CERFP_Inbrief-Template.pptx

NGB Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team Program

NV CERFP

Evaluation Inbrief

UNCLASSIFIED

SEAT Mission Statement The Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team (SEAT) conducts field evaluations of NG CBRN Response Enterprise (CRE) organizations (57/17/10) in order to:

2000-2001: DOD IG and AAA audits. Findings reflected WMD-CST program-wide noncompliance with law, policy, and doctrine and lack of adequate oversight

2004: NG J3 identified lack of standardization as major factor in noncompliance.

2005: NG DJ3 approved SEAT concept in January; authorized beta testing

2006: GAO conducted an audit of the WMD-CST program SEAT effort is key to institutionalizing interoperability (GAO-06-498) SEAT Background

2009: CNGB directed SEAT expansion into the CERFP program in decision brief. CNGBM 3510.01 contains SEAT policy and directs participation

2009: CERFP SEAT beta tests began in FY 10

2010: GAO audit of CERFP

“The National Guard’s CERFPs face personnel, training, and equipment challenges that increase the risk that they are not fully prepared to effectively execute their domestic CBRNE consequence management mission.” (GAO 12-114, Dec 11)

SEAT Background

SEAT Background

2010: AAA and DOD IG audits of the WMD-CST program “The National Guard Bureau established strong oversight programs. It used external evaluations to make sure teams were trained and ready, and it established the SEAT to ensure that CSTs complied with policies and guidance.” (AAA A-2011-0126-FFD, June 11) “Periodic SEAT reviews assure the Bureau that CSTs are complying with laws and regulations.” ( AAA A-2011-0126-FFD, June 11) 2012: NG DJ3 directed SEAT to develop HRF Beta evaluation 2014: HRF Beta evaluations began 2016: Record HRF evaluation commenced

The first HRF Record Evaluation took place in February 2016

NG CRE SEAT Evaluations SEAT evaluations of NG CRE elements Modular concept equally adaptable across all NG CRE elements

Common methodologies, checklist formats, evaluation standards, and products result in a consistency of evaluations recognizable to leadership at all levels

HRF and CERFP evaluations synched with EXEVAL as threshold event

Enhances accountability to chain of command through comprehensive outbrief to leadership

Can relieve Organizational Inspection Programs (OIPs) of CRE specific evaluation requirements

HRF

X

Evaluates Budget, Logistics, Medical, and Operations & Training Evaluates Budget, Logistics, Medical, and Operations & Training 4 FAs 4 FAs

CASE

S&E

Decon

Med

WMD-CST

Evaluates ALS, Budget, Logistics, Medical, Operations, Personnel, and Training (Commo, Physical Security and Safety) 10 FAs

CBRN

FSRT

Please view this slide in slide show mode

Developmental Status

CERFP Evaluated Areas

CERFP Phased Progression

Evaluations increase in scope and rigor as they progress to the right.

Crawl

Walk

Run

Beta (crawl) Compliance Oriented practice evaluation Aimed at establishing systems and programs Not systemic in nature, only a “snap-shot in time” Guide organizations to initial compliance, to “show what right looks like.”

Orient leadership to the SEAT mission and intent

Phase I (walk) Record compliance evaluation Evaluate the degree to which programs and processes have become institutionalized Establishes starting point for systemic evaluations utilizing ARIMS/ AFRIMS standards Reduce vulnerability to future GAO or AAA audits, FOIA, Civil/ Criminal Investigations, IG actions

Systemic Evaluations (run) Systemic compliance evaluations performed cyclically for NG CBRN Response Enterprise within State, WMD-CST/ CERFP/ HRF

Systemic in nature – evaluates current status as well as compliance over time HRF & CERFP evaluations synched with EXEVAL as threshold event Facilitates comprehensive outbrief to leadership

SEAT Phase I Evaluation

Compliance evaluation

Aimed at ensuring systems and programs have been established, and preparing the organization for systemic evaluations

Not systemic in nature, only addresses current year

Guides teams to compliance, to “show what right looks like”

Orients JFHQs to the CERFP SEAT/ CBRN Response Enterprise evaluation program mission and intent

Establishes a baseline CERFP SEAT Record Evaluations

Evaluation Standards

95% or above overall average and

All functional areas 95% or above

In Compliance with Comments

80% or above overall average and

Any functional area(s) 80% - 94%

Not in Compliance

79% or below overall average or

Any functional area(s) 79% or below

Standards and Criteria

In Compliance

Compliance Rate Interpretation Compliance reflects the number of individual items that are in compliance versus the total number

Scoring is not like a college grade; the compliance requirement for law and policy is 100%

The “In-Compliance” range of 95-100% reflects USA and USAF recognition of OPTEMPO and turnover impacts

Compliance is an indicator of the organization’s ability to sustain its operational capability

SEAT Evaluation Products

Formal Report of Evaluation (ROE) and Trend Analysis not generated for Beta Tests.

Report Of Evaluation

CNGB

Posted to GKO

TAG

Trend Analysis

NG J3

CNGB

Executive Summary

Systemic Issues

TTP&E

Cmd Interest Items

NG J3

NG J-Staff

Stay Behind Package

Inbrief, Outbrief, Checklists

SEAT Team Leader

OIC or Commander

Previous Evaluation Results

Provide data for last 2 evaluations or initial and final depending on phase.

The August 13 evaluation was a Beta Test

SEAT CONOPS

Friday 3 March Thursday 2 March Wednesday 1 March Tuesday 28 February SEAT travels to NV

SMEs move to location of evaluated functional areas

Team Leader recons CERFP Primary Location- Links-up with CERFP OIC

1930: Internal Coordination Meeting for the SEAT 0900: Team Leader Inbrief CERFP OIC and Key Personnel (via web as required)

0930 - COB: Conduct Functional Area Assessments;

Budget, Logistics, Medical, and Operations & Training (at various locations as required) 0900: Continue Functional Area Assessments and assistance

1500 – 1700 (estimated): Provide hotwash to OIC

1900: SEAT Outbrief Rehearsal (Internal) 0900: Final Outbrief to CRE Leadership, OIC and Key Personnel (via web as required)

1100: SEAT conducts Internal AAR

1200: SEAT Departs NV

SEAT Organization Provide Name in Each Block

NGB Representative

Logistics

Medical

Budget/Team Lead

O&T

SEAT Goals During the SEAT Evaluation our goals include:

Helping to sustain what is working Assisting in improving shortfalls Adding value to programs to improve compliance and efficiency Providing a genuine learning opportunity

This is a standards based compliance evaluation and not a numbers drill

Any Questions?—Let’s get to work!

NGB Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team Program

NV CERFP

Evaluation Inbrief Prepared by: Mr. Rick Swain Approved by: Ms. Nhu-Dan Duong Date of COR Approval LTC Kenneth Barrett

NG-J39

703-607-1815 kenneth.w.barrett.mil@mail.mil

NGB Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team Synchronized Training Proficiency Assessment SEAT Component

STPA

Synchronized Training Proficiency Assessment (STPA) Organizational SEAT Evaluation

Deployment Readiness Exercise (DRE)

EXEVAL

SEAT Component of STPA Synchronized with EXEVAL- 36 month cycle vice 24 Sustains current SEAT evaluation Synchronized with and 9-12 months prior to EXEVAL Crawl, Walk and Run methodology Assistance available before and after evaluation Recognizes corrective actions during evaluation Sustains Staff Assistance Visit (SAV) capability Adds SEAT Pre-EXEVAL Update 90-120 days prior to EXEVAL Ensures individual training requirements have been met Assesses JMEEL equipment status Includes written feedback to NG-J39 in the form of an Executive Summary Summary includes comparison of SEAT Pre-EX findings to those of the last SEAT evaluation approximately 6-9 months prior

SEAT STPA Pre-EX Update “Offsite” evaluation relying on systems and digital documentation GKO will be the primary portal for information upload, locations TBA Reviews individual training status against ITRM requirements Requires personnel training certificates to be digitized per CNGBM 3510.01 Format specifics can be found in CNGBM3510.01, Encl C, paragraph 14 Expectation is personnel will be in “duty manning roster” configuration per EXEVAL requirements in Encl C, paragraph 13c(2) Includes review of equipment on hand status Will utilize systems of record; PBUSE or GCSS-A Includes ANG Medical and ultimately FSRT utilizing DMLLS and CA/CRL Includes examination of MOA for units supporting mission with Army Standard Green Gear JMEEL authorized equipment

FY 17 Evaluations including Pre-EXs

Evaluations conducted in FY 17 which will include a Pre-EX.

SEAT STPA References CNGBM 3510.01 HRF and CERFP Procedures CNGBM3510.01, Encl C, paragraphs 12-14

NG CRE Yearly Training Guidance 2017-2018, Serial 2 dtd 31 Aug 2016 Paragraphs 2a, and 3

The SEAT GKO Page https://gkoportal.ng.mil/joint/J3/D07/SEAT/SitePages/Home.aspx

LTC Kenneth Barrett

NG-J39

703-607-1815 kenneth.w.barrett.mil@mail.mil Prepared by: Mr. Scott Davis Approved by: Mr. Scott White 21 November 2016 NGB Standardization Evaluation and Assistance Team Synchronized Training Proficiency Assessment SEAT Component image4.png image5.png image6.png image10.jpeg image7.wmf image8.jpeg image9.png image1.jpeg image2.jpeg