5-Att C1 - Score Sheet (Informational Only).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- AS26-68
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a score sheet evaluation document for the AS26-68 Walk-In Building Supplies RFP issued by the State of Utah in collaboration with the NASPO ValuePoint cooperative purchasing program. The RFP seeks to re-solicit the Walk-In Building Supplies portfolio, which is set to expire on July 31, 2027. This is a national cooperative contract available to multiple participating entities including states, cities, counties, and municipalities. The resultant Master Agreement(s) will be for convenience purchases at retail locations, with contract discounts provided to purchasing entities at the time of purchase. The contract term is five years, and vendors must guarantee their minimum percentage discount for the entire contract duration. Proposals must be submitted through the U3P Platform (Bonfire); Utah does not accept submissions by email or traditional mail.
The evaluation methodology specifies that any offeror passing the technical criteria points threshold with a total of 600 points will receive an award, potentially resulting in multiple awards. While the RFP prioritizes national coverage, state-by-state offerors providing less than national coverage may still be considered for award on a state-by-state basis. The score sheet serves as an informational tool for evaluating proposals against the established technical and financial criteria outlined in Attachment C of the RFP Evaluation Plan. Businesses meeting the RFP requirements are encouraged to respond regardless of geographic coverage limitations.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Walk-In Building Supplies | |||
| SOLICITATION # AS26-68 | |||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||
| Offeror Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offeror certifies that Offeror can accept purchasing cards and credit cards as an acceptable form of payment without any processing or other related fees. | Prerequisites | |
| 2 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment G, Offeror Information, Acknowledgements, and Certifications | Prerequisites | |
| 3 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment H, Offeror Response Worksheet | Prerequisites | |
| 4 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment I, Cost Proposal | Prerequisites | |
| 5 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment J, Proposed Modifications to the Sample Master Agreement, if no modifications load a document with stating "NONE" | Prerequisites | |
| 6 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment K, Claim of Business Confidentiality, if no claims then upload a document stating "NONE". | Prerequisites |
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Average Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | Customer Service and Emergency Services | Prerequisites | 22 | 15.7% | 110.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Contract Management | Prerequisites | 22 | 15.7% | 110.00 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Implementation of the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement | Prerequisites | 18 | 12.9% | 90.00 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Billing and Purchases | Prerequisites | 38 | 27.1% | 190.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | Return Policy and Warranties | Prerequisites | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | Technology & Storage of Electronic Data | Prerequisites | 20 | 14.3% | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| 100.0% | 700.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| Prerequisites | 70% | 490.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| *Cost - Minimum Discount % Off | RFP Section | Highest Discount % | Offered Discount % | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Prerequisites | 25% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |||
| * The Lead State will use the cost formula included in Attachment C, RFP Evaluation Plan. |
| *Cost - Market Basket | RFP Section | Lowest Market Basket | Offered Market Basket | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Prerequisites | 5% | 50.0 | 0.0 | |||
| * The Lead State will use the cost formula included in Attachment C, RFP Evaluation Plan. | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 700.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points - Minimum Discount % Off | 25% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points - Market Basket | 5% | 50.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
Scoresheet Summary AS26-68 Walk-In Building Supplies
| Signatures: | Date: |
| Evaluator 1 | |
| Evaluator 2 | |
| Evaluator 3 | |
| Evaluator 4 | |
| Evaluator 5 |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T | |
| 1 | Offeror certifies that Offeror can accept P-Cards as an acceptable form of payment without any processing or other related fees. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment G, Offeror Information, Acknowledgements, and Certifications | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment H, Offeror Response Worksheet | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment I, Cost Proposal | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment J, Proposed Modifications to the Sample Master Agreement, if no modifications load a document with stating "NONE" | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | Offeror must upload a completed Attachment K, Claim of Business Confidentiality, if no claims then upload a document stating "NONE". |
| Weight | Technical Scores | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T |
| Criteria #1 - Customer Service/Emergency Serivces | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 22.0 | Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 110) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #2 - Contract Management | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 22.0 | Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 110) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #3 Implementation of NVP Master Agreement | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 18.0 | Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 90) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #4 Billing and Purchases | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 38.0 | Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 190) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #5 - Return Policy and Warranties | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 20.0 | Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 100) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #6 Technology & Storage of Electronic Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 20.0 | Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible 100) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = 700) Minimum Threshold = 490 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total Cost Points | Cost Scores | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T |
| Market Basket | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.0 | Cost Points | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Cost Points | Cost Scores | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T |
| Discount % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 250.0 | Cost Points | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Score Summary | Offeror A | Offeror B | Offeror C | Offeror D | Offeror E | Offeror F | Offeror G | Offeror H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T | |
| Total Technical Points (Total Possible = 700) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total Cost Points (Total Possible = 300) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Grand Total Points (Total Possible = 1000) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .