36C25026R0006 0004.pdf

Department of Veterans Affairs

AMENDMENT TO REQUEST FOR LEASE PROPOSAL (RLP)

RLP No.

36C25026R0006

Amendment No.

Effective Date Page of

Issued By Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 10 8888 Keystone Crossing Suite 325 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Description of Amendment RLP# 36C25026R0006 Amendment No. 0004 is hereby issued for the purpose of:

responding to Requests for Information (RFIs) submitted by interested Parties up through May 25,2026.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 1, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

Name and Title of Signer Name and Title of Contracting Officer

Kevin Adkins Lease Contracting Officer

Offeror Date Signed United States of America

Date Signed 05-26-2026

VA RFI RESPONSE THRU May 25, 2026

1. Per Amendment 3, No. 37. Engineering Requirements

Please clarify whether stamped MEP, civil, structural, fire protection, life safety, and related engineered drawings are required with the proposal submission, or whether those items are intended to be completed after award. “VA response: Stamped MEP, civil, structural, fire protection, life safety, and related engineered drawings items…” Is this the full response? Based off the previous responses, stamped drawings will be provided after Lease Award and DID approval. “completed after award” Correct?

VA response: No that is an incomplete response by the VA. Stamped MEP, civil, structural, fire protection, life safety, and related engineered drawings items are all post award deliverables (SEE Exhibit A-Section 4.01 (A) & (B) {pre-award} compared to Section 4.01(D) {post award CDs}.

2. Please clarify how Offerors are to present Building Specific Amortized Capital (BSAC) security costs as part of the lease proposal submission.

1. Are the BSAC costs the only costs left blank in the Exh. E (SECURITY UNIT PRICE LIST (FSL II)) form?

VA response: All “BSAC” costs left blank, and not “priced in shell,” should be included in the TI lump sum estimate. All recitals to “BSAC” under exhibit E should be read as “TI.”

2. Please verify if the items called out in the Exh. E (SECURITY UNIT PRICE LIST (FSL II)) form are being called out correctly. Example: Exh. E 5.5 INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (IDS) COVERAGE: is called out as (TI), but then the Exh. E (SECURITY UNIT PRICE LIST (FSL II)) is requests this costs as if it is a BSAC cost? IV. SECURTIY

SYSTEMS B. VSS.

VA response: All “BSAC” costs left blank and not “priced in shell” should be included in the TI lump sum estimate. All recitals to “BSAC” under exhibit E should be read as “TI.”

3. Shall the BSAC costs only be submitted with the SECURITY UNIT PRICE LIST (FSL II) form, or should these costs be filled out in the TICs table tab 28.2? one or the other, or both?

VA response: All “BSAC” costs left blank and not “priced in shell” should be should be read as “TI.” Both, identify TI security items costs on Exhibit E for ease of identification; as well as in the comprehensive TICs table.

4. Are Offerors required to include estimated BSAC costs within the initial proposed shell rental rate at time of proposal submission, or will BSAC pricing be separately finalized and negotiated during pre-award DIDs and then amortized into the lease rate afterward?

VA response: Include all “shell” identified items in initial proposed shell rent proposal. All “BSAC” costs left blank and not “priced in shell” should be

For security items identified as “Priced in Shell,” should these costs simply be included within the Offeror’s shell rent and excluded from the BSAC Exh. E (SECURITY UNIT PRICE LIST (FSL II)) form pricing worksheet?

VA response: Include all “shell” identified items in initial proposed shell rent proposal. All “BSAC” costs left blank and not “priced in shell” should be

5. Is there a document that needs to be filled out and submitted per the “Foreign Ownership/Financing Representation for High-Security Leased Space. GSAR 552.270- 33, Foreign Ownership and Financing Representation for High-Security Leased Space” requirement.

VA response: No affirmative submission is required.

6. Is there a document that needs to be filled out and submitted per the “Small Business Subcontracting Plan, if required for Other Than Small Business above the threshold (FAR 19.109(a)(1) (GSA Class Deviation RFO-2025-19))” requirement?

VA response: Small business subcontracting plan does not apply to SDVOSB submissions.