRENHEIT.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. G
WEEP HOLES 7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. F
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N
FOUNDATIONS 16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N
OTHER 19. N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
(DROP INLET)
N F N F G G G G G
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.2,6 FORM TIE BOLTS LEFT IN PLACE ON INTERIOR OF BOX GIRDER AND
DIAPHRAGMS AT SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR DAMAGE TO SCREENS
OVER DRAINS INSIDE BOX GIRDER AT SOME LOCATIONS. MINOR
LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF INTERIOR WEB WALLS EXTENDING
FROM OPENINGS. MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING
OF END DIAPHRAGMS AT ABUTMENTS.
WIDESPREAD MINOR MAP AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF BOX
GIRDER UNDERSIDE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR SIDES OF BOX GIRDER WEBS AT
BOTH ABUTMENTS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF EXTERIOR
SIDES OF BOX GIRDER WEBS AT BOTTOM.
COLLISION DAMAGE (7"W X 4"H X 2"D) TO BOTTOM OF BOX GIRDER
ON WEST SIDE OVER EASTBOUND LANE.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS. MINOR WATER STAINING AT BOTH ENDS OF
SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; MODERATE ALONG FULL LENGTH
OF NORTH ABUTMENT.
60.4 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT
BACKWALLS; MODERATE AT WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT AND
EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.
60.6 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS AT ABUTMENT
BEARING SEATS. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AT WINGWALL AND CHEEKWALL CONSTRUCTION
JOINTS.
60.9 MINOR EROSION ALONG WEST SIDE OF SLOPE PROTECTION AT
BOTH ABUTMENTS.
60.11 NO SEALANT PRESENT IN JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION
AND ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. VEGETATION GROWTH IN SOUTH
ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION JOINT NEAR EAST END. MINOR
SPALLING OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION CURB ON
WEST SIDE AT BOTTOM.
222.1 MINOR CRACKING OF BOTH APPROACH SLABS (NO LONGER
VISIBLE DUE TO PAVEMENT).
222.2,4,6 MINOR CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT. PAVEMENT SAW CUT
AND SEALED AT APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS; SEALANT
DETERIORATED WITH PAVEMENT BREAKING UP. MINOR
SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT IN SOUTHBOUND LANE AT SOUTH
APPROACH RELIEF JOINT.
222.5 MINOR EROSION AND UNDERMINING (3'L X 6"H X 1' UNDER) OF
DROP INLET AT SOUTH END OF WEST RAILING.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT RAILING ENDS.
VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS NOT PRESENT AT UNDERPASS APPROACHES.
222.9 DROP INLET AT SOUTH END OF WEST RAILING.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 36 33 60 55
TYPE 3 33 30 56 51
TYPE 3S2 38 34 63 57
TYPE 3-3 40 36 67 61
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LIVINGSTON ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 089 - MADISON
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-475P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LIVINGSTON ROAD
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 475P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570475P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3O PROJECT SECTION.
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. RIDGELND (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NPS (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 98.03 (KM PT 157.76)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NATR3O10 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
133.5 FT (40.7 M)
211.5 FT (64.5 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 1 - EPOXY COATED REINF.
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (55.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°25'20.26" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°11'58.09" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 37.0 FT (11.3 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 210 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 28 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 231 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 0 - N/A
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 0 - N/A
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.58 FT (0.79 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 15.08 FT (4.60 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2006 (EST.)-ROADWAY REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:90�11'58.09 http:32�25'20.26
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-475P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF
DEBRIS IN DECK EXPANSION JOINTS; NORTH
JOINT SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND
RANDOM CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE;
SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF
DEBRIS IN CURBLINES; WEST CURBLINE NEAR
NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
RELIEF JOINT SEALANT WITH ASPHALT
BREAKING UP; SOUTH APPROACH RELIEF
JOINT SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO;
ALSO NOTE SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH
PAVEMENT
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT
APPROACHES; SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL MOWER DAMAGE TO ENDS OF RAILINGS; NORTH
END OF WEST RAILING SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - EROSION WITH UNDERMINING OF DROP INLET AT SOUTH
END OF WEST RAILING
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER ELASTOMERIC (FIXED)
BEARINGS; EAST SIDE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL BEARING CONTRACTION AND LATERAL
DISTORTION; BEARING #3 AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING
SOUTH, CENTER CELL
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
ON DECK UNDERSIDE; WEST CELL AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL HONEYCOMBING OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH
EXPOSED REBAR; EAST CELL NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF INTERIOR WEB
WALLS EXTENDING FROM OPENINGS; EAST WALL OF CENTER CELL
NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #19 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER
PHOTO #20 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK OVERHANGS; WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
DECK OVERHANG ON EAST SIDE AT NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF EXTERIOR SIDES
OF BOX GIRDER WEBS AT BOTTOM; WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
ABUTMENT BACKWALLS AT ENDS; EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND
DIAGONAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT
BACKWALLS AT ENDS; WEST END OF NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #28 - TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT CONSTRUCTION
JOINTS IN WINGWALLS AND CHEEKWALLS;
SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #29 - EROSION ALONG EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
SLOPE PROTECTION
PHOTO #30 - EROSION ALONG WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT
SLOPE PROTECTION
PHOTO #31 - SPALLING OF SLOPE PROTECTION CURB ON WEST SIDE
OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION AT BOTTOM
PHOTO #32 - TYPICAL UNSEALED SLOPE PROTECTION JOINT AT
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .