5570-482P6875.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
693C73-20-B-000007
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

This document summarizes a federal contract solicitation for bridge preventive maintenance repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The solicitation seeks sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns to perform work including repair of deteriorated expansion joints, asphalt pavement crack cleaning and sealing, concrete repairs, and other miscellaneous tasks. The project will be split into multiple work schedules with a total expected cost between $500,000 and $1,000,000. Bid documents are available on the Federal Business Opportunities website and bids are due on a date specified in the solicitation. The work is to be completed on bridges located in Hinds and Madison Counties, Mississippi as part of the Natchez Trace Parkway Project NATR BMS FY19(1).

Bridge Inspection Report

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Natchez Trace Parkway, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results of Bid Opening - NATR BMS FY19(1).pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
NEPA_CE.pdf PDF
5570-472P6875.pdf PDF
5570-484P3438.pdf PDF
5570-501P13750.pdf PDF
5570-474P3438.pdf PDF
5570-502P6875.pdf PDF
5570-473P4583.pdf PDF
5570-477P1964.pdf PDF
5570-500P28.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf PDF
5570-479P1528.pdf PDF
5570-475P2750.pdf PDF
5570-498P1719.pdf PDF
5570-503P4583.pdf PDF
5570-135P2750.pdf PDF
5570-471P13750.pdf PDF
5570-499P1528.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-NATR_BMS_FY19(1).pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NATR_BMS_FY19(1).doc DOC document
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY SPUR BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/6/17

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 410.0 FT (125.0 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 180.3 FT (55.0 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 37.1 FT (11.3 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... NPS-NATR / 3P14 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006 (EST.) - WEARING SURFACE ADDED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 93.30 (KM PT 150.15)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 3P PROJECT SECTION

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY SPUR

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This continuous prestressed concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate accumulation of debris in deck expansion joints, failure of the joint seal between the slope protection and abutment breastwall at both abutments, and failure of the relief joint sealant at the ends of both approach slabs.

Other problems include a broken box girder access hatch in the south span, minor collision damage to the west side of the box girder over the eastbound lanes of Route 49, and deterioration of the pavement joint seal at the end of both approach slabs.

The deck and some bearings are out of alignment, possibly due to the curvature of the structure, and will continue to be monitored during future inspections.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: P. JORDAN (SEH), M. COEN (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

PAUL J. JORDAN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.11 CLEAN AND RESEAL JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND BREASTWALL AT

BOTH ABUTMENTS.

222.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL RELIEF JOINTS IN APPROACHES.

58.2 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINTS.

59.2 REPAIR BOX GIRDER ACCESS HATCH IN SOUTH SPAN.

222.7 INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON STRUCTURE AND UNDERPASS

ROADWAY.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

F G N N N G N N G

N G

G G G G G N

N

G

G

G

58.1 DECK SHIFTED (1") WEST AT BOTH ABUTMENTS AS MEASURED AT

RAILING JOINTS. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS. MINOR

DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF

OVERHANGS AT ABUTMENTS.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF DECK. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK EXTENDING FROM

DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS AND ABUTMENTS. MINOR FLAWS (1/4"

DISPLACEMENT) AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT LOCATIONS ON DECK

UNDERSIDE, LIKELY DUE TO MOVEMENT OF FORMS DURING POUR.

58.2 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN STRIP SEAL JOINTS.

58.3, 222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT

WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT.

58.5,6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS AND

RAILINGS. MAP CRACKING IN FINISH COAT ON CURBS.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF RAIL POSTS ADJACENT TO RAILING

DEFLECTION JOINTS. SPALL (1 SF) ON TOP OF EAST RAIL OF

NORTH SPAN.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES.

59.1 UPPER BEARING SOLE PLATE OVERHANGS PREFORMED FABRIC

BEARING PADS (UP TO 3") AT NORTH ABUTMENT AND (UP TO 2") AT

SOUTH ABUTMENT; BEARING PADS REMAIN NEUTRAL. SOLE PLATE

OVERHANGS BEARING PADS UP TO 2" ON WEST SIDE, AS WELL.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. G

WEEP HOLES 7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION 11. F

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. G

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. G

FOUNDATIONS 16. (BURIED) N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. G

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS G

F N G G F G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.2 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACK ON WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER

NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT. WIDESPREAD MINOR SHRINKAGE

CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER. MINOR COLLISION

DAMAGE TO WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER OVER EASTBOUND LANES

OF U.S. ROUTE 49. VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX

GIRDER IN SOUTH SPAN OVER CEMETERY SPUR. EXPOSED REBAR

CHAIR TIPS ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE NEAR EAST END OF

SOUTH PIER. ONE OF TWO HINGES ARE NOT ANCHORED AT

ACCESS HATCH IN SOUTH SPAN AT SOUTH ABUTMENT. MINOR

ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NESTING DEBRIS INSIDE BOX GIRDER AT

ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS.

59.6 MINOR VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING EXTENDING FROM

OPENINGS IN END DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS.

60.1,4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND

BACKWALLS.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH SOME EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS.

MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACK AT WINGWALL TO CAP JUNCTIONS.

60.11 JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL OPEN UP TO 1-1/2"; JOINT SEAL FAILED FOR FULL

LENGTH; VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINT. MINOR VINE GROWTH

ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION.

ADHESION FAILURE OF JOINT SEALANT AT EAST END OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION. NUMEROUS SPALLS DUE TO

MOWER DAMAGE TO WEST CURB OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

PROTECTION, MINOR SPALL ON OTHER CURBS.

60.13 MOWER SCRAPES ON PIER STEMS. MODERATE VINE GROWTH ON

SOUTH PIER.

222.2 PAVEMENT SAW CUT AND SEALED OVER APPROACH ENDS OF

APPROACH SLABS; MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF

JOINT SEALANT.

222.6 MINOR SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES ALONG

ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS.

222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT

AT RAILING ENDS. VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS NOT PRESENT AT

APPROACHES OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY. '1667' ON NORTH FACE

OF SOUTH PIER AND SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 41 37 68 62

TYPE 3S2 44 40 74 67

TYPE 3-3 46 42 77 70

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY SPUR BRID(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 049 - HINDS

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-482P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE: ................. 1810001C0

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... U.S. ROUTE 49 & CEMETERY

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 482P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570482P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3P PROJECT SECTION

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JACKSON (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ NPS-NATR (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 93.30 (KM PT 150.15)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3P14 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

180.3 FT (55.0 M)

410.0 FT (125.0 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.1 FT (10.4 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 32°22'56.68"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 90°15'35.22"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 04

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 31.3 FT (9.5 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

37.1 FT (11.3 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

34.1 FT (10.4 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.58 FT (0.79 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

14.67 FT (4.47 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 111N

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2006 (EST.) - WEARING SURFACE ADDED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

STRUCTURE HAS ONE ENCLOSED (INACCESSIBLE) ABUTMENT SPAN PER ABUTMENT.

http:90�15'35.22 http:32�22'56.68

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-482P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD NATCHEZ

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - DECK SHIFTED WEST AT BOTH ABUTMENTS, SOUTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN STRIP SEAL

JOINTS, JOINT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING

SURFACE, SOUTHBOUND LANE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS

AND RAILINGS, EAST SIDE OVER SOUTH PIER SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL

DIAGONAL CRACKING OF RAIL POSTS

PHOTO #8 - SPALL ON TOP OF EAST RAIL OF NORTH SPAN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN

CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH

PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF RELIEF JOINT SEALANT AT

APPROACH ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS, SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN;

NOTE TYPICAL SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH, CENTER

SPAN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL UPPER BEARING SOLE PLATE OVERHANGS

PREFORMED FABRIC BEARING PADS AT NORTH ABUTMENT, BEARING

#3 SHOWN; NOTE BEARING PADS REMAIN NEUTRAL

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS AT PIERS, WEST

BEARING AT SOUTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS, WEST OVERHANG

NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS AT ABUTMENTS, EAST OVERHANG AT

NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - LONGITUDINAL CRACK ON WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER

NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER

OVER EASTBOUND LANES OF U.S. ROUTE 49

PHOTO #19 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER IN

SOUTH SPAN OVER CEMETERY SPUR

PHOTO #20 - ONE OF TWO HINGES BROKEN AT BOX GIRDER ACCESS

HATCH IN SOUTH SPAN AT SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING

NORTH, WEST CELL IN CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK, WEST CELL NEAR SOUTH

PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK EXTENDING FROM

DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS, WEST CELL AT NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK EXTENDING FROM

DIAPHRAGMS OVER PIERS, CENTER CELL AT NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF BIRD NESTING DEBRIS

INSIDE BOX GIRDER AT ACCESS HATCH LOCATIONS, HATCH IN

CENTER CELL AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

WINGWALLS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - JOINT BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND NORTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL OPEN; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH DUE TO

JOINT SEAL FAILURE

PHOTO #29 - MOWER DAMAGE TO WEST CURB OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

SLOPE PROTECTION

PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE; NOTE VINE

GROWTH

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .