5570-499P1528.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000007
About this file
This solicitation seeks bids for the Natchez Trace Parkway Project NATR BMS FY19(1), solicitation number 693C73-20-B-000007, to perform bridge preventive maintenance repairs on sixteen bridges. Work includes repairing deteriorated expansion joints, cleaning and sealing asphalt pavement cracks, concrete repairs, and other miscellaneous work. The project will be split into multiple work schedules with a total cost expected between $500,000 to $1,000,000. Bids are due from certified small business concerns only on a date specified in the solicitation to be issued on or about October 22, 2019. The solicitation can be found on FBO.gov using the search term "EFLHD" and is issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for repairs within the Natchez Trace Parkway in Hinds and Madison Counties, Mississippi.
Questions regarding the construction project should be directed to eflhd.contracts@dot.gov and must include solicitation number, project name and number, requester information, and contact details. Bidders must register in SAM for payment processing. Security screening is required for site access and bid opening attendance.
Bridge Inspection Report
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NATR BMS FY19(1).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| 5570-503P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-135P2750.pdf | ||
| 5570-471P13750.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| 5570-484P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-501P13750.pdf | ||
| 5570-474P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-502P6875.pdf | ||
| 5570-473P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-477P1964.pdf | ||
| 5570-500P28.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| 5570-479P1528.pdf | ||
| 5570-475P2750.pdf | ||
| 5570-498P1719.pdf | ||
| 5570-482P6875.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| NEPA_CE.pdf | ||
| 5570-472P6875.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).doc | DOC document |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
WEST NORTHSIDE DRIVE BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/6/17
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
BITUMINOUS
SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
N/A
CONCRETE
NATR 3P9 / B0113
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
221.1 FT (67.4 M)
140.5 FT (42.8 M)
48.6 FT (14.8 M)
34.1 FT (10.4 M)
N/A
20 °
N/A
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 88.25 (KM PT 142.02)
STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 0.80 MILES NORTH OF I-20.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST NORTHSIDE DRIVE
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time.
These include debris accumulation in the deck expansion joints; evidence of ponding along the west curbline near midspan; deterioration of the relief joint sealant at the approaches; cracking of the asphalt wearing surface and the pavement at the approaches; and joint sealant deterioration and cracking of the concrete slope protection at both abutments.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: P. JORDAN (SEH), M. COEN (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
PAUL J. JORDAN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.3, 222.4 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STRUCTURE
AND PAVEMENT AT APPROACHES.
222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINTS AT BOTH APPROACHES.
60.11 RESEAL JOINTS BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION.
58.2,7, 59.2 PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM DECK
EXPANSION JOINTS, CURBLINES, AND BOX GIRDERS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
G G N N N G N N G
N G
F G F F P N
N
F
G
G
58.1 DECK SURFACE COVERED WITH ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE. MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT END
DIAPHRAGMS; EFFLORESCENCE HEAVIER AT NORTH END.
58.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION JOINTS OVER
ABUTMENTS. SEE ALSO 60.1.
58.3, MINOR ALLIGATOR, TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
222.2,4,6 OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT;
MODERATE CRACKING (UP TO 1/4"W) AT NORTH APPROACH.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER
ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS AND APPROACH SLABS. PAVEMENT
SAW CUT AND SEALED OVER APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH
SLABS; MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT.
MODERATE SETTLEMENT AND RUTTING OF NORTH APPROACH
PAVEMENT AT END OF APPROACH SLAB WITH MINOR ASPHALT
PATCH IN SOUTHBOUND LANE.
58.5,6 MINOR MAP AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS, RAILINGS, AND
PEDESTRIAN PARAPET, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE.
SIDEWALK ALONG WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE: MODERATE
DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STEEL
DECK HEADERS AT ABUTMENTS.
58.7 NO DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN ROADWAY AT THIS LOCATION; EVIDENCE
OF PONDING ALONG WEST CURBS NEAR MIDSPAN. MINOR
ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG
CURBLINES AND PEDESTRIAN PARAPET .
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. F
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. F
WEEP HOLES 7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N
FOUNDATIONS 16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N
OTHER 19. N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS N
F N F G F G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.2 MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR SIDE OF BOX GIRDER WEB WALLS
AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.
MINOR ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NEST DEBRIS INSIDE BOX GIRDER
AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON
INTERIOR SIDE OF EAST WEB WALL OF CELL #4 AT NORTH AND
SOUTH ABUTMENTS.
59.6 MINOR DIAGONAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF END
DIAPHRAGMS.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS. WATER STAINING ON WEST SIDE OF BOTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS DUE TO DECK JOINT LEAKING ABOVE.
60.4 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT END OF
BOTH ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.
60.6 MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS,
SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR PEELING OF FINISH COAT.
MINOR CRACKING AT CHEEKWALLS.
60.9 MINOR EROSION TROUGH AT WEST SIDE ON NORTH ABUTMENT
SLOPE EXTENDING FROM BASE OF SLOPE PROTECTION.
60.11 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN JOINTS BETWEEN
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION. MINOR
TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLOPE PROTECTION PANELS AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT.
222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT
AT RAILING ENDS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 36 33 59 54
TYPE 3 35 32 58 53
TYPE 3S2 39 35 65 59
TYPE 3-3 41 38 69 63
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... WEST NORTHSIDE DRIVE BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 049 - HINDS
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-499P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... WEST NORTHSIDE DRIVE
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 499P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570499P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.80 MILES NORTH OF I-20.
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. RIDGELAND (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NATR 3P9 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 88.25 (KM PT 142.02)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... B0113 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
140.5 FT (42.8 M)
221.1 FT (67.4 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 1 - CONCRETE
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 01 - SLAB
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 59.1 TONS (53.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°21'16.20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°19'55.42" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 48.6 FT (14.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 9100 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 20 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2013 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 10920 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2033 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 10.4 FT (3.2 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 34.7 FT (10.6 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.58 FT (0.79 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 17.17 FT (5.23 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-499P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION
JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING
SURFACE, SOUTHBOUND LANE NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF PEDESTRIAN PARAPET
WITH EFFLORESCENCE, PARAPET NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE
OVER STEEL DECK HEADERS AT ABUTMENTS, NORTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND MOSS GROWTH
ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN; NOTE
EVIDENCE OF PONDING
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL ALLIGATOR, TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH
PAVEMENT OVER ENDS OF ABUTMENT SLABS, SOUTH APPROACH
SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF RELIEF JOINT SEALANT AT
APPROACHES, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - SETTLEMENT AND RUTTING OF NORTH APPROACH
PAVEMENT AT END OF APPROACH SLAB WITH ASPHALT PATCH IN
SOUTHBOUND LANE
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS AT ABUTMENTS,
BEARING #2 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR SIDE OF BOX GIRDER WEB WALLS AT
BOTH ABUTMENTS, WEST WEB WALL AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING
NORTH, CELL #4 SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, CELL #3 NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - DIAGONAL CRACKS ON DECK UNDERSIDE AND END WALL
WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT NORTH END OF BOX GIRDER #3
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, CELL #4 NEAR SOUTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT END DIAPHRAGMS, CELL #4 AT NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NEST DEBRIS INSIDE
BOX GIRDER AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATION,; CELL #2 NEAR SOUTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON INTERIOR SIDE OF EAST
WEB WALL OF CELL #4 OF BOX GIRDER AT NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT
END OF BOTH ABUTMENT BACKWALLS, EAST END OF NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF
WINGWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, NORTHWEST WINGWALL
SHOWN
PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SEALANT IN JOINTS
BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND SLOPE PROTECTION,
CENTERLINE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .