09 Attachment 2 - Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet.pdf
PDF 119 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9115125RA004
About this file
This document is a Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet template used for documenting an offeror's past performance on contracts similar to the current solicitation. The template requires comprehensive documentation for each relevant contract, including detailed information such as contract number, award date, contract type, original and modified pricing, delivery schedules, and contact information for key contracting personnel (Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, and Technical Representative).
The form mandates offerors to provide a narrative explanation for each contract, highlighting objectives achieved, any cost growth or schedule delays, and corrective actions taken to address performance issues. Offerors must explicitly demonstrate how previous contracts are similar in nature, size, and complexity to the current solicitation, and include negative performance documentation like cure notices or contract discrepancy reports. The goal is to allow the government to assess the offeror's past performance and potential for successfully executing the proposed contract, with the understanding that problems alone do not automatically result in a negative rating if effectively managed and resolved.
View the file
Other files
Show all 43
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet
The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.
1. Contract Number, Award Date and Contract type.
2. Price/Cost – original awarded AND final (or projected final, if contract is current).
3. Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).
4. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:
5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
6. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
7. Government or commercial technical representative or COR Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation. In determining relevancy, consideration should be given but not limited to such things as product/service similarity, product/service, size and complexity, contract type, contract environment, division of company proposing, and subcontractor interaction.
8. Narrative explanation on each contract listed describing the objectives achieved and the following data: any cost growth or schedule delays encountered. For any Government contracts which did not/do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Limited or a No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a Substantial Confidence or Satisfactory Confidence candidate.
9. Negative Performance Documentation. A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.
10. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule. The contractor shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary.
1. Contract Number
Award Date Contract type
2. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule.
Original completion/delivery date Revised completion/delivery date
3. Price/Cost – original awarded price
4. Modified Price/Cost -
5. Completion Date or Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).
6. Changed Dates -
7. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:
8. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
9. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
10. Government or commercial technical representative or COR.
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
11. Relevancy Description.
12. Narrative explanation.
13. Negative Performance Documentation.
| Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet |
| 1. Contract Number, Award Date and Contract type. |
| 5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) |
| 1. Contract Number Award Date Contract type |
| 4. Modified Price/Cost - |
| 8. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .