25Q000032-Amend 0001.pdf

(x)

69056725Q000032 x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

690567

Vancouver WA 98661

610 E FIFTH STREET

FHWA WESTERN FED LANDS DIVISION

Federal Highway Administration

07/02/20250001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

07/02/2025

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

HVAC ROOF TOP UNIT (RTU) WITH ANCILLARY INSTALLATION

By way of this amendment, amendment 0001, amend the Evaluation Criteria, Factor 3 Relevant Experience, by revising the minimum required experience from ten (10) years to five (5) years.

All changes are indicated by red and/or lined-through text on the attached pages.

All other stipulations remain unchanged.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

N/A

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

haydar.mohammad Highlight

A-4 AMENDMENT 0001

approximately equal to price. By submission of its quote, the contractor accepts all RFQ requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. The Government intends to select ONE Contractor for the award of this requirement.

4. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will evaluate the quotations and make an award decision based on the following factors:

A. Factor 1 – Price: Offeror must submit a completed price quote in the format of the Schedule of Supplies table shown in Section B -or- the same information on a similar, vendor-generated price quote sheet. The Government will evaluate the total quoted price to determine that the price is valid and realistic as well as for consistency and understanding of the SOW requirements.

The Government may reject any quote that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low in cost/price, or are unbalanced, such that the offer is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the technical requirements.

Award will be made to the Offeror found to be technically acceptable that offers the lowest total price submitted on the base and all options, if any.

B. Factor 2 – Technical Compliance with Solicitation Requirements: Offeror must comply with ALL instructions and submit ALL items as stated in Section A of the solicitation. Quotes will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis with respect to this evaluation factor.

i. TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE: Complied with ALL instructions and provided

ALL required information as identified in Section A of the solicitation.

ii. TECHNICALLY UNACCEPTABLE:

(1) Did NOT comply with ALL instructions as stated in Section A of the solicitation;

or

(2) Did NOT provide all required information as identified in Section A of the solicitation, or

(3) Provided information does NOT demonstrate all minimum requirements are met.

C. Factor 3 –Relevant Experience: Offeror must furnish, with its offer, Offeror Work

Experience Form(s) (Attachment 0001), or a similar vendor-generated document, providing information on individual contract(s) to indicate a minimum of ten (10) five (5) years of relevant experience during the last ten (10) five (5) years that involve the Offeror providing services of a similar size and scope. FHWA reserves the right to contact such references directly and use such information in determining satisfactory relevant experience. The Government will evaluate how much experience an offeror has performing work similar in

A-5 AMENDMENT 0001

nature, magnitude, and complexity. Relevant experience, unlike past performance, is not limited to the past three years.

ii. TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE: Provided required information and offeror has a minimum of ten (10)- five (5) years of relevant experience during the last ten (10) five

(5) years providing services of a similar size and scope.

iii. TECHNICALLY UNACCEPTABLE:

(1) Did not provide required information; or

(2) Information provided does not substantiate a minimum of ten (10) five (5) years of relevant experience during the last ten (10) five (5) years providing services of a similar size and scope.

D. Factor 4 – Past Performance: The Offeror’s relevant past performance provides assurance that the contractor will meet or exceed all solicitation requirements. The Offeror’s relevant past performance should demonstrate that within the past 12 months they have successful past performance meeting and/or performing contract requirements of similar size and scope.

Evaluation of past performance may be based on information obtained from references submitted by the offeror as well as information obtained from other sources such as CPARS, FAPPIS, PPIRS, SAM, and any other sources deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. Only ongoing contracts and contracts completed within the past 12 months will be evaluated with respect to past performance.

Offerors are strongly encouraged to have a minimum of three (3) customers complete the Past Performance Reference Questionnaire (Attachment 0002) and submit such surveys to FHWA via e-mail WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov with the subject line “69056725Q000032 Past Performance Review for < insert vendor name >”

i. TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE: Based on the Government’s review:

(1) Evaluation(s) reflect no unsatisfactory ratings, no more than 2 marginal ratings, and the CO has no other information that would lead the CO to conclude that there are significant problems with Offeror’s past performance; or

(2) Past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or neutral) past performance.

ii. TECHNICALLY UNACCEPTABLE: Based on the Government’s review, evaluation(s) reflect:

(1) 1 or more unsatisfactory rating; or

(2) 3 or more marginal ratings; or

(3) the CO has other information that would lead the CO to conclude that there are significant problems with Offeror’s past performance.

5. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) COMPLIANCE WITH PRESIDENT

TRUMP'S PRIORITIES AND AGENDA

mailto:WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov