5570-482P6875.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000007
About this file
This document summarizes a federal contract solicitation for bridge preventive maintenance repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The solicitation seeks sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns to perform work including repair of deteriorated expansion joints, asphalt pavement crack cleaning and sealing, concrete repairs, and other miscellaneous tasks. The project will be split into multiple work schedules with a total expected cost between $500,000 and $1,000,000. Bid documents are available on the Federal Business Opportunities website and bids are due on a date specified in the solicitation. The work is to be completed on bridges located in Hinds and Madison Counties, Mississippi as part of the Natchez Trace Parkway Project NATR BMS FY19(1).
Bridge Inspection Report
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NATR BMS FY19(1).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| NEPA_CE.pdf | ||
| 5570-472P6875.pdf | ||
| 5570-484P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-501P13750.pdf | ||
| 5570-474P3438.pdf | ||
| 5570-502P6875.pdf | ||
| 5570-473P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-477P1964.pdf | ||
| 5570-500P28.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| 5570-479P1528.pdf | ||
| 5570-475P2750.pdf | ||
| 5570-498P1719.pdf | ||
| 5570-503P4583.pdf | ||
| 5570-135P2750.pdf | ||
| 5570-471P13750.pdf | ||
| 5570-499P1528.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).doc | DOC document |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY SPUR BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/6/17
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 410.0 FT (125.0 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 180.3 FT (55.0 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 37.1 FT (11.3 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... NPS-NATR / 3P14 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006 (EST.) - WEARING SURFACE ADDED.
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 93.30 (KM PT 150.15)
STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 3P PROJECT SECTION
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY SPUR
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This continuous prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate accumulation of debris in deck expansion joints, failure of the joint seal between the slope protection and abutment breastwall at both abutments, and failure of the relief joint sealant at the ends of both approach slabs.
Other problems include a broken box girder access hatch in the south span, minor collision damage to the west side of the box girder over the eastbound lanes of Route 49, and deterioration of the pavement joint seal at the end of both approach slabs.
The deck and some bearings are out of alignment, possibly due to the curvature of the structure, and will continue to be monitored during future inspections.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: P. JORDAN (SEH), M. COEN (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
PAUL J. JORDAN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.11 CLEAN AND RESEAL JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND BREASTWALL AT
BOTH ABUTMENTS.
222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINTS IN APPROACHES.
58.2 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINTS.
59.2 REPAIR BOX GIRDER ACCESS HATCH IN SOUTH SPAN.
222.7 INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON STRUCTURE AND UNDERPASS
ROADWAY.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
F G N N N G N N G
N G
G G G G G N
N
G
G
G
58.1 DECK SHIFTED (1") WEST AT BOTH ABUTMENTS AS MEASURED AT
RAILING JOINTS. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS. MINOR
DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF
OVERHANGS AT ABUTMENTS.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
UNDERSIDE OF DECK. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK EXTENDING FROM
DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS AND ABUTMENTS. MINOR FLAWS (1/4"
DISPLACEMENT) AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT LOCATIONS ON DECK
UNDERSIDE, LIKELY DUE TO MOVEMENT OF FORMS DURING POUR.
58.2 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN STRIP SEAL JOINTS.
58.3, 222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT
WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT.
58.5,6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS AND
RAILINGS. MAP CRACKING IN FINISH COAT ON CURBS.
MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF RAIL POSTS ADJACENT TO RAILING
DEFLECTION JOINTS. SPALL (1 SF) ON TOP OF EAST RAIL OF
NORTH SPAN.
58.7 MINOR DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES.
59.1 UPPER BEARING SOLE PLATE OVERHANGS PREFORMED FABRIC
BEARING PADS (UP TO 3") AT NORTH ABUTMENT AND (UP TO 2") AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT; BEARING PADS REMAIN NEUTRAL. SOLE PLATE
OVERHANGS BEARING PADS UP TO 2" ON WEST SIDE, AS WELL.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. G
WEEP HOLES 7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. G
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. G
FOUNDATIONS 16. (BURIED) N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. G
OTHER 19. N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS G
F N G G F G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.2 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACK ON WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER
NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT. WIDESPREAD MINOR SHRINKAGE
CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER. MINOR COLLISION
DAMAGE TO WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER OVER EASTBOUND LANES
OF U.S. ROUTE 49. VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX
GIRDER IN SOUTH SPAN OVER CEMETERY SPUR. EXPOSED REBAR
CHAIR TIPS ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE NEAR EAST END OF
SOUTH PIER. ONE OF TWO HINGES ARE NOT ANCHORED AT
ACCESS HATCH IN SOUTH SPAN AT SOUTH ABUTMENT. MINOR
ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NESTING DEBRIS INSIDE BOX GIRDER AT
ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS.
59.6 MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING EXTENDING FROM
OPENINGS IN END DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS.
60.1,4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND
BACKWALLS.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH SOME EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS.
MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACK AT WINGWALL TO CAP JUNCTIONS.
60.11 JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND NORTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL OPEN UP TO 1-1/2"; JOINT SEAL FAILED FOR FULL
LENGTH; VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINT. MINOR VINE GROWTH
ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION.
ADHESION FAILURE OF JOINT SEALANT AT EAST END OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION. NUMEROUS SPALLS DUE TO
MOWER DAMAGE TO WEST CURB OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE
PROTECTION, MINOR SPALL ON OTHER CURBS.
60.13 MOWER SCRAPES ON PIER STEMS. MODERATE VINE GROWTH ON
SOUTH PIER.
222.2 PAVEMENT SAW CUT AND SEALED OVER APPROACH ENDS OF
APPROACH SLABS; MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF
JOINT SEALANT.
222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES ALONG
ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS.
222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT
AT RAILING ENDS. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS NOT PRESENT AT
APPROACHES OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY. '1667' ON NORTH FACE
OF SOUTH PIER AND SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 36 33 60 55
TYPE 3 41 37 68 62
TYPE 3S2 44 40 74 67
TYPE 3-3 46 42 77 70
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY SPUR BRID(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 049 - HINDS
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-482P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE: ................. 1810001C0
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 482P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570482P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3P PROJECT SECTION
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JACKSON (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NPS-NATR (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 93.30 (KM PT 150.15)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3P14 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
180.3 FT (55.0 M)
410.0 FT (125.0 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°22'56.68"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°15'35.22"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 04
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 31.3 FT (9.5 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
37.1 FT (11.3 M)
34.0 FT (10.4 M)
6.0 FT (1.8 M)
6.0 FT (1.8 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
34.1 FT (10.4 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
1 - CONCRETE
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.58 FT (0.79 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
14.67 FT (4.47 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 111N
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2006 (EST.) - WEARING SURFACE ADDED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
STRUCTURE HAS ONE ENCLOSED (INACCESSIBLE) ABUTMENT SPAN PER ABUTMENT.
http:90�15'35.22 http:32�22'56.68
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - DECK SHIFTED WEST AT BOTH ABUTMENTS, SOUTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN STRIP SEAL
JOINTS, JOINT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING
SURFACE, SOUTHBOUND LANE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS
AND RAILINGS, EAST SIDE OVER SOUTH PIER SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL
DIAGONAL CRACKING OF RAIL POSTS
PHOTO #8 - SPALL ON TOP OF EAST RAIL OF NORTH SPAN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN
CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH
PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF RELIEF JOINT SEALANT AT
APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN;
NOTE TYPICAL SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH, CENTER
SPAN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL UPPER BEARING SOLE PLATE OVERHANGS
PREFORMED FABRIC BEARING PADS AT NORTH ABUTMENT, BEARING
#3 SHOWN; NOTE BEARING PADS REMAIN NEUTRAL
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS AT PIERS, WEST
BEARING AT SOUTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS, WEST OVERHANG
NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS AT ABUTMENTS, EAST OVERHANG AT
NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - LONGITUDINAL CRACK ON WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER
NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #18 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER
OVER EASTBOUND LANES OF U.S. ROUTE 49
PHOTO #19 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER IN
SOUTH SPAN OVER CEMETERY SPUR
PHOTO #20 - ONE OF TWO HINGES BROKEN AT BOX GIRDER ACCESS
HATCH IN SOUTH SPAN AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING
NORTH, WEST CELL IN CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK, WEST CELL NEAR SOUTH
PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK EXTENDING FROM
DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS, WEST CELL AT NORTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK EXTENDING FROM
DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS, CENTER CELL AT NORTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NESTING DEBRIS
INSIDE BOX GIRDER AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS, HATCH IN
CENTER CELL AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
WINGWALLS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #28 - JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND NORTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL OPEN; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH DUE TO
JOINT SEAL FAILURE
PHOTO #29 - MOWER DAMAGE TO WEST CURB OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
SLOPE PROTECTION
PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE; NOTE VINE
GROWTH
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .