12-Att J - Proposed Modifications to Sample Master Agreement.docx
DOCX document 434 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- AS26-68
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This document consists of proposed modifications to a sample Master Agreement for the AS26-68 Walk-In Building Supplies cooperative purchasing contract issued by the state of Utah in collaboration with the NASPO ValuePoint cooperative purchasing program. The RFP seeks to re-solicit the Walk-In Building Supplies portfolio, which is currently set to expire on July 31, 2027. The resulting Master Agreement(s) will facilitate convenience purchases at retail locations with contract discounts provided to purchasing entities at the time of purchase. This is a national cooperative contract available to multiple participating entities including states, cities, counties, and municipalities, though state-by-state offerors may be considered for awards on a regional basis. The contract term is five years, and vendors must guarantee their minimum percentage discount throughout the entire contract period. Proposals must be submitted through the U3P Platform (Bonfire), with no email or traditional mail submissions accepted.
The RFP may result in multiple awards, with selection determined by a methodology whereby any offeror passing the technical criteria points threshold with a total of 600 points will receive an award. Detailed evaluation criteria can be found in Attachment C of the RFP Evaluation Plan. As a proposed modifications document, this file addresses specific alterations to the standard Master Agreement template to accommodate the requirements and conditions of this particular solicitation. Businesses meeting the RFP requirements are encouraged to respond regardless of whether they can provide national coverage, as state-by-state participation is acceptable for consideration.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Proposals for
[PORTFOLIO NAME]
Issued by the State of [Lead State] Solicitation Number: [#######]
Request for Proposals for Walk-In Building Supplies Issued by the State of Utah Solicitation Number AS26-68 Attachment J
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO SAMPLE MASTER AGREEMENT
The Lead State may, but is not obligated to, consider proposed modifications to Attachment D, Sample Master Agreement.
Provisions of the Sample Master Agreement that are generally inapplicable to, incompatible with, or unsuitable for the subject of this RFP should be brought to the attention of the Lead State using the process described in this RFP for asking questions and will be addressed only at the sole discretion of the Lead State.
Offeror-specific modifications to the Sample Master Agreement may be proposed as part of Offeror’s proposal in this attachment but are strongly discouraged. The quantity, breadth, and nature of modifications proposed by Offeror may be considered in the Lead State’s evaluation of Offeror’s proposal and of its risks, costs, and benefits to the Lead State and potential Participating Entities and Purchasing Entities. Proposing excessive or overly restrictive modifications, or proposing modifications upon which Offeror’s proposal is conditioned, may result in Offeror’s proposal being deemed non-responsive.
Offeror’s Proposed Modifications. (Check one of the below.)
| ☐ | Offeror has no proposed modifications to Attachment D, Sample Master Agreement. |
| ☐ | Offeror proposes the modifications set forth in the table below and will submit with Offeror’s proposal a redlined copy of Attachment D, Sample Master Agreement incorporating each proposed modification. Offeror understands, acknowledges, and agrees to comply with the following: |
· The Lead State will not consider any proposed modification that:
· Is not submitted in this attachment;
· Is not accompanied by an explanation as required in this attachment;
· Is not reflected in redlined edits to the Sample Master Agreement and submitted with Offeror’s proposal;
· Merely references another document or a URL; or
· Modifies the NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee.
· Offerors may propose additional terms but must include them in this attachment and must clearly identify where any terms conflict with the Sample Master Agreement.
· If Offeror is awarded a Master Agreement resulting from this RFP, a comparison of Attachment D, Sample Master Agreement and Offeror’s accepted modifications thereto may be posted on the NASPO ValuePoint website for examination by potential Participating Entities and Purchasing Entities.
· Each of the following fields must be completed for each proposed modification to the Sample Master Agreement:
· Sample Master Agreement Section Reference: The page, section, or paragraph in the Sample Master Agreement that is the subject of Offeror’s proposed modification.
· Sample Master Agreement Language: The language in the Sample Master Agreement that the Offeror is proposing to modify.
· Proposed Changes and Alternate Language: The Offeror’s proposed changes to the Sample Master Agreement language including, if applicable, Offeror’s proposed alternate language.
· Justification for Proposed Change: Offeror’s justification for the proposed change.
· Risk and Benefits of Acceptance: Offeror’s analysis of the risk and benefits to the Lead State, Participating Entities, or Purchasing Entities—including quantifiable costs or cost savings—if Offeror’s proposed change is accepted by the Lead State.
| Sample Master Agreement Section Reference |
| Sample Master Agreement Language |
| Proposed Changes and Alternate Language |
| Justification for Proposed Change |
| Risk and Benefits of Acceptance |
(Add additional rows as needed.)
Page 2 of 9 – Attachment [X], RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Attachment J, PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO SAMPLE MASTER AGREEMENT image1.png image2.png image3.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .