WMD-CST_Inbrief_Template.pptx

NGB Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team 71st WMD-CST Evaluation Inbrief

UNCLASSIFIED

SEAT Mission Statement The Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team (SEAT) conducts field evaluations of NG CBRN Response Enterprise (CRE) organizations (57/17/10) in order to:

SEAT Phased Progression SEAT Phase I (Crawl) Compliance Oriented Aimed at establishing systems and programs within the CSTs Not systemic in nature, only a “snap-shot in time” Guide teams to initial compliance, to “show what right looks like.”

Orient JFHQs to the SEAT program mission and intent SEAT Phase II (Walk) Compliance Oriented Evaluate the degree to which programs and processes have become institutionalized Systemic in nature –evaluates compliance over time Reduce team and program vulnerability to future GAO or AAA audits, IG actions Offer greater involvement to JFHQs SEAT Phase III (Run) Compliance oriented evaluation of the degree to which programs and processes have become institutionalized Systemic in nature – evaluates current status as well as compliance over time (ARIMS standard) Reduce team and program vulnerability to future GAO, DOD IG, AAA, FOIA, Civil/ Criminal Investigations Tie performance to funding and frequency of evaluation Focus efforts on pulling the bottom up

Evaluations increase in scope and rigor as they progress to the right. Ultimate evolution is the NG CRE Evaluation

Crawl

Walk

Run

Evaluated Areas Areas Evaluated by SEAT Areas Evaluated by

JFHQ

Evaluation Standards

95% or above overall average and

All functional areas 95% or above

In Compliance with Comments

80% or above overall average and

Any functional area(s) 80% - 94%

Not in Compliance

79% or below overall average or

Any functional area(s) 79% or below

Standards and Criteria

In Compliance

Compliance Rate Interpretation Compliance reflects the number of individual items that are in compliance versus the total number

Scoring is not like a college grade; the compliance requirement for law and policy is 100%

The “In-Compliance” range of 95-100% reflects USA and USAF recognition of OPTEMPO and turnover impacts

Compliance is an indicator of the unit’s ability to sustain its operational capability

Communications, Physical Security, and Safety are evaluated only as Go or No Go

Not In Compliance 90 Day Re-Evaluation 12 Month Cycle Funding Implications In Compliance 24 Month Cycle Funding Implications In Compliance w/ Comments 24 Month Cycle Funding Implications 95-100% 80-94% ≤79% Evaluation Implications Funding Implications:

- Address poor fund management

- Correct significant material or training deficiencies

36 month cycles no longer authorized in FY18 and beyond-

Re-Evaluation Criteria Re-Evaluation triggers include:

A unit overall, or functional area, 79% compliant or below

Systemic non-compliance since last SEAT evaluation

A 10% or more drop in overall compliance, or in a functional area, between SEAT evaluations

SEAT Evaluation Products

Formal Report of Evaluation (ROE) and Trend Analysis not generated for Beta Tests.

Report Of Evaluation

CNGB

Posted to GKO

TAG

Trend Analysis

NG J3

CNGB

Executive Summary

Systemic Issues

TTP&E

Cmd Interest Items

NG J3

NG J-Staff

Stay Behind Package

Inbrief, Outbrief, Checklists

SEAT Team Leader

OIC or Commander

Previous Evaluation Results Functional Area Final Oct 11

Average

Results from the last 2 SEAT evaluations

SEAT CONOPS

Thursday 19 Oct Wednesday 18 Oct Tuesday 17 Oct Monday 16 Oct 0900: In Brief with WMD-CST Commander, his Staff and State Representatives

0930: Brief JFHQ Evaluators: COMSEC, Info Assurance, Safety, Physical Security

0930 – COB: Conduct Functional Area Assessments Arrive IA

TBD – Informal meeting with WMD-CST Commander or Representative(s)

1930: Final Internal Coordination Meeting for the SEAT 0900: Continue Functional Area Assessments and Assistance

1500 – 1700: Update to Commander 0900: Formal Out Brief. Recommend TAG, DAG, CofS or J3 attend

1030: SEAT Internal AAR

Depart IA

Task Organization

JFHQ-IA

Communications

JFHQ-IA

Physical Security

JFHQ-IA

Safety NGB Government Rep Provide Name in Each Block

Team Lead/ Training

Operations

Medical

Personnel

Logistics

Budget

SEAT Goals During the SEAT Evaluation our goals include:

Helping to sustain what is working Assisting in improving shortfalls Adding value to programs to improve compliance and efficiency Providing a genuine learning opportunity

This is a standards based compliance evaluation and not a numbers drill

Any Questions?—Let’s get to work!

NGB Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team 71st WMD-CST Evaluation Inbrief image6.jpeg image3.wmf image4.jpeg image5.png image1.png image2.png