5570-473P4583.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

HIGHLAND COLONY PARKWAY BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 1/18/17

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 306.6 FT (93.5 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 136.0 FT (41.5 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 37.2 FT (11.3 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.2 FT (10.4 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... NPS-NATR 3P14 / SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 15 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006 (EST.) - ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH OVERLAY ADDED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 100.97 (KM PT 162.49)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 3P PROJECT SECTION

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. HIGHLAND COLONY PARKWAY

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This continuous prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate accumulation of debris in the deck expansion joints, and deterioration of the joint sealant between the abutment breastwalls and the adjacent slope protection. Other problems include accumulation of debris and vegetation growth in the curblines; longitudinal cracking of the wearing surface; and deterioration of the relief joint sealant and pavement at both approaches.

It should be noted that the box girder access hatches are low and can be easily accessed from the slope protection without a ladder. Currently there is no provision for locking the hatches; therefore it is recommended that the hatches be modified and locked to prevent unauthorized entry. Also, some bearings are out of alignment and will continue to be monitored during future inspections.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: A.D. MITCHEM, M.S. RAIFET (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

A. DWAYNE MITCHEM, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 5/31/17

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.11 CLEAN AND RESEAL JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND BREASTWALL AT

BOTH ABUTMENTS.

222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINTS AT BOTH APPROACHES.

58.2 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINTS.

59.2 MODIFY AND LOCK GIRDER ACCESS HATCHES.

60.9, 222.5 FILL AND STABILIZE EROSION AT NORTHEAST RAILING END.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

G1. DECK SLAB

F2. EXPANSION JOINTS

F3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

G5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

G6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

F

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

1. BEARING DEVICES

G

N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND MOISTURE SEEPAGE ON UNDERSIDE OF

EAST OVERHANG AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

58.2 MODERATE TO SEVERE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN DECK

EXPANSION JOINTS OVER BOTH ABUTMENTS. DEPRESSED JOINT

SEAL NOTED AT SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT (NOT VISIBLE DUE TO

DEBRIS).

58.3, 222.2,4 MINOR DELAMINATION AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING

SURFACE AT NORTH ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINT IN SOUTHBOUND

LANE. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING

SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR RANDOM CRACKING

OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER

ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS. PAVEMENT SAW CUT AND SEALED

OVER APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS; MODERATE

DETERIORATION OF SEALANT AND ADJACENT ASPHALT.

58.5,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF RAIL POSTS AT DEFLECTION

JOINTS.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN

CURBLINES.

59.1 UPPER BEARING SOLE PLATE OVERHANGS PREFORMED FABRIC

BEARING PADS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS (2-1/2" AT NORTH ABUTMENT

AND 1-3/4" AT SOUTH ABUTMENT); BEARING PADS REMAIN

NEUTRAL.

ABUTMENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. G

WEEP HOLES 7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. G

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. G

FOUNDATIONS 16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. G

OTHER 19. N

INSPECTION DATE: 1/18/17

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

HIGHLAND COLONY PARKWAY BRIDGE

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

1. ALIGNMENT

61. CHANNEL N

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

F N F F F G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.2

59.6

60.1

60.6

60.11

222.1

222.5,6

222.7

MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR FACES OF BOX GIRDER WEB

WALLS AT ABUTMENTS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON INTERIOR FACES OF BOX GIRDER WEB

WALLS.

BOX GIRDER ACCESS HATCHES ARE LOW AND CAN BE EASILY

ACCESSED FROM SLOPE PROTECTION; HATCHES CAN NOT BE

LOCKED.

MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING EXTENDING FROM

OPENINGS IN END DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF ALL WINGWALLS.

MINOR SPALL ON NORTHEAST WINGWALL AT RAILING END.

SEVERE DETERIORATION OF JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN SLOPE

PROTECTION AND NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; MINOR AT

SOUTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF BOTH APPROACH SLABS.

MINOR SPALLING AT EAST SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH SLAB

(DEFICIENCIES COULD NOT BE VERIFIED DUE TO ASPHALT

OVERLAY).

MODERATE EROSION (4' DIA. X 3'D) AT END OF EAST WINGWALL AT

NORTH ABUTMENT; ADJACENT APPROACH PAVEMENT SETTLED.

TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT ENDS OF RAILINGS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 34 30 56 51

TYPE 3S2 38 34 63 58

TYPE 3-3 40 37 67 61

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... HIGHLAND COLONY PARKWAY BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-473P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 473P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. RIDGELND

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NPS-NATR 3P14

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

089 - MADISON

160000000

HIGHLAND COLONY PARKWA

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570473P0000000

3P PROJECT SECTION

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

100.97 (KM PT 162.49)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

136.0 FT (41.5 M)

306.6 FT (93.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 1 - CONCRETE

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 01 - SLAB

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (55.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°25'46.00" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.2 FT (10.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°08'56.10" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 37.2 FT (11.3 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 04 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 210 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 15 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 231 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.63 FT (0.80 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 19.33 FT (5.89 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2006 (EST.) - ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH OVERLAY ADDED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:90�08'56.10 http:32�25'46.00

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-473P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF

DEBRIS IN DECK EXPANSION JOINTS OVER

BOTH ABUTMENTS; SOUTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING

SURFACE; WEARING SURFACE OVER SOUTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING

SURFACE; CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS; WEST CURB

IN CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION

GROWTH IN CURBLINES; EAST CURBLINE SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - RANDOM CRACKING OF NORTH

APPROACH PAVEMENT; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL

TRANSVERSE CRACKING OVER ENDS OF

ABUTMENT SLABS

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER

ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS; SOUTH

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

RELIEF JOINT SEALANT AND ADJACENT

ASPHALT OVER APPROACH ENDS OF

APPROACH SLABS; SOUTH APPROACH

SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

RELIEF JOINT SEALANT AND ADJACENT

ASPHALT OVER APPROACH ENDS OF

APPROACH SLABS; NORTH APPROACH

SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - EROSION AT END OF EAST WINGWALL AT NORTH

ABUTMENT; NOTE ADJACENT APPROACH PAVEMENT SETTLED

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH, CENTER

SPAN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS; EAST OVERHANG

AT SOUTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

MOISTURE SEEPAGE ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST OVERHANG AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL UPPER BEARING SOLE PLATE OVERHANGING

PREFORMED FABRIC BEARING PAD AT ABUTMENTS; BEARING #3 AT

NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING

NORTH, CENTER CELL IN CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE; CENTER CELL NEAR SOUTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE; WEST CELL IN CENTER SPAN

AT SOUTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

ON INTERIOR FACES OF BOX GIRDER WEB WALLS; WEST WEB WALL

OF WEST CELL IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #23 - DETERIORATION OF JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN SLOPE

PROTECTION AND NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER, NORTH SIDE